||Akdemir,O., & Koszalkab,T.A.(2008). Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers & Education,50(4), 1451–1461.|
Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community, New York: ACM, 3-10.
Baúar, H. (2006). SÕQÕf yönetimi. (13. BaskÕ). Ankara: AnÕ YayÕncÕOÕk
Boddy, N., Watson, K. and Aubusson, P. (2003). A Trial of the FiveEs: A referent modelfor constructivist teaching and learning.Research in ScienceEducation 33(1): 27-42.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J.,
Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Bybee, J. W., & Landes, N. M. (1988). The biological sciences curriculum study (BSCS). Science and Children, 25 (8), 36-37.
Chao, P. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2009). Augmenting paper-based learning with mobile phones. Interacting with Computers, 21, 173–185.
Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2009). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments,18(4), 341–364.
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (3), 347-359.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education,54(1),289–297.
Crawford, V., & Vahey, P. (2002). Palm education pioneers program, March 2002 evaluation report, Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Day, T. M., Raven, M. R., & Newman, M. E. (1998). The effects of world wide web Instruction and traditional instruction and learning styles on achievement and changes in student attitudes in a technical writing in agricommunication course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39(4), 65–75.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of inquiry. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp.3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of learning styles questionnaire.Retrieved 20 December 2008, from. www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
Fraser, B.J., Fisher, D.L., McRobbie, C.J., 1996a. Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. In: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement, big ﬁve personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 769–782.
Gay, G., Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M., & Hembrooke, H. (2001). The effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 13 (2), 257-276.
G.D. Chena, C.K. Changb, C.Y. Wanga.(2008).Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50 (1), 77–90.
Goldstein, J. (1998). The case for learning styles. Training and Development, 52(9), 36
Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2),116–131.
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H. & Ke, H. R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57, 4, 2272–2280.
Jackson, C., Baguma, P., & Furnham, A. (2009). Predicting grade point average from the hybrid model of learning in personality: consistent ﬁndings from Ugandan and Australian students. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 747–759.
Jeong, A., & Lee, J. (2008). The effects of active versus reﬂective learning style on the processes of critical discourse in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 651–665.
Karplus, R., & Their, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. IL: Rand McNally
Keefe, J. W. (1978). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Students Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs, 1-17. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lee, M. G. (2001). Proﬁling students’ adaptation styles in web-based learning. Computers & Education, 36, 121–132.
Liu, T.-C., Peng, H., Wu, W.-H., & Lin, M.-S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: a case study. Educational Technology & Society,12(4), 344–358.
Luff, P., & Heath, C. (1998). Mobility in collaboration. In Proceedings of the CSCW’98 conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 305–314). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information and Management, 40, 497–507
Morris, M. R., Brush, A. J. B., & Meyers, B. R. (2007). Reading revisited: evaluating the usability of digital display surfaces for active reading tasks. In Proceedings of the second annual IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human computer systems TABLETOP07 (pp. 79–86).
Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs type indicator manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Penuel, W. R., Tatar, D. G., & Roschelle, J. (2004). The role of research on contexts of teaching practice in informing the design of handheld learning technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30 (4), 353-370.
Perry, M., O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., Brown, B., & Happer, R. (2001). Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 8(4), 323–347.
Pettit, J., & KuKulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Going with the grain: mobile device in practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 17–33.
Polman, J. L., & Pea, R.D.(2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223-238.
Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a Web-based educational system: an experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,26, 243–257
P.V. Vinua, P.C. Sherimonb, Reshmy Krishnanc. (2011). Towards pervasive mobile learning – the vision of 21st century. Social and Behavioral Sciences ,15, 3067-3073.
Riding, R. J. (1991). Cognitive Styles Analysis – CSA administration. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Rogers, Y., Stanton, D., Thompson, M., Weal, M., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., & Randell, C. (2004).
Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (3), 260-272.
Smith, Patricia L., and Ragan, Tillman J. (1999). Instructional design. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, and imprint of Prentice Hall.
Swan, K., van’ t Hooft, M., Kratcoski, A., & Unger, D. (2005). Uses and effects of mobile computing devices in K-8 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (1), 99-112.
Tseng, C. R., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers and Education, 51(2), 776–786.
van’t Hooft, M., & Swan, K. (2004). Special issue on ubiquitous computing: Introduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30 (4), 275-279.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A.Maher & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics, (Monograph 4), (pp. 19-29). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(9), 936-960.
Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217.
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematice learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.
Witkin, H. A. (1949). The nature and importance of individual differences in perception. Journal of Personality, 18(2), 145–170.
Wong, L. H., Chin, C. K., Tan, C. L., & Liu, M. (2010). Students’ personal and social meaning making in a Chinese idiom mobile learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 15–26.
Yang, J. C., & Lin, Y. L. (2010). Development and evaluation of an interactive mobile learning environment with shared display groupware. Educational Technology &
Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic grouping in collaborative learning supported by wireless handhelds. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (3), 149-161.