摘要(英) |
The situation of climate change caused by global warming becomes more and more serious. In recent years, the unprecedented of abnormal weather phenomena emerge all around the world, just like the counterattack of nature. A lot of the countries in Europe and the Americas had noticed that the importance of carbon reduction more than ten years ago. In the contrast, the concept of the environmental protection was realized by Asia countries in recent years. With the “Kyoto protocol” was signed in December 1997, there were a lot of countries beginning to set their own carbon reduction target. Although, Taiwan didn’t restrict by “Kyoto protocol”, and do not need for commitment to carbon reduction targets. But, as a member of the Global Village, Taiwan should take the responsibility to against global warming with others.
The consultancies in Taiwan begin to provide the services of Organization Carbon Inventory and Product Carbon Footprint for business organization in Taiwan, according to the International regulations and the guideline “Greenhouse gas inventory and login” developed by Environmental Protection Administration, R.O.C. (Taiwan). But, the assisted computing greenhouse gas emission method that consultants use is too rough during the inventory. Therefore, our study is going to use Activity-Based Costing approach that can separate costing well and using it to assisted computing greenhouse gas emission. Currently, there were no literature shows that they apply the ABC approach in greenhouse gas calculation because the ABC approach is purpose to separate the costs. In this study, we are going to use the calculate logic of ABC approach to develop an assisted computing greenhouse gas emission method – Activity Based Carbon Footprint. Use the sample pump in ERP of SAP to simulate the ABCF operation. At last, making a conclusion and suggesting the future research. |
參考文獻 |
英文部分
1. James.H.Butler, 2011, The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, Retrieved April 5, 2012, from: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/
2. Tsai, W.H., Shen, Y.S., Lee, P.L., Chen, H.C., Kuo, L., Huang, C.C., 2012. Integrating information about the cost of carbon through activity-based costing.
3. Limnios, E.A.M., Ghadouani, A., Schilizzi, S.G.M., Mazzarol, T., 2009. Giving the consumer the choice-A methodology for product ecological footprint calculation.
4. Hooshang M. Beheshti., 2004. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage with activity based cost management system.
5. Innes*, J., Mitchell, F., Sinclair, D., 2000. Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies - a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management Accounting Research, 11, 349–362.
6. Andersson, J., Skoogh, A., Johansson, B., 2011. Environmental Activity Based Cost using Discrete Event Simulation.
7. Bennett, M., Rikhandsson, P.M., Schaltegger, S., (Eds.), 2003. Environmental Management Accounting: Purpose and Progress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
8. KeithRenison, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2009. Carbon footprint Modeling with SAS® for Sustainability Management: Beyond Calculation.
9. United Nations, 1998. Kyoto Protocol To The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change.
10. Schaltegger, S., Csutora, M., 2012. Carbon accounting for sustainability and management.Status quo and challenges.
11. Turney, P.B.B., President and Chief Executive Officer Cost Tectnolohy, Inc.,2008. Activity-Based Costing –An Emerging Foundation for Performance Management.
12. Staudt, M., Stranz, M., (Eds.), 2009. Costing Accounting, 14e.
13. Stchemesser, K., Guenther, E., 2012. Carbon accounting – a systematic literature review.
14. Olson, E.G., Ernst & Young LLP, Los Angeles, California, USA., 2010. Challenges and opportunities from greenhouse gas emissions reporting and independent auditing.
15. Beer, P.d., Friend, F., 2005. Environmental accounting – A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance.
中文部分
1. 許莉艷,「台灣節能減碳政策與措施之個案研究」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國102年。
2. (Hansen, D.R., Mowen, Maryanne.M.)著,成本管理(上),吳惠琳譯,揚智文化,台北,民國88年。
3. 台灣環保署,「溫室氣體盤查與登錄指引」,台灣行政院環境保護署,民國98年。
4. 台達電子,「誰有碳稅誰有碳交易」,台達電子文教基金會,民國100年。
5. 聯合國,「聯合國氣候變化框架公約-京都議定書」,聯合國,民國87年。
6. 沈國基、陳振明、許秉瑜,「碳管理計畫計劃書」,國立中央大學,民國102年。
7. 李羽涵,「作業基礎成本至於學校人事成本之應用-以某大學為例」,私立東海大學,碩士論文,民國99年。
8. 王茂源、何正得,「作業基礎成本制度愛定價決策中的運用-以鋼鐵業Y公司為例」,國立高雄應用科技大學 工業工程與管理系,工程科技與教育學刊 第七卷 第五期 745-761,民國99年。
9. 劉家伶,「ERP為基準碳足跡計算之觀念性架構發展」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國102年。
網路資料來源
1. 李逆熵﹝李偉才﹞,洋流知多少?,2013/02/05,取自http://blogger.etpress.com.hk/eddylwc/?p=1370
2. 社團法人中華民國低碳環境學會,各國碳標籤,2013/02/05,取自http://inventory16.fo.ntu.edu.tw:8081/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=105
3. Carbon Disclosure Project,2006,沃爾瑪碳揭露計畫,2013/02/06,取自https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Walmart.aspx#submenu
4. 德勤中國研究與洞察力中心,《碳計量的會計挑戰:報告概述》,2013/02/18,取自http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-China/Local%20Assets/Documents/Firmwide/Boao/cn%28zh-cn%29_CRIC_carbon_accounting_SC_300310.pdf |