應用公理設計與設計結構矩陣於產品平台之協同設計

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：3.142.156.67

姓名

王雋爲(Chun-wei Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

應用公理設計與設計結構矩陣於產品平台之協同設計
(Applying Axiomatic Design and Design Structure Matrix to Collaborative Product Platform Design)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，隨著個人電腦產業成長趨緩，毛利率大幅下滑，許多廠商競相投入高毛利的工業電腦市場，競爭愈趨激烈。而工業電腦產業具有少量多樣、客製化之特性，因此，若能依不同顧客需求，結合相關角色協同設計產品平台，快速地提供大量客製化產品，可以降低開發時間成本，提高產品功能及彈性，滿足市場需求，增加競爭力。
聚焦在產品概念設計階段，考慮顧客需求，以協同合作為前提，應用公理設計，可以快速了解所需功能與設計參數關係；而設計結構矩陣，具有易於辨識，易懂之優點，容易表示設計參數彼此關係。鑒於兩者互補特性，本研究旨在提出以公理設計與設計結構矩陣的整合架構，在產品概念設計階段，快速地發展產品平台與部署產品家族。最後，以工業電腦產業的車載資通訊產品為例，分析與說明。

摘要(英)

In recent years, the growth of pc industry has slowed down. Due to its sharp drop in gross profit margin, many manufacturers have devoted them into high niche IPC market which caused the battle of winning orders more competitive than ever. On the other hand, IPC industry has the characteristics of low-volume, and high-customization. On account of different customer requirements, if we could collaborate with roles in the value chain and design product platform collaboratively so as to provide customization service, we could reduce the cost of development time, improve product functionality and flexibility, meet the market demand, and increase competitiveness.
Put eyes on the stage of conceptual product design, by means of considering customer’s requirement and devoting collaboration efforts. We could quickly understand what we need in FRs and the relationships between DPs through axiomatic design method; design structure matrix has the merit of easy to recognize, understand, and representing the relationship between DPs easily. For the reason of complementary traits between each other, we propose an integrated framework combined with AD and DSM to support the design of product platform in the conceptual design stage under the premise of collaboration. At the end, we will give an illustration of IPC telematics product to verify the framework.

關鍵字(中)

★ 產品平台設計
★ 產品家族部署
★ 公理設計
★ 設計結構矩陣
★ 工業電腦
★ 協同設計

關鍵字(英)

★ Product Platform Design
★ Product Family Design
★ Collaborative Design
★ Axiomatic Design
★ Design Structure Matrix
★ Industrial PC

論文目次

Table of Contents
中文摘要...........................I
Abstract..........................II
誌謝.............................III
List of Figure........................VI
List of Table.........................VIII
Chapter 1 Introduction....................1
1.1 Background............................1
1.2 Motivation & Objectives...............1
1.3 Research Overview.....................2
Chapter 2 Literature Review...............4
2.1 New Product Development...............4
2.1.1 Introduction to NPD.................4
2.1.2 NPD process.........................5
2.1.3 NPD Approaches......................7
2.2 Collaborative Product Design................12
2.3 Product Family and Product Platform Design..15
2.3.1 Introduction of Product Platform and Product Family Design...................................................15
2.3.2 Methods for Product Platform and Product Family Design...................................................18
Chapter 3 Architecture of Collaborative-Design Product Platform.................................................23
3.1 Overview of Collaborative-Design Product Platform Project..................................................24
3.1.1 Decision Framework of the Product Platform Development..............................................24
3.1.2 Collaborative-Design Product Platform..............26
3.2 Methodological Framework.............................28
3.3 Overview of Methodology..............................32
3.3.1 Axiomatic Design (AD)..............................32
3.3.2 Design Structure Matrix (DSM)......................45
Chapter 4 Application....................................52
4.1 The Industrial PC Industry...........................52
4.1.1 The Definition of Industrial PC....................54
4.1.2 Application & Typical Product of IPC...............54
4.1.3 Vehicle Telematics.................................56
4.1.4 Construction of collaborative Telematics Device Design...................................................59
4.2 Product Platform & Product Family Development for Telematics Device........................................62
4.2.1 Analysis of Axiomatic Design and Design Structure Matrix...................................................62
4.2.2 Product Family Development.........................73
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future research.................77
5.1 Conclusion...........................................77
5.2 Future Research......................................78
Reference................................................79

參考文獻

Alexander, C., (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard Press, Boston, MA.
Agard, B., & Barajas, M. (2012). The use of fuzzy logic in product family development: Literature review and opportunities. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1445-1462.
Braha, D. and Maimon, O. A., (1998), Mathematical Theory of Design: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
Browning, T.R., (2001), “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, pp. 292-306.
Braha, D., (2002), “Partitioning Tasks to Product Development Teams,” In: Proceedings of the ASME 14th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Montreal, Canada
Basem S. El-Haik, (2005), Axiomatic Quality, Wiley, USA
Bulent G., (2005), Axiomatic Product Development Lifecycle, Texas Tech University.
Brown, C. A. (2006). Teaching axiomatic design to engineers-theory, applications, and software. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 24(3), 186-195.
Bartolomei, J. Cokus, M. Dahlgren, J. de Neufville, R. Maldonado, R. and Wilds, J. (2007). Analysis and Applications of Design Structure Matrix, Domain Mapping Matrix, and Engineering System Matrix Framework

Brad, C. & Dr. Peter, G. (2008). The Creativity Matrix: An Extension To Axiomatic Design. Proceedings of CDEN Conference, Dalhousie University, Halifax July 27-29, 2008.
Belkadi, F., Dremont, N., Notin, A., Troussier, N., & Messadia, M. (2012). A meta-modelling framework for knowledge consistency in collaborative design. Annual Reviews in Control, 36(2), 346-358.
Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54.
Chen, C. H., Ling, S. F., & Chen, W. (2003). Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 291-299.
Chuang, T.T, Nakatani, K. (2004). Planning and deployment of collaborative commerce: a conceptual framework and empirical evidences. International Journal of Electronic Business, Volume 2, Number 2, 23 August 2004 , pp. 157-173(17)
Cooper, R.G. and Edgett, S.J. (2005). Lean, Rapid and Proﬁtable New Product Development. Ancaster, ON: Product Development Institute, Inc.
Choi, Y., Kim, K., & Kim, C. (2005). A design chain collaboration framework using reference models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(1-2), 183-190.
Cooper, R.G. (2006a). Formula for Success. Marketing Management Magazine (American Marketing Association), March–April, pp.21–24.
Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage-gates® idea-to-launch process - update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213-232.
Dong, Q., & Whitney, D. E. (2001). Designing a requirement driven product development process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 4 11-20.
Dong, Q. (2002). Predicting and Managing System Interactions at early phase of the product development process, PhD Thesis, MIT.
Dunn, T. P., & Sussman, J. M. (2006). Design structure matrices to improve decentralized urban transportation systems
Eppinger & Browning (2012), Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Emmatty, F. J., & Sarmah, S. P. (2012). Modular product development through platform-based design and DFMA. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(9), 696-714.
Fiore, C. (2005). Accelerated Product Development. New York: Productivity Production Press.
Guan, W.C, Wen, C.X, Yeong, D.W(2007), The Research of the Disc Machine by Integrating QFD and Axiomatic Design tools. Leader University, NSC Project No.: NSC94-2213-E-426-002.
Guenov, M. D., & Barker, S. G. (2005). Application of axiomatic design and design structure matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems. Systems Engineering, 8(1), 29-40.
Guo, J., Jiang, P., Guo, J. W., Zhang, J., & Tan, R. H. (2012). Innovation design of existing product based on function recombination. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE 6th International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2012, 812-817.
Hintersteiner, Jason D. (2000), Addressing Changing Customer Needs by Adapting Design Requirements, Proceeding of ICAD2000, First International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge, MA – June 21-23.
Halman, J. I. M., Hofer, A. P., & Van Vuuren, W. (2003). Platform-driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 149-162.
Jiao, J., Simpson, T. W., and Siddique, Z., (2007), “Product Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 18, pp. 5-29.
Janthong, N., Brissaud, D., & Butdee, S. (2010). Integration matrix to support technology evolution in (re)design of complex products. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT2010, 485-490.
Janthong, N. (2011). A methodology for tracking the impact of changes in (re)designing of the industrial complex product. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 1058-1062.
Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative design: What is it? Automation in Construction, 9(4), 409-415.
L, Moutinho. (2000). Strategic Management in Tourism. CABI publishing.
Lee, Y. C., & Gilleard, J. D. (2002). Collaborative design: A process model for refurbishment. Automation in Construction, 11(5), 535-544.
Levandowski, E. C, Stig, C. D, Bersjö, D, Forslund, A, Högman, U, Söderberg, R, Johannesson, H. (2012). An integrated approach to technology platform and product platform development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 0(0) 1-19.
Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P. (1997). The Power of Product Platforms. Building value and cost leadership. The Free Press, New York.
Martin, M. V., & Ishii, K. (2002). Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design, 13(3), 213-235.
Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2002). Product architecture and platforms: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(1), 1–16.
Maranzana, N., & Gartiser, N. (2008). From concurrent engineering to collaborative learning of design. International Journal of Design and Innovation Research, 4(1), 39-51.
Nyere, J. (2006). The Design-Chain Operations Reference-Model, Supply Chain Council.
Oliver Toubia. (2008). Forthcoming in Handbook of Technology Management. Columbia business school.
Perks, H., Cooper, R., & Jones, C. (2005). Characterizing the Role of Design in New Product Development: An Empirically Derived Taxonomy, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 111-127
Suh, N.P. (1990). The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Suh, N.P. (2001). Axiomatic Design - Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Simpson, T. W. (2003). Product platform design and optimization: Status and promise. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2 a, 131-142.
Sharon. A., Dori. B., & de Weck, O. (2009). Model-Based Design Structure Matrix: Deriving a DSM from an Object-Process Model. Second International Symposium on Engineering Systems MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 15-17, 2009
Sköld, M., & Karlsson, C. (2012). Product platform replacements: Challenges to managers. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(6), 746-766.
Song, Y. W., Kim, J. D., Yu, L., Lee, H. K., & Lee, H. S. (2012). A comparative study of the telematics industry in korea and china. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 17(1)
Tang, D. B., Qian, X. M., Wang, X. Y., Lou, P. H. (2007). Coevolution Mechanism Between axiomatic Design Matrix & Design Structure Matrix. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Vol. 13 No.8 Aug. 2007.1006-5911(2007)08-1465-05.
Tang, D., Zhang, G., & Dai, S. (2009). Design as integration of axiomatic design and design structure matrix. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25(3), 610-619.
Tang, D. B., Zhu, R. M., Dai, S., & Zhang, G. J. (2009). Enhancing Axiomatic Design with
Design Structure Matrix. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 17(2), 129-137.
doi: Doi 10.1177/1063293x09105348
Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C., & Kimura, F. (2009). Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 58(2), 543-565.
Tanner.J & Raymond A.M (2010). Principles of Marketing. Flat World Knowledge.
Uang, S. T., Liu, C. L., & Chang, M. (2011). A product design approach by integrating axiomatic design and TRIZ
Von Hippel, Eric (1994), ““Sticky Information” And the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation,” Management Science, 40 (4), 429-439.
Wilhelm, B. (1997). Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen - Their effect on the assembly process. In Transforming Automobile Assembly: Experience in Automation and Work Organization (Shimokawa, K., Jürgens, U., & Fujimoto, T., Eds.), pp. 146–156.
New York: Springer.
Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., & Pardasani, A. (2002). Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends. CAD Computer Aided Design, 34(13), 981-996.
X. Du, J. Jiao, M. M. Tseng. (2001). Architecture of product family: Fundamentals and methodology Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 4. (2001), pp. 309-325
Xiao, R., & Chen, T. (2010). Research on design structure matrix and its applications in product development and innovation: An overview. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 37(3-4), 218-229.
Xiao, R.B, Cheng, X.F, Chen, C., Chen, W.M (2011). A New Approach to Product Platform Design Based on Axiomatic Design and Design Relationship Matrix. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 48(11), TH122.
Yassine Ali. (2004). An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method. No. 9.
Yee, S. L. (2007). Differing roles of axiomatic design and design structure matrix in reducing system complexity. Paper presented at the IEEM 2007: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 994-998.
Zha, X. F., & Sriram, R. D. (2006). Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19(7), 524-543.
Online Resources:
Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs: http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/
Axiomatic Design Solutions, INC: http://www.axiomaticdesign.com/
Design Structure Matrix: http://www.dsmweb.org/
Supply Chain Council: http://supply-chain.org/
VWvortex: http://www.vwvortex.com/

指導教授

高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao)

審核日期

2013-7-2

推文