課堂教學對於培養工學院與資電學院大ㄧ學生核心能力的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：7

、訪客IP：3.135.195.103

姓名

黃瑾如(Chin-ju Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

課堂教學對於培養工學院與資電學院大ㄧ學生核心能力的影響
(The Impacts of Classroom Teaching with Respect to the Development of Core Competencies among First-Year Engineering & Computer Science Students)

相關論文

★ 服務學習融入師資培育: 以線上課輔活動為例	★ 閱讀教學與國民小學學童閱讀動機及行為的關係—以2005年PIRLS資料為例
★ 大學工科教師對成果導向認證制度之態度研究	★ 大學新進教師工作壓力與專業發展之探究~以北部某國立大學為例
★ 探究國內大一新生解決問題歷程與思考風格之關係-以機械系為例	★ 經驗的聆聽、凝視與回觀─我在沈昭良的攝影課上
★ 生命與教學之舞道─從雲門舞集2駐校課程看見自己	★ 工程及科技教育認證制度實施之研究：大學教師之觀點
★ 以成果導向教學探討大一國文課程	★ 以核心能力探討大一國文之學習成效
★ 一般生與在職生合作型問題解決模式之實證研究:以資電學院實作課程為例	★ 國中機率課程：設計與實驗
★ 臺灣與香港中學階段機率與統計主題的教科書研究	★ 團隊合作與個人轉化之歷程探究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

國外高等教育從輸入導向轉為成果導向已行之有年，而國內針對職場新鮮人能力不足的問題，各大專院校也紛紛建立核心能力，以培養畢業生需具備的能力。本研究旨在探究透過課堂教學對於培養學生核心能力的影響，以及學生實際的學習情況。
為達以上研究目的，本研究採質量並重的方式，並根據文獻探討編製「學生核心能力調查問卷」。研究對象選取103學年入學之工學院與資電學院大一學生共581位，隨機取樣發出397份，回收有效問卷數203份，可用率51.1%。訪談對象則選取工學院與資電學院中六個學系的大一學生共10位，並根據研究結果與分析結論如下：
一、老師的教學方式有助於學生學習運用數學、科學、工程知識以及現代化工具解決工程領域問題之能力。
二、學生對於自己在發掘問題、設計規劃、實驗分析、詮釋數據與執行工程專題與專業之能力有不同看法。
三、專業表達、語言、撰寫之能力比較不足。
四、團隊合作的機會成效不如預期。
五、師生互動頻率偏低，但反而增強學生自我學習的能力。
儘管Lattuca(2006)從學生、教師、學院長以及雇主多方的觀點，探究核心能力實施的狀況，考量國內相關實證研究比較少，而本研究則預期能根據調查結果，提供教師在課程設計與教學的參考，學校推動相關措施的依據，以及未來研究的延伸。

摘要(英)

For many years, domestic and foreign higher education institutions have already shifted from an input-oriented system to an output-oriented system. In the face of a large number of fresh graduates who lack the ability required by Taiwanese companies, various tertiary institutions are gradually placing more emphasis on developing critical core competencies among students in order to prepare graduates for the workplace. This study aims to explore students’ learning experience in a classroom setting and the impact of classroom learning with respect to the development of students’ core capabilities.
In order to achieve the objectives of this study, qualitative and quantitative methods were adopted, and a “Student Critical Competency Survey” was also developed based on past literature reviews and discussions from researchers. The subjects of the study were 581 freshmen who enrolled in either the College of Engineering or the College of Engineering & Computer Science during 2014. Out of the 581 students, 397 were randomly selected to participate in the survey, and 203 valid responses were received for a response rate of 51.1%.
Ten freshmen from six different departments under the College of Engineering and the College of Engineering & Computer Science were selected for interviews. The following conclusions were established based on our study results and data analysis:
I. Professors’ teaching methods help students learn to apply their mathematical skills, science/engineering knowledge, and use modern tools to solve various engineering problems.
II. Students have different views when exploring problems on their own, designing/planning, analyzing lab results, interpreting data, executing engineering projects, as well as on their own professionalism.
III. Inadequacies in professional expression, verbal, and writing skills.
IV. The effectiveness of teamwork was not as high as expected.
V. Low levels of teacher-student interaction can actually increase students’ self-learning capabilities.
Although Lattuca (2006) took into account the development of core competencies from the perspective of students, teachers, college heads, and employers, there has been very little study conducted based on the domestic sphere. This study can serve as a reference for teachers when designing and teaching a curriculum, for schools as a basis to promote related measures, and for expanding the research in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 核心能力
★ 課堂教學

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝 ……………………………………………………………… iv
目錄 ……………………………………………………………… v
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vi
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vii
一、緒論………………………………………………………… 1
1-1 研究動機與背景………………………………………… 1
1-2 研究目的與問題………………………………………… 4
1-3 名詞釋義…………………………………………………… 5
二、文獻探討…………………………………………………… 7
2-1 成果導向之探討…………………………………………… 7
2-2 核心能力之探討…………………………………………… 12
2-3 課堂教學之探討…………………………………………… 21
三、研究方法…………………………………………………… 25
3-1 研究架構與研究流程………………………………… 25
3-2 研究對象…………………………………………………… 27
3-3 研究工具…………………………………………………… 28
3-4 資料蒐集與分析………………………………………… 30
3-5 研究限制…………………………………………………… 42
四、研究結果分析與討論………………………………… 43
4-1 問卷資料分析……………………………………………… 43
4-2 訪談內容分析……………………………………………… 51
4-3 綜合討論…………………………………………………… 57
五、討論與建議………………………………………………… 63
5-1 結論……………………………………………………………… 65
5-2 研究貢獻…………………………………………………… 68
5-3 建議………………………………………………………………… 70
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………… 73
附錄一預試問卷…………………………………………………… 81
附錄二正式問卷…………………………………………………… 84
附錄三訪談大綱…………………………………………………… 87

參考文獻

中文部分
王秀槐(2011)。學習成果導向的課程設計與評量─理念與實例。教育研究月刊，
207，53-59。
王保進(2011)。引導學生學習成效品質保證機制之推動與落實－論第二週期系所評
鑑之核心內涵。評鑑雙月刊，取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2011/07/01/4599.aspx
何希慧、王淑芳(2009)。建構學生學習能力指標：以東吳大學結合學生e-
portfolio為例。評鑑雙月刊，19。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2009/05/01/1602.aspx
李坤崇(2011)。成果導向的大學校務與課程評鑑。教育研究月刊，205，79-91。
李坤崇(2010)。學習成果評量計畫及實例。教育研究月刊，196，78-92。
李坤崇(2009)。成果導向的課程發展模式。教育研究月刊，186，39-58。
李新民(2009)。大學回饋環境的裡子與面子層面分析及其與大學生學習表現之潛在
關聯：形成性測量模式的應用。屏東教育大學學報，33，425-458。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，4，
97-130。
余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報，1，69-
90。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式 : SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市 : 高等教育文化。
吳京玲(2009)。全國性大學生核心能力指標建構初探。2009海峽兩岸高等教育永
續發展學術研討會論文集，台灣：國立暨南國際大學，頁87-98。
陳玉婷(2010)。教學策略影響學習成效之實證研究。台南科大學報，29，191-
212。
陳順宇(2004)。多變量分析。台北市：華泰書局。
許明得、李偉成(2008)。有效課堂管理: 營造積極學習氣氛。台灣：香港大學出版
社。
梁佩雲(2010)。成果導向的教與學―一個師訓課程的科目發展案例。教育研究月
刊，96，35-47。
張佩芬、汪島軍、張凈怡(2008)。台灣工程及科技教育之國際化因應：合乎「華盛
頓協定」認證制度的建構。教育政策論壇，2，1-36。
楊士隆(2014)。中正大學自我評鑑與確保學生學習成效之具體作法。評鑑雙月刊，
48。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/02/25/6128.aspx
楊玲(2007)。教學卓越新模式　創造課堂學習新驚喜。評鑑雙月刊，6。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2007/03/09/179.aspx
黃曙東(2006)。我國技專校院學生學習成效評估機制之研究。國立彰化師範大學
(未出版之博士論文)，彰化縣。
劉曼君(2014)。IEET TAC認證晉升雪梨協定會員。評鑑雙月刊，50。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/07/01/6197.aspx
劉曼君(2014)。學生學習成果之評量及評分量表Rubrics之使用。評鑑雙月刊，
48。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/03/01/6135.aspx
劉孟奇(2014)。國立中山大學總結性課程計畫簡介。評鑑雙月刊，49。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/05/01/6158.aspx
鄧鈞文(2013年5月)。e-portfolio平台推動經驗分享。顏家鈺(主持人)，教學
與評量策略。IEET中華工程教育研討會，國立台灣科技大學。
蔡育秀(2013年5月)。學生基本能力指標(C-Map)系統。顏家鈺(主持人)，教學與
評量策略。IEET中華工程教育研討會，國立台灣科技大學。
蔡進發(2012)。落實成果導向的教、學及評量機制：亞洲大學的教學與學習資源特
色。評鑑雙月刊，36。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2012/03/01/5565.aspx
蔡姿娟(2004)。合作學習教學法對高三學生英文閱讀理解及態度之效益研究。國民
教育研究學報，13，261-283。
羅寶鳳、白亦方(2012)。以優質學習為主的教學卓越：教學卓越計畫與優質學習
之間的連結。臺灣教育評論月刊，4，11-17。
Woodhouse、侯永琪(2010)。學習成效評估之國際發展。評鑑雙月刊，27。取自
http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2010/09/01/3341.aspx

西文部分
Aihara, S.(2012). Development of Comprehensive I-E-O model Incorporating Alternative Engagement：How to Measure Learning Outcomes of Japanese College Students. Proceedings of the 2012 IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics, 303-308. doi: 10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2012.66
Amy, C., David, E., &David, S.(2012). Building Student Teamwork with the Student Geo-Challenge. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(1), 14-20. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000082
Ab Rahim, A. A., Thamrin, N. M., Abdullah, N. E., & Hashim, H.(2010). Modem Control Systems in Electrical Engineering Course Assessment Using the Outcome Based Education approach. Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Congress on Engineering Education, 145-150. doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2010.5940780
Albanese, M. A., Mejicano, G., Mullan, P., Kokotailo, P., & Gruppen, L.(2008). Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Medical Education, 42(3), 248-255. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02996.x
Alderson, A., & Martin, M.(2007). Outcomes based education: Where has it come from and where is it going?. Educational Research, 17(2), 161-182.
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning,Teaching, and Assessing:A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson.
Baumgartner, I. & Shankararaman, V. (2013). Actively linking learning outcomes and competencies to course design and delivery: experiences from an undergraduate Information Systems program in Singapore. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 238-246. doi:10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530112
Brennan, R. W., Hugo, R. J., & Gu, P.(2012). Reinforcing Skills and Building Student Confidence through a Multicultural Project-based Learning Experience. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, 1-10.
Bassett, P.(2011). How Do Students View Asynchronous Online Discussions As A Learning Experience?. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 69-79.
Barte, G. B. & Yeap, G. H.(2011). Problem-based Learning Approach in Enhancing Engineering Graduates’ Employability. Proceedings of the Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER), 2011 IEEE Colloquium, 771-775. doi: 10.1109/CHUSER.2011.6163840
Bowman, N. A.(2010). Assessing learning and development among diverse college students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 145, 53-71. doi:10.1002/ir
Berheide, C. W.(2007). Doing LessWork, Collecting Better Data: Using Capstone Courses to Assess Learning. Peer Review, 9(2), 27–30.
Bouslama, F., Lansari, A., Al-Rawi, A., & Abonamah, A. A.(2003). A Novel Outcome-Based Educational Model and its Effect on Student Learning, Curriculum Development, and Assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 203-214.
Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., Wolfe, H., Atman, C. J., McGourty, J., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M. and Rogers, G. M.(2000). Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC 2000. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 43, 100-110. doi: 10.1109/13.848060
Chen, P. D., & Cragg, K.(2012). Multilevel Modeling: Applications to Research on the Assessment of Student Learning, Engagement, and Developmental Outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 154, 95-109. doi: 10.1002/ir.20016
Crespo, R. M., Najjar, J., Derntl, M., Leony, D., Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P., Totschnig, M., Simon, B., Gutiérrez, I., &Kloos, C. D.(2010). Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes in Outcome-based Education. Proceedings of the IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering 2010, 1239-1246. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492385
Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., &Hamilton, E. R.(2008). Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 339-353. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00983.x
Cranmer, S.(2006). Enhancing graduate employability: best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169-184. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572041
Deardorff, D. K.(2011). Assessing Intercultural Competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149. doi: 10.1002/ir.381
Doll, B., Spies, R. A., LeClair, C. M., Kurien, S. A., & Foley, B. P. (2010). Student Perceptions of Classroom Learning Environments: Development of the ClassMaps Survey. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 203-218.
Debra, M. B. & Calvin, D. S.(2009). The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 173-189. doi: 10.1080/01580370902927758
DeVellis, R. F. (1998). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. CA: Sage.
Eryilmaz, E., Chiu, M. M., Thoms, B., Mary, J. & Kim, R.(2014). Design and evaluation of instructor-based and peer-oriented attention guidance functionalities in an open source anchored discussion system. Computers & Education, 71, 303–321. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.009
Fortaleza, L., L, Vieira, S., R., C., Junior, O., O., M., Prikladnicki, R., & Conte, T. (2013). Using Distributed Software Development in the Improvement of Communication and Collaboration Skills in SE Courses: An Observational Study. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference, 139-148. doi: 10.1109/CSEET.2013.6595245
Gavin, K.(2011). Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 547-558. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.624173
Gary, K. W.& Cheung, H. Y.(2011). Evaluation of Outcome-Based Approach in Computer Science Education at Sub-degree Level. Proceedings of the Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference, 142-146. doi: 10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013796
Hassan, M. M. S.(2012). Challenges of Implementing Outcome Based Engineering Education in Universities in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Electrical & Computer Engineering (ICECE), 2012 7th International Conference. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 238-245. doi: 10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530112
Hashemi, M. R., & Ghanizadeh, A.(2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40(1), 37-47. doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.01.009
Hee, S. L., Marcia, C.L., Keisha, V.& Ou, L. L.(2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71-90. doi: 10.1002/tea.20304
Imam, M.H., & Tasadduq, I. A. (2012). Satisfaction of ABET Student Outcomes. Proceedings of the Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2012 IEEE, 1-6. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201167
Julia, K., Noreen, K., Barbara, S., Monika, F., &Christiane, S. (2014). How do teachers promote their students’ lifelong learning in class?Development and first application of the LLL Interview. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 119-129.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial class¬room: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491-525.
Lee, Y. H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script:Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.004
Lambert, A. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Lattuca, L. R.(2007). More than meets the eye: Curricular and Programmatic Effects on Student Learning. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 14-168. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9040-5
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. Philadelphia, PA: ABET.
Lattuca, L. R., Voigt, L. J., & Fath, K. Q.(2004). Does Interdisciplinarity Promote Learning? Theoretical Support and Researchable Questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23-48.
Leesa, D. M., Miriam, M. K., & Catherine, T. L.(2001). Do Learning Style and Learning Environment Affect Learning Outcome?. Journal of Allied Health, 30(2), 112-115.
Ladyshewsky, R. K., Barrie, S. C., & Drake, V. M.(1998). A Comparison of Productivity and Learning Outcome in Individual and Cooperative Physical Therapy Clinical Education Models. Physical Therapy, 78(12), 1288-1298.
Mathieson, S.(2012). Disciplinary cultures of teaching and learning as socially situated practice: rethinking the space between social constructivism and epistemological essentialism from the South African experience. Higher Education, 63(5), 549-564.
McNaught, C., Lam, P.&Cheng, K.F. (2012). Investigating relationships between features of learning designs and student learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development,60(2), 271–286.doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9226-1
Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Pegg, J.(2012). The Adoption of a Capstone Assessment Instrument. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 657-678.
Makinda,J., Bolong, N., Gungat, L., & Sarman, A.(2011). Assessment of Program Educational Objectives Using Alumni Survey: The UMS Experience. Proceedings of the 2011 3rd International Congress on Engineering Education (ICEED), 14-17. doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2011.6235351
Ming(2012). Alignment of Learning Outcomes and Assessment. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).
Moula, H., Neha, T., & Nirmala, P.(2013). Teaching Programming Course Elective: A New Teaching and Learning Experience. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference in MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE). doi:10.1109/MITE.2013.6756349
Matthew, J. M., Gregory, C. W., & Ernest, T. P.(2008). How Educational Practices Affect the Development of Life-long Learning Orientations in Traditionally-aged Undergraduate Students. Research in Higher Education, 49, 337-356. doi: 10.1007/s11162-007-9081-4
Nuno, E., Paula, E., Ana, B., & Cristina, L.(2011). Enhancing Students Team Work and Communication Skills in International Settings. Proceedings of the Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2011 International Conference, 1-8. doi: 10.1109/ITHET.2011.6018683
Najjar, J., Klobu_ar, T., Nguyen-Ngoc, A.V., Totschnig, M., Muller, F., Simon, B., Karlsson, M., & Eriksson, H.(2011). Towards Outcome Based Learning: An Engineering Education Case. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1039-1048. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773276
Oliver, R., Kersten, H., Vinkka-Puhakka, H., Alpasan, G., Bearn, D., Cema, I, Delap, E., Dummer, P., Goulet, J. P., Gugushe, T., Jeniati, E., Jerolimov, V., Kotsanos, N., Krifka, S., Levy, G., Neway, M., Ogawa, T., Saag, M., Sidlauskas, A., Skaleric, U., Vervoorn, M., & White, D.(2008). Curriculum structure: principles and strategy. European Journal of Dental Education, 12(1), 74-84. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00482.x
Pe´rez-Sanagustı´n, M., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Herna´ndez-Leo, D., Mun˜oz-Organero, M., Santos, P., Blat, J., & Kloos, C. D.(2012). Discovering the campus together: A mobile and computer-based learning experience. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35, 176-188. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.02.011
Passow, H. J.(2012). Which ABET Competencies Do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in their Work. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118.
Pooja, K. A., Patrice, M. B., &Roger, W. C.(2012). The Value of Applied Research: Retrieval Practice Improves Classroom Learning and Rcommendations from a Teacher, a Principal, and a Scientist. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 437-448. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9210-2
Rocio, M., Angeles, C., Santiago, U., &Angel, S.(2011). Experience of cooperative learning in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 13-19. doi:10.1080/03043797.2010.518232
Ruff , S., & Carter, M.(2009). Communication Learning Outcomes from Software Engineering Professionals: A Basis for Teaching Communication in the Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350442
Suhana, M. S., Chee-Onn, C., Mokhtar, N., Ramli, R., Tuan, M. Y. S. T. Y., &Mohd, F. M. S.(2013). Accreditation of engineering programs: an evaluation of current practices in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 313–328
Sundaram, R.(2012). Work in Progress: Redesigned First-Year Seminar Course in Engineering - Delivery, Learning Outcomes Assessment, and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of the 2012Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
Shariff, S. M., Johan, Z. J., &Jamil, N. A.(2011). Developing Soft Skills and Learning Outcomes of Business Management Students in Project Management. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 141-146. doi:10.1109/ICBEIA.2011.5994229
Sajjad, S.(2011). Effective Teaching Methods at higher Education Level. 1-16.
Strauss, L. C., & Terenzini, P. T.(2007). The Effects of Students’ In- and Out-of-Class Experiences on their Analytical and Group Skills: A Study of Engineering Education. Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 967-992. doi: 10.1007/s11162-007-9057-4
Spady, W. G., & Marshall, K. J. (1991). Beyond traditional outcome-based education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67-72.
Tong, H., Ye, Y., Pan, Y., Lu, S., Zhang, J.(2010). Analysis and Evaluation for Core Competence of Insurance Company Based on SEM. Scientific Research, 2, 178-182. doi:10.4236/ib.2010.22021
Tubaishat, A., Lansari, A. & Al-Rawi, A.(2009). E-portfolio Assessment System for an OutcomeBased Information Technology Curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 43-54.
Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Harper, B. J., &Domingo, R. J.(2007). Measuring the Impact of Professional Accreditation on Student Experiences and Learning Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 251-282. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9039-y
Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Strauss, L. C., & Sukhbaatar, J., (2004). Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 318-328.
Wegener, R., &Leimeister, J. M.(2012 January). Do Student-Instructor Co-Created eLearning Materials Lead To Better Learning Outcomes? Empirical Results from a German Large Scale Course Pilot Study. Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 978-0-7695-4525-7/12. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.227
Wass, R., Harland, T., &Mercer, A.(2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317-328.
Yasemin, D. C.(2015). Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’ problem-solving skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 250-258.

指導教授

張佩芬

審核日期

2016-1-28

推文