| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 土木工程學系 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 方嬿甄 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | Yen-chen Fang | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-8-24T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-8-24T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=973202018 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 土木工程學系 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 多項式摩擦單擺支承(Polynomial Friction Pendulum Isolator，PFPI) 為具變頻特性之新型摩擦單擺支承，其曲面函數為一六次方多項式，利用回復勁度遞減之軟化段減緩結構加速度反應，亦可藉由回復勁度遞增之硬化段降低結構位移反應。經研究已證實PFPI可發揮變頻特性，於近域與遠域震波皆發揮良好隔震效果。
若PFPI曲盤硬化段曲面曲率變化急遽，易導致上部結構產生劇烈垂直向運動，改變摩擦面之正向力，因而影響支承摩擦力。然而，前人研究所使用之數值分析法僅考量水平向反應，為了藉由分析模擬含PFPI隔震橋梁之雙向動力反應，本研究考慮水平向與垂直向自由度發展數值分析方法，另考量受水平向及垂直向震波作用及考量橋墩進入非線性行為之結構反應，此外，採用PSO-SA混合式演算法進行多項式摩擦單擺支承與傳統摩擦單擺支承(FPS)最佳參數設計，並比較PFPI與FPS之隔震效益。結果顯示，本研究發展二維數值分析確實可模擬含PFPI隔震橋梁之雙向動力反應，此外，PFPI確實可降低結構受震反應，其減震效能較FPS佳。
| zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The sliding surface of Polynomial Friction Pendulum Isolator (PFPI) is defined by a sixth-order polynomial function. The restoring force possesses a softening section and a hardening section. In the softening section, the restoring stiffness is decreasing in order to mitigate the structural acceleration response, while in the hardening section, the restoring stiffness is increasing so as to reduce the isolator drift. It has been proven that PFPI is not only able to effectively mitigate the structural seismic response induced by either long period near-fault earthquakes or far-field earthquakes.
However, if the PFPI surface curvature increasing rapidly, it may induce severe structural vertical response. For the purpose of simulating horizontal and vertical responses of the bridge with PFPI, the derivation of analysis method considering horizontal and vertical degree of freedom is developed in this study. Discussion on effects of considering vertical ground excitation and the nonlinear behavior of piers. Moreover, optimal parameter study of PFPI and Friction Pendulum System (FPS) and comparison the effectiveness between PFPI and FPS.
The results show that the derivation of analysis method developed in this study does indeed simulates horizontal and vertical structural seismic responses. Moreover, PFPI is more effective to reduce structural seismic response than FPS.
| en_US |
| DC.subject | 垂直向震波 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 摩擦單擺支承 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 變頻式隔震支承 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 變曲率隔震支承 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | friction pendulum system | en_US |
| DC.subject | vertical ground motion. | en_US |
| DC.subject | various frequencies seismic isolator | en_US |
| DC.subject | variable-curvature seismic isolator | en_US |
| DC.title | 考量垂直向效應之多項式摩擦單擺支承之分析與設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | Analysis and Design of Polynomial Friction Pendulum Isolator with Vertical Effect | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |