體感科技支持全肢體反應教學法應用於高中英語教學之成效

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：7

、訪客IP：3.139.85.35

姓名

周克謙(Ke-Chien Chou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

體感科技支持全肢體反應教學法應用於高中英語教學之成效

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

英語能力的重要性在全球化的趨勢下日與俱增，英文嚴然已成為世界上溝通的最主要語言，然而台灣現今的英語教育中，忽視了人類在習得一門語言時的能力自然發展程序；同時脫離情境的教學方式，使得學習者無法對其外語視為與生活相關的重要性知識，形成了對外語學習的排斥感、感到不實用的與缺乏動機等抗拒現象，進而導致學習成效較差等問題。有鑑於此，本研究以全肢體反應教學法(Total Physical Response)與認知心理學理論為核心，並結合Microsoft Kinect體感科技，建置一體感式互動英文學習系統(KELS)，期望透過體感科技使用肢體互動的特性，可以有效增強外語學習的過程。
本研究以國立高中一年級學生為研究對象，共包含39位女性實驗參與者，透過實證研究比較方式，採用控制組與實驗組作為學習成效上之對照。並深入探討學習者在體感學習系統上的行為表現與其學習成效間之關係。接續再根據學者Reid(1984)所提出的知覺學習風格分類方式，進一步的瞭解不同知覺風格的學習者，在使用體感此種高度肢體互動學習模式時，是否會有學習成效上的差異。最後調查學習者們對於體感式學習系統的接受程度，並提出體感互動的學習模式在實際教學環境中所遭遇到的困難與可能解決的方法。
研究結果發現，控制組與實驗組在學習後長久保留效果上有顯著差異。此外，本研究所設計之「雙人互動口說遊戲」會顯著影響其學習成效。而在知覺學習風格方面，學習者不論是否偏好動覺學習特質，皆可透過本研究開發之體感學習系統達到良好的學習成效。最後，多數實驗組參與者一致認同本研究所開發之體感互動學習模式，可以有效增強其英語學習動機，並具有強烈的持續使用意圖。

摘要(英)

The important ability of English proficiency grows in tend of globalization, English have obviously been one of the major international languages for communication. However, the English education in Taiwan neglect that human have a natural procedure in learning language, and the teaching method depart from the life-related situation. This phenomenon is made that learners cannot regard English as the important knowledge of the life-related and forms an attitude of exclusion in learning English, feeling of unpractical, lack the learning motivation and so on. Therefore, this study is based on Total Physical Response (TPR) theory and Cognitive Psychology theories as the core and combines the technology of Microsoft Kinect to build an English learning system which is interacting by kinesthetic. Through the feature of kinesthetic interaction in English like body motion or context recognition by Kinect Technology we expect it will effectively enhance students’ motivations and procedure of foreign language learning.
This study conducted 39 senior high school students to participate, 20 students were employed as the control group and 19 students were employed as the experiment group. And further explore the relationship between behavior of using system and learning effect in experiment group. Moreover, we use the perceptual learning style which is proposed by Reid (1984) to understand whether students with different perception style would have any difference in learning effect. Finally, we investigated the acceptance and motivation for using this learning system, and propose some difficulty in implementing in the real teaching environment and some solutions.
The result show that there are significant different in long-term retention between control group and experimental group. Moreover, the peer interaction activity which is designed by this study would affect the learner’s learning effect. Concerning perception learning style, no matter the learner prefer the Kinesthetic style or not , they can get the better learning effect by using this learning system. Finally, most of the participants who are in experiment group agreed unanimously that this learning system would effective enhance their learning motivation and have a strong intention to use this learning system in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 全肢體反應教學法
★ 外語學習
★ 體感
★ 肢體互動
★ 知覺學習風格

關鍵字(英)

★ Total Physical Response
★ Foreign language learning
★ Kinesthetic
★ Gesture interaction
★ Perceptual Learning Style

論文目次

中文摘要 ..................i
Abstract.................ii
圖目錄...................vii
表目錄....................ix
第一章緒論................1
1.1 研究背景與動機......1
1.2 研究目的..........5
1.3 研究限制..........6
第二章文獻探討.............7
2.1 肢體互動與學習......7
2.2 訊息處理論.........8
2.3 多媒體與學習........9
2.4 學習保留效果.......11
2.5 學習動機 ..........12
2.6 情境與大腦.........14
2.7 全肢體反應教學法....16
2.8 運動與學習.........19
2.9 互動與語言習得......20
2.10 知覺學習風格........20
第三章系統設計與實作........22
3.1 系統設計...........22
3.2 互動機制...........23
3.2.1 動作解鎖機制.......23
3.2.2 物件辨識機制.......25
3.2.3 手勢方位機制.......25
3.2.4 體感點選機制.......26
3.3 系統功能模組..............27
3.3.1 字彙學習活動.......27
3.3.2 聽力測驗活動.......28
3.3.3 雙人互動口說遊戲....31
3.3.4 肢體造句..........31
第四章研究方法...................35
4.1 研究架構.................35
4.2 研究步驟.................38
4.3 研究對象與時間............39
4.4 活動設計.................40
4.5 研究工具.................43
4.6 資料蒐集.................45
4.7 資料處理.................46
第五章結果分析與討論...............47
5.1 控制組與實驗組學習成效之分析...47
5.1.1 樣本基本資料之描述....47
5.1.2 前後測學習成效分析....47
5.1.3 學習增益效果分析......49
5.1.4 延宕測試成效分析......49
5.2 系統實際使用行為對於學習成效之分析............50
5.2.1 系統實際使用行為對於後測成效之分析.....50
5.2.2 系統實際使用行為對於延宕測試成效之分析..52
5.3 問卷分析.................56
5.3.1 科技接受模型.......56
5.3.2 凱勒學習動機ARCS...61
5.4 知覺學習風格對於學習成效之分析.....66
第六章緒論與建議.......................67
6.1 結論..........................67
6.2 研究結果與貢獻..................68
6.3 未來工作與建議..................70
參考文獻................................71
附錄一後測試卷.........................77
附錄二延宕測試問卷.....................82
附錄三知覺風格問卷.....................86
附錄四控制組學習單.....................88
附錄五實驗組學習單.....................92
附錄六科技接受模型問卷..................93
附錄七凱勒學習動機問卷..................96
附錄八開放性問卷.......................98
附錄九訪談題目........................100

參考文獻

蔡瓊玲 (民93)。TPR策略應用對國小學童英語聽說學習成效之影響：以說故事教學為例。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所。
江明麗 (民99)。全肢體反應教學法對國小資源班智能障礙學生英語聽說能力之教學成效。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系所。
許惠菁 (民93)。全肢體反應教學法對國小身心學生功能性英語詞彙學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系所。
姚玉娟 (民99)。以手勢為基礎之遊戲式行動學習系統對學習成就及學習保留的影響。國立新竹教育大學資訊科學所。
阮氏惠 (民99)。A virtual reality learning game by using stereoscopic and interaction . 國立中央大學嵌入式系統產業研發碩士外國學生專班。
陳堅 (民99)。肢體動作感應的沉浸式學習用遊戲。國立中央大學嵌入式系統產業研發碩士外國學生專班。
Ansbacher, T. (1998). John Dewey’s Experience and Education: Lessons for Museums. The Museum Journal Volume 41, Issue 1, pages 36–50, March 1998.
Asher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of total physical response: A review. Modern Language Journal, 50(2), 79-84.
Asher, J. J. (1967). The learning strategy of total physical response: some age differences. Child Development, 38(4), 1219-1227.
Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.
Asher, J. J. (1972). Children first language as a model for second language. Modern Language Journal, 56, 133-139.
Asher, J. J., Kusudo, J. & Torre, R. (1974). Learning a Second Language Through Commands: the Second Field Test. Modern Language Journal, 58, 24-32.
Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning Another Language through: The Complete Teacher’s Guide. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Publications.
Asher, J. J. (1983). Learning Another Language through Actions : The Complete Teacher’s GuideBook (2nd Edition). Sky Oaks Productions, Inc Los Gato, Ca.
Asher, J. J. (1984). Total physical response: Some Guidelines For Evaluation. Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposal system and its control processes. The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.8), 1968, London: Academic Press.
Blakemore, S. J. & Firth, U. (2005). The Learning Brain. Published By arrangement with Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
Brown, H. D. (1974). Affective variables in second learning acquisition. Language Learning, 23, 231-243.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interaction approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Bruner, J. S. & College, F. O. H. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press.
Castelli, C., Hillman, C., Buck, S. & Erwin, H. (2007). Physical fitness and academic achievement in 3rd 5th grage students. J Sport Exerc Psychol 29, 239-252.
Coe, D. P., Pivarnik, J. M., Womack, C. J., Reeves, M. J. & Malinar., M. (2006) . Effect of Physical Education and Activity Levels on Academic Achievement in Children. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp. 1515–1519.
Davis, C. L., Tomporowski, P. D., Boyle, C. A., Waller, J. L., Miller, P. H., Naglieri, J. A. & Gregoski, M. (2007). Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Overweight Children’s Cognitive Functioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2007, 78(5): 510–519.
Dewey (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Dunn, R. (1983). Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional Children, 49, 496-506.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York city, Teachers college, Columbia university Press.
Ely, C. (1986). An analysis of discomfort, risk taking, sociability and motivation in the L2 classroom. Language Learning, 36, 238-244.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T. & Tesch, R. C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Pshchological Review, 100(3), 363-406 .
Felder, R. & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and Teaching Style in Engineering Education. Engineer Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Gardner, H. (1993). Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER November 1989 vol. 18 no. 8 4-10.
Guilherme, M. (2007). English as a global language and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 72-90.
Hatch, E. (1974). Second language learning universals? Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, pp.1-17.
Hein, G.E. (1996). Developing museum exhibitions for lifelong learning. London: The Stationery Office, 30-34.
Herson, J. & Stansfield, C. (1981). Relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31, 349-367.
Hersen, J. & Stansfield, C. (1982). Student-teacher cognitive styles and foreign language achievement: A preliminary study. Modern Language Journal, 66 , 263-273.
Heyde, A. (1977). Teaching and Learning English As a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice. TESOL 77, 226-240.
Hillman, C. H., Pontifex, M. B., Raine D. M., Hall, E. E. & Kramer, A. F. (2009). The effect of acute treadmill walking on cognitive control and academic achievement in preadolescent children. Neuroscience 159 (2009), 1044–1054.
John, M.(1995).Multimedia-why and why not. The Computing Teacher. P.16-18.
Johanna, H., Perttu, H., Laura, T. & Teppo. (2005). Children’s Intuitive Gestures in vision-based action games. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2005/Vol. 48, No. 1.
Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17-24.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS Model of instructional Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS Motivational Process in Computer - Based Instruction and Distance Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning Volume 1999, Issue 78, pp. 37–47.
Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and E-Learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pregamon Press.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instruction Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krash, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1988). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NY : Prentice Hall Inc.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M. & Todesco, A. (1975). The good second language learner. TESL Talk, 5(1),58-75.
Pavio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Price, S. & Rogers, Y. (2004) . Let’s get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education, 43 (2004) 137–151.
Reid, J. M. (1983). Perceptual learning style preferences of international students. Paper presented at the National NAFSA Conference, Cincinnati.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. TESOL QUARTERLY, Vol. 21, No. 1, March 1987.
Stevick, E. W. (1976). Memory, Meaning and Method: Some Psychological Perspectives on Language Learning. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., 68 Middle Road, Rowley, Massachusetts 01969.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human - machine communication. Cambridge University Press.
Tarone, E. (1979). Inter-language as chameleon. Language Learning, 29, 181-191.
Tucker, G. R., Hamayan, E. & Fathman, A. (1976). Some limitations to the classroom applications of second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 19-32.
Westling, D. L. & Fox, L. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Wudong, W. (1994). English language development in China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania.
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M. R. & McGue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2013-6-18

推文