展現寫作思考流程的範文閱讀平台

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：22

、訪客IP：52.14.126.74

姓名

許博盛(Bo-sheng Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

展現寫作思考流程的範文閱讀平台
(A Model Essays Reading Platform for Showing the Thinking Procedural of individual Writing Steps)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來台灣越來越重視學生的語言表達能力，最明顯的反應就是國、高中各類考試作文成績所占比例的提高，教育部甚至考慮在民國一百零七年將作文改設成獨立的考科。現今台灣，學生若要加強作文能力，最快速、直接的方法就是使用坊間的寫作參考教材，然而現行紙本的寫作參考教材卻無法有效的提升學生寫作之能力。我們認為主要的原因是因為紙本教材無法控制與確保學生是否按照設計的步驟作學習，加上紙本教材的內容多直接顯示給學生使用，學生大多照單全收，缺乏自主思考的機會。這樣的方式也使的學生無法確實學習到寫作的知識與寫作思考的訓練。
為此我們設計了一套「步驟式思考重建」的數位範例文章閱讀平台，透過數位技術克服紙本作文教材編排的困境，創造一種新穎的數位範文閱讀模式，藉以提升學生寫作思考之能力。本研究目前還在前導階段，主要透過訪談與問卷作意見上的調查。本研究共訪問了五位任教於各層級教學現場的國文教師，以及十七位學生之意見。結果顯示，教師與學生對於這種數位閱讀模式，都抱持正向支持的態度，但實際進入學校作為教師教學或是學生課後練習使用，仍需要後續的規劃與設計。至於學習效果上的影響，由於目前只採用訪談與問卷方式了解，欲了解實際學習效果的提升程度，需要日後實際進入教學現場實驗才能驗證。

摘要(英)

In recent years, people in Taiwan take verbal expression skills much more seriously. The most obvious difference is that the rate in the whole test of writing score is higher than before. Our Ministry of Education even considers to make writing as an independent subject in the future.
Nowadays, the most convenient and direct way to improve students’ writing ability is using the anecdotal textbooks as extra training. However, people can’t improve their writing ability efficiently by using those kinds of textbooks. We guess the probably reasons are the following two. First, the most student won’t follow the learning steps which designed by the author. Second, the process of students’ reading are passive. They lack of active thinking in this way. Above all, that’s why the students can’t surly learn the writing’s knowledge and writing’s thinking by using paper-style textbook.
So, we design a digital essay reading platform which can show the thinking procedural of individual writing steps to solve the above questions. Our target is to improve students’ thinking and writing ability. This is only a pilot study and thus we need to obtain more suggestions about this research. We interview five Chinese teachers and seventeen students. Based on the result of interview, the teachers and students hold a positive attitude on our research. However, the truly results should be verified through practical experiments.

關鍵字(中)

★ 寫作
★ 思考引導
★ 範例文章

關鍵字(英)

★ Writing
★ Thinking Guidance
★ Sample Articles

論文目次

中文摘要 v
Abstract vi
誌謝 vii
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xi
第一章　緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 1
1-3 研究目標 2
1-4 研究問題 2
1-5 解決方法 3
1-6 論文架構 3
第二章　文獻探討 4
2-1 電子教科書 4
2-2 寫作步驟與教學 5
2-2-1 國內外寫作步驟 5
2-2-2 國內外寫作教學策略 8
2-3 閱讀與寫作的相互關係 11
2-4 鷹架理論 12
2-5 後設認知 13
2-6 總結 13
第三章　系統設計與實做 15
3-1 系統設計 15
3-2 學生端系統描述 16
3-2-1 功能介紹 16
3-2-2 操作流程 22
3-3 教材編輯端系統描述 26
3-4 系統架構 31
第四章　系統評估與討論 34
4-1 研究方法與問題探討 34
4-2 研究流程 35
4-2-1 教師端 35
4-2-2 學生端 36
4-3 研究調查結果 38
4-3-1 教師訪談結果 38
4-3-2 學生問卷與訪談結果 41
第五章　討論 49
5-1 教學現場狀況(教學方法與學生能力背景) 49
5-2 學生對於電子式教科書與紙本教科書的看法與偏好 50
5-3 對「步驟式思考重建-範文閱讀」的看法與建議 51
5-4 系統建議與看法 52
第六章　結論與未來發展 54
參考文獻 56
附錄1-教師訪談內容 61
附錄2-學生問卷與訪談內容 65

參考文獻

〔1〕洪為璽、黃耀德，「電子教科書之使用行為意圖探討擴充整合性科技模式之觀點」，國立中正大學，碩士論文，民國100年。
〔2〕陳偉慈：「淺談電子教科書之發展」，取自：http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/91/13.htm
〔3〕 Blumenstyk, G., “Publishers promote e-textbooks, but many students are skeptical,” Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 35, May 2001.
〔4〕 Cheng, S. J. (2003). 具學習支援及診斷之線上電子書學習系統。
〔5〕 Wei, Fu‐Hsiang, and Gwo‐Dong Chen. "Collaborative mentor support in a learning context using a ubiquitous discussion forum to facilitate knowledge sharing for lifelong learning." British journal of educational technology 37.6 (2006): 917-935.
〔6〕 Li, L. Y., Chen, G. D., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32-39.
〔7〕 Li, L. Y., Fan, C. Y., Huang, D. W., & Chen, G. D. (2014). The Effects of the E-Book System with the Reading Guidance and the Annotation Map on the Reading Performance of College Students. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 320-331.
〔8〕 Chen, Yung-Che. (2013) 「論點-理由-證據」模式之議論文閱讀素養學習系統。
〔9〕 Le gum, S. E., & Krashen, S. D. (1972). Conceptual Framework for the Design of a Composition Program.
〔10〕 Flower, L. S.,& Hayes, J. R. (1981).A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
〔11〕 Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). ; The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publisher.
〔12〕 Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
〔13〕韋志成《作文教學論》，廣西教育出版社出版，1998年11月第一版，2002年4月第四次印刷
〔14〕劉忠惠（1996）。寫作指導（下）－文體實論。高雄：麗文。
〔15〕易淑貞（2004）。範文引導式作文教學法之研究─以各版國中國文範文為例。國立高雄師範大學國文教學碩士班論文。
〔16〕仇小屏（2005）。限制式寫作題型與能力。國文天地，21（3），87-91。
〔17〕 Cotton, K. (1988). Teaching composition: Research on effective practices. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
〔18〕 Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1993). Self-regulated strategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 169-181.
〔19〕 Harris, K. R., Schmidt, T., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategies for composition and self-regulation in the writing process. University of Maryland, reprinted with permission from Teaching Every Child Every Day: Learning in Diverse Schools and Classrooms
〔20〕 Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. Handbook of writing research, 187-207.
〔21〕 Goddard, Y. L., & Sendi, C. (2008). Effects of self-monitoring on the narrative and expository writing of four fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24(4), 408-433.
〔22〕 Yang, Y. F. (2010). Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1202-1210.
〔23〕 Levett-Jones, T. L. (2007). Facilitating reflective practice and self-assessment of competence through the use of narratives. Nurse education in practice, 7(2), 112-119.
〔24〕 Danoff, B., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1993). Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Literacy Research, 25(3), 295-322.
〔25〕 Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39-50.
〔26〕 Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111-129.
〔27〕 Ruiz‐Furies, M. (1999). The Process of Reading‐to‐Write Used by a Skilled Spanish‐As‐a‐Foreign‐Language Student: A Case Study. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 45-58.
〔28〕 Lin, F. C. (2004). 廣泛閱讀教學對高職生閱讀, 寫作及學習動機之影響. 臺灣師範大學英語學系在職進修碩士班學位論文, 1-113.
〔29〕 Lai, F. K. (1993). The effect of a summer reading course on reading and writing skills. System, 21(1), 87-100.
〔30〕楊純真 (2003) 閱讀與寫作指引對台灣高中生英文寫作的影響.國立彰化師範大學英語學系碩士班學位論文
〔31〕 Chen, F. Z. (1998). 閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。博士論文。國立台灣師範大學。
〔32〕徐仕勳. (2013) 整合主題閱讀與自由寫之數位寫作環境(何艾模式)：從設計到評估。碩士論文。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
〔33〕蔡慧美. (2008). 整合大量閱讀與寫作教學之行動研究.碩士論文。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所。
〔34〕姚素芳. (2003). 高中英文閱讀與寫作統合教學研究。碩士論文。國立中正大學外國語文研究所。
〔35〕 Kathleen Cotton , “Classroom Questioning” ,School Improvement Research Series,2001
〔36〕 T. M. GUNN “The Effect of Questioning on Text Processing”, Reading Psychology, pp405-422, Vol. 29, Oct 2008.
〔37〕 Eleanor Holmes, “Reading Guided by Questions versus Careful Reading and Re-Reading without Questions”, The School Review, Vol. 39, pp361-371, 1931
〔38〕 Raphael, T.E., Wonnacott, C.A. “Heightening fourth grade students’ sensitivity to sources of information for answering comprehension questions”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp282–296, 1985
〔39〕 Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving*. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
〔40〕 Doyle, W.（1986）. Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Witt rock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., 392-431). New York: MacMillan.
〔41〕 Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O＇Conner, M. C. （1992）. Discourse analysis. In M. D. Lecompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.). The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp.227-291). New York: Academic Press.
〔42〕 Judithann, W. W., （1993） Weekend report: A qualitative study of the scaffolding.
〔43〕 Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science:A project-based approach. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
〔44〕 Wood, Bruner & Ross, 1976 A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students
〔45〕 Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H.(1991). Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American educational research journal, 28(2), 373-391.
〔46〕 Lansman, M., Smith, J. B., & Weber, I. (1993). Using the Writing Environment to study writers′ strategies. Computers and Composition, 10(2), 71-92.
〔47〕王萬清(民83)。認知觀點之寫作歷程與寫作教學。初等教育學報，7，171-212。
〔48〕 Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
〔49〕 Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P., Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995.
〔50〕 Paz, S. D. L. (2007). Managing cognitive demands for writing: Comparing the effects of instructional components in strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 249-266.
〔51〕 Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 251-272.
〔52〕 Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. Handbook of writing research, 187-207.
〔53〕 Swanson, H. L. (2001). Searching for the Best Model for Instructing Students with Learning Disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(2), 1-15.

指導教授

陳國棟、黃興燦(Gwo-dong Chen Shing-tsaan Huang)

審核日期

2014-7-29

推文