公司多角化與公司績效：以組織內部升遷政策與職涯管理實務為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：54

、訪客IP：44.192.26.226

姓名

林郁婷(Yu-Ting Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

公司多角化與公司績效：以組織內部升遷政策與職涯管理實務為調節變項
(Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Organizational Promotion Policy and Career Management Practices)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在現今的商業環境中，多角化策略已然成為公司普遍選擇的策略模式；然而，從許多研究中發現，多角化策略對於公司績效的影響是複雜且多變的，學界對其關聯性的看法也尚未達到共識。有些學者稱多角化對於公司績效是有正向的效果，有些研究卻表示其效果為負向，甚至有其他研究宣稱兩者間毫無關連性。此研究嘗試找出多角化對於台灣公司績效的影響，以及人力資源管理實務對其影響的調節作用；使用檔案資料與問卷調查檢視三個相關假設，雖然研究結果不支持假設，卻解釋了當前台灣公司面臨的現況。
研究結果顯示多角化策略對於台灣公司的影響為負向效果，此結果解釋了台灣公司傾向選擇非相關多角化策略，而不是相對上能夠帶來更高效益的相關多角化策略。同時，人資實務上的調節作用，職涯管理會降低多角化對公司績效的影響效果；而組織內部升遷政策沒有明顯的調節作用。此研究解釋了可能導致上列結果的原因，並提出相關管理實務建議與未來相關研究的建議。

摘要(英)

Nowadays, diversification has become a common choice of corporate strategy; however its effect on firm performance is complex and there is no one consensus on the effect in previous articles. Some say the diversification effect on firm performance is positive; others say it is negative; and still others say it has no relationship with firm performance. In this study, we intend to find out how the diversification affect firm performance in Taiwanese companies and how the HRM practices coordinate the effect. By using both archival and survey data, we examine three hypotheses of the issues above, though results do not support our notions, they still explain the present status of Taiwanese companies encounter.
The results indicate that diversification effect is negative in Taiwanese companies and this sustains the perspective that Taiwanese companies tend to choose unrelated diversification rather than related one. Also, the coordination effect of career management practice would decrease the effect of diversification on firm performance and the coordination effect of organizational promotion policy has no clear influence. We explained the possible reasons that induce the results above and proposed some managerial suggestions. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for future research.

關鍵字(中)

★ 公司多角化
★ 公司績效
★ 調節作用
★ 職涯管理
★ 組織內部升遷政策

關鍵字(英)

★ corporate diversification
★ firm performance
★ coordination effect
★ career management
★ organizational promotion policy

論文目次

Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1
Chapter 2 Literature review ........................................................................................................ 5
2.1 The definition of diversification ................................................................................... 5
2.2 Different types and measures of diversification ........................................................... 7
2.3 Diversification and firm performance ........................................................................ 11
2.4 The importance of coordination ................................................................................. 12
2.5 The activities of HRM practices as coordination ....................................................... 14
2.5.1 HRM practice: the promotion from within policy ........................................... 14
2.5.2 HRM practice: the career management practice.............................................. 15
Chapter 3 Methods ................................................................................................................... 17
3.1 Research framework ................................................................................................... 17
3.2 Sample and data selection........................................................................................... 18
3.3 Measurement .............................................................................................................. 19
3.3.1 Independent variable........................................................................................ 19
3.3.2 Dependent variables ........................................................................................ 19
3.3.3 Moderators ....................................................................................................... 20
3.3.4 Control variables ............................................................................................. 21
3.4 Research methods ....................................................................................................... 24
Chapter 4 Results ...................................................................................................................... 26
4.1 Descriptive statistics analysis ..................................................................................... 26
4.2 Reliability analysis ..................................................................................................... 27
4.3 Pearson correlation analysis ....................................................................................... 28
4.4 Regression analysis .................................................................................................... 31
Chapter 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 36
5.1 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 36
5.2 Managerial implication ............................................................................................... 38
5.3 Limitations and direction for future research ............................................................. 40
5.3.1 Limitations of this research ............................................................................. 40
5.3.2 Direction for future research............................................................................ 41
References ................................................................................................................................ 42

參考文獻

Althauser, R. P. (1989). Internal labor markets. Annual review of sociology, 143-161.
Amit, R., & Belcourt, M. (1999). Human resources management processes: a value-creating source of competitive advantage. European Management Journal, 17(2), 174-181.
Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard business review,35(5), 113-124.
Ariel, K. W. H. (2010). Collectivistic-HRM and Firm Performance: The moderating effect of Firm Strategy (Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong).
Becerra, M., & Santalo, J. (2004). The effect of diversification on performance revisited: diversification discount, premium, or both? (No. wp04-36). Instituto de Empresa, Area of Economic Environment.
Brian Leaby (1996). Key processes in strategy- themes and theories. Intype London Ltd, UK, Chapter 4, 45-46
Bryce, D. J. (2009). The Effects of Uncertainty on the Performance of Diversification Strategies.
Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic management journal, 12(1), 33-48.
Christensen, H. K., & Montgomery, C. A. (1981). Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy versus market structure. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4), 327-343.
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm
performance. Journal of applied psychology,96(3), 443.
Dobbin, F., Sutton, J. R., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. (1993). Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, 396-427.
Erdorf, S., Hartmann-Wendels, T., Heinrichs, N., & Matz, M. (2013). Corporate diversification and firm value: a survey of recent literature. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 27(2), 187-215.
Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification*. The Journal of Business, 73(4), 629-660.
Fey, C. F., Björkman, I., & Pavlovskaya, A. (2000). The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1-18.
Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (1992). Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance. Strategic management journal,13(5), 381-397.
Guadalupe, M., Li, H., & Wulf, J. (2012). Who lives in the c-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management (No. w17846). National Bureau of Economic Research.
H. van Kranenburg, J. Hagedoorn, and J Pennings (2004). Measurement of international and product diversification in the publishing industry. The Journal of Media Economics, 17(2), 87-104
Hsu, C. C., & Liu, H. (2007). Corporate diversification and firm performance: The moderating role of contractual manufacturing model. In annual meeting of the Academy
of International Business, Indianapolis.
Hurley, A. E., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1998). The effect of organizational experience on managerial career attainment in an internal labor market. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(2), 172-190.
Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 359-369.
Jin, L. (2002). CEO compensation, diversification, and incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(1), 29-63.
Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y. S., Davidson, W. N., & Singh, M. (2006). Corporate governance, shareholder rights and firm diversification: An empirical analysis.Journal of Banking &
Finance, 30(3), 947-963.
Kistruck, G. M., Qureshi, I., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Geographic and product diversification in charitable organizations. Journal of Management, 39(2), 496-530.
Kor, Y. Y., & Leblebici, H. (2005). How do interdependencies among human‐capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms′ financial
performance?. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 967-985.
Lamont, O. A., & Polk, C. (2002). Does diversification destroy value? Evidence from the industry shocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), 51-77.
Liang, C. S. (2007). The relationship of diversification, multidivisional structure, human resources management and it effects on the organization performance.
Malcomson, J. M. (1984). Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. The Journal of Political Economy, 486-507.
Mangum, G., Mayall, D., & Nelson, K. (1985). The temporary help industry: A response to the dual internal labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 599-611.
Marinelli, F. (2011). The relationship between diversification and firm’s performance: is there really a casual relationship. IESE Business School-University of Navarra, 907, 1-32.
Martin, J. D., & Sayrak, A. (2003). Corporate diversification and shareholder value: a survey of recent literature. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(1), 37-57.
Montgomery, C. A. (1982). The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Academy of Management journal, 25(2), 299-307.
Pandya, A. M., & Rao, N. V. (1998). Diversification and firm performance: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 11(2), 67-81.
Park, K., & Jang, S. S. (2013). Effects of within-industry diversification and related diversification strategies on firm performance. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 34, 51-60.
Pfeffer, J., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Determinants of internal labor markets in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 550-572.
Ramanujam, V., & Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic management journal, 10(6), 523-551.
Rose, N. L., & Shepard, A. (1994). Firm diversification and CEO compensation: Managerial ability or executive entrenchment? (No. w4723). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic management journal, 3(4), 359-369.
Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. The Academy of Management Executive (1987-1989), 207-219.
Skaggs, B. C., & Youndt, M. (2004). Strategic positioning, human capital, and performance in service organizations: A customer interaction approach.Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 85-99.
Som, A. (2006). Bracing for MNC competition through innovative HRM practices: The way ahead for Indian firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(2), 207-237.
Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A. (2005). Managing the career deal: The psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 821-838.
V. Ramanujam, &P. Varadarajan (1989). Research on corporate diversification: a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 10, Issue 6, 523-551
Van Kranenburg, H., Hagedoorn, J., & Pennings, J. (2004). Measurement of international and product diversification in the publishing industry. Journal of media economics, 17(2), 87-104.
Wan, W. P., Hoskisson, R. E., Short, J. C., & Yiu, D. W. (2010). Resource-based theory and corporate diversification: Accomplishments and opportunities. Journal of Management,
0149206310391804.
Yiğit, İ., & Tür, Ş. (2012). Relationship between diversification strategy applications and
organizational performance according to Herfindahl Index criteria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 118-127.
Zhou, Y. M. (2011). Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices.Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 624-639.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2015-7-7

推文