以事件相關腦電位探討特質焦慮對主動式注意力攫取的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：18.190.217.134

姓名

呂昕潔(Hsin-Jie Lu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

以事件相關腦電位探討特質焦慮對主動式注意力攫取的影響
(Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence that the effect of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture)

相關論文

★ 時間及空間對注意力暫失的影響以及其可能的神經生理機制	★ 注意力分配及眼球運動準備歷程對於眼動潛伏時間與眼動軌跡的影響
★ 注意力暫失中的數字表徵: 數字距離對注意力暫失的影響	★ 利用跨顱磁刺激探討主動式注意力攫取的神經機制
★ 以數學模型及跨顱磁刺激探討注意力分配及眼球運動準備歷程	★ 學齡前兒童之視覺注意力發展及電腦化注意力訓練效果之探討
★ 以跨顱磁刺激探討左側下部頂葉以及左側上部頂葉的功能在中文處理中所扮演的角色	★ 性侵害犯的衝動行為表現-情緒狀態如何影響性侵害犯的抑制能力？
★ 學齡前階段孩童眼動抑制能力的發展和特性	★ 學齡前階段孩童衝突解決和動作反應抑制能力的發展
★ 6歲孩童與成人在數字和具體數量上的自動化處理	★ 期望效果之影響與可能的神經機制
★ Attentional reorienting: the dynamic interaction between goal-directed and stimulus-driven attentioinal control	★ 前額葉眼動區在視覺搜尋作業上對不同干擾物特徵與顯示時間扮演的角色
★ Roles of the Pre-supplementary Motor Area and Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Stimulus Selective Stop-signal task: A Theta Burst Transcranial!Magnetic! Stimulation!Study	★ Investigation of posterior parietal cortex visuospatial control over processing in near and far space using transcranial magnetic stimulation

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在探討選擇注意力的研究中，認為注意力歷程是由刺激驅動以及自主性控制兩者互動所控制，這樣的現象稱之為「主動式注意力攫取」。根據神經模型指出，注意力控制歷程分別由兩個神經網路負責，一為背側網路，主要負責自主性控制，維持注意力設定；而腹側網路，與突現刺激的處理有關。在近二十年的研究觀察到，焦慮症患者的注意力易受到負向、威脅性的刺激影響而改變。注意力控制理論 (attentional control theory)認為這樣的現象是由於焦慮干擾了背側網路以及腹側網路互動的平衡。根據此理論的假設，本研究欲探討長期的特質焦慮性格，是否會影響一般人的注意力控制歷程以及背後的神經機制。
本研究利用 RSVP ( repid serial visual presentation, 快速序列視覺呈現)作業，並操弄不同顏色的干擾物以建立主動式注意力攫取。研究結果發現，高低特質焦慮受試者在行為表現以及 N2pc 成份均觀察到與目標物相關的干擾物出現時，注意力攫取現象所受到的影響最大，符合主動式注意力攫取的理論。而更進一步的分析發現，相較於低特質焦
慮受試者，高特質焦慮受試者在目標物相關的干擾物產生的 N2pc 成份要來的大。此外，也發現到當干擾物呈現在左視野時，高特質焦慮受試者的行為表現比干擾物呈現在右視野時來的差。本研究顯示，特質焦慮的確干擾了左右腦活動的平衡，尤其使得右腦過度活化，並造成了向左的注意力偏誤現象。

摘要(英)

Attention may be captured by salient stimuli, but this effect is determined by top-down control settings, a phenomenon called "contingent capture". Previous theoretical approaches claimed that anxiety impairs attentional control processing by disrupting the balance between top-down and bottom-up attentional control systems (Eysenck et al., 2007) resulting in anxious individuals having difficulty resisting distraction. The present study tests this assumption by investigating the relationship between individual differences in trait anxiety and attentional distraction by task-irrelevant stimuli in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm while the electroencephalogram was recorded. Analysis of the behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of attentional control processing for three different
distractors showed a larger capture effect in the target-relevant distractor condition than the non-target relevant distractor and the distractor absent condition both in high trait anxiety and low trait anxiety groups, states that capture effects appear to be contingent on top-down
attention settings. Moreover, high trait anxiety participants generated a larger N2pc in the target-relevant distractor condition and their behavioral performance was worse when distractors presented in the left visual field. The findings in this study suggested that trait anxiety influence the balance between two hemispheres especially in hyperactivation of the right ventral attention network, resulting in a leftward attentional asymmetry effect in spatial orienting.

關鍵字(中)

★ 主動式注意力攫取
★ 特質焦慮
★ 注意力控制理論
★ N2pc

關鍵字(英)

★ Contingent capture
★ trait anxiety
★ attentional control theory
★ N2pc

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
致謝 iii
Table of Content iv
List of Figures vi
Chapter 1 :Introduction 1
1.1.Contingent attentional capture (Attention control) 1
1.1.1.The neural mechanisms of contingent attentional capture 1
1.2.Anxiety 7
1.2.1.Attentional bias in anxiety 8
1.2.2.Attentional Control Theory 9
1.3.Research aims 10
Chapter 2 :Method 11
2.1.Participants 11
2.2.Apparatus and Materials 12
2.2.1.Questionnaire 12
2.2.2.Apparatus 12
2.2.3.Stimuli and Materials 12
2.3.Procedure 14
2.4.EEG recording 14
2.4.1.Protocol 14
2.4.2.ERP analysis 15
2.5.Date Analysis 15
2.5.1.Behavioral data 15
2.5.2.EEG data 15
2.5.3.Statistic 16
Chapter 3 :Results 17
3.1.Behavioral results 17
3.1.1.Accuracy 17
3.1.2.Reaction time 18
3.2.Electrophysiological results 20
3.2.1.ERPs 20
Chapter 4 :Discussion 24
Reference 27

參考文獻

Aftanas, L. I. & Pavlov, S. (2005). Trait anxiety impact on posterior activation asymmetries at rest and during evoked negative emotions: EEG investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 85-94.
Alden, L.E., Taylor, C.T., Melligs, T.M., & Laposa, J.M. (2008). Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events. Journal of Anxiety Disorder. 22(4), 577-590. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.05.007
Ashwin, C., Wheelwright, S., & Barcon-Cohen, S. (2005). Laterality Biases to Chimeric Faces in Asperger Syndrome: What is ‘Right’ About Face-Processing? Journal of Autism and Developmental disorders. 35(2), 183-196. doi:10.1007/s10803-004-1997-3
Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H.E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(5), 485-96.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., & van IJzendoorn M.H.(2007).Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a
meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1-24.
Baxter, A.J., Scott, K. M., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H.A. (2013). Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine. 43(5).897-910. doi:10.1017/S003329171200147X
Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 49–58.
Bishop, S. J. (2009). Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 92-98. doi: 10.1038/nn.2242
Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980): Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia. 18,491-498.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Burnham, B.R., Rozell, C.A., Kasper, A., Bianco, N.E., Delliturri, A. (2011). The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search. Brain and Cognition, 75(3), 261-72. 9.
Calvo, M. G., & Cano-Vindel, A. (1997). The nature of trait anxiety: Cognitive and biological vulnerability. European Psychologist, 2(4), 301-312.
Chang, C.F., Hsu, T.Y., Tseng, P., Liang, W.K., Tzeng, O.J., Hung, D.L., et al. (2013) Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting. Human Brain Mapping, 34(4), 869-77.
Christman, S. D., & Hackworth, M. D. (1993). Equivalent perceptual asymmetries for free-viewing of positive and negative emotional expressions in chimeric faces. Neuropsychologia, 31, 621–624.
Cisler, J.M., & Koster, E.H. (2010). Mechanisms of Attentional Biases towards Threat in the Anxiety Disorders : An Integrative Review. Clinical Psychology Review,30(2), 203-16.
Coles, M.E., Turk, C.L., & Heimberg, R. (2007). Memory Bias for Threat in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The Potential Importance of Stimulus Relevance. Cognitive Behaviour
Therapy. 36(2), 65-73, doi: 10.1080/16506070601070459
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G.L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306-24.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G.L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-15.
Craske, M.G., Rauch, S.L., Ursano, R., Prenoveau, J., Pine, D.S., Zinbarg, R.E. (2009). What is an anxiety disorder? Depression Anxiety, 26(12), 1066-85.
Demaree, H.A., Everhart, D.E., Youngstrom, E.A., & Harrison, D.W. (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating
"dominance". Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev.4(1),3-20. doi: 10.1177/1534582305276837
Derakshan, N., Ansari, T.L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M.W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness. An investigation using antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48-55. 5.
Derakshan, N. & Eysenck, M.W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: new developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist.
14(2), 168-176. doi 10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168
Derryberry, D., Reed, M.A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 225-36.
Du F., & Abrams, R.A. (2010). Visual field asymmetry in attentional capture. Brain Cognition, 72(2), 310-16.
Eimer ,M. (1996). The N2p component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(3), 225-34.
Eysenck, M.W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M.G. (2007). Anxiety and Cognitive Performance: Attentional Control Theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-53.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Percept Psychophys, 64(5), 741-753.
Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 18,1030–1044.
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700.
Gawda, B. & Szepietowska, E. (2016).Trait Anxiety Modulates Brain Activity during Performance of Verbal Fluency Tasks. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10:10. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00010
Gibson, B.S., & Kelsey, E.M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 699-706.
Hagemann, D., Hewig, J., Naumann, E., Seifert, J., & Bartussek, D. (2005). Resting brain asymmetry and affective reactivity: Aggregated data support the Right-Hemisphere
Hypothesis. Journal of Individual Differences, 26(3), 139-154. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.139
Hellige. J. B. (1990). Hemispheric asymmetry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41,55-80.
Leblanc, E., Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4),
657-671. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20051
Legerstee J. S., Tulen J. H. M., Kallen V. L., Dieleman G. C., Treffers P. D. A., & Verhulst F. C., et al. (2009). Threat-related selective attention predicts treatment success in childhood anxiety disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry.48(2),196–205. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819176e4
Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 20(5), 1000-14.
Kiss, M., Jolicœur, P., Dell′Acqua, R., Eimer, M. (2008). Attentional capture by visual singleton is mediated by top-down task set: New evidence from the N2pc component.
Psychophysiology, 45(6), 1013-1024. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00700.x
Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement,
impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behav Res Ther, 44(12), 1757-1771. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011
MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: accessibility of information or assignment of processing priorities? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29(6), 599-610.
Mathews, A., MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotion disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 1,167-195. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916
Moser, J.S., Becker, M.W., & Moran, T.P. (2012). Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety. Emotion, 12(2), 213-16.
Olatunji, B.O., Cisler, J.M., & Tolin, D.F. (2007). Quality of life in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(5), 572-81. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.015
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Posner, M.I., & Petersen, S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
Rapaport, M.H., Clary, C., Fayyad, R., & Endicott, J. (2005). Quality-of-Life Impairment in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(6), 1171-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1171
Reeck, C., LaBar, K.S., Egner, T. (2012). Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1113-26.
Sawaki, R., Geng, J.J., Luck, S.J., (2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. J Neurosci, 32, 10725–10736.
Serences, J.T., Shomstein, S., Leber, A.B., Golay, X., Egeth, H.E., & Yantis, S. (2005).
Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychological Science, 16(2), 114-22.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Sylvester, C. M., Barch, D. M., Corbetta, M., Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., and Luby, J. L. (2013). Resting state functional connectivity of the ventral attention network in children with a history of depression or anxiety. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 52, 1326–1336.e1325. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.001
Sylvester, C.M., Corbetta, M., Raichle, M.E., Rodebaugh, T., Schlaggar, B.L., Sheline, Y.I., Zorumski, C.F., & Lenze1, E.J. (2012). Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(9), 527-35.
Wascher, E., Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG,Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(2), 149-62.
Whiteford, H.A., Degenhardt, L., Rehm, J., Baxter, A.J., Ferrari, A.J., Erskine, H.E., Charlson, F.J., et al. (2013). Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 Lancet. 382, 575–1586.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61611-6
Williams, J. M., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorder. Chichester, England: Wiley. Woodman, G.F., Luck S.J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of
attention during visual search. Nature, 400(6747), 867-69.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 16(1), 121-34.

指導教授

阮啟弘(Chi-Hung Juan)

審核日期

2016-7-25

推文