會計師任期、事務所規模對會計保守性之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：13.58.109.36

姓名

魏曉傑(Hsiao-Chieh Wei) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

會計師任期、事務所規模對會計保守性之影響
(Auditor tenure、 Audit-firm size influence the accounting conservatism)

相關論文

★ 以房養老貸款政策-由台灣金融業之觀點論析	★ 企業導入電子商務對經營績效之影響－以N公司為例
★ 台灣網通業應收帳款管理-論析信用保險之功能	★ 蘋果概念股金屬機殼產業之投資分析
★ 由鑑識會計角度偵測公司之舞弊－以某個案公司為例	★ 企業流程再造－以某食品原料加工公司之報價作業流程為例
★ 企業資源規劃系統導入之關鍵成功因素與效益評估－以某個案公司為例	★ 企業組織再造之分析－以某醫材業公司為例
★ 金融機構執行共同申報及盡職審查作業辦法之影響	★ 中美貿易戰對台灣企業之影響 -以某公司為例
★ 管理報表編制對企業經營績效之影響—以Ａ公司為例	★ 現金減資宣告之股價異常報酬-以台灣上市公司為例
★ 公司價值評估－以半導體產業某公司為例	★ 公司併購價格之決定-以電子業大聯大收購文曄為例
★ 製造業轉型之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 鑑識會計於政府採購招標階段之應用

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討國內會計師任期與會計保守程度之關聯性，並評估國內審計準則公報46號之規定會計師每七年輪調政策之良窳，另外，也延伸探討事務所任期、事務所規模對會計保守性之影響。本研究以1996年至2002年上市公司共計1673個觀察值為樣本，並採用Basu (1997) 的盈餘報酬迴歸模型來衡量會計保守性與時效性。依循2009年法規之規定，將會計師任期區分為未超過七年與七年以上，結果顯示，會計師任期與會計保守性有非線性關係，會計師任期越長，是可使盈餘報導更加保守，但超過七年，反而會使盈餘報導變得不保守。在不連續事務所任期樣本中，長任期相對於短及中任期，盈餘報導會較保守，亦指事務所任期於長任期下，盈餘報導會較保守。再者，本研究也發現由四大事務所查核的公司，其盈餘報導之保守性會顯著優於非四大事務所查核的公司，顯示由四大事務所查核，盈餘報導會較保守性。從會計保守性觀點，本研究實證結果支持審計公報48號規定會計師每7 年應進行所內會計師輪調之規範，另外，也發現事務所於長任期及由四大事務所查核是可讓盈餘報導更加保守。

摘要(英)

This study investigates the relations between auditor tenure and the level of accounting conservatism, and evaluate whether seven-year audit partner rotation requirement specified in the Auditing Standard Bulletin No. 46 is needed. In addition, we also extent to investigating the effect of audit-firm tenure and audit-firm size on the level of accounting conservatism. Our samples include 1673 observations of TSE (Taiwan Stock Exchange) firms from 1996 to 2002, and we measure of conservatism and timely based on Basu (1997) asymmetric timelines of earnings model. From the view point of 2009 regulation, we next partition the sample into less 7 years and excess 7 years based on the length of auditor tenure. our empirical evidence reveals that nonlinearity in the relation between conservatism and auditor tenure. The longer the auditor tenure, the better report of conservative earning, but excess 7 years results in lower report of conservative earning. In nonlinearity audit-firm tenure, the results indicate that report of conservatism earning is higher for longer tenure and relatively lower short tenure and medium tenure, suggest the report earnings conservatism when audit-firm tenure is longer,. Secondly, we find that reporting of conservative earnings of Big four clients is significantly higher than for non-Big four clients, suggest reporting of conservative earnings for Big four clients is conservatism. From accounting conservatism view, our empirical evidence support to Mandatory CPA Rotation’ rule in Taiwan since 2009, in addition, finding that reporting of conservative earnings for audit-firm tenure in longer and Big four clients is conservatism.

關鍵字(中)

★ 會計師任期
★ 事務所任期
★ 事務所規模

關鍵字(英)

★ Auditor tenure
★ audit-firm tenure
★ audit-firm size

論文目次

摘要 ...........................................................................................................................................I
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................II
謝辭 ......................................................................................................................................III 目錄 ........................................................................................................................................IV 圖目錄 .....................................................................................................................................V 表目錄......................................................................................................................................VI
第一章緒論 ..........................................................................................................................1
1-1 研究背景 ...............................................................................................................2
1-2 研究動機 ...............................................................................................................4
1-3 研究目的 ...............................................................................................................4
1-4 研究發現與貢獻 ...................................................................................................5
1-5 研究架構及流程圖 ...............................................................................................6
第二章文獻探討 ..................................................................................................................8
2-1 保守性之定義 .......................................................................................................8
2-2 國內會計師輪調制度 ...........................................................................................9
2-3 會計師輪調 .........................................................................................................11
2-4 事務輪調 .............................................................................................................12
2-5 事務所規模 .........................................................................................................13
第三章假說發展 ................................................................................................................15
3-1 會計師任期與會計保守性之間的關聯 .............................................................15
3-2 事務所任期與會計保守性之間的關聯 .............................................................15
3-3 事務所規模與會計保守性之間的關聯...............................................................16
第四章研究設計 ................................................................................................................17
4-1 Basu’s(1997)盈餘對報酬不對稱反應衡量法......................................................17
4-2 實證模型與變數定義 .........................................................................................17
4-3 樣本選取與資料來源 .........................................................................................20
第五章實證結果與分析 ....................................................................................................22
5-1 樣本敘述性統計與相關係數分析.......................................................................22
5-2 實證結果分析 .....................................................................................................25
5-3 穩健性測試 .........................................................................................................29
第六章結論與限制 ............................................................................................................33
6-1 結論.......................................................................................................................33
6-2 研究建議 .............................................................................................................34
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................35

參考文獻

(1)王茂昌，2009，「會計師任期與企業價值之攸關性:投資人決策之觀點」，企業管理學報，第80期：65-86。
(2)林嬋娟與林孝倫，2007，「會計師輪調制度」，會計研究月刊，第258期：88-95。
(3)廖秀梅與許雅雯，2010，「非審計服務、事務所規模與盈餘價值攸關性」，會計與公司治理，第2期：47-74。
(4)賴春田，2000，「會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變」，國立台灣大學會暨研究所碩士論文。
(5)謝永明與黃荃，2009，「會計師事務所任期與盈餘管理之關聯性－自我選擇模型之運用」，會計學報，第2期：73-99。
(6)劉嘉雯與王泰昌2008，「會計師任期與審計品質之關聯性研究」，管理評論，第27期：1-28。
(7)Ahmed ,A. S., B. K. Billings, R. M. Morton, and M. S. Harris, 2002. The Role of Accounting Conservatism in Mitigating Bondholder‐Shareholder Conflicts over Dividend Policy and in Reducing Debt Costs, The Accounting Review, 77: 867-890.
(8)Basu, S, 1997. The Conservatism Principle and The Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1): 3-37.
(9)Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin, 2000. The effort of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 291-151.
(10)Beaver, W. H, and S. G. Ryan, 2005. Conditional and nconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling, Review of Accounting Studies, 10 (2-3): 269-309.
(11)Carcello, J. V, and A. L. Nagy, 2004. Audit Firm tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting, A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23 (2): 55-69.
(12)Chen, C. Y, C. J. LIN, and Y. C. LIN, 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair EARNings Quality?, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25: 415–45.
(13)Chi, W., and H. Hunng, 2005. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-Firm Tenure and Audit-Partner Tenure: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, I: 65-92.
(14)Davis, L. R., B. Soo, and G. Trompeter, 2002. Auditor tenure, auditor independence and earnings management, Working paper, Boston College, Boston, MA.
(15)Davis ,L.,B. S. SOO and G. M. TROMPETER, 2005. Auditor Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat EARNings Forecasts,Contemporary Accounting Research, 26: 517-548.
(16)Davis, S. J, 2008. Does auditor tenure influence the reporting of conservative earnings?, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27: 115-132.
(17)DeAnglo, L. E, 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3: 113-127.
(18)Dopuch, N., and D. Simunic, 1982. Competition in auditing: An assessment, Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research, 401–450.
(19)Dye, 1993. Auditing Sandards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth, Journal of Political Economy, 101: 887-914.
(20)Emiliano R.B, G.A. Nieves, and B. L. Estibaliz, 2006. Long-term audit engagements and opinionshopping: Spanish evidence, Accounting Forum, 30: 61-79.
(21)Francis, J., E. Maydew, and H. Sparks, 1999. The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18: 17-34.
(22)Francis J. R, and J. Krishnan, 1999. Accountiing accruals and auditor reporting conservatism, contemporary accounting research, 1: 135-165.
(23)Ghosh, A, and D. Moon, 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality, The Accounting Review, 80: 585-612.
(24)Givoly, D, and C. Hayn, 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows, and accruals: Has financial accounting become more conservative?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (3): 287-320.
(25)Johnson V. E, I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds, 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial report. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (4): 637-660.
(26)Kothari, S. P, T. Lys, C. W. Smith, and R. L. Watts, 1989. Auditor liability and information disclosure, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 3 (4): 307-339.
(27)Knapp, M. C, 1991. Factors that audit committees use as surrogates for audit quality, A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10 (1): 35–52.
(28)Letwich, R., 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements, The Accounting Review, 58 (1): 23-42.
(29)Lev,b, and P. Zarowin, 1999. The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them,Journal of Accounting Research, 37: 353-385.
(30)Mautz, R, and H. Sharaf, 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing, Sarasota, American Accounting Association, 204-231.
(31)Myers, J. N, L. A. Myers and T. C. Omer, 2003. Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of EARNings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?, The Accounting Review, 78 (3): 779-799.
(32)Myers, J. N, L. A. Myers, Z. V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz, 2003. Mandatory Auditor Rotation: Evidence from Restatements, Working paper.
(33)Palmrose, Z. V, 1988. litigation and independent auditors:the role of business failures and management fraud, A Journal of Practice & Theory, 6: 90-103
(34)PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2002. Mandatory rotation of audit firms: Will it improve audit quality?, New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
(35)Reynolds, J. K, and J. R. Francis, 2000. Does Size Matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3): 375-400.
(36)Teoh, S. H, and T. J. Wong, 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earning response coefficient, The Accounting Review, 68: 346-366.
(37)Turner, L. E. and J. H. Godwin, 2003. Auditing earnings management, and international accounting issues at the securities and exchange commission, Accounting Horizons, 13: 281-297
(38)Shackelford, D. A., and T. Shevlin, 2001. Empirical tax research in accounting, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3): 321-387.
(39)Shockley, R. A, 1981. Perceptions of auditor independence: An empirical analysis, The Accounting Review, 56: 785–800.
(40)Watts, R. L, 2003a. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanation and implications, Accounting Horizons, 17 (3): 207-221.
(41)Watts, R. L, 2003b. Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities, Accounting Horizons 17 (4): 287-301.
(42)Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman, 1981. The Markets for Iindependence and Independent Auditors, Working paper, University of Rochester.
(43)Watts, R. L, J. L. Zimmerman, 1986. Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. Journal of Accounting Review, 66: 131-156.

指導教授

王曉雯

審核日期

2013-7-12

推文