資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力 對新產品開發績效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：8

、訪客IP：3.142.196.27

姓名

劉貞君(Jen-Jiun Liu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力對新產品開發績效之影響
(The Impact of IT Leveraging Competence on coordination capability and improvisational capacity)

相關論文

★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司	★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究－以A公司為例	★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新－以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例	★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究－以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation	★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果	★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究－以新產品開發專案為例	★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例	★ 社會鑲嵌與團隊衝突影響產品創新與效用之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在動盪且競爭的環境下，組織若想突破困境擊退競爭者，持續保持創新是一個非常重要的因素。如何使新產品開發團隊的績效達到最佳化，與資訊技術運用能力、協調能力與即興能力有密切的關係。
過去雖然已經有許多研究來探討新產品開發團隊成功的要素，但是這中間的運作過程還是有許多潛在的因素尚未被發掘，所以本研究將理論與實務結合，探討資訊技術運用能力，透過協調能力與即興能力對新產品開發績效會產生甚麼樣的影響，其中將新產品開發績效區分成專案效率與產品效用進行分析，此外，以及在什麼樣的環境下，即興能力會顯得相對重要，以上便是本研究的重要課題。
經由本研究實證，針對台灣製造業廠商為研究主體，並且以曾經參與過新產品開發的專案人員為研究對象，所得有效樣本為160份。實證結果發現，知識管理系統與協同設計系統對協調能力有正向影響，協同設計系統對即興能力有正向影響，協調能力對即興能力有正向影響，協調能力對專案效率與產品效用有正向影響，即興能力對專案有正向影響。另外，專案的不確定性對即興能力與新產品開發績效(專案效率、產品效用)間的關係具有正向影響。
因此，本研究認為專案團隊若想提升新產品開發績效，可以加強資訊技術的運用能力，或團隊成員之間合作良好以及快速反應市場變化，皆可以幫助新產品開發績效有更卓越的提升。

摘要(英)

In the competitive environment, the organization will face many challenges, if organizations want to overcome difficulties repel competitors, continued to maintain innovation is a very important issue. How to make the NPD team performance better, the IT leveraging competence and improvisational capacity have a great relationship.
This research will combine theory and practice to investigate IT leveraging competence through coordination capability with the improvisational capacity of NPD performance will produce what influence. The NPD performance will be divided into process efficiency and product effectiveness to analysis. That is an important issue in our study.
Our empirical focus on Taiwan manufacturing industry, and we send the questionnaires to the NPD team members. We collected 160 effective samples. The results showed KMS and CWS have a positive effect to coordination capability, the CWS has a positive effect to improvisational capacity, the coordination capability has a positive effect on improvisational capacity,. In addition, the coordination capability has a positive impact on NPD performance, improvisational capability has a positive impact on process efficiency. Project uncertainty moderate improvisational capacity and NPD performance.
Therefore, we suggest that if project team wants to improve NPD performance. They can enhance the IT leveraging competence, advance relationship of team members, and react to market change. All can help NPD performance improvement.

關鍵字(中)

★ 資訊技術運用能力
★ 協調能力
★ 即興能力

關鍵字(英)

★ IT leveraging competence
★ coordination capability
★ improvisational capability

論文目次

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝詞 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 2
第三節研究流程 3
第四節章節架構 4
第二章文獻探討與研究假說 5
第一節資訊技術運用能力 5
第二節協調能力 8
第三節即興能力 9
第四節新產品開發績效 12
第五節專案不確定性 12
第七節結構方程模式 14
第三章研究設計 16
第一節研究架構 16
第二節研究假說 17
第三節衡量變數定義 17
第四節結構方程模型 22
第五節抽樣方法與問券設計 28
第四章研究結果 29
第一節基礎樣本資料分析 29
第二節測量模型之評估 32
第三節結構模型之評估 39
第四節資訊技術運用能力與社會資本對新產品開發績效之影響假說分析 44
第五章結論與建議 47
第一節研究結果 47
第二節管理意涵 49
第三節研究限制與未來研究建議 50
參考文獻 50
附錄 53

參考文獻

Acur, Nuran, Kandemir, Destan, Weerd?Nederhof, De, Petra, C, & Song, Michael. (2010). Exploring the impact of technological competence development on speed and NPD program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 915-929.
Ali E. Akguna, John C. Byrneb, Gary S. Lynnc & Halit, Keskina. (2007). New product development in turbulent environments: Impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3), 203-230
Anandhi S. Bharadwaj.(2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.
Bharadwaj, A, Sambamurthy, V, & Zmud, R. (2002). Firmwide IT capability: An empirical examination of the construct and its links to performance. Emory University.
Bhatt, Ganesh D, Grover, Varun, & GROVER, VARUN. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253-277.
Carr, Nicholas G. (2003). IT doesn′t matter. Educause Review, 38, 24-38.
Christoph, Stockstrom. & Cornelius, Herstatt. (2008) Planning and uncertainty in new product development. Journal of R&D Management, 38(5), 480-490
Clark, Kim B, & Fujimoto, Takahiro. (1991). Product Development PerformanceHarvard Business School Press. Boston, MA.
Cohen, Wesley M, & Levinthal, Daniel A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Cohen, Wesley M, & Levinthal, Daniel A. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40(2), 227-251.
Cousins, Paul D, Lawson, Benn, Petersen, Kenneth J, & Handfield, Robert B. (2011). Breakthrough scanning, supplier knowledge exchange, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 930-942.
Dusya, Vera. & Mary, Crossan. (2005). Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224
Devaraj, Sarv, & Kohli, Rajiv. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management science, 49(3), 273-289.
Faraj, Samer, & Xiao, Yan. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management science, 52(8), 1155-1169.
Hair, Joseph F, Anderson, Rolph E, Tatham, Ronlad L, & Black, William C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th. NY: Prentice Hall International.
Hair, Joseph F, Black, Wiiliam C, Babin, Barry J, Anderson, Rolph E, & Tatham, Ronald L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 7): Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Henard, David H, & Szymanski, David M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of marketing Research, 362-375.
Joreskog, Karl G, & Sorbom, Dag. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language: Scientific Software.
Joreskog, Karl G, & Sorbom, Dag. (1996). LISREL 8: User′s reference guide: Scientific Software.
Kline, RB. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling The Guilford Press. New York.
Kline, Rex B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: The Guilford Press.
Kusunoki, Ken, Nonaka, Ikujiro, & Nagata, Akiya. (1998). Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organization Science, 9(6), 699-718.
Leana, Carrie R, & Pil, Frits K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17(3), 353-366.
Lichtenthaler, Ulrich. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846.
Madhavan, Ravindranath, & Grover, Rajiv. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management. The Journal of marketing, 1-12.
Malone, Thomas W, & Crowston, Kevin. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87-119.
Mata, Jose, Portugal, Pedro, & Guimaraes, Paulo. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 459-481.
McGrath, Michael, & Iansiti, Marco. (1998). Envisioning IT-enabled innovation. Insight Magazine, 1(1), 2-10.
Nambisan, Satish. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. Mis Quarterly, 1-18.
Okhuysen, Gerardo A, & Bechky, Beth A. (2009). 10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463-502.
Parikh, Mihir. (2001). Knowledge management framework for high-tech research and development. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL-ROLLA-, 13(3), 27-34.
Pavlou, Paul A, & El Sawy, Omar A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198-227.
Pavlou, Paul A, & El Sawy, Omar A. (2010). The “Third Hand”: IT-Enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational Capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-273.471
Roberts, Nicholas, Galluch, Pamela S, Dinger, Michael, & Grover, Varun. (2012). Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Information Systems, 6(1), 25-40.
Samer, Faraj & Yan, Xiao.(2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Mangement Science, 52(8), 1155-1169
Sethi, Rajesh. (2000). New product quality and product development teams. The Journal of Marketing, 1-14.
Sethi, Rajesh, Smith, Daniel C, & Park, C Whan. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 73-85.
Sohel, Ahmad, Debasish N. Mallick & Roger G. Schroeder. (2013). New Product Development: Impact of project characteristics and development practices on performance. Journal of product innoviation, 30(2), 331–348.
Subramaniam, Mohan, & Youndt, Mark A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Tippins, Michael J, & Sohi, Ravipreet S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745-761.
Tsai, Wenpin, & Ghoshal, Sumantra. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 464-476.
Vera, Dusya, & Crossan, Mary. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224.

指導教授

陳炫碩

審核日期

2014-6-30

推文