| 參考文獻 |
Bergin, D. A. (1996). Adolescents’ out-of-school learning strategies. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(4), 309-323.
Black, Susan. (2002). Time for learning. American School Board Journal, 189(9), 58-62.
Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note Taking, Review, Memory, and Comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 63-73. doi: DOI 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063
Brush, A. J. B. (2002). Annotating Digital Documents for Asynchronous Collaboration. Teanical Report, 02-09-02.
Chen, C. C., & Huang, T. C. (2012). Learning in a u-Museum: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 873-883. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.003
Chen, C. J., & Liu, P. L. (2012). Comparisons of Learner-Generated Versus Instructor-Provided Multimedia Annotations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 72-83.
Chen, Y. C., Hwang, R. H., & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1094-1105. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.017
Chou, Shih-Chun, Stu, Jay, Lin, Yuting, & Hsieh, Wen-Tai. (2010). Toward computer-based learning: a taxonomy of ebook readers. Paper presented at the Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), 2010 2nd International Conference on.
Cordon-Garcia, J. A., & Lopes, C. A. (2012). The e-book: invariances and transformations. Profesional De La Informacion, 21(1), 83-90. doi: DOI 10.3145/epi.2012.ene.11
Crestani, Fabio, Landoni, Monica, & Melucci, Massimo. (2006). Appearance and functionality of electronic books. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 6(2), 192-209.
Dairianathan, A., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). Learning about Inheritance in an Out-of-School Setting. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1079-1108. doi: Doi 10.1080/09500693.2010.494185
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review., UK: The Department for Education and Skills.
Fisher, Douglas. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum.
Floyd, L. O., & Vernon-Dotson, L. J. (2009). Using Home learning Tool Kits to facilitate family Involvement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 160-166. doi: Doi 10.1177/1053451208326049
Fredrick, Wayne C, & Walberg, Herbert J. (1980). Learning as a function of time. The journal of educational research(73), 183-194.
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M.J. (2012). Classroom Strategies to Enhance Academic Engaged Time. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 653-673.
Gettinger, Maribeth. (1985). Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 3-11.
Gonzalez, A. R. (2002). Parental Involvement: Its Contribution to High School Students’ Motivation. The Clearing House, 75(3), 132-134.
Halpern, Robert. (2003). Making play work: The promise of after-school programs for low-income children: Teachers College Pr.
Handley, Z. (2009). Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning? Speech Communication, 51(10), 906-919. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.specom.2008.12.004
Hanna, D., Ulrich, T., Oliver, L., Marko, N., Alois, N., & Inge, S. (2011). Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes?
Harmer, Jeremy. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing Written Summaries: Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction. Review of Educational Research Winter.
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement - Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161-164.
Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., Su, Y. N., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 703-722. doi: DOI 10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R., & Li, J. S. (2011). Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1016-1028. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01126.x
Hwang, W. Y., F, L. Y., H, L. H., & M, H. Y. (2011). A Study of E-readers with Multimedia Annotation to Help Elementary School Students Learning with Parental Involvement. ICCE 2011.
Hwang, W. Y., & Hsu, G. L. (2011). The Effects of Pre-Reading and Sharing Mechanisms on Learning with the Use of Annotations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 234-249.
Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., & Huang, S. M. (2011). A study of a multimedia web annotation system and its effect on the EFL writing and speaking performance of junior high school students. Recall, 23, 160-180. doi: Doi 10.1017/S0958344011000061
Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials. Computers & Education, 48(4), 680-699. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.020
Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christian, D., Mcshane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-Taking Functions and Techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240-245. doi: Doi 10.1037//0022-0663.83.2.240
Kiewra, K.A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.
Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242-262. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001
Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24-31. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.014
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and Indirect Teaching: Using E-Books for Supporting Vocabulary, Word Reading, and Story Comprehension for Young Children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 135-152. doi: Doi 10.2190/Ec.46.2.B
Krumm, Volker. (1996). Parent involvement in Austria and Taiwan: Results of a comparative study. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(1), 9-24. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(96)82038-6
Lai, J. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). User attitudes toward dedicated e-book readers for reading The effects of convenience, compatibility and media richness. Online Information Review, 35(4), 558-580. doi: Doi 10.1108/14684521111161936
Lam, P., Lam, S. L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 30-44.
Li, L. Y., Chen, G. D., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32-39. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023
Muschamp, Y., Bullock, K., Ridge, T., & Wikeley, F. (2009). ’Nothing to do’: the impact of poverty on pupils’ learning identities within out-of-school activities. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 305-321. doi: Pii 902053226
Doi 10.1080/01411920802044362
Noam, Gil G, Biancarosa, Gina, & Dechausay, Nadine. (2003). Afterschool Education: Approaches to an Emerging Field: ERIC.
Pattuelli, M. C., & Rabina, D. (2010). Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings, 62(3), 228-244. doi: Doi 10.1108/00012531011046880
Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167-180. doi: Doi 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.167
Peverly, S. T., Vekaria, P. C., Reddington, L. A., Sumowski, J. F., Johnson, K. R., & Ramsay, C. M. (2013). The Relationship of Handwriting Speed, Working Memory, Language Comprehension and Outlines to Lecture Note-taking and Test-taking among College Students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 115-126. doi: Doi 10.1002/Acp.2881
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312. doi: Doi 10.1002/Acp.1086
Power, S., Taylor, C., Rees, G., & Jones, K. (2009). Out-of-school learning: variations in provision and participation in secondary schools. Research Papers in Education, 24(4), 439-460. doi: Doi 10.1080/02671520802584095
Quade, Ann M. (1996). An Assessment of Retention and Depth of Processing Associated with Notetaking Using Traditional Pencil and Paper and an On-line Notepad during Computer-Delivered Instruction.
Rayner, Keith, & Alexander, Pollatsek. (1989). The Psychology of Reading. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Rickards, John P, & Friedman, Frank. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136-143.
Roberts, Mary Lou, & Wortzel, Lawrence H. (1979). New life-style determinants of women’s food shopping behavior. The Journal of Marketing, 28-39.
Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334-1347. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015
Sartor, C. E., & Youniss, J. (2002). The relationship between positive parental involvement and identity achievement during adolescence. Adolescence, 37(146), 221-234.
Savova, M., & Garsia, M. (2012). McGill Library Makes E-books Portable: E-reader Loan Service in a Canadian Academic Library. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 12(2), 205-222.
Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Fellah, R. (2012). Promoting vocabulary, phonological awareness and concept about print among children at risk for learning disability: can e-books help? Reading and Writing, 25(1), 45-69. doi: DOI 10.1007/s11145-010-9247-x
Shih, J. L., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Kinshuk. (2011). An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 373-394. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01020.x
Shin, D. H. (2011). Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratification expectancy model. New Media & Society, 13(2), 260-278. doi: Doi 10.1177/1461444810372163
Shurtz, S., & von Isenburg, M. (2011). Exploring e-readers to support clinical medical education: two case studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(2), 110-117. doi: Doi 10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.002
Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., & Wurtz, P. (2012). Reading on LCD vs e‐Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics.
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., & Groner, R. (2011). Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268-273. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2011.05.005
Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752-766. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008
Thayer, A., Lee, C.P., Hwang, L.H., Sales, H., Sen, P., & Dalal, N. (2011). The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Tran, N. A. (2011). The Relationship between Students’ Connections to Out-of-School Experiences and Factors Associated with Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1625-1651. doi: Doi 10.1080/09500693.2010.516030
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary Growth and Reading Development across the Elementary School Years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8-25. doi: Pii 932516233
Doi 10.1080/10888438.2011.536125
Wade, S. E., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An Analysis of Spontaneous Study Strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 147-166.
Wilson, R., & Landoni, M. (2001). Evaluating electronic textbooks: a methodology. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 1-12.
Woolley, S. L., Benjamin, W.J., & Woolley, A. W. (2004). Construct validity of a selfreport measure of teacher beliefs related to constructivist and traditional approaches to teaching and learning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(2), 319-331.
Wright, S., Fugett, A., & Caputa, F. (2013). Using E-readers and Internet Resources to Support Comprehension. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 367-379.
Wyne, Marvin D, & Stuck, Gary B. (1982). Time and learning: Implications for the classroom teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 83(1), 67-75.
Xu, J. Z. (2004). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1786-1803.
Yang, C. C., Tseng, S. S., Shih, W. C., & Liang, T. (2012). A Cross-Text Annotation Sharing Mechanism for Enhancing Students’ Comprehension of Poetry. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 13-24.
Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y. S., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45-62. doi: Doi 10.1080/10494820.2011.528881 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit