博碩士論文 100227003 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:21 、訪客IP:3.233.217.242
姓名 施琬諭(Wan-yu Shih)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 認知與神經科學研究所
論文名稱 以行為及事件相關腦電位實驗探討前瞻記憶線索出現機率對於前瞻干擾效果的影響
(The probability of the prospective memory cue presentation modulates the prospective interference effect: Behavioral and ERP studies)
相關論文
★ 意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響★ 以行為及事件相關電位探討中文雙字詞的記憶聯結錯誤
★ 項目指示遺忘效果的行為與事件相關電位研究★ 項目指示遺忘作業中記憶登錄及提取歷程的行為及事件相關腦電位研究
★ 以語意促發作業探討項目指示遺忘中線索對於記憶登錄歷程影響之行為及事件相關腦電位研究★ 特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位
★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位探討處理層次與聯結性登錄方式對記憶連結錯誤之影響★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位
★ 由語意透明度所引發的再認記憶鏡像效應:行為與事件相關腦電位研究★ 登錄作業對於中文雙字詞語意透明度在再認記憶中所引發鏡像效應之影響:行為及事件相關腦電位實驗
★ 以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向★ 以跨顱電刺激與事件相關腦電位探討左側後頂葉腦區於再認記憶中所扮演之角色
★ 測驗表現回饋對測驗效應之調控的行為與事件相關腦電位研究★ 以非侵入式腦刺激探討左後側頂葉與情節記憶提取之因果關係
★ 中文假字形聲限制高低對於試誤與無誤學習之影響的行為與事件相關腦電位研究★ 情緒入碼情境對於記憶登錄與提取中的控制歷程之影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在前瞻記憶作業中,為了履行被延遲的意圖而造成進行中的活動表現下降,稱為前瞻干擾效果。普遍認為,前瞻干擾效果反映出,為了準備提取被延遲的意圖,而從其他進行中的活動所挪用的注意力資源。本篇論文使用前瞻編碼/提取實驗派典(prospective memory encoding/retrieval paradigm),研究前瞻干擾效果如何受到前瞻記憶線索的出現機率所調控。此外,也利用事件相關腦電位實驗來研究前瞻干擾效果的神經相關。
行為實驗結果顯示,相較於前瞻記憶線索出現機率較高的情況下,機率較低時,前瞻干擾效果比較大;這暗示著,當前瞻記憶線索出現機率較低時,受試者挪用較多的注意力資源在為提取前瞻記憶做準備。在實驗三中,事件相關腦電位結果顯示,和前瞻記憶的準備歷程相關的腦電位有二:前瞻持續正向電位(PM sustained positivity)和晚期正向複合電位(late positivity complex)。每當作業中加入一個被延遲的意圖時,前瞻持續正向電位就會產生,其電位並不會受到前瞻記憶線索的出現機率所調控。另一方面,當有個被延遲的意圖需要被執行時,晚期正向複合電位就會增強,而且在前瞻記憶線索的出現機率較低時增強更多;這些結果顯示出,主要造成前瞻干擾效果的歷程和前瞻監控有關。
本研究結果指出,前瞻記憶線索的出現機率是藉由調節挪用至前瞻監控歷程的注意力資源量,進而影響前瞻干擾效果。當線索的出現機率較低時,較多的注意力資源被挪用至監控環境以察覺前瞻記憶線索,造成較大的前瞻干擾效果。
摘要(英) The prospective interference effect refers to the performance decline of the ongoing activities due to a delayed intention to be implemented in the prospective memory tasks. It is generally thought to reflect the recruitment of attentional resource for preparing the retrieval of the delayed intention while engaging in the ongoing activities simultaneously. This thesis investigated how the prospective interference effect is modulated by the probability of the prospective memory (PM) cue presentation using prospective memory encoding/retrieval paradigm. Furthermore, the neural correlates of the prospective interference effect were investigated using event-related potential (ERP) measures.
The behavioral results revealed that the prospective interference effect was higher in the low-probability condition than in the high-probability one, which indicated that the participants recruited more attentional resource for preparatory attentional processes when the probability of the PM cue presentation was low. The ERP results in Experiment 3 found that two ERP components, the PM sustained positivity and the late positivity complex (LPC), were associated with the preparatory processes for prospective remembering. The PM sustained positivity arose in the ongoing activity trials whenever a delayed intention was added, and its amplitude was not modulated by the probability of the PM cue presentation. On the other hand, the amplitude of the LPC was larger when there was an intention to be performed, and was larger in the low-probability condition. These results indicated that the processes underlying the prospective interference effect refer to the prospective monitoring.
The current findings suggested that the probability of the PM cue presentation influences the prospective interference effect by modulating the magnitude of the attentional resource engaged in prospective monitoring. When the probability of the PM cue presentation was low, more attentional resource were employing on monitoring the environment for the PM cue, leading higher prospective interference effect.
關鍵字(中) ★ 前瞻記憶
★ 前瞻干擾效果
★ 前瞻編碼/提取實驗派典
★ 機率
★ 事件相關腦電位
關鍵字(英) ★ prospective memory
★ prospective interference effect
★ prospective memory encoding/retrieval paradigm
★ probability
★ event-related potentials
論文目次 Table of Contents

Chinese Abstract i
English Abstract iii
Acknowledgements v
Table of Contents vii
Table of Figures ix
Table of Tables xi
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Prospective memory 2
1.1.1. Prospective and retrospective component 3
1.1.2. Laboratory paradigms of event-based prospective memory 5
1.1.3. Prospective interference effect 8
1.2. Theories of prospective memory 8
1.2.1. The preparatory attentional and memory processes theory 9
1.2.2. The retrieval mode and target checking theory 11
1.2.3. The multi-process theory 12
1.3. Neuroimaging studies concerning prospective memory 16
1.3.1. Anterior prefrontal cortex and prospective memory retrieval 17
1.3.2. ERP studies 18
1.4. The probability of the presentation of the PM cue 20
2. Research Aims and General Methods 22
2.1. Research aims 22
2.2. General Methods 22
2.2.1. PM encoding/retrieval paradigm 23
2.2.2. Event-related potentials 26
2.3. Overview of the experiments 27
3. Experiment 1 30
3.1. Methods 32
3.2. Results 36
3.3. Discussion 40
4. Experiment 2 43
4.1. Methods 44
4.2. Results 45
4.3. Discussion 49
5. Experiment 3 51
5.1. Methods 53
5.2. Results 56
5.3. Discussion 65
6. General Discussion 67
6.1. Experimental Findings 67
6.2. Further Directions 75
6.3. Conclusions 76
References 77
參考文獻 Breneiser, J. E., & McDaniel, M. a. (2006). Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 837–841. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23224823
Burgess, P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi, G., & Volle, E. (2011). Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2246–57. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.014
Burgess, P. W., Quayle, a, & Frith, C. D. (2001). Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia, 39(6), 545–55. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11257280
Burgess, P. W., Scott, S. K., & Frith, C. D. (2003). The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 906–918. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00327-5
Chen, Y., Huang, X., Jackson, T., & Yang, H. (2009). Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory. Neuroreport, 20(1), 81–6. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831ac700
Chen, Y., Huang, X., Yang, H., Ren, G., Chen, Y., & Yue, C. (2007). Task interference from event-based prospective memory: an event-related potentials study. Neuroreport, 18(18), 1951–5. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f202dd
Cockburn, J. (1995). Task Interruption in Prospective Memory: A Frontal Lobe Function? Cortex, 31(1), 87–97. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80107-4
Cohen, A.-L., Dixon, R. a, Lindsay, D. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). The effect of perceptual distinctiveness on the prospective and retrospective components of prospective memory in young and old adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 57(4), 274–89. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14710865
Cohen, A.-L., West, R., & Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Modulation of the Prospective and Retrospective Components of Memory for Intentions in Younger and Older Adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section B), 8(1), 1–13. doi:10.1076/anec.8.1.1.845
Czernochowski, D., Horn, S., & Bayen, U. J. (2012). Does frequency matter? ERP and behavioral correlates of monitoring for rare and frequent prospective memory targets. Neuropsychologia, 50(1), 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.023
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!? Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18(5), 493–513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. a, Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(3), 327–42. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717–26. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2142956
Einstein, G. O., Mcdaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval : Factors Determining Monitoring Versus Spontaneous Retrieval, 134(3), 327–342. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
Elliott, R. (2003). Executive functions and their disorders. British Medical Bulletin, 65(1), 49–59. doi:10.1093/bmb/65.1.49
Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (2001). Prospective memory: a new focus for research. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(4), 437–50. doi:10.1006/ccog.2001.0504
Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1711–25. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x
Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two‐process model of strategic monitoring in event‐based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 245–256. doi:10.1080/00207590344000178
Guynn, M. J. (2008). Theory of monitoring in prospective memory: Instantiating a retrieval mode and periodic target checking. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 53–76). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Knight, J. B., Ethridge, L. E., Marsh, R. L., & Clementz, B. a. (2010). Neural correlates of attentional and mnemonic processing in event-based prospective memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(February), 5. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.005.2010
Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45(1-3), 19–56. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9083643
Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Loft, S., Kearney, R., & Remington, R. (2008). Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation? Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 139–148. doi:10.3758/MC.36.1.139
Lourenço, J. S., & Maylor, E. A. (2013). Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), (February 2014), 37–41. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.826257
Mansouri, F. a, Tanaka, K., & Buckley, M. J. (2009). Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 10(2), 141–52. doi:10.1038/nrn2538
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Memory & Cognition, 34(8), 1636–43. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489290
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 68–75. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.68
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 861–70. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861
Martin, T., McDaniel, M. a, Guynn, M. J., Houck, J. M., Woodruff, C. C., Bish, J. P., … Tesche, C. D. (2007). Brain regions and their dynamics in prospective memory retrieval: a MEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 64(3), 247–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.010
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S127–S144. doi:10.1002/acp.775
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.tw/books?id=ISTy4MjfRe4C
McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), 605–14. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.605
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 269–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Okuda, J., Fujii, T., Ohtake, H., Tsukiura, T., Yamadori, A., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W. (2007). Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) in time- and event-based prospective memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 64(3), 233–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.009
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–48. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
Pratt, N., Willoughby, A., & Swick, D. (2011). Effects of working memory load on visual selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(June), 57. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00057
Reynolds, J. R., West, R., & Braver, T. (2009). Distinct neural circuits support transient and sustained processes in prospective memory and working memory. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 19(5), 1208–21. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn164
Simons, J. S., Schölvinck, M. L., Gilbert, S. J., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W. (2006). Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 44(8), 1388–97. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.005
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347–61. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12776746
Smith, R. E. (2010). What Costs Do Reveal and Moving Beyond the Cost Debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 1089–1095. doi:10.1037/a0019183
Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 756–77. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.756
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. Clarendon Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.tw/books?id=2699AAAAMAAJ
West, R. (2007). The influence of strategic monitoring on the neural correlates of prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1034–1046.
West, R. (2011). The temporal dynamics of prospective memory: a review of the ERP and prospective memory literature. Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2233–45. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.028
West, R., & Bowry, R. (2005). Effects of aging and working memory demands on prospective memory. Psychophysiology, 42(6), 698–712. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00361.x
West, R., Bowry, R., & Krompinger, J. (2006). The effects of working memory demands on the neural correlates of prospective memory. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.003
West, R., Herndon, R. W., & Covell, E. (2003). Neural correlates of age-related declines in the formation and realization of delayed intentions. Psychology and Aging, 18(3), 461–73. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.461
West, R., Herndon, R. W., & Crewdson, S. J. (2001). Neural activity associated with the realization of a delayed intention. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11489603
West, R., & Krompinger, J. (2005). Neural correlates of prospective and retrospective memory. Neuropsychologia, 43(3), 418–33. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.012
West, R., & Ross-Munroe, K. (2002a). Neural correlates of the formation and realization of delayed intentions. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 162–73. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.2.162
West, R., & Ross-Munroe, K. (2002b). Neural correlates of the formation and realization of delayed intentions. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 162–73. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14518808
West, R., Wymbs, N., Jakubek, K., & Herndon, R. W. (2003). Effects of intention load and background context on prospective remembering: an event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 260–76. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12820867
Whittlesea, B. W., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 3–13. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11204105
Whittlesea, B. W., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 14–33. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11204095
Wilson, J., Cutmore, T. R. H., Wang, Y., Chan, R. C. K., & Shum, D. H. K. (2013). Effects of cue frequency and repetition on prospective memory: An ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.08.003
指導教授 鄭仕坤(Shih-kuen Cheng) 審核日期 2014-7-30
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明