從本土企業董事性別比例平衡與績效的關係看性別平等意涵

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：86

、訪客IP：3.135.247.94

姓名

王孟洵(Meng-hsun Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

從本土企業董事性別比例平衡與績效的關係看性別平等意涵
(Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Firm Financial Performance：The Institutional Investor Bias in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著教育的普及、就業市場的增加、家庭經濟需求或自我實現等因素，全球婦女逐漸在就業市場佔有舉足輕重的力量，而女性工作權的議題漸漸延伸到爭取更多平等的機會擔任企業高層職位。由觀察企業女性董事的比率可衡量女性在工作職場上對決策影響的程度。董事會是公司治理的核心，本研究目的欲了解台灣本土企業的董事性別比例平衡與企業績效的關聯，並釐清本土企業董事性別比例平衡的性別平等意義。
本研究以台灣經濟新報TEJ資料庫2010年底資產額達100億以上的上市公司（共計240家）為研究對象。使用多元迴歸方程式，分別以「企業經營績效指標」、「機構法人投資持股比率」為依變項，對「女性董事比率」做迴歸分析研究。研究結果顯示若沒有考量機構法人持股比率，則女性董事的比率和企業經營績效-Tobin’s Q無顯著效果，但考量了機構法人持股比率後，女性董事比率和Tobin’s Q呈顯著正相關。本土企業董事性別比例平衡與Tobin’s Q的關係可能受機構法人投資性別偏見影響，而機構法人投資偏見又以國內法人的影響最為顯著。儘管許多研究試圖將董事性別比例平衡從經濟層面的角度切入，但是在討論此議題時，仍然不能忽視其社會層面的角度考量。

摘要(英)

With the growth of general education, job market, assuming economic responsibility for the household and self-actualization etc., there are more and more women play a decisive role in workplace throughout the world. And the issue of the working women’s right has become having the equal opportunities to promote to the top level of management. The board of directors is the most important decision-making body in a corporation, and by observing the rate of women on board can measure the decision-making power of women in workplace. The study aims to know the relation between board gender diversity and firm financial performance in Taiwan, and try to know how the gender bias in it.
The data collected from Taiwan Economic Journal Data Bank, with the total of 240 subjects whose corporations have total assets over 10 billion NT dollar in 2010. Analyzing the relation between board gender diversity and firm financial performance by using method of multiple regressions and the result shows that the gender diversity has no significant relevant relations with financial performance-Tobin’s Q. But if consider the rate of institutional investor, there has significant positive relations. The institutional investor bias, especially the domestic legal instrument, may influent the relations between board gender diversity and Tobin’s Q.

關鍵字(中)

★ 董事性別比例平衡
★ 機構法人偏見
★ 女性董事
★ 公司治理

關鍵字(英)

★ board gender diversity
★ institutional investor bias
★ women on board
★ corporate governance

論文目次

一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究架構 4
二、文獻探討 5
2-1 性別平等 5
2-2 董事會性別比例平衡 7
2-3 董事會性別比例平衡與企業經營績效的關聯 9
2-4 女性董事比率影響機構法人投資持股比率 12
2-5 機構法人投資持股比率影響企業經營績效 15
三、研究方法 16
3-1 研究對象 16
3-2 研究變項 16
3-3 研究方法 18
四、研究結果 20
4-1 描述統計 20
4-2 多元迴歸分析 22
五、結論和建議 26
5-1 研究結論與討論 26
5-2 限制與建議 28
參考文獻 30
中文部分 30
英文部分 31
表3-1本研究變數名稱與衡量定義 17
表4-1描述性統計摘要表 21
表4-2女性董事比率、法人持股比率和企業績效的迴歸分析摘要表 25
表4-3國內、外法人持股和女性董事比率、TOBIN’S Q的迴歸分析摘要表 25
表4-4女性董事比率、法人持股比率和企業績效的迴歸分析摘要表 25
圖1-1研究流程圖 4
圖4-1女性董事比率影響機構法人投資持股，並影響對TOBIN’S Q的效果關係圖 23

參考文獻

中文部分
王力行，2011。鐵娘子的玻璃懸崖學。遠見雜誌，297
王孟洵、邱薇庭、張華軒與楊珺涵，2012。企業董事性別比例平衡─人力資源管理的新挑戰。第十八屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會，國立中央大學。
李馨蘋與鄭誌偉，2008。從管理者薪酬與機構法人持股之觀點看企業創新投資之影響因素。東吳經濟商學學報，62，47-68。
何碧珍，2009。推動我國加入CEDAW的策略與努力。台灣婦女團體全國聯合會，取自http://www.natwa.org.tw/about3.php。
邱毅與張訓華，1991。股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效。台北市銀月刊，22(5)，11-31。
周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏，1996。家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究，中國財務學刊，4(1)，115-139。
胡家寧與顏良恭，2008。我國性別工作平等制度變遷之探討，台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會暨夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會發表之論文，台中：東海大學。
謝若蘭，2008。聯合國婦女會議與人權。台灣國際研究季刊，4，2，53-79。
顧燕翎，2010。中華民國(台灣)報告－「北京宣言暨行動綱領」落實狀況檢視，財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。
劉明香，2010。性別平等之理論與實踐－以台北縣工作平等宣導團實施成效為例。亞東學報，30，355-374。
潘慧玲、梁文蓁與陳宜宣，2000，台灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析：女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊，11，151-190。
賴偉傑，2010。女性董事、公司治理與財務績效－以台灣上市公司為例。國立臺北大學金融與合作經營學系碩士論文。
瞿宛文，2005。公司治理缺乏典範。21世紀商業評論，10，34-45。
英文部分
Adams, R. & Ferreira, D., 2009. Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2), 291-309.
Agrawal, A. & Knoeber, C. R., 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 377-397.
Anker, R., 1997. Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex : An Overview. International Labor Review, 136, 315-339.
Barnhart, S. W. & Rosenstein S., 1998. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1-16.
Bielby, W. T., 2000. Minimizing Workplace Gender and Racial Bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29, (1), 120-129.
Brammer, S., Millington A. & Pavelin S., 2007. Gender and Ethnic Diversity among UK Corporate Boards, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393-403.
Brown, D., Brown D. & Anastasopoulos V., 2002.Women on Boards: Not just the Right Thing, But the “Bright” Thing. The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa. 341-342.
Carli L. L. & Eagly A. H., 2001. Gender, Hierarchy, and Leadership: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 629-636.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G., 2003. Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38 (3), 33-53.
Catalyst, 2012. Women on Boards. Retrieved from http://www.communitybusiness.org/library/other_publication/QuickTake_Catalyst.pdf
Daniel, F., 2010. Board Diversity. Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research, and Practice. In Anderson R. and Baker H.K. (eds.), 2010. 225-242.
Davies, L., 2012. Women on Boards: The Business Case for Gender Balance. The HR and Training Journal, 12.
Dobbin, F. & Jung, J., 2011. Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89(3), 809-838.
Doug Macnamara & Banff Executive Leadership Inc., 2008, 2010. Human Resources and The Board. Leadership Acumen. Retrieved from http://www.banffexeclead.com/AcumenPDF/Governance%20Articles/Leadership%20Acumen%20V10%20Human%20Reources%20and%20The%20Board.pdf
Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J. D. & Shrader, C. B., 2003. Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 (2), 102-111.
Farrell, K. A. & Hersch, P. L., 2005. Additions to Corporate Boards: The Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 85-106.
Fisher, F. M. & McGowon, J.J., 1983. On the Misuse of Accounting Rate of Return to Infer Monopoly Profit. American Economic Review, 73, 82-97.
Fondas, N. & Sassalos, S., 2000. A Different Voice in the Boardroom: How the Presence of Women Directors Affects Board. Influence over Management, 12, 13-22.
Froot, K. A., Perold, A. & Stein, J. C., 1992. Shareholder Trading Practices and Corporate In-vestment Horizons. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(2), 42-58.
Graves, S. A. & Waddock, S., 1990. Institutional Ownership and Control: Implication for Long-term Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 4(1), 75-83.
Guy, M. L., Niethammer, C. & Moline, A., 2011.Women on Boards: A Conversation with Male Directors. International Finance Corporation, 9.
Izraeli, D., 2000. Women Directors in Israel. In: Burke & Mattis (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities, 75-96.
Pound, J., 1998. Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.
Reskin, B. F., 2000. The Proximate Causes of Employment Discrimination, Contemporary Sociology, 29(2), 319-328.
Rose, C., 2007. Does Female Board Representation Inﬂuence Firm Performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2), 404-413.
Riehl, C. & Lee, V. E., 1996. Gender, Organization, and Leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (eds.), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration: Part 2. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 873-919.
Ryan, M. C. & Haslam, S. A., 2007. The Class Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding Women’s Appointment to Precarious Leadership Positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549-572.
Schmuck, P. A., 1996. Women’s Place in Educational Administration: Past, Present, and Future. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration: Part 1. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 337-367.
Steven M. D., 2011, September 11. Seeking Critical Mass of Gender Equality in the Boardroom. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/seeking-critical-mass-of-gender-equality-in-the-boardroom/
Joy, L., Carter, N.M., Wagener, H.M., Narayanan, S. & Catalyst, 2007. The Bottom Line: Corporate Performance and Women’s Representation on Boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/200/the-bottom-line-corporate-performance-and-womens-representation-on-boards
Karathanassis, G. A., & Drakos, A. A., 2004. A Note on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value in Greece. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(8), 537-547.
Mak., Y. T. & Li., Y., 2001. Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure: Evidence from Singapore. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 235-256.
McConnell J. J. & Servaes H., 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612.
McKinsey & Company, 2007. Woman Matter: Gender Diversity, A Corporate Performance driver. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/paris/home/womenmatter/pdfs/Women_matter_oct2007_english.pdf
Morck, R., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R., 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
Oakley G. J., 2000. Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4).
Schein, V. E., 2007. Women in Management: Reflections and Projections. Women In Management Review, 22 (1), 6-18.
Truman G. E. & Baroudi J. J., 1994. Gender Differences in the Information Systems Managerial Ranks: An Assessment of Potential Discriminatory Practices. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 129-142.
Wilson, N. & Altanlar, A., 2009. Director Characteristics, Gender Balance and Insolvency Risk: An Empirical Study. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1414224
Zelechowski, D. & Bilimoria, D., 2004. Characteristics of Women and Men Corporate Inside Directors in the US, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 337-42.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-yuan Chen)

審核日期

2013-8-20

推文