博碩士論文 84342003 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:4 、訪客IP:18.204.56.104
姓名 吳桂陽( Kuei-Yang Wu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 土木工程學系
論文名稱 建設公司全面品質管理. 產品定位與規劃績效關係之研究
(The study of relationship between the total quality management, product position and planning performance in the real estate industries)
相關論文
★ 捷運乘客舒適度調查分析 以台北高運量板南-土城線為例★ 時依性路段暨時窗限制下單一車輛路線問題之研究
★ 飛航組員及客艙組員影響溝通協調關鍵因素之研究★ 廢棄機車回收廠區位選址之研究
★ 航空客運業綠色行銷與措施對消費者忠誠度影響★ 以高齡者觀點評估台北市政府轉運站滿意度及行為意向之研究
★ 自行車接駁軌道運輸關鍵因素之探討-以捷運為例★ 捷運車廂內廣播系統旅客服務品質之研究 -以台北市捷運為例
★ 小汽車駕駛人之行為意向研究★ BRT路線試營運對用路人與乘客服務水準之影響評估―以台中市BRT藍線為例
★ 高鐵車站接駁公車營運前後服務水準之評估與比較-以苗栗高鐵站為例★ 營建公司財務績效評估模式之研究
★ 都會區基地開發道路交通衝擊預測模式之建立─應用多元迴歸與模糊迴歸分析★ 無道碴軌道型式決策模式之研究(應用價值工程及多屬性決策理論)
★ 地方基層建設引用專案營建管理最適統合方式之研究★ 宅配服務之生產力與行銷策略之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究以文獻探討、問卷調查,輔以專家訪談、統計與多變量分析,作為主要研究方法。在文獻探討方面,則蒐集國內外有關全面品質管理、產品定位及規劃相關之理論與實證研究資料,作為本研究建立研究架構之基礎。在問卷調查方面,以李克特總加法態度量表進行問卷設計,並訪問具實務經驗之高階管理者及學術研究者共十名,以評估本研究問卷之效度,再以經預試及項目分析修正後之問卷進行調查,整理後共收集了有效樣本116份,所得的量化資料以因素分析、卡方考驗、雙因子變異數分析及多元迴歸分析方法進行統計與多變量分析。
首先將國內建設公司依其垂直整合程度分為:基本型、複合型及一貫作業型,進一步以集群分析法,將公司對全面品質管理的推動程度分為:積極型、適中型及消極型三種型態;且依公司對產品定位策略運用之不同分為:積極開創型及漸進調整型兩種模式。接著將建設公司依以上特性分為群組分析,經比較歸納後,提出以下結論:
一、經卡方考驗,發現國內建設公司的垂直整合型態與全面品質管理型態、產品定位模式有相關性,積極型全面品質管理公司與積極開創型產品定位的公司,其垂直整合程度有趨向於一貫作業模式的趨勢,但在區域上卻有顯著不同,即南部地區之建設公司除了同業競爭劇烈外,加上有較多新的公共建設及新商圈,在產品定位模式上,比其他地區較趨向於採積極開創策略。此說明了面對未來多變的競爭環境,公司宜以積極的品質管理、產品定位策略及一貫作業之模式因應,此可以促進整體性且連續性的產品規劃與服務。
二、經因素分析後,國內建設公司重視之全面品質管理因素依序有:領導能力、人力資源管理、製程管理、供應商管理及連續改善與資訊;產品定位因素有:成本附加價值、目標顧客、安全管理及資源形象;規劃績效因素有:技術表現、產品利用率、效益符合度、使用者滿意度及管理維護。以上因素均經本研究建立可評量問卷,且經信度與效度檢驗,故可作為建設公司評量公司全面品質管理執行、產品定位策略擬定及規劃作業成果的參考依據。
三、建設公司的產品定位模式、全面品質管理因素及規劃績效因素相互之間有顯著的影響,其中最顯著者敘述於次:
(一)在全面品質管理因素方面,「連續性改善與資訊」及「供應商管理」因素,為全面品質管理之核心概念,故對此兩因素之推動均表現積極,並不因區域之不同而有所分別;但北部地區建設公司對全面品質「人力資源管理」因素之推動,較其他地區為積極,而北部與中部地區的建設公司對全面品質「製程管理」因素之執行,較其他地區為優。換言之,區域因素會影響建設公司對全面品質管理各因素推動的優先順序,但面對國內外不確定及善變的環境下,經營者對不同地區公司間相互參訪及學習,以擬定切實可行推動全面品管的策略,應是值得採行的方向。
(二)在產品定位因素方面,各地區差異不大,僅南部地區建設公司較重視「目標顧客」因素。此可歸因於近年來南部地區有較多新的公共建設,促使公司對目標市場的重新界定,以掌握更多目標市場的機會。此說明了環境因素會影響產品定位中「目標顧客」的方向,而其他地區的建設公司,應可在既有市場內,去創造更多的目標市場,發展適當的產品,以創造基地的價值。
(三)在規劃績效因素方面,即在「技術表現」及「管理維護」兩個因素,為建設公司參與市場競爭的基礎能力,是以地區之間並無明顯差異;但在「使用者滿意度」、「效益符合度」兩因素上,一貫作業及複合作業型公司優於基本型公司。由此可了解到,在都市土地日益稀少,餘屋銷售處理日益嚴重等情況下,建設公司需更重視規劃成果與業主期望的符合度及思考如何將客戶之需求轉化成實體的產品,因此宜將公司調整至較能整合協調相關部門意見的複合作業型或一貫作業型,以符合未來之趨勢。
(四)產品定位模式與全面品質管理型態在規劃績效「技術表現」因素上有交互作用,且積極型全面品質管理配合積極開創型的產品定位,可有效提昇規劃之「技術表現」。換言之,各建設公司應持續積極加強全面品質管理活動及產品定位模式的配合。
(五)全面品質管理因素之「領導能力」及「供應廠商管理」因素與產品定位之「安全管理」因素對規劃績效影響最大,是以國內建設公司可優先提昇此三因素,以有效提昇專案之規劃績效
根據以上之分析結果,本研究提出下列建議,以供業界及後續相關研究之參考:
一、為促成建設公司全面品質管理系統的建立,宜以「領導能力」、「人力資源管理」、「製程管理」、「供應商管理」及「連續改善與資訊方面」五個因素,做為公司經營管理的評估指標。換言之,公司在措施上宜鼓勵全員參與、強調持續改善活動與資訊蒐集、要求製程標準、持續人力資源管理及訓練、強化與供應商的關係,藉以提昇規劃績效。
二、因各區域對不同指標因素之反應,部份有顯著性的差異,因此國內建設公司宜正視各經營區域所面對的市場與競爭,並借鏡其他分區成效優良的措施,來提昇公司的規劃品質。
三、建議後續研究可探討建設公司其他階段(如設計、施工或行銷階段)之績效衡量指標及影響品質管理實施成功的因素(如溝通、進度控制、設備支援因素),以發展一完整的評量體系,並與其他客觀可量化之指標(如投資報酬率、上市公司之財報)相互比較,以提供實務界及相關研究完整的參考依據。
摘要(英) At first, it is necessary to go through product position procedure in understanding the real demands from homebuyers’ point of view in order to have an excellent planning outcome. As a result, homebuyers will benefit from these products; in return, the real estate company will become profitable and continue its growth as well. Many of the researchers had proposed that the result of quality management is positively related with the organization performance. In this study, the characteristics of planning operation are discussed to find out the relationships between the business type, the product position strategy, and the quality management to improve the planning performance and to be established as a reference for future studies in this industry.
The main methods used in this study are literature review, questionnaire investigation, expert interview, statistics, and multivariate analysis. In terms of the literature review, theories and empirical literatures from domestic and foreign countries relating to total quality management, product position, and product planning are collected and used as the groundwork for establishing the research frame in this study. In regard to questionnaire used in this survey, it was designed with Likert / summated scales first. Furthermore, 10 high-level managers that have practical experience and academic researchers are interviewed to evaluate the questionnaire validity of this study. Then the investigation is implemented again by using the questionnaires that have been modified by pretest and item analysis. Finally, there are 116 valid samples to be collected. The quantity data of these samples were analyzed to conduct statistic and multivariate analysis using methods such as factor analysis, chi-square test, two-way ANOVA and multiple regression analysis.
First of all, operation modes based on their degree of vertical integration from domestic real estate industries can be classified into the following three types: basic, complex and sustained. By using the cluster analysis method, these companies are further categorized into the active type, common type and passive type according to their degree of implementation in the area of total quality management. In addition, they are also grouped into the innovation type and the progressive type in accordance with their different strategies for defining product position. Then, according to the characteristics mentioned above, they are divided into groups for further analysis. Finally, the following conclusions are reached after conducting comparative induction analysis on these groups:
1.After the chi-square test, it is found that there exists a correlated pattern between the degree of vertical integration, total quality management, and the product position for domestic real estate companies. For companies that implement active total quality management and innovative product position strategy, their degrees of vertical integration tend to move toward the sustained type. However, it can be seen obviously that there is a difference in terms of locations. That is, due to the facts that there are more newly-developed business circles and more public facilities to be constructed in the southern area with greater competitions among these building companies, the product position pattern for companies located in the southern part of Taiwan has a tendency to utilize a more aggressive and innovative strategy as compared with the companies located in other areas. It becomes clear that the real estate companies should adopt actively the strategies of total quality management, product position and sustained pattern to confront the highly changeable and competitive environment in the future. Therefore, the entirety and the continuity of the product planning and service of their companies will be promoted.
2.After the factor analysis, it is found that domestic real estate companies have focused the total quality management on factors such as leadership ability, human resource management, process management, suppliers’ management, continuous improvement and information management; whereas their focus on the product position factors are cost plus value, object clients, safe and management and image of resource. Moreover, their focusing factors on planning performance are technical representation, utilization of product, conformity of benefit, user’s satisfaction and availability of maintenance. These factors mentioned above have already been established by this study as the scaling questionnaires with their reliability and validity being examined to have passed the test; therefore, they can be used as the references to assess the degree of satisfaction in executing the total quality management, formulating the strategy of product position, and planning operation result for domestic companies.
3.As mentioned above, there is a significant and interactive influence between the product position pattern, the total quality management factors and the planning performance factors for real estate companies. Among these factors, the most significant ones are stated as follows:
(1)In respect of the total quality management factors, continuous improvement and information management as well as suppliers’ management are two core concepts in terms of the total quality management. For this reason, both of these factors are carried out actively by nationwide real estate companies without showing much difference in different areas. Nevertheless, companies in the northern part of Taiwan implement the human resource management factor more aggressively than those in other areas. On the other hand, the real estate companies in the Northern and the Central parts of Taiwan execute the process management factor much better as compared with the other areas. In other words, the area factor will affect the priorities set by the companies in terms of the total quality management. However, due to the uncertain and ever-competitive environment, decision-makers should spend time to visit and exchange ideas with other companies located in different areas such that a practical strategy of promoting total quality management can be implemented in their companies. This is a direction of which it is worth the emphasis to be adopted for each company.
(2)As for the product position factors, the difference resulting from area factor is not much. The only item that worth mentioning is that the companies in the Southern area emphasize more on factor of object clients. This is because there have been more newly-developed public constructions needed in the southern area recently, which makes companies redefine the object market in order to discover more opportunities. This explains why the direction of the object client in the product position will be influenced by the environmental factor. Furthermore, the real estate companies located in other areas should be able to create more object market and develop proper product within the accessible market to generate the base value.
(3)As to the planning performance factors, the technical representation and the availability of maintenance are the two basic abilities for the real estate companies to participate in the competitive market; hence, there isn’t any significant difference with respect to the locations. As far as the user’s satisfaction and the conformity of benefit are concerned, companies of sustained type and complex type are better than those of basic type. This indicates that the real estate company should pay more attention to the planning result and meet consumers’ expectation; in addition, it needs to think hard how to convert the demands of clients into the practical products as a result of both lands being diminished continuously in the urban area and the serious situation of excessive empty houses. Therefore, the company should be reformed to become the complex type or the sustained type, which is capable of integrating and coordinating the comments from each related department in order to compete in the future market.
(4)With regard to the technical representation factor of planning performance, the product position pattern and the total quality management type are interactively related to each other. In addition, active total quality management in conjunction with product position of innovative type will improve the performance of technical representation effectively. In other words, each of the real estate companies should actively and continuously promote the cooperation between the activities of the total quality management and the product position pattern.
(5)The leadership ability of the total quality management and the suppliers’ management factor in addition to the safety management factor of product position have the greatest influence on planning performance. Therefore, the domestic real estate companies should firstly promote these three factors mentioned above to effectively improve the project’s planning performance.
According to the results analyzed from above, there are several suggestions proposed by this study to be used in real estate industries as reference for further study:
1.To urge and materialize the establishment of the total quality management system for a real estate company, the following five factors: leadership ability, human resource management, process management, suppliers’ management, continuous improvement and information management should be employed as the assessment indicators for managing company. In other words, the company should take measures to encourage all employees participating in such quality assurance activities and to emphasize the importance of factors including continuous improvement, information collection, process standardization requirement, continuous human resource management and training, and enhancement of the relationships with the suppliers to enrich the planning performance.
2.Since there exists significant difference for some areas in response to reactions from various indicators, the domestic real estate companies should confront the market and the competition encountered in each area. Furthermore, the company should also refer to the effective measures implemented by other areas to improve company’s planning quality.
3.It is recommended that other phases (design phase, construction phase and the marketing phase) as well as factors affecting the success of quality management (communication, schedule control and equipment supply) can be used as topics to investigate a real estate company for further research to develop a complete evaluation system. Finally, these measurable components just mentioned above can be applied to compare with other objective and quantitative indicators (investment rate of return and finance report of listed firm) in order to provide a complete reference for companies and the related academic institutes.
關鍵字(中) ★ 建設公司
★ 全面品質管理
★ 產品定位
★ 規劃績效
關鍵字(英) ★ real estate industry
★ total quality management
論文目次 圖目錄XII
表目錄XIIV
第一章 緒論1
1.1研究動機1
1.2研究目的4
1.3研究方法與流程4
1.4主要名詞詮釋6
1.5研究對象與範圍8
1.6論文章節架構9
第二章 文獻探討10
2.1全面品質管理10
2.2建設公司專案之運作模式與全面品質管理26
2.3建設公司專案的規劃績效37
第三章 研究設計59
3.1 研究架構59
3.2 研究對象60
3.3 研究假設60
3.4 研究變數定義63
3.5研究工具69
3.6實施程序82
3.7資料處理83
第四章 研究結果87
4.1樣本描述性分析87
4.2全面品質管理與產品定位構面分群90
4.3建設公司經營型態與全面品質管理型態、產品定位模式之比較分析92
4.4產品定位模式對全面品質管理因素之影響95
4.5產品定位模式對規劃績效因素之影響113
4.6全面品質管理型態對產品定位因素之影響129
4.7全面品質管理型態對規劃績效因素之影響141
4.8全面品質管理型態、產品定位模式與規劃績效關係之整體分析154
4.9全面品質管理、產品定位各因素與規劃績效因素之關係162
第五章 訪問調查結果168
5.1建設公司的全面品質管理執行狀況168
5.2建設公司產品定位之作法174
5.3建設公司對規劃績效的評估178
5.4綜合評述181
第六章 結論與建議187
6.1主要研究發現187
6.2結論197
6.3建議199
6.4後續研究建議202
參考文獻204
附錄一 問卷214
附錄二 各變數與參酌學者對照表221
附錄三 訪問調查表226
附錄四 接受訪談及諮詢之專家學者名單227
附錄五 接受預試公司名單228
附錄六 接受本研究調查之樣本公司名單229
參考文獻 一、英文部份
Ansoff, H. and Stewart, J. M.(1967). “Strategies for a technology based business.” Harvard Business Review, 67, 81-93.
Atkinson,W.(1990). “The customer-responsive manufacturing organization.” Manufacturing System, May, 58-61.
Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C. and Fisher, D. (1988). Factors affecting project success, in Cleland D. I. And King,W. R. (ed.), Project Management Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Burati, J. L., Matthews, M. F. and Kalidindi, S. N. (1992). “Quality management organizations and techniques.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118 (1), 112-128.
Burati, J. L., and Oswald, T. H. (1993). “Implementing TQM in engineering and construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 456-470.
Chase, G. W. (1993). “Effective total quality management (TQM) process for construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 433-443.
Cleland, D. I. & King,W. R. (1983). Systems analysis and project management, McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York, 3rd ed.
Cooper, R. and Press, M. (1997). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley. 游萬來,宋同正譯 (1998),「設計進程」,六合出版社。
Creech,B.(1994). The five pillars of TQM, Dutton Signet, Truman Talley Books.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free : the art of making quality certain, New York : McGraw-Hill
Crosby, P. B. (1984). Quality without tears : the art of hassle-free management, New York : Penguin Group.
Culp, G., Smith, A. and Abbott, J. (1993). “Implementing TQM in consulting engineering firm.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 340-356.
Dale, B. and Cooper, C. (1992). Total quality and human resources, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
DeCotiis, A. T., Dyer. L. (1979). “Defining and measuring project performance.” Research Management, Jan, 17-21.
Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis, Cambrige, MA:MIT Center for Adranced Engineering.
DoD, (1989). Total quality management guide, 2, 5000.51-G.
Droge, C. and Calantone, R. (1996). “New product strategy, structure, and performance in two environments.” Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 555-566.
Duttenhoeffer, R. (1992). “Cost and quality management.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 8(2), 167-175.
Feiganbaum A.V. (1983). Total quality control, 美亞書局。
Feiganbaum A.V. (1991). Total quality control, New York:Mc Graw-Hill.
Fisher, T. J. (1992). “The Impact of Quality Management on Productivity,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 9(3), 44-52.
Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G. and Sakakibara, S. (1994) “A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument,” Journal of Operations Management, 11, 339-366.
Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G. and Sakakibara, S. (1995). “The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage.” Decision Science, 26(5), 659-691.
Garvin, D. A. (1984). “What Does Product Quality Really Mean?” Sloan Management Review , Fall, 37.
Gobeli, D. H. and Brown, D. J. (1987). “Analyzing product innovations.” Research Management, 30(4), 25-31.
Gold, B. (1991). “Toward the increasing integration of management function: needs and illustrative advance.” Internatiomal Journal of Technology Management, Special Publication on the Role of Technology in Corporate Policy, 10-20.
Gregory, M. J. (1993) “Integrated performance measurement: a review of current practice and emerging trends.” International Journal of Production Economics, 30, 251-295.
Griffin, A. and Page, A. L. (1993) “An interim report on measuring product development success and failure.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 291-308.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., and Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings, Macmillan Publishing Company.
Harwood, C.C. & Pieters, G. P. (1990). “How to manage quality improveent.” Quality Progress, 22(3), 48.
Herman, J. J. (1994). Holistic quality managing: restructuring. And empowering school. Monica, CA: Corwin.
Hunt, I., Roberts, S. and Jones, R. (1993). “The integration of design and manufacture: a quantum leap.” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 4(2), 15-19.
Hutchins, S. (1989). “What customers want: results of ASQC / gallup survey.” Quality Progress, February, 33-36.
James L. Burati Jr. and Thomas H. Oswald (1993). “Implementing TQM in engineering and construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 456-470。
Johne, F. A. (1984). “How experienced product innovators organize.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 210-223.
Juran, J. M. (1988). Juran on planning for quality, New York : Free Press.
Juran, J. M. (1995). Managerial breakthrough : the classic book on improving management performance, New York : McGraw-Hill.
Kanji, G. K. (1990). “Total quality management:myth or miracle.” Total Quality Management, 1(2), 163-167.
Kanji, G. K. (1993). 100 Statistical tests, London: Sage Publications.
Kerzner, H. (1992). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling, Van Nostra and Reinhold, 4ht ed.
Kinnear, T. C. and Bernhardt, K. L. (1983). Principles of marketing, Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresmas and Company.
Larson, E.w. and Gobeli, D. H. (1989). “Significance of project management structure on development success.” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 36(2), 119-125.
Levine, H. A. (1986). Project management using microcomputers, Osborne: McGraw-Hill.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of psychology, No. 140.
Might, R. J., and Fischer W. A., (1985). “The role of structural factors in determining project management success.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-32, 71-77.
Miller, R., (1995). “Applying Quality Practices to R&D.” Research Technology Management, March-April, 47-54.
Moenaert, R.K., Meyer, A.D., Souder, W.E. and Deschoolmeester, D. (1995). “R&D / marketing communication during the fuzzy front-end.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3), 243-258.
Morgan, C. and Murgatroyd S. (1994). Total quality management and the school, Buckingham, PA: Open University.
Moser, M. R. (1985). “Measuring performance in R&D settings.” Research Management, Sep-Oct, 31-33.
Munns, A. K. & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). “The role of project management in achieving project success.” International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81-87.
Nylen, D. W. (1979). “New product failures: not just a marketing problem.” Business, 29(5), 2-7.
Olson, E. M., Walker, O.C. and Ruekert, R.W. (1995). “Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness.” Journal of Marketing, 59, 48-62.
Ottum, B. D. and Moore, W. L. (1997). “The role of market information in new product success/failure.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14 (3), 258-273.
Pinto, J. K. & Slevin, D. P. (1988). “Project success: definitions and measurement techniques.” Project Management Journal, 19(1).
Porter, M. E. (1996). “What is strategy?” Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 61-78.
Powell, T. C. (1995). “Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study,” Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15-37.
Ries, A. and Trout, J. (1986). Positioning: the battle for your mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rockart, J. F. (1982). “The Changing Role of the Information Systems Executive: A CSF Perspective,” Sloan Management Review, 24, 3-13.
Roth, A.V.and Miller, J.G. (1992). “Success factors in manufacturing.” Business Horizon, July-August, 73-81.
Ryan, J. (1988). “Consumers see little change in product quality.” Quality Progress,December, 16-20.
Sand, S. and Warwick, K. M. (1977). “Successful business innovation: a survey of current professional view.” Californian Management Review, 20(2), 5-16.
Saraph, J.V., Benson, P. G.and Schroeder, R. G. (1989). “An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management.” Decision Science, 20, 810-829.
Saylor, J. H. (1992). Total quality management. Field manual, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmenner, R. W. (1987). Production / operations management concepts and situations, Science Research Associates Inc.
Shih, L. H., Huarng, F. and Lin, B. (1996). “ISO in Taiwan: a survey ”, Total Quality Management, 7(6), 681-690.
Snee, J. A. (1986). “In pursuit of total quality.” Quality progress, 19, 25-31.
Song, X. M. and Montoya-Weiss M. M. (1998). “Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124-135.
Song, X. M. and Parry, M. E. (1997). “A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States.” Journal of Marketing, 61, 1-18.
Stuckenbruck, L. C. (1986). “Project management framework: an overview of the project management body of knowledge.” Project Management Journal, 17(3).
Tushman, M. L. (1978). “Technical communication in R&D laboratories: the impact of project work characteristics.” Academy of Management Journal, 21, 624-645.
Vasilash, G.S. (1990). “Hearing the voice of customer.” Production, February, 66-74。
Walleigh, R. (1989). “Product design for low-cost manufacturing.” Journal of Business Strategy, Auguest, 37-41.
Wind, Y. (1973). “A new procedure for concept evaluation.” Journal of Marketing, 37, 2-11.
Youssef, M. A., Boyd, J. and Williams, E. (1996) “The impact of total quality management on firms’ responsiveness: an empirical analysis.” Total Quality Management, 7(1), 127-144.
Zeisel, J. (1987). Inquiry by design: tools for environment-behavior research, Cambridge University Press, London.
二、中文部份
王慶煌等(1993),「建築投資風險性報酬模式」,建築學報,第八期,第29-58頁。
內政部營建署(1998),中華民國第二屆住宅社區金獎評選專輯,內政部營建署,台北。
司徒達賢(1985),策略管理,台北:遠流出版。
石川馨著 , 鍾朝嵩譯(1996),日本式品質管理,台北: 先鋒。
岳林(1993),「全面品質管理的特質」,品質管制月刊,8,第12頁。
李秀華(1993),ISO 9000品保制度對台灣企業助益實證研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所。
邢祖援(1981),「現代考核評估的發展方向」,研考月刊,第5卷第2期,第5頁。
林公孚(1996),TQM之標準與模式,中華民國品質管制學會,第145頁。
林宜桐(1999),全方位房地產行銷策略,台北﹕寶川出版社。
林英峰(1985),現代生產與作業管理,台北商務印書館。
林英峰(1995),「從國品獎談企業的全面品質管理」,中衛簡訊,119期,第91-92頁。
林能白(1993),品質管理對生產績效的影響,行政院國家科學委員會專題成果報告。
吳毓勳(1993),營建業品質經營管理,台北:詹氏書局,。
吳明隆(2000),SPSS統計應用實務,台北:松崗電腦圖書公司。
周文賢、李宏達(1994),市場調查與行銷策略研擬,台北:華泰書局。
周文賢、陳錦滄(1994),商情預測─理論架構與實務運作,台北:華泰書局。
范垂爐(1991),房地產真實交易價格之研究,中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
姚仁喜(1981),「集合住宅之社會性考慮」,建築師,1,第8-12頁。
信義不動產企劃研究室(1997),1997年台灣地區房地產產業年鑑,信義文化出版有限公司,台北。
胡誌芳(1989),台北市民住宅選擇與購宅能力之研究,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
洪崑煌、林宜桐(1997),建築個案案前前置作業戰略,台北﹕寶川出版社。
洪境聰、林志棟(1998),「國內通過ISO 9000 驗證廠商之普查統計」,推廣ISO 品質管理制度以提昇公共工程品質研討會專輯,中華民國營建管理協會,第27-34頁。
翁田山(1993),「談事業決策者,對品質經營應有的認知與作為」,品質管制月刊,8,第48-49頁。
曾善霞(1991),台北市住宅品質指標之研究,中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
許士軍 (1983),「現代行銷管理」,台北:商務印書館。
陳耀茂 (1995),品質管理,五南圖書公司,第19頁。
梁樾(1995),我國營建自動化之實施與檢討,載於「營建自動化技術推廣研討會論文集」,第4-1~4-33頁。
黃世孟(1988),「從建築物用後評估探討學校建築規劃與設計之研究」,國民中小學學校建築與設備專題研究,中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,台灣書店印,第47-62頁。
黃定國(1992),建築計畫,台北﹕大中國圖書公司。
黃玲珠(1984),台北縣居住環境之研究,政治大學地政研究所碩論。
黃德榮(1998),台灣住宅產品品質定位之研究,台灣科技大學工程技術研究所碩論。
莊明煌(1997),推行TQM的診斷,中原大學工業工程學系研究所碩士論文。
馮先勉(1995),房地產經營致富寶典,大日出版社。
馮先勉、張玉貞(1999),房地產行銷實務,基泰管理顧問公司。
程添旺(1996),建築經理實務,大日出版社。
張文忠(1998),台中市民購屋行為與建設公司行銷策略之研究,東海大學管理研究所碩論。
張玉貞、張宗銘、樓翠珍與黃銘顯(1997),產品定位實務,碁泰管理顧問公司。
張存金(1993),全面品質管理關鍵成功因素與我國業者推行全面品管現況之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
張金鶚(1991),建築投資業與建築經理公司管理制度之研究,內政部營建署。
張金鶚(1997),房地產投資與決策分析,華泰書局。
張保隆(1994),組織特性對專案管理執行及績效的影響,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1988),社會及行為科學研究法,東華書局。
蔡明勳(1993),中日企業技術發展與品質管理制度之比較研究,文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩論。
劉振誠(1986),住宅價格影響因素之研究─松山、大安、古亭為例,中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
賴士葆(1990),研究發展╱行銷互動與新產品發展績效相關之研究,中華民國管理科學學會。
賴清山(1988),策略性市場規劃,華泰書局。
簡福榮,張增宏(1998),「建築工程落實ISO 9001設計管制之實例」,載於推廣ISO 9000品質管理制度以提昇公共工程品質研討會,行政院公共工程委員會,第201-220頁。
魏啟林(1993),策略行銷,時報文化出版社。
薛榮松(1995),營建產業分析暨企業競爭策略初步研究,台灣工業技術學院營建工程技術研究所碩士論文。
謝潮儀(1991),從民營企業房地產企劃過程探討國宅興建計畫改進之途徑,台灣省政府。
戴久永(1994),全面品質經營,中華民國品質管制學會。
羅勤誠(1991),以經濟觀點探討建築投資業管理制度之研究,中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
指導教授 謝浩明(How-Ming Shieh) 審核日期 2001-12-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明