以五大人格特質理論及主觀規範探討團隊知識分享之影響因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：9

、訪客IP：3.135.190.232

姓名

翁柏登(Bo-deng Weng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

以五大人格特質理論及主觀規範探討團隊知識分享之影響因素

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

全球正處於以知識為基礎的新經濟時代，知識與創新將改變個人、企業、甚至國家，面對知識經濟時代的來臨，團隊若想保持競爭力及競爭優勢，就必須懂得創造知識的價值。本研究主要目的是以五大人格特質與主觀規範為基礎，探討團隊知識分享行為之因素，透過彙整先前研究知識分享之主觀規範前置因素以及運用五種不同人格特質，分析影響知識貢獻與知識接收的各種因素，目的在提供團隊成員一個廣泛多元的思考方向，落實團隊知識分享。
　　本研究透過網路問卷調查，以參與過工作團隊、學生團隊、網路團隊之團員作為調查對象，共回收368份問卷，有效問卷為308份 (回收率占84%)。本研究以結構方程式進行資料分析，研究結果顯示，測量模型信、效度良好，而在驗證假說檢定方面則發現：(1)對於知識分享構面，主觀規範對於知識貢獻以及知識收集皆為正向顯著關係；(2)對於五大人格特質構面，外向性對知識貢獻、親和性對知識貢獻與知識收集、盡責性對知識貢獻、經驗開放性對知識收集有顯著關係，其餘則無；(3)主觀規範前置因素構面，團隊支持與信任、自我價值感、高階管理支持、共同目標皆對主觀規範形成有正向顯著關係，而團隊隸屬感、團隊公平性則無顯著關係；(4) 在調節效果方面，所屬團隊性質不同對於主觀規範對知識貢獻有調節效果。

摘要(英)

This study tries to explore the team member’s behavior on knowledge sharing. On the basis of Big Five and subjective norm, this study examines factors which influence the team member’s knowledge contributing and collecting by integrating antecedents of subjective norm of knowledge sharing in previous studies and using Big Five. Then, according to empirical results, the study provides multi-thinking for the team member to carry out knowledge sharing.
This study collects 368 samples in total by using internet questionnaires. Analyzing upon 308 usable responses by structural equation modelling reveals that the measurement model has good reliability and validity. The empirical results show that (1) for Knowledge Sharing construct, Subjective Norm has significantly positive effect on both knowledge contributing and collecting; (2) for Big Five construct, Extraversion and Conscientiousness toward knowledge contributing and Openness to Experience toward knowledge collecting have significantly positive effect; Agreeableness toward both knowledge contributing and collecting also has. However, Neuroticism has no significant impact. (3) for the construct of antecedents of Subjective Norm, Team Support and Trust, Sense of Self-Worth, Top Management Support and Shared Goal Perceived Behavior Control have a positive relationship with Subjective Norm, but Team Affiliation and Team Fairness haven’t.

關鍵字(中)

★ 團隊
★ 知識貢獻
★ 知識收集
★ 知識分享
★ 五大人格特質
★ 主觀規範
★ 因素分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Team
★ Knowledge Collecting
★ Knowledge Contributing
★ Knowledge Sharing
★ Big Five
★ Subjective Norm
★ Factor Analysis

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 IX
第一章、緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3研究流程 5
第二章、文獻探討 6
2.1團隊知識分享 6
2.1.1知識分享的定義 6
2.1.2知識分享的動機 7
2.1.3知識貢獻與知識收集 10
2.1.4知識分享之相關研究 11
2.2主觀規範 11
2.2.1主觀規範的定義 11
2.2.2主觀規範構面 12
2.2.3知識分享與主觀規範前置因素 13
2.2.4主觀規範之相關研究 16
2.3人格特質 16
2.3.1人格特質的定義 17
2.3.2人格特質的分類與發展 17
2.3.3五大人格特質 18
2.3.4五大人格特質之相關研究 20
第三章、研究方法 22
3.1抽樣方式與抽樣對象 22
3.2資料分析方法 22
3.2.1敘述性統計分析 22
3.2.2因素分析 23
3.2.3信度檢定 23
3.2.4效度檢定 23
3.2.5假設驗證 24
3.3變數定義與衡量 25
3.4問卷設計與內容 28
3.5問項資料與因素分析 36
3.5.1問項統計資料 36
3.5.2因素分析 38
3.6研究架構 42
3.7研究假說 44
第四章、資料分析 51
4.1樣本資料分析 51
4.2測量模型之信效度分析 54
4.2.1信度分析 56
4.2.2效度分析 57
4.3結構方程模式與調節效果之測量分析 62
4.3.1模型配適度檢定 62
4.3.2研究假說驗證與結果 63
第五章、結論與建議 70
5.1研究結果 70
5.2管理意涵 74
5.2.1對理論的貢獻 74
5.2.2對實務的貢獻 75
5.3研究限制與未來研究建議 76
參考文獻 78
附錄一問卷 86

參考文獻

中文部分
1. 吳有順. (2000). 網路社群知識分享過程之研究─以企業管理教學網站為例, 國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文.
2. 周希炯. (2003). 學習動機, 人格特質與學習滿意間關係之研究—以私立大學商管學程碩士在職專班為例. 台北: 淡江大學商管學院高階主管管理學程碩士論文. 未出版.
3. 周昭臣 (2006)，「探討網路知識分享的促成因素－以Yahoo!奇摩知識+為例」，東吳大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文
4. 周惠英. (1999). 派駐大陸人員之人格特質與組織社會化戰術對組織承諾之影響. 高雄: 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
5. 陳正昌. (2005). 多變量分析方法: 統計軟體應用. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
英文部分
1. Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F., & Carley, K. M. (2003). Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49(1), 21-38.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I. (2002). "Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1".Journal of Applied SocialPsychology32(4): 665-683.
4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
5. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i.
6. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
8. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
9. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of applied psychology, 83(3), 377.
10. Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(3), 729.
11. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
12. Besser, A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Mediation of the effects of the big five personality dimensions on negative mood and confirmed affective expectations by perceived situational stress: A quasi-field study of vacationers. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1333-1346.
13. Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 30(4), 411-420.
14. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 87-111.
15. Brockner, J. (1988). "The Effects of Work Layoffs OnSurvivors: Research, Theory, and Practice,"Research in Organizational Behavior (10), pp.213-256.
16. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). "Alternative ways of assessing model fit." Sage Focus Editions154: 136-136.
17. Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
18. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 38(4), 476.
19. Chen, C. J., & Hung, S. W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226-236.
20. Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170-175.
21. Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study. MIS quarterly, 34(4).
22. Chong, C. W., Teh, P. L., & Tan, B. C. (2013). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter?. Educational Studies, (ahead-of-print), 1-25.
23. Chong, C. W., Teh, P. L., & Tan, B. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter?. Educational Studies, 40(1), 1-25.
24. Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
25. Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301.
26. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization science, 7(2), 119-135.
27. Costa Jr, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of tshe NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898.
28. Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 414-436.
29. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
30. Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Ou, C. X. (2012). The Roles of Theory in Canonical Action Research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3).
31. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
32. Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). Research note-how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 93-105.
33. Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Harvard Business Press.
34. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., Hall, M., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
35. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
36. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(1).
37. French, JP, & Raven, BH (1959). The bases of social power. In D.Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power.
38. Friedman M. & Rosenman R.H.(1976). Type A Behavior and Your Heart. New York Knoph. General Psychology,190, 189–199.
39. Galton, F. (1949). The Measurement of Character.
40. Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy within the Organizational Context An Empirical Examination. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 48-70.
41. Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual review of sociology, 8(1), 1-33.
42. Guieford, J. P.(1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education.
43. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis 5th Edition Prentice-Hall International.
44. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and process management, 6(2), 91-100.
45. Herbert, T. T. (1976). Dimensions of organizational behavior. Macmillan.
46. Hinds, P. J., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Why organizations don’t “know what they know”: Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management, 3-26.
47. Hislop, D. (2002). Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology. Journal of Information Technology, 17(3), 165-177.
48. Ho, S. C., Ting, P. H., Bau, D. Y., & Wei, C. C. (2011). Knowledge-Sharing intention in a virtual community: a study of participants in the Chinese Wikipedia. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 541-545.
49. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments . Psychological Assessment Resources.
50. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
51. Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 72-79.
52. Jewels, T., & Ford, M. (2006). Factors influencing knowledge sharing in information technology projects. E-service Journal, 5(1), 99-117.
53. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 85(5), 751.
54. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
55. Kang, Y. J., Kim, S. E., & Chang, G. W. (2008). The impact of knowledge sharing on work performance: an empirical analysis of the public employees′ perceptions in South Korea. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 31(14), 1548-1568.
56. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly, 113-143
57. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS quarterly, 23(2).
58. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public opinion quarterly, 25(1), 57-78.
59. Kenny, D. A. (2011). Measuring model fit. Retrieved November, 29, 2011.
60. Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process. Harvard business review.
61. Kim, Y., & Lee, B. (1995). R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach. R&D Management, 25(2), 179-196.
62. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472-477.
63. Koys, D. J., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1991). Inductive measures of psychological climate. Human Relations, 44(3), 265-285.
64. Lekvall, P., & Wahlbin, C. (1973). A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion functions. The Swedish journal of economics, 362-377.
65. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326.
66. Lin, H. F. (2006). Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 26-35.
67. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.
68. Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2004). Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge-sharing behaviour. Management Decision, 42(1), 108-125.
69. Lounsbury, J. W., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M., & Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 395-406.
70. Matsuo, M., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2008). Beyond the knowledge sharing dilemma: the role of customisation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 30-43.
71. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81.
72. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2), 175-215.
73. McDermott, R., & O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 76-85.
74. McLure Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 155-173.
75. Merali, Y. (2000). Individual and collective congruence in the knowledge management process. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 213-234.
76. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
77. Nonaka, I. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford university press.
78. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. Oldham, G. R. (2003). Stimulating and supporting creativity in organizations. Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management, 243-273.
80. Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). After the disaster: Using the Big-Five to predict changes in mental health among survivors of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22(5), 456-466.
81. Pi, S. M., Chou, C. H., & Liao, H. L. (2013). A study of Facebook Groups members’ knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1971-1979.
82. Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management, 50(4), 144-153.
83. Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva, 51(2), 131-154.
84. Roger, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 41, 1002-1037.
85. Rosen, P. A., & Kluemper, D. H. (2008). The impact of the big five personality traits on the acceptance of social networking website.
86. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1.
87. Ryu, S., Ho, S. H., & Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(1), 113-122.
88. Sandve, A., & Øgaard, T. (2014). Exploring the interaction between perceived ethical obligation and subjective norms, and their influence on CSR-related choices. Tourism Management, 42, 177-180.
89. Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS quarterly, 139-163.
90. Senge, P. (1997). Sharing knowledge: the leader′s role is key to a learning culture. Executive Excellence, 14, 17-17.
91. Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistic methods. Eighths Edition, Iowa.
92. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 240..
93. Sun, P. Y. T., & Scott, J. L. (2005). An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer. Journal of knowledge management, 9(2), 75-90.
94. Sutanto, J., & Jiang, Q. (2013). Knowledge seekers’ and contributors’ reactions to recommendation mechanisms in knowledge management systems. Information & Management, 50(5), 258-263.
95. Sveiby, K. E. (2007). Disabling the context for knowledge work: the role of managers′ behaviours. Management Decision, 45(10), 1636-1655.
96. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(WINTER), 27-43.
97. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). An integrated model of waste management behavior A test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 603-630.
98. Teh, P. L., Yong, C. C., Chong, C. W., & Yew, S. Y. (2011). Do the Big Five Personality Factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1).
99. Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self‐efficacy for participating in self‐managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 349-362.
100. Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M. (2010). Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 611-631.
101. Tokar, D. M., & Subich, L. M. (1997). Relative contributions of congruence and personality dimensions to job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 482-491.
102. Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. (1998). Need for Supervision Its Impact on Leadership Effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(4), 486-501.
103. Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management journal, 38(1), 152-173.
104. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological bulletin, 96(3), 465.
105. Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. A., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 164.
106. Wolfe, C., & Loraas, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing: the effects of incentives, environment, and person. Journal of information systems, 22(2), 53-76.
107. Wolff, H. G., & Kim, S. (2012). The relationship between networking behaviors and the big five personality dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43-66.
108. Wong, C. S., Wong, Y. T., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (2001). The significant role of Chinese employees’ organizational commitment: Implications for managing employees in Chinese societies. Journal of World Business, 36(3), 326-340.
109. Zhang, P., & Ng, F. F. (2013). Explaining Knowledge-Sharing Intention in Construction Teams in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), 280-293.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-wan Hung)

審核日期

2014-7-18

推文