博碩士論文 100430001 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:10 、訪客IP:3.94.200.93
姓名 秦毓淳(Yu-chun Chin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 企業避稅及審計公費溢酬
(Enterprise Tax Aggressiveness and Audit Fee Premium)
相關論文
★ 財務預測與會計師核閱★ 盈餘持續性與財稅差異
★ 公司會計品質對於負債到期日結構之影響★ 審計任期與市場效率
★ 未來盈餘反應係數與審計任期★ 上市IPO之盈餘管理與審計品質
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性★ 股東可扣抵稅額減半政策之事件研究
★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有★ 國際財務報告準則(IFRS)對盈餘之影響
★ 會計資訊對系統風險之增額預測能力★ 財稅差異與現金流量及盈餘持續性
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究之目的在於探討當企業從事較積極的稅務規劃時,是否會影響會計師審計公費收取的多寡。本文認為,當企業暴露在極高的租稅風險時,會使得會計師面臨較高的審計成本及未預期風險,因此預期會計師會收取較高的審計公費。本研究以2008-2011四年期間的上海交易所上市公司A股作為研究對象,並參考過去學者審計公費定價模型(Simunic, 1980),額外放入五種稅務規劃代理變數,其中包含現金有效稅率、會計帳面有效稅率、四年期累積現金有效稅率、財稅差異以及剩餘財稅差異。研究結果發現,當企業稅務規劃程度越高,使得會計師必須承擔較高的成本及風險,將導致會計師收取較高的審計公費。
摘要(英) The purpose of this research is to explore whether client firm’s tax aggressiveness leads its auditor to charge higher fees. We expect that when a client firm exposes to higher tax risk, its auditor will charge more audit fees due to the resulting higher audit costs and unanticipated risks. Our sample covers 2008-2011 all A-share firms listed on the Shanghai stock exchange. We follow Simunic’s (1980) audit pricing model and add five additional tax avoidance variables, including cash effective tax rate, book effective tax rate, four-year cumulative cash effective tax rate, book-tax difference, and residual book-tax difference. We find that higher level of the client firm’s tax avoidance leads its auditor to incur higher costs and risks and thus causes auditor to charge higher fees.
關鍵字(中) ★ 稅務規劃
★ 審計公費
關鍵字(英) ★ Tax-planning
★ Audit fee
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 3
1-3研究架構 4
第二章 相關文獻探討 5
2-1 租稅規劃的定義與衡量 5
2-2家族企業和租稅規劃 6
2-3會計師和租稅規劃 7
第三章 研究方法 9
3-1假說發展 9
3-2樣本和資料來源 10
3-3實證規劃 10
3-3-1因變數的衡量 11
3-3-2 自變數的衡量 11
3-3-3控制變數的衡量 14
3-4研究模型 17
第四章 實證結果 18
4-1敘述統計 18
4-2相關係數分析 20
4-3迴歸之實證結果 22
4-4敏感性測試 26
第五章 結論與建議 37
5-1結論 37
5-2研究限制及後續研究建議 38
參考文獻 39
參考文獻 中文部分
[1] 李建然、顏怡音,「影響首次公開發行公司內部控制制度專案審查公費之因素」,當大會計,第六卷第一期,頁61-88,2005年。
[2] 張仲岳、曹美娟,「臺灣上市公司審計公費之決定因素」,當代會計,第六卷第二期,頁1-28,2005年。
[3] 黃美祝,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第50期,頁23-55,2010年。
[4] 蔡玉琴、倪伯煌、黃美珠、廖麗敏,中國大陸審計收費定價-深圳交易所上市公司之實證研究,東吳經濟商學學報,第六十三期,頁1-28,2008年。
[5] 王建煊,租稅法,32版,文笙書局股份有限公司,台北市,1980年
英文部分
[1] Baber, W. R., E. H. Brooks, and W. E. Ricks., “An empirical investigation of the market for audit services in the public sector”, Journal of Accounting Research, 25(2), 293-305. 1987.
[2] Badertscher, B. A., J. D. Phillips, M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego., “Earnings management strategies and the trade-off between tax benefits and detection risk: To conform or not to conform?”, The Accounting Review, 84(1), 63-97. 2009.
[3] Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin., “Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61. 2010.
[4] Craswell, A. T., and J. R. Francis., “Pricing initial audit engagements: A test of competing theories”, The Accounting Review, 74(2), 201-216. 1999.
[5] Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor., “Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations”, Journal of accounting and economics, 20(3), 297-322. 1995.
[6] Desai, M. A., A. Dyck, and L. Zingales., “Theft and taxes”, Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 591-623. 2007.
[7] Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala., “Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives”, Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179. 2006.
[8] Donohoe, M. P., and W. Robert Knechel., “Does corporate tax aggressiveness influence audit pricing?”, Contemporary Accounting Research. 2013.
[9] Dyreng, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew., “Long-run corporate tax avoidance”, The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82. 2008.
[10] Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen., “Separation of ownership and control”, Journal of law and economics, 26(2), 301-325. 1983.
[11] Francis, J. R., “The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market”, Journal of accounting and economics, 6(2), 133-151. 1984.
[12] Francis, J. R., and D. T. Simon., “A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market”, Accounting Review, 145-157. 1987.
[13] Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego., “Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting”, The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496. 2009.
[14] Gleason, C. A., and L. F. Mills., “Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting”, The Accounting Review, 77(2), 317-342. 2002.
[15] Gul, F. A., “Audit prices, product differentiation and economic equilibrium”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(1), 90-100. 1999.
[16] Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman., “A review of tax research”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127-178. 2010.
[17] Hay, D., R. Knechel, and V. Li., “Non‐audit Services and Auditor Independence: New Zealand Evidence”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(5‐6), 715-734. 2006.
[18] Khurana, I., and W. Moser., “Shareholder investment horizons and tax aggressiveness”, Available at SSRN 1517913. 2009.
[19] Manzon Jr, B. G., and G. A. Plesko., “Relation between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income”, The. Tax L. Rev., 55, 175. 2001.
[20] Maydew, E. L., and D. A. Shackelford., “The changing role of auditors in corporate tax planning (No. w11504)”, National Bureau of Economic Research. 2005.
[21] McGill, G. A., and E. Outslay., “Lost in translation: Detecting tax shelter activity in financial statements”, National Tax Journal, 57, 739-756. 2004.
[22] Menon, K., and D. D. Williams., “Long-term trends in audit fees”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 115-136. 2001.
[23] Menon, K., and D. D. Williams., “Auditor credibility and initial public offerings”, Accounting Review, 313-332. 1991.
[24] Mills, L. F., “Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments”, Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), 343-356. 1998.
[25] O’Keefe, T. B., D. A. Simunic, and M. T. Stein., “The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm”, Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 241-261. 1994.
[26] Omer, T. C., J. C. Bedard, and D. Falsetta., “Auditor-provided tax services: The effects of a changing regulatory environment”, The Accounting Review, 81(5), 1095-1117. 2006.
[27] Palmrose, Z. V., “The relation of audit contract type to audit fees and hours”, Accounting Review, 488-499. 1989.
[28] Phillips, J. D., M. Pincus, S. O. Rego, and H. Wan., “Decomposing changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities to isolate earnings management activities”, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 26(s-1), 43-66. 2004.
[29] Scholes, M., M. Wolfson, M. Erickson, E. Maydew, and T. Shevlin., Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach 3rd edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2005.
[30] Seetharaman, A., F. A. Gul, and S. G. Lynn., “Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 91-115. 2002.
[31] Shackelford, D. A., and T. Shevlin., “Empirical tax research in accounting”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 321-387. 2001.
[32] Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny., “A survey of corporate governance”, The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783. 1997.
[33] Simon, D., and J. Francis, S. Teo, and G. Trompeter., “A comparative study of the Market for audit services in Hong Kong, malaysia and Singapore”, The international journal of accounting, 27(3), 234-53. 1992.
[34] Simunic, D. A. and M. T. Stein., “The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence”, Auditing: A Journal of Prcatice and Theory, 15, pp. 119-134. 1996.
[35] Simunic, D. A., “The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence”, Journal of accounting research, 18(1), 161-190. 1980.
[36] Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan., “Evidence on the Joint Determination of Audit and Non‐Audit Fees”, Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721-744. 2003.
[37] Wilson, R. J., “An examination of corporate tax shelter participant”, The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999. 2009.
指導教授 郭南廷 審核日期 2013-7-8
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明