高績效工作系統與創新績效之後設分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：3.131.110.169

姓名

朱郁婷(Yu-Ting Chu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

高績效工作系統與創新績效之後設分析
(High Performance Work System and Innovation Performance: A meta-analysis)

相關論文

★ 人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以F銀行財富管理事業群人員為例	★ 護理人員的人格特質與工作滿意及工作績效之關係—以工作壓力為調節變項
★ 護理人員之工作壓力、工作動機、工作滿意與工作績效的影響-以某公立醫院為例	★ 心理契約與勞雇關係之關聯性探討
★ 情緒智力對工作動機、工作滿意及工作績效之影響-以人力資源工作者為例。	★ 社會人際行為模式測驗與工作績效間關連性之探討
★ 財務與非財務獎酬對工作動機與工作滿意度之干擾研究-以M直銷公司為例	★ 薪酬制度與員工績效表現之個案研究
★ 領導行為、員工創新行為及績效表現關聯性之個案探討	★ 高科技廠商薪資策略與離職率關係之探討
★ 人力資源管理系統與組織文化之交互作用對組織績效的影響	★ 情境式與行為描述式結構性面談之比較研究
★ 日薪人員與月薪人員之工作動機傾向對其工作績效與工作滿意之影響	★ 本地員工人格特質與對外派人員的利他行為、互動適應之關連探討
★ 五大人格量表的效用分析—以Taylor-Russell、Naylor-Shine 及Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser 模型為例	★ 工作動機的效用分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著高績效工作系統與創新績效的議題逐漸受到重視，過去 14 年來已有許多學者
針對相關議題進行研究，但因為每個研究的抽樣對象、研究設計、衡量的方式不盡相同，使得各個研究結果相當分歧。故本研究透過後設分析法，將過去的個別研究結果，以量化的方法獲得一特定的結論。
本研究主要以後設分析法探討：（1）高績效工作系統是否與創新績效有顯著的相
關性；（2）產業對於高績效工作系統與創新績效的干擾效果。針對 21 篇研究報告，共6999 個樣本，進行後設分析。本研究結果發現：
1. 高績效工作系統對創新績效具有顯著的中度影響效果，效果量為 0.332。
2. 產業對高績效工作系統與創新績效有顯著的干擾效果，其中以製造業的效果量
最大，其次為服務業、高科技業與混合產業。
最後，本研究進一步針對研究結果提出管理意涵，以作為企業在實施高績效工作
系統相關措施之參考，並提供未來研究之建議。

摘要(英)

With the increase in the concern of high performance work systems and innovation over the past 14 years, countless research has been conducted. However, varying sample
characteristics, research design, and measures have led to inconclusive results. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to get a generalized conclusion about the relationship between high performance work system (HPWS) and the performance of innovation. This is done through the meta-analysis method with results collected from past research.

This study used meta-analysis to examine: (1) the relationship between HPWS and innovation performance; (2) the moderate effect of industry on the relationship between HPWS and innovation performance. A statistical aggregation of 21 studies and a total of 6999 sample size were used in this study. The result shows that:
1. HPWS has a significant impact on innovation performance, which effect size was estimated at 0.332.
2. The industry has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between HPWS and innovation performance. The effect size in manufacturing industry is the largest, and followed by services, high-tech and mixed industry.

關鍵字(中)

★ 高績效工作系統
★ 創新績效
★ 後設分析

關鍵字(英)

★ High performance work system
★ Innovation performance
★ Meta-analysis

論文目次

第一章緒論 ........................................................................................................................ 1
第一節研究背景與動機 ............................................................................................ 1
第二節研究目的 ........................................................................................................ 4
第三節研究流程 ........................................................................................................ 5
第二章文獻探討 ................................................................................................................ 6
第一節高績效工作系統 ............................................................................................ 6
第二節創新績效 ...................................................................................................... 14
第三節高績效工作系統與創新績效之相關研究 .................................................. 20
第四節產業對高績效工作系統與創新績效的干擾效果 ...................................... 23
第三章研究方法 .................................................................................................................... 24
第一節研究範圍與文獻來源 .................................................................................. 24
第二節研究樣本篩選標準 ...................................................................................... 24
第三節變項之編碼 .................................................................................................. 25
第四節干擾變項 ...................................................................................................... 25
第五節資料分析方法 .............................................................................................. 25
第四章研究分析與結果 ........................................................................................................ 32
第一節高績效工作系統對創新績效之整體效果量 .............................................. 33
第二節產業為調節變項之效果 .............................................................................. 33
第五章結論與建議 ................................................................................................................ 38
第一節結論 .............................................................................................................. 38
第二節管理意涵 ...................................................................................................... 40
第三節研究限制與建議 .......................................................................................... 41
參考文獻 .................................................................................................................................. 43
附件一：本研究編碼項目 ...................................................................................................... 52

參考文獻

一、中文部分
齊力（1999），社會研究的後設分析程序。臺北: 弘智，Rosenthal。
孫旻儀、蔡明學（2007），社經地位和學生學業成就關係之後設分析。
黃聖雯（2010），高績效工作系統對派外人員知識管理與創新績效之影響研究，東
吳大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士班國際企業組碩士論文。

二、英文部分
Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G.（2003）. The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of operations Management, 21（1）, 19-43.
Al-bahussin, S. A., & El-garaihy, W. H.（2013）. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices, Organisational Culture, Organisational Innovation and Knowledge Management on Organisational Performance in Large Saudi Organisations:
Structural Equation Modeling With Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business and Management, 8（22）, p1.
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y., & Otaye, L. E.（2012）. Impact of high performance work systems on individual-and branch-level performance: test of a
multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97（2）, 287.
Baregheh et al.（2009）. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47（8）, 1323-1339.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S.（2009）. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47（8）, 1323-1339.
Becker BE, Huselid MA, Pickus PS, Spratt MF.（1997）. HR as a source of shareholder value: Research and recommendations. Human Resource Management, 36, 39–47. 44
Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A.（1998）. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In Research in personnel and human resource management.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R.（2011）. Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. com.
Byron, K. （2005）. A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67（2）, 169-198.
Chao, C. Y., & Liu, S. Y.（2006）. The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices, Creativities of R & D Engineers on Organizational Innovation Capability. 2006 The 10th Conference on Interdisciplinary and Multifunctional Business Management, May, 606-629.
Chen, I. C.（2008）. The Study of the Relationships among High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Human Capital, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Performance.（Master Thesis, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences）.
Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W.（2009）. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62（1）, 104-114.
Cheng, D. J., Song, J. & Wang, B. B.（2010）. Cognition Trust or Affect Trust：How High Involvement Work System Affects Innovation Performance?. Study on China Administration for Industry & Commerce, 32（1）, 81-90.
Chowhan（2013）. High performance work systems: A causal framework of training, innovation , and organizational performance in Canada. McMaster University Open Access Dissertations and Theses. Paper 7751.
Chuang, T. L. （2012）. The Study of the Relationship between Human Resource Management Practices, Innovation Capabilities and Organizational Performance.（Master Thesis, National Sun Yat-Sen Univeristy）.
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D.（2006）. How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59（3）, 501-528.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. （2010）. A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47（6）, 1154-1191.
Damanpour, F.（1991）. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34（3）, 555-590.
Damanpour, F.（1996）. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 693-716.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N.（2009）. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46（4）, 650-675.
Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M.（2005）. HRM and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135–145.
David P. Lepak, Hui Liao, Yunhyung Chung and Erika E. Harden.（2006）.Management in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 25, 217–271.
Dayarathna（2012）. High performance work systems for high performance companies. Business Times. Retrieved from:
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/120624/business-times/high-performance-work-systems-for-high-performance-companies-3853.html.
*De Kok, J. M. P., & den Hartog, D.（2006）. High performance work systems, performance and innovativeness in small firms. EIM Scales Paper,（200520）.
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H.（1996）. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance
predictions. Academy of management Journal, 39（4）,802-835.
Ellis, P. D.（2010）. The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
Erickson K.（2004）. To invest or detach? Coping strategies and workplace culture in service work. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 549–572.
Evans, W.R. and Davis, W.D.（2005）. High performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure. Research in Journal of Management, Vol.31（5）, pp. 758-775.
Flood et al.（2008）. Partnership, high performance work systems and organizational effectiveness. LInK Working Paper Series, Paper No.02-08, The Learning, Innovation and Knowledge Research Centre, Dublin City University, Ireland.
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P（2002）. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48（9）, 1103-1122.
Gittell, J. H., Seidner, R., & Wimbush, J.（2010）. A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science, 21（2）, 490-506.
Gritti, P., & Leoni, R.（2012）. High performance work practices, industrial relations and firm propensity for innovation. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, 13, 267-309.
Guthrie, J. P.（2001）. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from New Zealan. Research in Academy of Management Journal, 41: 180–
189.
Guthrie, J. P., Liu, W., Flood, P. C., & MacCurtain, S.（2008）. High performance work systems, workforce productivity, and innovation: A comparison of MNCs and
indigenous firms.
Hartog, D. N., & Verburg, R. M.（2004）. High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14（1）, 55-78.
Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1995). Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 327.
Huselid, M. A.（1995）. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management
journal, 38（3）, 635-672.
Hsu, Y. C.（2009）. The Relationship Between High Performance Work System and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Mediating Effect of Organization Innovation Climate. （
Master Thesis, National Central University）.
Jensen, M. B., & Vinding, A. L.（2007）. High performance work practices and innovation in the manufacturing and service sectors. ServINNo project paper.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C.（2012）. How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of management Journal, 55（6）, 1264-1294.
Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R.（2008）. Could HRM support organizational innovation?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19（7）, 1208-1221.
Samer, K., & Abdelghafour, A.（2012）. High-performance work practices, innovation and perceived organizational performance: Evidence from the Jordanian service sector.
African Journal of Business Management, 6（9）, 3320-3326.
Kintana, M. L., Alonso, A. U., & Olaverri, C. G.（2006）. High-performance work systems and firms′ operational performance: the moderating role of technology. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17（1）, 70-85.
Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y.（2004）. The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation.International business review, 13（6）, 685-703.
Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J.（2003）. New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of economics, 27（2）, 243-263.
Lievens, A., Moenaert, R. K., & Jegers, R. S. (1999).Linking communication to innovation success in the financial services industry: a case study analysis. International
Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(1), 23-48.
Lin, J. H.（2011）.The Relationship Between Human Resource Management Practice and Organization Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee Knowledge Innovative Management Behavior.（Master dissertation, Soochow University）.
Liu et al.（2007）. Human resource management system, innovation and organizational performance: Evidence from the tech company. Studies in Science of Science, 25（4）, 764-771.
Lorenz, E., Michie, J., & Wilkinson, F.（2004）. HRM complementarities and innovative performance in French and British industry. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 8, 181-210.
Lu, Y. W.（2008）. A Research of the Relationship of Human Resource Practices and Organizational Innovation Performance.（Master Thesis, National Sun Yat-Sen
Univeristy）.
Luna-Arocas, R., & Camps, J.（2007）. A model of high performance work practices and turnover intentions. Personnel Review, 37（1）, 26-46.
Madsen, A. S., & Ulhøi, J. P.（2005）. Technology innovation, human resources and dysfunctional integration. International Journal of Manpower, 26（6）, 488-501.
Messersmith, J. G., Patel, P. C., Lepak, D. P., & Gould-Williams, J. S.（2011）.Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96（6）, 1105.
Montes FJL, Moreno AR, Fernandez LMM（2004）. Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation. International Journal of Manpower, 25（2）:167 – 80. 49
Mumford MD（2000）. Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10（3）:313 – 51.
O′Regan, C.（2011）. The impact of high performance work systems on innovation performance: A study of Irish companies.（Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City
University）.
Peng, H. X. & Da, Q. L.（2007）. Empirical Study on HR systems, corporate culture and innovation performance. Journal of International Trade, 4, 100-105.
Pfeffer, J.（1998）. The human equation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, M. E.（1990）. The Competitive Advantage of Notions. Harvard business review.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers（1999）. Global Top Decision Makers’Study on Business Process Outsourcing. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Yankelovich Partners, Goldstain
Consulting Group, New York.
Qiao, K., Khilji, S., & Wang, X.（2009）. High-performance work systems, organizational commitment, and the role of demographic features in the People′s Republic of China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20（11）, 2311-2330.
Richard, O. C., & Johnson, N. B.（2004）. High performance work practices and human resource management effectiveness: Substitutes or complements?. Journal of Business Strategies, 21（2）.
Rosenthal, R.（1979）. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86（3）, 638.
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R.（2001）. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual review of psychology, 52（1）, 59-82.
Schumpeter, J. A.（1934）. Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 50
Seong, J. Y.（2011）. The Effects of High Performance Work Systems, Entrepreneurship and Organizational Culture on Organizational Performance. Seoul Journal of Business, 17（1）.
Song et al.（2009）. An Empirical Study of the Relationship among Strategic Human Resource Management，Corporate Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Performance. Science of Science and Management of S.& T, 12, 134-139.
Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K.（2007）. High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective. Research in Academy of Management Journal, 50（3）: 558-577.
Tregaskis, O., Daniels, K., Glover, L., Butler, P., & Meyer, M.（2013）. High Performance Work Practices and Firm Performance: A Longitudinal Case Study. British Journal of Management, 24（2）, 225-244.
Tseng et al.（2008）. Interactive Research of Haman Resource Management System, Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance- Innovation as Intermediary
variable. Operating Management Reviews, 4 （2）, 11-46.
Tucker, R. B.（2002）. Driving growth through innovation: How leading firms are transforming their futures. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Ulrich, D., & Lake, D.（1990）. Organizational Capability: Competing from the Inside Out. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Varma, A., Beatty, R., Schneier, C. E., & Ulrich, D.（1999）. High performance work systems. Research in Human Resource Planning, 22, 26–27.
Victor Oladapo（2013）. An empirical investigation of sub dimensions of high performance work systems that predict organizational innovation International. Journal of Management & Marketing Research（IJMMR）.
Walker, R. M.（2008）. An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18（4）, 591-615.
Wang, X. L.（2009）. Empirical Study on Enterprise’s High Performance Work Systems and its Mediated Mechanism. China Soft Science, S1, 223-230.
Wang, D., & Chen, S.（2013）. Does intellectual capital matter? High-performance work systems and bilateral innovative capabilities. International Journal of Manpower,
34（8）, 861-879.
Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W.（2001）. Practical meta-analysis.（см. http://www. mason. gmu. edu/）.
Wolf, F. M.（1986）. Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis（Vol. 59）. Sage.
Wong, A., Tjosvold, D. and Liu, C.（2008）. Innovation by teams in Shanghai, China: cooperative goals for group conﬁdence and persistence. British Journal of Management.
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D.（2005）. High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90（1）, 77.
Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G.（1994）. The ﬁnancial implications of ﬁt between competitive strategy and innovation types and sources. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 183-211.
Zhao, W. H. & Zhou, M.（2012）. Influence of Human Resource Management Practices for R&D Team on Enterprise Innovation Performance. R & D Management, 24（4）, 61-102.

指導教授

房美玉(Mei-Yu Fang)

審核日期

2014-8-13

推文