博碩士論文 100450014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:100.26.179.196
姓名 鄧世璿(Shih-chun Teng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 高階主管企管碩士班
論文名稱 台灣中小企業策略發展演進之研究─以電子連接器K公司為例
相關論文
★ 電腦CPU散熱模組的技術發展策略★ 探討台灣印刷電路板產業經營策略-以A公司競爭策略為例
★ LED照明市場進入策略探討—以M公司為例★ 集團企業多角化對總部管控模式影響之研究 -以W集團企業為例-
★ 安全注射器中國專利授權模式研究★ 中國大陸房地產投資評估決策之研究 -以上海地區服務式公寓之投資為例-
★ 臺灣電子企業組織架構運作模式在中國之競爭優勢分析★ 小型台灣建築設計事務所於中國之發展策略探討
★ 半導體測試設備公司成長策略之個案分析★ 台灣不動產估價師事務所於中國發展策略研討
★ 軟體能力成熟度專案導入之個案研究-以某研發機構為例★ 新巴賽爾協定(Basel II)對中小型銀行授信風險管理政策的影響 -以U銀行為例
★ 價值投資法實證之研究-以臺灣證券市場為例★ 委外生產評估與執行之研究-以冷卻塔製造業個案為例
★ 企業多角化經營對供應鏈管理的決策影響★ 新產品導入量產流程之探討-以W公司衛星接收器為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 經濟部中小企業處《2012中小企業白皮書》資料顯示,2011年台灣中小企業家數為127萬9,784家,創下近年來最高紀錄,占全體企業家數97.63%;2011年中小企業的就業人數833萬7千人,占全國就業人數77.85%,足見中小企業是台灣經濟成長的動力,也是增加國民就業及提高國民所得的要角(經濟部中小企業處,2012)。
台灣中小企業從70年代開始,以價格便宜、快速、生產彈性佳的特質聞名,吸引世界知名大廠到台尋找合作生產廠商。然而,中小企業的資源遠不如大企業充足,創業者大多是由黑手變成頭家,企業的經營也缺乏規劃及管理,究竟中小企業持續成長的憑藉是甚麼?而且,隨著時間的演進,中小企業又是如何成長為有規模、有制度的企業?
本研究選擇中小規模電子連接器K公司為研究對象,以「資源基礎觀點」理論為基礎,結合企業經營策略與企業生命周期理論,探討個案公司在不同的企業生命周期階段之策略型態與決策過程,目的在瞭解中小企業在發展過程中策略型態及決策過程的演變。
本研究發現:
一、 個案公司企業生命周期的三個階段,皆屬不同策略類型的特色,而且隨著市場與產品的擴張、生產技術以及管理技術的進步,企業的策略型態會隨之轉變,非固定一種策略型態,而演進的過程是由防禦者策略(Defender),轉變成分析者策略型態(Analyzer),進而發展成前瞻者策略型態(Prospector)。
二、 個案公司的決策過程,在企業生命周期的三個階段皆屬不同類型,其草創期的決策是以領導者的直覺行動;於行動後累積資源,成為成長擴張期的決策基礎;成熟期則以企業願景為決策主軸。
依據研究結果,企業的策略型態會隨著企業生命周期不同的階段改變,而非固定不變。本研究建議企業經營者或管理者必須瞭解企業所處的生命周期階段的資源具備狀態,適時調整及修正「市場與產品」、「生產技術」以及「管理技術」三個構面的策略,使採行的策略適合在該生命周期階段發展。
摘要(英) The data from “2012 SMEs’ White Paper” revealed that in year of 2011, there were more than 1.2 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in Taiwan, and this number also hit a record high, accounting for 97.63% of all the businesses in Taiwan. Likewise, the number of people employed by such businesses in 2011 was 8.33 million and 7 thousands, representing 77.85% of the national employment. These numbers show that SMEs are the driving force of economies in Taiwan, and also the major players for increasing national employment and national domestic product.
Since the 1970s, Taiwan’s SMEs have been well-known for their advantages of competitive prices, faster delivery and services, and production flexibility. These competitive advantages also attract world-renowned manufacturers coming to Taiwan for seeking collaborations with Taiwan’s enterprises. However, SMEs have limited resources compared with large enterprises. Many of the SMEs’ entrepreneurs started their businesses from scratch and their business operations often lack planning and management. Under these awkward situations, how do these SMEs grow? How do they succeed? As time evolving, what strategy patterns will help SMEs growing into a large scale?
The case, Company K, studied in this research is a Taiwan-funded enterprise which produces electronic connectors. This research adopts a case study approach along with the “resource-based view” as the theoretical basis. The research explores how Company K did business decisions at different stages through strategy mapping. This research provides managerial implications based on the evolving business model of the case company.
Research findings and conclusions are as follows:
(1) Company K went through three stages of business lifecycle and adopted different strategic business model at each stage. The strategies are continuously regulated and adjusted to comply with the market expansion, technology evolution and management’s striving for improvement. The strategy evolution was from defender strategy, transformed into analyzer strategy, and then developed into prospector strategy.
(2) There have been three stages of decision-making process in Company K. Action-initiation and execution was the most urgent focus in the funding period while resource accumulation was the business decision that pursued further scale-up during the expansion period. The visionary approach is currently centered as the core as the company has entered the maturity stage.
This research suggests that enterprises’ strategy models are not immutable and frozen since businesses are always changing during different lifecycles. Business leaders have to understand the status of their business resources. Timely adjustments and improvements on market and product strategies, manufacturing technologies, and management competencies are essentially and critically required for the future success of any business.
關鍵字(中) ★ 電子連接器
★ 中小企業
★ 企業生命周期
★ 資源基礎觀點
關鍵字(英) ★ Electronic connector
★ Small and medium-sized enterprises
★ Business lifecycle
★ Resource-based view
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 1
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 企業生命周期 4
2.1.1 企業生命周期理論 4
2.1.2 企業生命周期與策略的關係 5
2.2 企業的經營策略 5
2.2.1 策略的定義 5
2.2.2 企業策略的類型 6
2.2.3 企業決策過程 10
2.3 資源基礎理論 12
2.3.1 資源基礎理論的發展 12
2.3.2 資源的定義 14
2.3.3 資源的分類 14
2.3.4 核心資源的特色 17
2.4 文獻探討結論 20
第三章 研究方法 21
3.1 研究方法 21
3.2 研究對象 22
3.3 資料蒐集方式 23
3.4 研究流程 24
第四章 個案分析 25
4.1 產業介紹 25
4.1.1 電子連接器產業背景 25
4.1.2 電子連接器製程 25
4.1.3電子連接器產業結構 26
4.1.4電子連接器產業未來趨勢 29
4.2 個案公司發展歷程與企業生命周期 30
4.3 個案公司資源分析 31
4.4 個案公司核心資源 33
第五章 結論與建議 35
5.1 研究結論 35
5.1.1 策略型態演變 35
5.1.2 決策過程演變 40
5.2 研究建議 47
5.2.1企業經營實務建議 47
5.2.2 研究限制 47
參考文獻 49
參考文獻 一、中文文獻
1. 大前研一(1984),策略家的智慧。台北市:書泉出版社。
2. 工研院經資中心(2004),我國連接器產業結構分析。新竹縣:工研院經資中心。
3. 司徒達賢(2001),「核心能力、互補性資源與持久競爭優勢之研究:以電子商務為例」(國科會研究計畫NSC89-2416-H-004-071)。台北:國科會。
4. 司徒達賢(2005),策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法。台北市:智勝文化出版。
5. 吳思華(2000),策略九說(第三版)。台北市:臉譜出版。
6. 周志龍(2001),「台灣網路產業資源內涵、資源特性與成長策略之個案研究」,國立
雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文。
7. 尚榮安(譯)(2001),個案研究法。台北:弘智文化。【Yin, R. K. (1998), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). CA: SAGE Publication.)】
8. 林建煌(2003),策略管理,台北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。
9. 許士軍(1980),管理學。台北市:東華出版社。
10. 陳寶惠(2006),「中小企業薪資不均程度與經營績效成長之實證研究-以台北縣製造業為例」,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
11. 張馨云(2004),「中小企業策略型態演進之研究-以桂盟企業為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
12. 張景翔(2000),「企業經營策略與薪資策略關係之研究-以台灣1000大製造業為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理碩士班碩士論文。
13. 彭永權(2013),「電子連接產業2012與2013年市場之探討」,電子連接產業通訊,第112期,頁數3。
14. 楊浩主(2001),現代企業理論教程。上海:上海財經大學出版社。
15. 經濟部中小企業處(2012),2012中小企業白皮書。台北市:經濟部中小企業處。
16. 謝孟玹(2013),「2012年我國連接器產業動態與市場掃描」,電子連接產業通訊,第113期,頁數4。
17. 顧淑馨(譯)(2004),競爭大未來。台北:智庫文化出版。【Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1994), Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.】
二、網路文獻
1. 工研院世界材料網(2010),「探討連接器及核能電廠設備/零組件材料技術」,工業材料雜誌,(取自2013/ 5/20,http://www.materialsnet.com.tw/DocView.aspx?id=8368)。
2. 無冕者的連接器世界(2011),「連接器時報.連接器產業:市場龐大 發展前景看好」,(取自2013/ 4/20,http://blog.xuite.net/crownless/connector/42621100)。
3. 經理人月刊編輯群(2006),「長壽企業的四項特質」,經理人月刊,(取自2013/3/30,http://www.managertoday.com.tw/?p=443)。
4. 趙忠傑(2008),「何謂策略」,(取自2013/ 4/28,http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/ajackperson-2006/article?mid=115&prev=116&next=114)。
5. 證券櫃檯買賣中心(2012),「連接器產業鏈簡介」,(取自2013/4/30,http://www.gretai.org.tw/ch/regular_emerging/ic2/introduce.php?ic=K000)。
三、英文文獻
1. Aaker, D. A. (1988), Strategic Market Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Adizes, I. (1979), “Organizational Passages: Diagnosing and Treating Life Cycle Problems of Organizations,” Organizational Dynamics, 8(1), 3-25.
3. Adizes, I. (1989), Corporate Lifecycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do About It. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Amit, R. and P. J. H. Schoemaker (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
5. Ansoff, H. I. (1965), Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Barney, J. B. (1986), “Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?” Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656-665.
7. Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
8. Barney, J., M. Wright and D. J. Ketchen, Jr. (2001), “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years after 1991,” Journal of Management, 27, 625-641.
9. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
10. Chatterjee, S. and B. Wernerfelt (1991), “The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence,” Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33-48.
11. Collis, D. J. and C. A. Montgomery (1995), “Competing on Resources: Strategy in the1990s,” Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-128.
12. Glueck, W. F. (1976). Business Policy: Strategy Formation and Management Action (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
13. Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
14. Habann, F. (2000), “Management of Core Resources: The Case of Media Enterprises,” International Journal on Media Management, 2(1), 14-24.
15. Hall, R. (1992), “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources,” Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.
16. Hofer, C. W. and D. Schendel (1978), Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
17. Hoskisson, R. E., M. A. Hitt, W. P. Wan and D. Yiu (1999), “Theory and Research in Strategic Management: Swings of a Pendulum,” Journal of Management, 25(3), 417-459.
18. Itami, H. and T. Roehl (1987), Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Jauch, L. R. and W. F. Glueck (1989), Strategic Management and Business Policy (1st ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
20. Johnson, R. P. (1997), “The Dynamics of Business Strategy: The Miles and Snow Typology and the Organizational Life Cycle,” International Journal of Management, 14, 222-228.
21. Kotler, P. (1976), Marketing Management, Analysis, Planning and Controls. NJ: Prentice-Hill.
22. Mata, F. J., W. L. Fuerst and J. B. Barney (1995), “Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487-505.
23. Miles, R. E. and C. C. Snow (1978), Organization Strategies, Structure and Process. NY: McGraw-Hill.
24. Mueller, D. C. (1972), “A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(3), 199-219.
25. Penrose, E. T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
26. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. NY: Free Press.
27. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
28. Rink, D. R. and J. E. Swan (1979), “Product Life Cycle Research: A Literature Review,” Journal of Business Research, 7(3), 219-242.
29. Robbins, S.P., (2001), Organizational Behavior, 9th ed., New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
30. Selznick, P. (1957), Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. NY: Harper & Row.
31. Shay, J. P. (1997), “Food-Service Strategy: An Integrated, Business-Life-Cycle Approach,” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 36-49.
32. Steiner, G. A. (1979), Strategic Planning: What Every Manager Must Know. NY: Free Press.
33. Stevens, M. (1988), “Guiding a Business through Its Life Cycles,” D&B Reports, 36(3), 48-49.
34. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
指導教授 王存國 審核日期 2013-6-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明