博碩士論文 100356007 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:14 、訪客IP:18.191.171.235
姓名 劉俊其(Chun-chi Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 環境工程研究所
論文名稱 以員工期望探討企業社會責任指標
(Using Employee Expectation as A Corporate Social Responsibility Index)
相關論文
★ 氫氟酸玻璃薄化製程之安全評估與風險控制★ 台北縣毒性化學物質運作場所災害潛勢分析
★ 潛盾隧道作業安全分析★ ISO 50001能源管理系統建置機制研究
★ 廢棄物管理e化系統設計與應用★ 印刷電路板製程高溫烘烤設備失效模式與效應分析研究
★ 承攬風險管理★ 光電業組立製程人因風險探討
★ 濺鍍耙材噴砂作業粉塵及噪音暴露危害評估★ 光電廠增光膜製程健康風險評估與控制
★ 行為安全執行策略探討-以某紡絲事業單位為例★ 高階製程安全管理架構
★ 工業化學品整合管理制度探討★ 半導體業承攬作業風險評估
★ 職業安全衛生績效管理機制★ 事件樹於職業安全風險評估應用研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 企業社會責任是任何企業組織持續經營及永續發展所需面對的核心議題,然而,台灣地區的中小企業面臨企業社會責任議題,參與性仍顯得較不積極。本研究採用廣泛使用之全球報告倡議組織所提出「GRI 永續性報告綱領」3.0版作為評估中小企業參與企業社會責任的可行性。
依據管理系統運作因素及永續性報告綱領中經濟、環境、勞工及尊嚴工作、人權、社會、產品責任等績效指標作為問卷調查基礎,並經專家檢視問項及進行前測效度及信度檢驗,以受訪者員工自身變項因素探討企業於執行企業社會責任各項績效指標優先順序。由於中小企業較不易由外部利害相關者期望作為規劃企業社會責任相關事宜,因此本研究設計上除以企業員工作為內部利害相關者進行問卷查訪外,並利用公開網路調查與回收,以作為問卷樣本背景及後續探討。
以敘述統計、單因子變異數及多準則相加模式驗證分析1,087回收問卷,調查結果顯示以員工自身變項(性別、年齡、教育程度、工作年資、產業別、身分群組、參與密度與參與權責時)不同,對於企業執行企業社會責任認知有顯著影響。其次,以員工的期望及認知排序可作為企業執行企業社會責任各項指標的優先順序。企業可檢視自身資源並妥善分配,可作為進行企業社會責任運作先期規劃,使逐一達到企業社會責任工作各績效指標揭露。此外,研究中提出方式亦可應用於中小企業評估員工以外的其他利害相關者期望,以作為整合建立企業社會責任工作。
關鍵詞:企業社會責任、利害相關者、全球報告倡議組織、利害相關者參與
摘要(英) Corporate social responsibility, CSR, is a core issue for any organization committed to sustainable development. However, it is uncommon for small and medium-sized enterprises, SMEs, to engage in corporate social responsibility. This study attempts to evaluate the feasibility of SMEs’ engagement in CSR. Because of its global acceptance, the Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Version 3.0 proposed by the Global Reporting Initiative are adopted in this research.
Questionnaires are designed based on the performance indicators of economic, environmental, labor practices, decent work, human rights, society, and product responsibility. To provide sufficient background information to respondents, respective aspects of each performance indicator are also included in the questionnaire. Applicability of the questionnaires is refined through an experts review process. This study only considers employees as the primary stakeholders. This is due to the fact that external stakeholders of a small and medium-sized company are relatively reluctant to engage in the CSR reporting process. To collect as many returned questionnaires as possible, social media is utilized in addition to in-house surveys.
Sophisticated statistical analysis methods are used to analyze 1,087 returned questionnaires. Results of the survey indicate that personal background such as gender, age, education, tenure, etc. strongly affect the respondents’ perception on CSR. Secondly, employees’ preference on the ranking of the performance indicators can be used to prioritize an organization’s social responsibility programs and to allocate limited resources. Approaches proposed in this study can also be used by a SME to engage other stakeholders other than its own employees.
Keywords : Corporate social responsibility, Stakeholders, Global reporting initiative, Stakeholders engagement
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業社會責任
★ 全球報告倡議組織
★ 利害相關者參與
關鍵字(英) ★ Corporate social responsibility
★ Global reporting initiative
★ Stakeholders engagement
論文目次 摘要……………………i
Abstract……………………ii
誌謝……………………iii
目錄……………………iv
圖目錄……………………vii
表目錄……………………viii
第一章 緒論……………………1
1.1 研究背景與動機……………………1
1.2 研究目的……………………4
1.3 研究流程……………………5
1.4 研究範圍與限制……………………6
第二章 文獻探討……………………7
2.1 企業社會責任……………………7
2.1.1 企業社會責意涵……………………8
2.1.2 企業社會責任概念發展……………………13
2.2 企業社會責任標準與規範……………………16
2.2.1 企業社會責任國際相關標準與規範……………………16
2.2.2 企業社會責任規範分類……………………25
2.2.3 GRI永續性報告綱領……………………29
2.3 員工在利害相關者角色……………………41
第三章 研究方法……………………45
3.1 研究架構……………………45
3.2 問卷設計……………………47
3.2.1 依變數設定與定義……………………47
3.2.2 自變數項目編寫……………………48
3.2.3 自變數量測工具……………………48
3.2.4 專家訪談與問卷修正……………………49
3.3 資料分析方法……………………50
3.3.1 信度分析……………………51
3.3.2 效度分析……………………52
3.3.3 敘述性統計分析……………………52
3.4 預測問卷……………………53
3.4.1 預測問卷樣本數……………………53
3.4.2 預測結果信度與效度分析……………………53
3.5 實測問卷……………………57
第四章 問卷調查結果與分……………………58
4.1 回收問卷樣本資料……………………58
4.1.1 實測問卷樣本數……………………58
4.1.2 實測結果信度與效度分析……………………61
4.2 實測因素分析結果……………………64
4.3 敘述統計分析……………………66
4.3.1 內部推動管理系統關鍵因素調查(MS)敘述統計量說明……………66
4.3.2 經濟績效指標重要度調查(EC)敘述統計量說明……………………66
4.3.3 環境績效指標重要度調查(EN)敘述統計量說明……………………67
4.3.4 勞工及尊嚴工作績效績指標重要度調查(LA)敘述統計量說明……68
4.3.5 人權績效指標重要度調查(HR)敘述統計量說明……………………69
4.3.6 社會績效指標重要度調查(SO)敘述統計量說明……………………69
4.2.7 產品責任績效指標重要度調查(PR)敘述統計量說明………………70
4.4 單因子變異數分析……………………71
4.4.1 管理系統推行關鍵因素(MS)單因子變異數分析………………………71
4.4.2 經濟績效指標重要度調查(EC)單因子變異數分析……………………72
4.4.3 環境績效指標重要度調查(EN)單因子變異數分析……………………74
4.4.4 勞工及尊嚴工作績效指標重要度調查(LA)單因子變異數分析………76
4.4.5 人權績效指標重要度調查(HR)單因子變異數分析……………………77
4.6.6 社會績效指標重要度調查(SO)單因子變異數分析……………………79
4.4.7 產品責任績效指標重要度調查(PR)單因子變異數分析………………80
4.5 單因子變異數分析比較……………………81
4.5.1 受訪者變項於內部推動管理系統關鍵因素調查(MS)分析比較………81
4.5.2 受訪者變項於經濟績效指標重要度調查(EC)分析比較………………82
4.5.3 受訪者變項於環境績效指標重要度調查(EN)分析比較………………83
4.5.4 受訪者變項於勞工及尊嚴工作績效指標重要度調查(LA)分析比較…84
4.5.5 受訪者變項於人權績效指標重要度調查(HR)分析比較………………85
4.5.6 受訪者變項於社會績效指標重要度調查(SO)分析比較………………86
4.5.7 受訪者變項於產品責任績效指標重要度調查(PR)分析比較…………86
4.6 多準則相加模式……………………87
4.6.1 各族群對於GRI考量面重要性成績加總……………………87
4.6.2 受訪者變項群組對於GRI指標重要性變異數排序……………………88
4.6.3 受訪者變項群組對於GRI指標重要性相加數排序……………………90
第五章 結論與建議……………………95
5.1 結論……………………95
5.1.1 員工對於企業社會責任考量面重要性……………………95
5.1.2 對於企業執行GRI等級之執行指標先後順序……………………99
5.2 建議……………………100
參考文獻……………………102
附錄一 GRI G 3.1標準揭露架構……………………109
附錄二 問卷……………………116
參考文獻 1.Archie B. Carroll, Kareem M. Shabana(2010), The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility:A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice, International Iournal of Management Reviews, 12(1), pp. 85–105.
2.魏文欽、莊怡萱(2009),企業社會責任、企業形象、消費者態度與行為意向關係之實證研究,大葉大學事業經營研究所,彰化:大葉大學。
3.中小企業白皮書書(2011),台北市:經濟部中小企業處。
4.滙豐銀行、台灣環境資訊協會,http://www.hsbc.com.tw/1/2/about.hsbc_zh_TW/about-hsbc/media-release/media-release2009/090623
5.Corporate Register.com, http://www.corporateregister.com/
6.Max B. E. Clarkson(1995), A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, 20, pp.92–117.
7.遠見雜誌編輯部(2008),遠見雜誌第262期,2008年4月號,台北市:天下遠見。
8.高希均、林宜諄(2008),企業社會責任入門手冊,台北市:天下遠見。
9.Oliver Sheldon(1924), The Philosophy of Management., London: Sir Isaac. Pitman and Sons Ltd.
10.Howard Rothmann Bowen(1953), Social Responsibilities of the Business, New York:Harper & Row.
11.John Elkington(1998), Cannibals with Forks, The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century, Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers.
12.維基百科,企業社會責任,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E8%B2%AC%E4%BB%BB
13.吳坤平(2012),企業倫理與社會責任–西方國家企業社會責任的發展與影響,中山大學公共事務研究所,高雄:中山大學。
14.William C. Frederick(1960), The Growing Concern Over Business Responsibility, California Management Review, 2(4), pp. 54–61.
15.Keith Davis(1960), Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), pp. 70–76.
16.Joseph William McGuire(1963), Business and Socitty, New York:Mcgran Hill, pp.144.
17.Clarence Cyril Walton(1967), Corporate Social Responsibilities, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
18.Milton Friedman(1970), The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, York New:New York Times Magazine.
19.George A. Steiner(1971), Business and Society, New York:Random House.
20.Richard Sedric Fox Eells, Clarence Cyril Walton(1974), Conceptual Foundations of Business(3rd ed.), Burr Ridge, Illinois:Irwin.
21.Keith Davis, Robert L. Blomstrom(1975), Business and Soviety:Envionment and Responsibility(3rd ed.), NewYork:Mcgran Hill.
22.S. Prakash Sethi(1975), Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Analytic Framework, California Management Review, 17(3), pp. 58–64.
23.H. Gordon Fitch (1976), Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 1(1), pp. 38–46.
24.Archie B. Carroll(1981), Business and Society:Managing Corporate Social Performance, Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
25.Archie B. Carroll(1979), A Three – Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), pp. 497–505.
26.William C. Frederick(1983), Point of View Corporate Social Responsibility in the Reagan Era and Beyond, California Management Review, 25(3), pp. 145–157.
27.Duffy A. Morf, Michael G Schumacher, Scott J. Vitell(1999), A Survey of Ethics Officers in Organigation, Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), pp. 265–271.
28.盧代富(2002),企業社會責任的經濟學與法學分析,北京:法律出版社。
29.Michael Hopkins(2003), The Planetary Bargain:Corporate Social Responsibility Matters, London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.
30.Odies C. Ferrell, John Fraedrich, Linda Ferrell(2005), Business Ethics:Ethical Decision Making and Cases, Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
31.John R. Boatright(2007), Reluctant Guardians:The Moral Responsibility of Gatekeepers, Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 613–632.
32.葉保強(2007),企業社會責任的發展與國家角色,應用倫理研究通訊第41期,2007年2月,頁35–47。
33.台灣企業社會責任協會(2013),http://www.csrtaiwan.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11&Itemid=25
34.中國石油(2013),http://161.207.8.13:82/gate/big5/csr.cnpc.com.cn/csr/zsk/shzr/
35.ISO/DIS 26000:2010(2010), Guidance on Social Responsibility, International Organization for Standardization,ISO.
36.香港特別行政區(2011),香港中小企業 – 企業責任指引,香港:企業社會責任亞洲,香港社會服務聯會。
37.Joseph William McGuire(1963), Bussinese and Society, New Year:McGuire – Hill.
38.Keith Davis(1960), Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, pp.70-76.
39.Keith Davis, Robert L. Blomstrom(1975), Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility, New Year:McGuire–Hill. pp. 39.
40.Milton Friedman(1970), A Friedman Doctrine:The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, pp. 33.
41.Henry Manne, Henry C. Wallich(1972), The Modem Corporation and Social Responsibility. Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
42.Waldemar Hopfenbeck(1992), Management Revolution:Lessons in Environmental Excellence, Hemel Hempstead:Prentice Hall.
43.Patrick E. Murphy(1978), An Evolution:Corporate Social Responsiveness, University of Michigan Business Review, November, 6(30), 20–22.
44.葉淑娟(1988),企業社會責任之研究 – 聯合分析法之應用,台灣大學商學研究所論文,台北市:台灣大學。
45.Robert Hay, Ed. Gray(1974), Social Responsibility of Business Manager. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 135–143.
46.Ricky W. Griffin(1999), Management, 6rd ed., Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
47.Lois A. Mohr, Deborah J Webb, and Katherine E. Harris(2001), Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible:The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), pp. 45–72.
48.Roy Jacob Epstein(1987), A History of Econometrics, New York:North–Holland.
49.Archie B. Carroll(1996), Business and Society:Ethics and Stakeholder Management, Ohio: South–Western College Publishing Co. pp.49.
50.Norman E. Bowie(1999), Busness Ethics:A Kantian Perspective, Malden, Malden, Mass and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
51.Armando Calabrese, Roberta Costa, Tamara Menichini, Francesco Rosati, Gaetano Sanfelice(2012), Corporate Social Responsibility–Driven Opportunities in Competitive Advantages:a Two–Dimensional Model. Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 20, 1(1), pp. 50–58.
52.Archie B. Carroll(1995), Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati, Ohio:South–Western.
53.John Elkington(2001), The Chrysalis Economy–How Citizen CEO’s and Corporations Can Fuse Values and Value Creation, Oxford:Capstone Publishing Ltd.
54.Malcolm McIntosh, Ruth Thomas, Deborah Leipziger and Gill Coleman(2003), Living Corporate Citizenship–Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business, London:Financial Times Prentice Hall.
55.經濟部工業局產業發展整合資訊網(2013),http://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/CSR/dutyinfo-more.asp?nplSjV==
56.Malcolm McIntosh, Ruth Thomas, Deborah Leipziger and Gill Coleman(2003), International Standards for Corporate Responsibility, Ethical Corporation Magazine, 13, pp. 22–29.
57.Kenneth J. Arrow(1973), Social Responsibility and Economic Effi–ciency, Public Policy, 11, pp. 303.
58.經濟部工業局產業永續發展整合資訊網(2013),http://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/CSR/dutyinfo-more.asp?nplShl==
59.台灣企業社會責任協會(2013),http://www.csrtaiwan.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=47&Itemid=1
60.Sheila J. Bosch, Annie R. Pearce(2003), Sustainability in Public Facilities: Analysis of Guidance Documents, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 17(1), pp.9–18.
61.全球報告倡議組織(2011),可持續發展報告指南中文版,全球報告倡議組織,頁RG19。
62.Global Rprting Initiative, https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx
63.GRI G4 Part1 Implementation Manual, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4–Part1–Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf
64.GRI G4 Part2 Implementation Manual, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4–Part2–Implementation-Manual.pdf
65.R. Edward Freeman(1984), Strategic Management:A Stakeholder Approach, Boston:Pitman.
66.Tiziana Casciaro, Mikotaj Jan Piskorski(2005), Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption:A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), pp. 167–199.
67.Van der Laan, Hans Van Ees, Arjen Van Witteloostuijn(2008), Corporate Social and Financial Performance:An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures, Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 79(3), pp. 299–310.
68.Anusorn Singhapakdi, Scott J. Vitell, Kumar C. Rallapalli, Kenneth L. Kraft Journal(1996),The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility:A Scale Development, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), pp. 1131–1140.
69.Kenneth E. Goodpaster(1991), Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis, Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, pp.53–73.
70.黃英忠、蔡正飛(2002),從利害關係人理論來探索企業的人力精簡策略 –以一個中外合資企業之個案為例,人力資源管論文與案例發表會論文集,中華人力資源管理學會。
71.Sean Valentine, Gary Fleischman(2008), Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction Journal Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), pp. 159–172.
72.林宜諄(2005),2005企業社會責任大調查 – 企業的公民成績單,遠見雜誌,2005年6月,頁128–133。
73.朗.富勒(Lon L. Fuller),鄭戈譯(2010),法律的道德性,臺北市:五南。
74.Deborah E. Rupp, Jyoti Ganapathi, Ruth V. Aguilera, Cynthia A. Williams (2006), Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: an Organizational Justice Framework, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), pp. 537–543.
75.Duygu Turker (2009), How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), pp. 189–204.
76.古佳蓉(2009),企業社會責任表現對消費者消費意向之影響,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文,高雄:中山大學。
77.Sean Valentine, Gary Fleischman(2008), Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction, Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), pp. 159–172.
78.ISO 19011:2002(2002), Provides Guidance on the Principles of Auditing a Quality and / or Environmental Management System, International Organization for Standardization, ISO.
79.Jum C. Nunally(1978), Psychometric Theory,(3nd ed.), New York:McGraw – Hill, pp. 595.
80.D. V. Cicchetti, D. Showalter, P. J. Tyrer(1985), The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability:A Monte Carlo Investigation, Applied Psychological Mea Surement, 9 , pp. 31–36.
81.G. Douglas Jenkins Jr., Thomas D. Taber,(1977), A Monte Carlo Study of Factors Affecting Three Indices of Composite Scale Seliability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp.392–398.
82.Gene Brown, Robert E. Widing, Ronald L. Coulter,(1991) Customer Evaluation of Retail Salespeople Utilizing the SOCO Sca1e:Replication, Extension, and Application, Journal of the Academy 01, Marketing Science, 9, pp. 347–351.
83.遠見雜誌編輯部(2010),CSR調查–第六屆遠見企業社會責任獎,遠見雜誌第285期,遠見雜誌2010年3月號,台北市:天下遠見,頁78–85。
指導教授 于樹偉(Shuh-woei Yu) 審核日期 2013-7-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明