權力對於供應鏈中跨組織相容性與跨組織資訊 系統整合之調節效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：3.129.216.30

姓名

謝佳樺(Chia-Hua Hsieh) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

權力對於供應鏈中跨組織相容性與跨組織資訊系統整合之調節效果
(Moderating Effect of Power on the Relationship between Inter-organizational Compatibility and IOS Integration in Supply Chain)

相關論文

★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析	★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例	★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越：中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究	★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討－以自行車產業為例	★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例	★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討	★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例	★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析－以銀行簡訊為例	★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著科技快速的發展，組織間越來越沒有國界的限制，因此將面臨充滿競爭
的全球化環境。組織必須改善其彈性與回應率來與其他的組織競爭，為了達到這
個目的，組織可使用跨組織資訊系統來與供應鏈中的交易夥伴連結。過去的研究
指出，組織可藉由使用跨組織資訊系統與交易夥伴合作來獲益。然而，在實行跨
組織資訊系統時將涉及多個組織，為了更了解跨組織資訊系統的潛力，因此對於
跨組織間不相容的問題必須要做更進一步的了解。
本研究以技術、文化和流程三個層面來探討跨組織相容性問題。除了跨組織
相容性的觀點，本研究亦使用權力不平衡當作調節變數來分析權力不平衡是否會
影響跨組織相容性和跨組織資訊系統之間的關係。透過郵寄問卷至台灣營業額排
名前 1000 名製造業的採購主管，我們探討跨組織資訊系統相容性對於跨組織資
訊系統的整合是否具有正向的影響，並進一步了解權力不平衡是否會弱化跨組織
相容性和跨組織資訊系統間的關係。結果顯示，技術相容性和文化相容性對於跨
組織資訊系統整合有正向影響；除此之外，權力不平衡對於跨組織相容性和跨組
織資訊系統之間的關係並沒有調節效果。

摘要(英)

As a result of the rapid development of technology, organizations are facing a more competitive environment and serious global competition without boundary limitations. Organizations attempt to find way to improve the flexibility and responsiveness to compete with other organizations. In order to achieve this goal, organizations use inter-organizational system (IOS) as a powerful tool to link with trading partners in supply chains. Prior studies indicate that organizations can gain significant benefits through using inter-organizational system (IOS) to collaborate with their partners. However, because the implementation of IOS will involve multiple organizations, many inter-organizational incompatible problems have to be addressed to realize the full potential of IOS.
This study addressed the inter-organizational compatibility in technical, cultural and process dimensions. Apart from the inter-organizational compatibility perspective, we use power imbalance as the moderating variable to analyze whether power imbalance will influence the relationship between inter-organizational compatibility and IOS integration. Through a survey of questionnaires in Top 1000 manufacturing firms in Taiwan, we examined whether inter-organizational compatibilities are positively associated with IOS integration, and whether the power imbalance weaken the moderating effect of the relationship between inter-organizational compatibility and IOS integration. The results demonstrate that technical compatibility and cultural compatibility are positively associated with IOS integration and power imbalance fail to moderate the relationship between inter-organizational compatibility and IOS integration.

關鍵字(中)

★ 跨組織資訊系統
★ 跨組織相容性
★ 權力不平衡

關鍵字(英)

★ IOS integration
★ inter-organizational compatibility
★ power imbalance

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
Contents iv
List of Table vi
List of Figures vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Purposes and Questions 3
Chapter 2 Literature review 5
2.1 Technical Compatibility 5
2.2 Cultural Compatibility 6
2.3 Process Compatibility 7
2.4 IOS integration 8
2.5 Supply Chain Performance 9
2.6 Power Imbalance 10
Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypotheses 12
3.1 Research Model 12
3.2 Hypothesis Development 13
3.2.1 Technical Compatibility and IOS Integration 13
3.2.2 Cultural Compatibility and IOS Integration 14
3.2.3 Process Compatibility and ISO integration 15
3.2.4 IOS Integration and Supply Chain Performance 16
3.2.5 Moderating Role of the Relationship between IOS Integration and Inter-organizational Compatibility 17
Chapter 4 Research Method 20
4.1 Sample Selection and Data Collection 20
4.2 Instrument Development 20
4.2.1 Technical Compatibility 20
4.2.2 Cultural Compatibility 21
4.2.3 Process Compatibility 22
4.2.4 IOS integration 22
4.2.5 Supply Chain Performance 23
4.2.6 Power imbalance 24
Chapter 5 Data Analysis and Results 25
5.1 Sample Characteristic 25
5.2 Reliability and Validity 28
5.3 Hypotheses Testing 34
Chapter 6 Conclusions 38
6.1 Findings and Discussion 38
6.2 Implications 40
6.3 Limitations 41
References 42
APPENDIX Questionnaire 49

參考文獻

[1] Bala, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2007). Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 340-362.
[2] Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292.
[3] Bloomfield, B. P., & Coombs, R. (1992). Information technology, control and power: the centralization and decentralization debate revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 459-459.
[4] Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205-225.
[5] Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23-48.
[6] Chong, A. Y. L., & Ooi, K. B. (2008). Adoption of interorganizational system standards in supply chains: an empirical analysis of RosettaNet standards. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 529-547.
[7] Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral science, 2(3), 201-215.
[8] Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management review, 23(3), 491-512.
[9] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
[10] Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E., Jr. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.
[11] Dijkstra, T. K. (2010). Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold’s basic design and partial least squares. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseier, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 23-46). Berling, Germany: Springer.
[12] Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
[13] El-Ansary, A. I., & Stern, L. W. (1972). Power measurement in the distribution channel. Journal of Marketing research, 9(1), 47-52.
[14] Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American sociological review, 27(1), 31-41.
[15] Fawcett, S. E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G. M., Brau, J. C., & McCarter, M. W. (2007). Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 358-368.
[16] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
[17] Frazier, G. L., & Rody, R. C. (1991). The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 52-69.
[18] Gaski, J. F. (1984). The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 9-29.
[19] Gilbert, C. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741-763.
[20] Grover, V., & Saeed, K. A. (2007). The impact of product, market, and relationship characteristics on interorganizational system integration in manufacturer-supplier dyads. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 185-216.
[21] Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269-295.
[22] Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of operations & production Management, 21(1/2), 71-87.
[23] Hart, P. J., & Saunders, C. S. (1998). Emerging electronic partnerships: antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 87-111.
[24] Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization science, 8(1), 23-42.
[25] Hibbard, J. D., Kumar, N., & Stern, L. W. (2001). Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 45-61.
[26] Hong, I. B. (2002). A new framework for interorganizational systems based on the linkage of participants’ roles. Information & Management, 39(4), 261-270.
[27] Jasperson, J. S., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J., & Zheng, W. (2002). Review: power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397-459.
[28] Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L., & Griffiths, A. (2005). The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: the mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 361-386.
[29] Ketikidis, P. H., Koh, S. C. L., Dimitriadis, N., Gunasekaran, A., & Kehajova, M. (2008). The use of information systems for logistics and supply chain management in South East Europe: current status and future direction. Omega, 36(4), 592-599.
[30] Klein, R., & Rai, A. (2009). Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 735-762.
[31] Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1-20.
[32] Lancioni, R. A., Smith, M. F., & Oliva, T. A. (2000). The role of the internet in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 45-56.
[33] Lauer, T. W. (2000). Side effects of mandatory EDI order processing in the automotive supply chain. Business Process Management Journal, 6(5), 366-375.
[34] Lee, S., & Lim, G. G. (2003). The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success. Information & Management, 41(2), 135-148.
[35] Li, F., & Williams, H. (1999). Interfirm collaboration through interfirm networks. Information Systems Journal, 9(2), 103-115.
[36] Lu, X. H., Huang, L. H., & Heng, M. S. H. (2006). Critical success factors of inter-organizational information systems: a case study of Cisco and Xiao Tong in China. Information & Management, 43(3), 395-408.
[37] Nahavandi, A., & Malekzadeh, A. R. (1993). Organizational culture in the management of mergers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
[38] Nambudiri, R. (2006). Cultural compatibility and inter-organisational relationship (IOR) success. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 3(2), 51-64.
[39] Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[40] Pereira, J. V. (2009). The new supply chain’s frontier: information management. International Journal of Information Management, 29(5), 372-379.
[41] Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston, MA: Pitman.
[42] Poon, S., & Swatman, P. (1999). An exploratory study of small business Internet commerce issues. Information & Management, 35(1), 9-18.
[43] Premkumar, G. P. (2000). Interorganizational systems and supply chain management: an information processing perspective. Information Systems Management, 17(3), 56-69.
[44] Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303-336.
[45] Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Crum, M. (1997). Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 107-121.
[46] Provan, K. G., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (2007). Supplier commitment in relational contract exchanges with buyers: a study of interorganizational dependence and exercised power. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 55-68.
[47] Provan, K. G., Beyer, J. M., & Kruytbosch, C. (1980). Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 200-225.
[48] Qrunfleh, S., Tarafdar, M., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2012). Supply chain information systems strategy: impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[49] Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246.
[50] Rajaguru, R., & Matanda, M. J. (2009). Influence of inter-organisational integration on business performance: the mediating role of organisational-level supply chain functions. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(4), 456-467.
[51] Rajaguru, R., & Matanda, M. J. (2012). Effects of inter-organizational compatibility on supply chain capabilities: exploring the mediating role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 620-632.
[52] Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (2005). Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-supplier dyads. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365-396.
[53] Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007). IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320-339.
[54] Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), 358-373.
[55] Sarkar, M., Cavusgil, S. T., & Evirgen, C. (1997). A commitment-trust mediated framework of international collaborative venture performance. In P. W. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.), Cooperative strategies: North American perspectives (pp. 255-285). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
[56] Scheer, L. K., & Stern, L. W. (1992). The effect of influence type and performance outcomes on attitude toward the influencer. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 128-142.
[57] Shang, R. A., Chen, C. C., & Liu, Y. C. (2005). Internet EDI adoption factors: power, trust and vision. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic Commerce, China, 113, 101-108.
[58] Skarmeas, D. A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2001). Drivers of superior importer performance in cross-cultural supplier-reseller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 227-241.
[59] Son, J. Y., Narasimhan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2005). Effects of relational factors and channel climate on EDI usage in the customer-supplier relationship. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 321-353.
[60] Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45-73.
[61] Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3), 2-9.
[62] Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Managemnet, 29(1), 28-45.
[63] Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131-1157.
[64] Vitale, M. R., & Johnson, H. R. (1988). Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 153-165.
[65] Wilkinson, I., & Kipnis, D. (1978). Interfirm use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(3), 315-320.
[66] Wilkof, M. V., Brown, D. W., & Selsky, J. W. (1995). When the stories are different: the influence of corporate culture mismatches on interorganizational relations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3), 373-388.
[67] Wu, W. Y., Chiag, C. Y., Wu, Y. J., & Tu, H. J. (2004). The influencing factors of commitment and business integration on supply chain management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(4), 322-333.
[68] Zairi, M. (1997). Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness. Business Process Management Journal, 3(1), 64-80.

指導教授

王存國(Tswen-gwo Wang)

審核日期

2013-7-4

推文