| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 大氣物理研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 高嘉婉 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | Jia-wan Kao | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-7-28T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-7-28T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=976201012 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 大氣物理研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究最主要的目的即是探討台灣各地區光化評估測站（Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station, PAMS）的逐時揮發性有機物（VOCs）濃度數據信心程度和規律性，主要分成兩部份來檢驗，首先是利用儀器本身對 PAMS 物種的偵測極限，計算各物種觀測值達到偵測極限的程度，定義為 Pass ratio，以此檢驗觀測值的信心程度，研究結果發現 PAMS 各物種在不同地區時，每個物種的 Pass ratio 表現大不相同。崇倫、草屯站大部分物種的 Pass ratio 主要集中在 70 % 以上，顯示在這兩個測站大部分物種的觀測是具有可信度的；反觀竹山站的結果，大部分物種的 Pass ratio 主要集中在 20 % 以下，因此其觀測資料的信心程度相對崇倫和草屯站來說是比較低的。再進一步將數據經過 Hilbert-Huang Transform（HHT）分析後，檢查觀測值中各種震盪模態的顯著性。將物種的偵測極限和顯著性比對結果分類，可以歸納出下面三種結果：第一種是濃度低且不具規律性的物種，第二種是信心程度高且具規律性的物種，第三種則是介於這兩種之間的其他物種。藉此找出 PAMS 各物種數據將來研究討論的價值。
整體來說，崇倫、草屯站的物種觀測大部分都有通過偵測極限，且顯著性測試結果較好，因此具有較高可信度和規律性，竹山站因位於中部地區的下風處，達到偵測極限以及顯著性測試的物種較少，但還是可以輔助其他兩站討論整個中部地區各種 PAMS 物種的特性。萬華、土城、橋頭測站位於都會和工業密集區，信心程度較高且具規律性的物種也都很多，而在中南部的台西站，雖然其位於郊區，普遍來說濃度都偏低，但可信度較低且不具規律性的物種較少，因其分類的臨界 Pass ratio 門檻值相對於各站來說較低，造成信心程度較高且具規律性的物種比較多，推測是因台西站的來源比較固定，主要污染來源為附近六輕工業區，所以就算其 Pass ratio 低，也可以從中找到規律性。各站物種歸納出來的結果大不相同， 分類之後發現崇倫站和草屯站具有較高可信度和規律性物種觀測值較多，崇倫共有 26 種，草屯則是 34 種，信心程度高的觀測值比竹山站多相當多，竹山站為10種，位於北部地區的萬華和土城兩站信心程度較高且具規律性的物種在萬華站有33種，土城站有23種。高雄地區的橋頭站信心程度較高且具規律性的物種為20 種，而在中南部的台西站有 18 種。在本研究中各站的觀測值皆沒有規律性，且物種濃度較低，在研究上比較不具代表性的物種為1-丁烯（1-Butene），而在各站的觀測值信心程度及規律性都較高的物種有丙烷（Propane）、異丁烷（iso-Butane）、正丁烷（n-Butane）、正己烷（n-Hexane）、乙苯（Ethylbenzene）、間,對-二甲苯（m,p-Xylene）。總結以上結果，此分析流程可以個別找出每個測站可信度較高且具規律性的物種，也可以篩選出各站濃度較低且可信度相對不高的物種。
| zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study is to find out the confidence level and regularity of VOCs hourly data detected by Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station (PAMS).The examination consists of two parts. First, We use the detection limit of PAMS species and Hilbert-Huang Transform(HHT) to calculate the degree to reach detection limit of each PAMS species and define it as pass ratio to check the confidence level of observed data. The result of study shows that the value of each PAMS species’s pass ratio varies obviously at different location. For example, the pass ratio of most PAMS species are over 70 % at Chunlung and Tsaotun stations, it shows that the PAMS species data observed from those two stations are highly reliable. On the other hand, the Pass ratio of most PAMS species are less than 20 % at Jhushan station, it shows that reliability and confidence level of observed data from this station are lower than Chunlung and Tsaotun stations. Second, after HHT analyzing of PAMS data, check the significance of each Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF) of observed data. We then classify the result of detection limit and significance comparison as three kinds of species to find out the value of PAMS species data of Taiwan PAMS stations in further research. First kind is low concentration and irregular species, second kind is high confidence level and regular species. third kind is other species which act between first kind and second kind.
Overall speaking, most PAMS observations of Chunlung and Tsaotun stations have reach detection limit and better significant test result, hence they have higher confidence level and regularity. Although the PAMS species of Jhushan station has less confidence level than Chunlung and Tsaotun stations because of its location at lee, it still can assist Chunlung and Tsaotun stations to discuss PAMS species characteristic of whole central area of Taiwan. Wanhua、Tucheng and Ciaotou stations all locate at urban area and industrial park, so they have higher confidence level of PAMS observation and more PAMS species with regularity. Although Taisi station locate at suburb of southern central area which has lower concentration, but it has fewer PAMS species with low confidence level and regularity. This is because lower threshold value of pass ratio compared to other stations make it has more PAMS species with higher confidence level and regularity. It is supposed Taisi station has more steady pollution PAMS species source, and the main pollution source is No. 6 Naphtha industrial park nearby, therefore even it has low pass ratio we can still find regularity from it. It has a big difference in concluded result between all stations PAMS species, and the analysis process can identify PAMS species with higher confidence level and regularity in every station. It also can filter low concentration and confidence level PAMS species comparatively in every station.
| en_US |
| DC.subject | 光化測站 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 顯著性 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 偵測極限 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 信心程度 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 規律性 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | significant test | en_US |
| DC.subject | detection limt | en_US |
| DC.subject | HHT | en_US |
| DC.subject | PAMS | en_US |
| DC.title | 台灣地區PAMS觀測資料之顯著性和規律性的分析與探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | The significance and regularity of PAMS observations of Taiwan | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |