Commercial Exchange and Social Exchange in Shakespeare′s Pericles, Prince of Tyre and The Merchant of Venice

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：3.135.219.166

姓名

林欣儒(Hsin-ru Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英美語文學系

論文名稱

(Commercial Exchange and Social Exchange in Shakespeare′s Pericles, Prince of Tyre and The Merchant of Venice)

相關論文

★ The Duchess of Malfi 和 The Revenger's Tragedy 女性身體意涵	★ 夏娃：失樂園中的馴化
★ 夾縫中的女體：《惡有惡報》與《泰特斯．安莊尼克斯》中的失聲現象	★ 偽裝:莎士比亞劇中的另類身份鑄造過程
★ 早期現代母職形構：奶媽的式微與新好媽媽的崛起	★ Ghostly Bodies of Knowledge: Authorship, History Writing and Visual Language in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"
★ Time to Sleep and Time Not to Sleep: The Making of the Polite and Productive Body in Modern Taiwan	★ The Representation of the Fit body: Food advertising in Modern Taiwan
★ 從消費論身分認同: 從社會與人際關係間的過程論貝琪的自我體現	★ The Theater of Pain and Community-Making in William Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus and Coriolanus
★ Drags and Gender Play in Pili Budaixi	★ Rabelais and Changes in Renaissance Medicine
★ 關係作為貨幣：《威尼斯商人》與《雅典的泰門》中的社會資本

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文以探討不同類型之「交換」行為如何影響人際關係為主題，在莎士比亞的劇作《佩瑞克里斯》與《威尼斯商人》中帶入馬修‧薩林和大維‧格雷伯的人類經濟學論點，分析社會交換及商業交換如何在人際互動中影響關係的形成或維持。這兩種交換模式為本論文主要的研究方向，而兩者差異在於執行者的目的與期待之不同。交換行為不僅會創造或塑造人際互動，也隱含了社會道德和規範。
第一章介紹《佩瑞克里斯》的主角佩瑞克里斯在不同場域如何使用「社會交換」以達到個人目的，建立新的關係，而其成果是無法用金錢衡量的。他的經歷將解釋「社會交換」之主要特徵和精神所在。另外，佩瑞克里斯的女兒瑪莉娜的故事，則是呈現了「商業交換」的行為如何將人與物的價值畫上等號。本文藉由兩人的境遇探討與分析「交換」行為的影響和規則。第二章則以《威尼斯商人》中兩大種族社群的互動，更進一步研究「交換」行為在社會中的意義，影響的層面牽涉了個人及族群的利益與認同的議題。最後，結論的部分將強調「交換」行為如何影響人際關係和身分地位，並討論劇本創作的年代至今，人們一直面對的相關經濟行為所衍伸的議題。從劇本角色的互動和理論之交互應證，本論文詮釋的是「社會交換」與「商業交換」在人際與社會關係中所扮演之不可或缺的角色。

摘要(英)

This thesis aims to discuss how exchange affects human relationships in Shakespeare’s plays. In view of Marshall Sahlins’ and David Graeber’s essays on human economics, this thesis suggests examining Pericles, Prince of Tyre and The Merchant of Venice with two patterns of exchange. Social exchange and commercial exchange differ in the executer’s purpose and expectation of the outcome. Exchange creates and shapes interpersonal interaction, and it implies morality and social norms as well. From this perspective, one sees that human relations are related to economic ideas.
The first chapter discusses how social exchange is applied to create and maintain relationships in Pericles, Prince of Tyre. The protagonist, Pericles, practices social exchange in different scenes and achieves his goals which cannot be estimated or valued in monetary terms. His experiences show the crucial elements and spirits in social exchange. On the other hand, Marina’s experience exemplifies commercial exchange in the play. The second chapter explains that The Merchant of Venice involves both commercial exchange and social exchange as well. Adding discussion of social distance and comparisons in communities, this chapter demonstrates how exchange affects human relationship in a broader sense. The thesis concludes by suggesting that the two patterns of exchange form a part of social life, that everywhere shape and reshape people’s life.

關鍵字(中)

★ 商業交換
★ 社會交換
★ 人類經濟學
★ 道德
★ 關係

關鍵字(英)

★ commercial exchange
★ social exchange
★ human economics
★ morality
★ relationship

論文目次

English Abstract ____________________________________________________________ i
Chinese Abstract ___________________________________________________________ ii
Acknowledgement _________________________________________________________ iii

Introduction ______________________________________________________________ 1

Chapter I: How Exchange Affects Human Relationships in Pericles, Prince of Tyre _____ 12
Social Exchange in Pericles, Prince of Tyre ________________________________ 13
Commercial Exchange in Pericles, Prince of Tyre ____________________________19

Chapter II: How Exchange Affects Human Relationships in The Merchant of Venice_____ 23
Social Exchange in The Merchant of Venice _________________________________24
Commercial Exchange in The Merchant of Venice ____________________________36

Conclusion _______________________________________________________________48

Works Cited ______________________________________________________________52

參考文獻

Appleby, Joyce Oldham. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press, 2004. Print.
Bailey, Amanda. Of Bondage. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania Press. 2013. Print.
Beck, Bernard. “The Taming of the Jew: The Merchant of Venice Is No Laughing Matter.” Multicultural Perspectives, 7-4 (2005):30-32. JSTOR. Web. 13 Jun. 2014.
Bilello, Thomas, C. “Accomplished with What She Lacks: Law, Equity, and Portia’s Con.” Law and Literature, 16-1 (2004): 11-32. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.
Burckhardt, Sigurd. “The Merchant of Venice: The Gentle Bond.” ELH, 29-3 (1962): 239-62.
JSTOR. Web. 08 Nov. 2015.
Drakakis, John, ed. The Merchant of Venice. London: A & C Black Publishers Ltd., 2010. Print.
Engle, Lars. “‘Thrift is Blessing’: Exchange and Explanation In The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 37-1 (1986): 20-37. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.
Evans, G. Blakemore, J. J. M. Tobin, et al. eds. “Pericles, Prince of Tyre.” The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Boston: Wadsworth, 1997. Print. 1527-64.
Graeber, David. Debt: the first 5,000 years. New York: Melville House Publishing, 2011. Print.
Graham, Cary B. “Standards of Value in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 4-2 (1953): 145-51. JSTOR. Web. 11 Nov. 2015.
Heller, Agnes. “The Absolute Stranger: Shakespeare and the Drama of Failed Assimilation.” Critical Horizons, 1-1 (2000):147-67. JSTOR. Web. 15 Jun. 2014.
Hillman, Richard. “Shakespeare’s Gower and Gower’s Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 36-4 (1985): 427-37. JSTOR. Web. 13 May 2015.
Hoeniger, F. D. “How Significant are Textual Parallels? A New Author for Pericles?” Shakespeare Quarterly, 11-1(1960): 27-37. JSTOR. Web. 22 Apr. 2015
---. “Gower and Shakespeare in Pericles.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 33-4 (1982): 461-79. JSTOR. Web. 15 May 2015.
Mauss, Marcel. “Gift, Gift.” The Logic of Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. New York: Routledge, 1997. 28-32. Print.
Newman, Karen. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 38-1 (1987): 19-33. JSTOR. Web. 3 Nov. 2015.
Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982. Print.
Riggio, Milla C. “The Universal Is the Specific: Deviance and Cultural Identity in the Shakespearean Classroom.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 46-2 (1995): 196-209. JSTOR. Web. 17 Oct. 2014.
Sahlins, Marshall. Stone Age Economies. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1972. Print.
Sharp, Ronald A. “Gift Exchange and the Economies of Spirit in ‘The Merchant of Venice.’” Modern Philosophy, 83-3 (1986): 250-65. JSTOR. Web. 3 Nov. 2015
Slights, Camille. “In Defense of Jessica: The Runaway Daughter in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 31-3 (1980): 357-68. JSTOR. Web. 3 Nov. 2015.
Thomas, Sidney. “The Problem of Pericles.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 34-4 (1983): 448-50. JSTOR. Web. 18 May 2015.
Wrightson, Keith. Early Necessities: Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain. New Haven: Yale UP. 2000. Print.

指導教授

林錥鋕(Spencer Lin)

審核日期

2016-1-21

推文