實測與模擬太陽光電系統(含聚光型)性能:中壢及屏東二地的比較

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：18.117.74.96

姓名

柯任鴻(Jen-Hung Ke) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

能源工程研究所

論文名稱

實測與模擬太陽光電系統(含聚光型)性能:中壢及屏東二地的比較
(Performance of PV/CPV System: A Comparison between Jhongli and Pingtung)

相關論文

★ 以數值模擬探討微管流之物理效應	★ 微管流之層流與紊流模擬
★ 銅質均熱片研製	★ 熱差式氣體流量計之感測模式及氣流道效應分析
★ 低溫倉儲噴流系統之實驗量測與數值模擬研究	★ 壓縮微管流的熱流分析
★ 微小圓管的層流及熱傳數值模擬	★ 微型平板流和圓管流的熱流特性：以數值探討壓縮和稀薄效應
★ 微管道電滲流物理特性之數值模擬	★ 電滲泵內多孔介質微流場特性之數值模擬
★ 被動式微混合器之數值模擬	★ 電滲泵的製作與性能測試
★ 叉合型流場於質子交換膜燃料電池之陰極半電池的參數探討	★ 無動件式高流率電滲泵的製作與特性分析
★ 不同型式光纖與集光器搭配之效率測試	★ 微電滲泵之暫態熱流研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文在戶外實測中壢及屏東地區的兩種雙軸追日太陽光電系統（PV和CPV）的電力性能，並使用PVsyst軟體模擬與實驗做比較。在中壢地區，本文比較了二種追日系統（太陽軌跡計算與光感測器）的PV性能，雖然太陽軌跡計算之追日系統的平均追日偏差角度為0.89o，相較於光感測器追日系統的平均偏差角0.3o大，但前者方式可穩定追日而不會受到天候不佳影響。反之，在天氣不佳時，光感測器易受影響而未能正常追日。太陽軌跡計算之追日系統的發電量仍略優於光感測器的追日系統，以十二天的實驗記錄期間，太陽軌跡計算之追日系統的每日平均最終產能為3.92 kWh/kW，而光感測器每日平均最終產能為3.83 kWh/kW。對於PV系統而言，發電量才是決定系統性能的最終指標，故太陽軌跡計算之追日控制仍為一實用且有效的追日方法。
本文藉由量測PV模組的電流電壓特性探討模組於戶外運作的實際性能，顯示在相同日照條件下，模組溫度上升會導致短路電流些微上升，開路電壓下降，導致PV模組整體發電量及效率都下降。
本文利用CPV模組搭配光感測器進行追日，當天氣條件不佳，太陽受到雲層遮蔽或是散射光較強的情況下，使光感測器無法正確感測到太陽位置，就會導致CPV系統輸出功率相當低或為零值。由於CPV模組接受角度僅有0.5o，且只能接受直射日照，因此使用CPV模組需搭配追蹤精度高的追蹤器，才能使其發揮最大效益。
由於日照量為直接影響系統發電量的主要因素，台灣南部日照和PV發電量都優於北部。本文比較相同追日控制（太陽軌跡計算追日）的同型雙軸PV追蹤器分別安裝在中壢及屏東地區的PV系統性能。在實驗期間（2012年12月至2013年5月），中壢及屏東地區的平均最終產能Yf分別為76 kWh/kW、95 kWh/kW，平均PR分別為0.85、0.9。屏東的追日PV性能高於中壢的追日PV。本文受限PV量測時間不長，因此目前的實測數據不足以論斷中壢及屏東地區的PV系統何者為佳。要評估任何一地的PV表現，需分析長時間（一年到數年）的Yf，才能評估一地是否適合安裝PV系統的參考。
由於氣象資料是最直接影響模擬PV發電量的因素，本文利用兩種不同的氣象年資料模擬中壢及屏東PV系統電力性能，發現利用真實年氣象資料模擬屏東雙軸PV系統的模擬誤差較小，而利用平均年概念模擬中壢PV系統電力性能，誤差較大。因此必須考慮適當的氣象資料形式對PV性能模擬影響。

摘要(英)

This study performed outdoor test of performance of the PV/CPV system in two areas (Jhongli and Pingtung), and PVsyst software was used to compare the measurements. In Jhongli, comparison of PV performance between two dual-axis sun-tracking systems (ephemeris calculation and light sensor) were made. The average offset angle of PV system based on ephemeris calculation was 0.89o, which is larger than that of light sensor (average offset angle was 0.3o). Although the former approach is less accurate than the approach of light sensor, but it can stably track the sun and does not affected by the weather. Meanwhile, the light sensor is easy affected by bad weather which prevent it function normally. Yet, the electricity output of the tracking PV system with ephemeris calculation is still better than the PV system using light sensor. For any PV system, electricity is the ultimate factor which decides the performance of PV. Thus, the approach of sun-tracking based on ephemeris calculation is a practical and effective sun-tracking method.
Results of I-V characteristic measurement of PV modules showed realistic performance of modules in outdoor tests. Under the same insolation, the increasing of module temperature causes rise of the short-circuit current and decrease of the open-circuit voltage, these decreased the overall electricity output and efficiency.
The CPV module uses the light sensor to track the sun. In bad weather condition, either clouds block the sun or strong diffuse irradiation will prevent the sensor to detect the sun, which degrade the power output of CPV module. Since the acceptance angle of CPV module is only 0.5o, and it only accept direct irradiation, therefore the CPV module have to use high accuracy tracker and order to maximize its effectiveness.
Since the irradiation directly affects the electricity production, the southern Taiwan has higher irradiation and PV electricity than that of the northern Taiwan. This study uses the same tracking PV with ephemeris calculation to install two system in Jhongli (northern Taiwan) and Pingtung (southern Taiwan), respectively. In the period of experiment (December 2012 to May 2013), the average final yield (Yf) for Jhongli and Pingtung are 76 kWh/kW and 95 kWh/kW, respectively. The average performance ratio (PR) for Jhongli and Pingtung are 0.85 and 0.9, respectively. The performance of tracking PV installed in Pingtung was better than that installed in Jhongli. This study was limited by short period of outdoor measurement of PV, and present experiment data was insufficient to decide the performance of both areas. To properly assess the behavior of PV in any location, Yf of longer time frame (one to several years) should be analyzed.
Due to the meteorological data directly affected the PV electricity production, this study uses two kinds of the meteorological data to simulate the electrical performance of the PV system in Jhongli and Pingtung. It was found that less error was obtained when using the real year meteorological data to simulate the PV system in Pingtung. As for the case of Jhongli, the error is smaller when using the average year meteorological data. Therefore, considering the appropriate type of meteorological data in the simulation of PV performance is important.

關鍵字(中)

★ 戶外雙軸追日PV與CPV性能實測
★ 追日偏差
★ I-V特性曲線
★ PVsyst軟體

關鍵字(英)

★ Performance of PV/CPV system
★ Sun-tracking offset angle
★ I-V characteristic
★ PVsyst software

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract iii
致謝 v
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 x
符號說明 xi
第一章緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 太陽能產業概況及技術 2
1.3文獻回顧 6
1.3.1不同追蹤器影響 6
1.3.2不同模組影響 7
1.3.3 性能分析 8
1.3.4模擬驗證 9
1.4研究動機 10
1.5論文架構 10
第二章實驗型太陽光電系統 11
2.1 系統架構 11
2.2 PV、CPV模組 13
2.3 太陽追蹤器 14
2.4 追日控制系統 15
2.4.1 開迴路控制 15
2.4.2 閉迴路控制 15
2.4.3 混合式控制 17
2.5 實驗數據擷取設備 17
2.5.1 追日偏差角度量測設備 17
2.5.2 系統電力設備 19
2.5.3微型氣象站 19
2.5.4 戶外型太陽電池陣列檢測儀 20
第三章太陽光電模擬分析 22
3.1 PVsyst軟體介紹 22
3.2 模擬架構及參數設定 23
3.3 數學模型 27
3.3.1傾斜面日照量模型 28
3.3.2 PV輸出模型 28
第四章中壢及屏東地區PV、CPV系統性能 30
4.1 PV、CPV系統性能分析參數 30
4.2 屏東地區雙軸PV系統性能分析實驗與模擬數據比較 31
4.2.1 雙軸PV系統實驗數據 31
4.2.2 雙軸PV系統模擬結果 34
4.3中壢地區雙軸PV系統性能分析實驗與模擬數據比較 37
4.3.1開迴路控制系統實驗數據(Tracker A) 37
4.3.2閉迴路控制系統實驗數據 (Tracker B) 38
4.3.3雙軸PV系統模擬結果 40
4.4 中壢與屏東地區PV雙軸系統性能實驗數據比較 44
4.5 中壢地區雙軸CPV系統性能模擬結果 50
4.7中壢地區雙軸PV、CPV系統性能實驗數據比較 54
4.8 參數對模擬誤差的影響 56
4.8.1 氣象資料 56
4.8.2 傾斜面日照量模型 57
4.9 I-V特性曲線量測 58
第五章結論與建議 63
5.1結論 63
5.2未來改進方向 64
參考文獻 65

參考文獻

Azhar, G.M., Abdul-Malek, A.R. (2012) The performance of three different solar panels for solar electricity applying solar tracking device under the Malaysian climate condition, Energy and Environment Research, 2(1), 235-243.
Barnett, A., Crowley, L., Farris, C. (2003) Solar electric power, The U.S. Photovoltaic Industry Roadmap
Cancro, C., Graditi, G., Leanza, G., Pascarella, F., Sarno, A., Mancini, D. (2007) Field testing of the PhoCUS solar tracker by means of a novel optoelectronic device, 4th Intern. Conf. on Solar Concentrators for the Generation of Electricity or Hydrogen, San Lorenzo del Escorial, Spain, 12-16.
Carr, A.J., Pryor, T.L. (2004) A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates, Solar Energy 76, 285-294.
DERlab (2011) DERlab technical guidelines on long-term PV module outdoor test 100 – 01, DERlab.
European Photovoltaic Industry Association (2012) Global market outlook for photovoltaics until 2016
Firth, S.K., Lomas, K.J., Rees, S.J. (2010) A simple model of PV system performance and its use in fault detection, Solar Energy, 84, 624-635.
Gómez-Gil F.J., Wang, X., Barnett, A. (2012) Energy production of photovoltaic systems: Fixed, tracking, and concentrating, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 306-313.
Hay, J.E., Davies, J.A. (1980) Calculation of the solar radiation incident on an inclined surface. In: Hay, J.E., Won, T.K. (Eds.), Proc. of First Canadian Solar Radiation Data Workshop.
Hung, B.J., Ding, W.L., Huang, Y.C. (2011) Long-term field test of solar PV power generation using one-axis 3-position sun tracker, Solar Energy, 85, 1935-1944.
Kacira, M., Simsek, M., Babur, Y., Demirkol, S. (2004) Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey, Renewable Energy, 29, 1265-1275.
Khalifa, A.N., Al-Mutawalli, S.S. (1998) Effect of two-axis sun tracking on the performance of compound parabolic concentrators, Energy Conversion Management, 39, 1073-1079.
Klise, G.T., Stein, J.S. (2009) Models used to assess the performance of photovoltaic systems, SAND 2009-8258.
Koussa, M., Cheknane, A., Hadji, S., Haddadi, M., Noureddine, S. (2011) Measured and modelled improvement in solar energy yield from flat photovoltaic systems utilizing different tracking systems and under a range of environmental conditions, Applied Energy, 88, 1756-1771.
Liu B.Y.H., Jordan, R.C. (1963) The long-term average performance of flat-plate solar energy collectors, Solar Energy, 7(2), 53-74.
Lalwani, M., Kothari, D.P., Singh, M. (2010) Investigation of solar PV simulation softwares, Inter. J. Applied Engineering Research, 1(3), 585-601.
Loulas, N.M., Karteris, M.M., Pilavachi, P.A., Papadopoulos, A.M. (2012) Photovoltaics in urban environment: A case study for typical apartment buildings in Greece, Renewable Energy, 48, 453-463.
Makrides, G., Zinsser, B., Georghiou, G.E., Schubert, M., Werner J.H. (2009) Temperature behavior of different photovoltaic systems installed in Cyprus and Germany, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 93,1095–1099.
Mattei, M., Notton G., Cristofari, C., Muselli, M., Poggi, P. (2006) Calculation of the polycrystalline PV module temperature using a simple method of energy balance, Renewable Energy, 31, 553-567.
Meike, W. (1998) Hot climate performance comparison between poly-crystalline and amorphous silicon cells connected to an utility mini-grid, Solar 98, Christchurch NZ.
Meyer, E.L., van Dyk, E.E. (2004) Assessing the reliability and degradation of photovoltaic module performance parameters, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53(1), 83-92.
Mondol, J.D., Yohanis, Y.G., Norton, B. (2007) Comparison of measured and predicted long term performance of grid connected photovoltaic system. Energy Conversion and Management, 48, 1065-80.
Perez, R., Ineichen, P., Seals, R., Michalsky, J., Stewart, R. (1990) Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy 44 (5), 271–289.
Phowan, A., Sripadungtham P., Limmanee A., Hattha E. (2011) Performance analysis of polycrystalline silicon and thin film amorphous silicon solar cells installed in Thailand by using simulation software, The 8th ECTI Association of Thailand – Conference.
PVsyst (2012), User’s guide, University of Geneva.
Reda, I., Andreas, A. (2008) Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications, NREL/TP-560-34302.
Reindl, D.T., Beckmann, W.A., Duﬃe, J.A. (1990) Diffuse fraction correlations, Solar Energy 45 (1), 1–7.
Van, Dyk, E.E., Gxasheka, A.R., Meyer, E.L. (2005) Monitoring current-voltage characteristics and energy output of silicon photovoltaic modules, Renewable Energy, 30, 399-411.
Wang, C.C., Lin, K.J., Koo, H.S. (2011) Study on conversion efficiency of photovoltaic system with sun-tracking and fixed solar modules under various illumination, The 21st Intern. Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference.
林武君（2012）影像視覺追日偏差量測技術開發與太陽光電系統之實測，國立中央大學能源工程研究所碩士論文。
林憲德和張思源（1987），建築空調耗能分析用平均氣象年資料之研究，國科會研究計畫，編號NSC75-0410-E006-33，p.3。
周建仁（2011），太陽電池短路電流法追日控制器之研發，國立中央大學機械工程研究所碩士論文。
劉佳宜(2007)，太陽光電產業製程與技術發展趨勢，COMPOTECH Asia，100期
「綠色能源產業旭升方案」行動計畫（2009），行政院經濟部。

指導教授

吳俊諆

審核日期

2013-7-25

推文