| 摘要(英) |
Recently, Taiwan′s economy gradually has developed, in opposite to the demand of infrastructure greatly enhance. In the infrastructure, Temporary road becomes indispensable role, because let large equipment of engineering to easily access the site. However, temporary road must be laid on the soft and compressible of soil subgrade. Because Taiwan is a subtropica and warm and rainy climate, throughout the island will have heavy rain, it may make the original soft soil with the low bearing capacity to reach saturation, the bearing capacity further reduce. During construction or after, the roads easily produce bearing-capacity failure, and there is a large settlement, derivative to safety
accident causes the loss of lives and property and the increment of social costs.
In order to strengthen the bearing capacity of weak soil, geosynthetics can be used (such as geogrids or geotextiles ) and by goesynthetics used in the mechanical mechanism of stiffened road to improve the insufficient bearing capacity characteristics of soft soil. In this study uses the California Bearing Ratio test, simulate the subgrade condition of reality tmporary road, use Central University laterite soil as a subgrade soil. And then use the different moisture content as the test factor is observed, to investigate the changes of bearing capacity in the unpavement.
The following summaries from preliminary test result are
addressed:(1) In the unsoaked condition, compaction moisture content increases, the CBR value of the specimen reduces. Conversely, compaction II moisture content increases, the CBR value of the specimen rises, indicate the amount of compaction moisture content will affect the bearing ratio,
and the swelling amount of specimen after immersion in water are closely related to the bearing ratio; (2) In soak and different laying position condition, stiffening effects of geotextiles in the dry side, the O.M.C side and the wet side of the modified compaction curve have different trends.
In conclusion, the stiffening effects on the wet side of the optimum moisture content are greater than on the dry side of the optimum moisture content. And the stiffening effects on the dry side of the optimum moisture content are greater than on the optimum moisture content side. |
| 參考文獻 |
1.葉真有，「以大型直接剪力試驗探討地工格網剪力介面行為之研究」，國立暨南國際大學地震與防災工程研究所碩士論文，南投 (2009)。
2.王聖昌，「地工合成材料於鐵路湧泥改善之研究」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，台南 (2003)。
3.林佳儀，「地工格網加勁土壤在邊坡穩定工程之應用研究」，朝陽科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，台中 (2008)。
4.楊善任，「夯實狀態對夯實紅土之土壤水分特性曲線之影響」，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士學位論文，台北 (2006)。
5.呂立炫，「築壩土石材料強度與濕陷性之探討」，中華大學土木工程學系碩士論文，新竹 (2000)。
6.梁樾，「土壤塑性對夯實黏土工程特性之影響」，中國土木水利工程學會年會論文，Vo1.IV，第673~692頁 (1983)。
7.吳建德、雷澄環、林佳弘、呂秋光及蔡秋明，「利用聚丙烯/高強力聚酯複合包芯紗織地工加勁隔網」，華岡紡織期刊，第10卷，第1期，第73-83頁 (2003)。
8.房性中，「CBR值的應用與探討」，中華技術，第65期 (2005)。
9.黃景川，「土壤力學」，三民書局股份有限公司，第427-469頁 (1999)。
10.CNS 11777-1，「土壤含水量與密度關係試驗法(改良式夯實試驗法)」，台灣 (2005)。
11.CNS 12382，「夯實土樣加州載重比試驗法」，台灣 (2006)。
12.American Society For Testing and Materials (2007), “Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils, (D1883-07).” ASTM, West Conshocken, Pennysylvania, 19428, United States.
13.Ashmawy, A.K., and Bourdeau, P.L., “Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soils under Repeated Loading: A Review and Comparative Design Study,” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 643-678 (1995).
14.Barden, L., and Sides, G.R., “Engineering Behavior and Strength of Compacted Clay,” J. of SFMD, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM4, pp.1171-1200 (1970).
15.Choudhary, A. K., Jha, J.H, and Gill, K.S., “A study on CBR behavior of waste plastic strip reinforced soil,” Emirates J Eng, Res 15, pp. 51-57 (2010).
16.Das, B.M., Principles of geotechnical engineering, Cengage Learning, United States, pp. 127-131 (2009).
17.Holtz, R.D., and Kovacs, W.D., “An introduction to geotechnical engineering,” Prentice-Hall Inc, Ch. 5 (1981).
18.Holtz, R. D., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R.R, “Geosynthetic Engineering,” BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., pp 451 (1997).
19.Lambe, T.W., “The Engineering Behavior of Compacted Clay,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 84，No. SM2, pp. 1655-1-1655-35 (1985).
20.Moayed, R.Z., Nazari,M., Allahyari, F., “Effect of geosynthetic inclusion on the bearing ratio of two-layered soil.,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 36, Issue 7, pp. 914-931 (2013).
21.Naeini, S.A. and Mirzakhanlari, M., “The Effect of Geotextile and Grading on the Bearing Ratio of Granular Soils”, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 13, Bundle J (2008).
22.Nimmesgern, M., and Bush, D., “The effect of Repeated Traffic Loading on Geosynthetic Reinforcement Anchorage Resistance,” Geosynthetics 91. Atlanta, GA, pp. 665-672 (1991).
23.Nair, A.M. and Latha, G.M., “Bearing Resistance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Aggregate Systems,” Indian Geotechnical Society, pp. 185-188 (2009).
24.Perkins, S.W. and Ismeik, M., “A Synthesis and Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Base Layers in Flexible Pavements: Part I,” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 549-604 (1997).
25.Rankilor, P.R., “Membranes in Ground Engineering.,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, England (1981).
26.Seed, H.B., and Chan, C.K., “Structure and Strength Characteristics of Compacted Clay,” J. Soil. Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, Vol. 85, No. SM5 (1959).
27.Shukla, S.K., “Fundamentals of geosynthetics.,” Geosynthetics and their application, pp. 1-54 (2002).
28.Tom, F., Abraham, A., Chacko, A., “Influence of Position of Geosynthetic Layer in Pavement.,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, Vol. 6, Isse 4, pp. 74-78 (2013). |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit