博碩士論文 101450089 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:3.226.245.48
姓名 李安燃(An-jan Lee)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 高階主管企管碩士班
論文名稱 A公司核心、領導職能模型建立及各階主管領導力評鑑研究報告
相關論文
★ 公關公司經營策略分析與討論─以C公司為例★ 金融海嘯後中小型金控經營策略之探討—以玉山金控為例
★ 台灣IC設計產業導入薪酬委員會制度與高階經理人薪酬管理決策之探討★ 應用福特8D法改善離子植入機設備效能探討─以A公司為例
★ 台灣半導體公司對製程技術精進的掌握與運作策略★ 大陸員工工作滿意度之調查分析與探討—以G公司為例
★ 大陸台資企業設廠規劃與營運策略探討:以某光電公司為例★ 大陸台資企業對新生代農民工之激勵制度構建─以M公司為例
★ 不沾塗料行業的發展策略分析:以某台資企業為例★ 台商在中國大陸勞動爭議研究─以華東地區製造業為例
★ 大陸台資企業人力資源管理措施與組織效益探討─以M公司昆山廠為例★ 勞務派遣行業在中國市場之策略研究─以某勞務派遣公司為例
★ 行動科技消費行為之探索性研究─以美食手機App愛評生活通為例★ EMBA成員參與課外社交聯誼之動機與滿意度研究-以慢速壘球運動為例
★ 企業風險管理在應收帳款之應用探討─以A公司為例★ 供應商品質管理系統導入及效益提升探討─以某投影機公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 目前台灣企業普遍面臨企業轉型及家族接班人的問題,及企業面臨局勢的變遷與成長的瓶頸。處在詭譎多變而又高度競爭的經濟情勢當中,企業如何永續發展取決於董事會的重大決策。
長久以來台灣中小企業組織多以個人的單一智能或知識技能來決定個人的進用、升遷或訓練發展;然而個體所處的是在組織環境之中,所以其表現將必須與組織特性、團隊運作和工作職責有所相關或配套。對於組織而言,單以個人表現的觀點來決定進用、升遷或訓練發展將無法為組織帶來人力資源的綜效,而是必須要思考個體與組織特性的配套(p-o fit)、個體與工作特性的配套(p-j fit)。因此希望藉由發展以職能為基礎(competency -based) 的管理,而能協助組織人力資源運用和策略制定。
A公司成立三十多年來持續穩健成長,員工亦追隨董事長多年;為求企業永續經營,對各階主管接班人規劃漸趨急迫,高階經營者對未來團隊經營模式及人才培養,面臨強大的需求,經初步檢視企業內部人才及接班規劃,於主管之領導能力發現缺口,由於過去人員流動穩定,工作輪調機會較少,中階及基層主管對於水平部門的瞭解與溝通,並未獲得完全的資訊;此外廠區位於苗栗偏遠鄉鎮,管理人才的缺乏亦成為企業急需解決的問題。
由上所述,企業對於內部各階管理人員的領導能力培訓有迫切的需求,主管與組織、人員的配合,為企業永續規劃的關鍵。本研究透過職能模式的建立來探討一個成功管理者所應具備的(領導)管理職能為何;並透過對(領導)管理職能的分析與研究以建立(領導)管理職能模式和評鑑量表,進而提供各階管理階層評核、晉升和發展的依據。藉此協助各階管理者瞭解所處職位所需之能力、特質與技術,並強化自身優勢,加強不足之處,對主管職場生涯發展方向更有依據,以協助企業達成管理綜效,永續經營穩健成長之經營理念。
摘要(英) Throughout the process of globalization, Taiwanese enterprises have had to evolve its organizational structure in order to maintain its competitive edge on a world scale. In particular, small and medium size family enterprises, limited in its resources, must navigate cautiously to ensure its organizational capabilities meet the rapid changing tides of the current global economy. The ability of such enterprises to constantly engage this dynamic is a key challenge that the Board must consider in order to maintain a sustainable and effective organization.
For small and medium size family enterprises, the origin and evolution of its organizational structure are often at the sole discretion of a single or small group of company founders. In other words, organizational structuring decisions are often made based on the personal knowledge and experiences of the founders, without considering a holistic point of view on the organization as a whole. For example, personnel training are done on an ad-hoc basis to resolve a particular company need, without much consideration for strategic planning in the long-term sustainability of workforce skills. Thus, this paper examines a more efficient approach to organizational structuring and development by integrating human resource planning more holistically, with consideration to person-organizational fit, person-job fit, and competency-based management.
A is a family company, has enjoyed 35 years of stable growth, with loyal employees building decades of long-term careers. For the sake of business continuity, management succession planning has become an urgent priority for the Board. The Board has examined its talent pipeline, discovering different gaps across levels within the organization. First, due to the long-term employment of high-level managers, few upward mobility opportunities exist for middle- to low-level managers. Second, there is a noticeable lack of clarity in communications across the high-level and middle-level managers on business decisions. Lastly, with Miao-li County as the production plant location, the region lacks management talent for company recruitment.
With the above context in mind, the purpose of this paper is to inform the Board of A company a more effective management model across organizational levels. First, the company must establish clear leadership and skills requirement for each level of management. Second, the company must establish transparent performance evaluation processes. Lastly, the company must communicate such standards across all levels effectively to identify and fill organizational gaps. With the above points accomplished, A company can then build an organizational management structure that is more sustainable to help navigate through future business challenges.
關鍵字(中) ★ 個體與組織特性的配套(p-o fit)
★ 個體與工作特性的配套(p-j fit)
★ 職能
★ 管理職能模式
★ 評鑑量表
關鍵字(英) ★ p-o fit
★ p-j fit
★ skills
★ leadership and skills requirement
★ transparent performance evaluation
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及需求 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻探討 3
第一節 職能的起源和意義 3
第二節 核心職能的定義和內涵 6
第三節 領導(管理)職能的定義和內涵 8
第三章 公司背景分析 10
第一節 臺灣黏性膠帶發展歷史 10
第二節 產品定義與功能 11
第三節 產業結構 14
第四節、產業現況 15
第五節 A公司組織管理分析 17
第六節 A公司發展優劣勢分析 18
第四章 職能模型建立流程 20
第一節 職能建立流程 20
第二節 訪談對象 21
第三節 研究實施 22
第五章 研究實施結果與資料分析 24
第一節 A公司職能模型 24
第二節 各階主管領導力評鑑分析結果 31
第六章 研究結果之建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄─個人領導力評鑑報表 41
參考文獻 一、中文部分
吳秉恩(1999)。分享式人力資源管理,台北 翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
莊朝正(1997)。管理才能評鑑量表之建立以某高科技公司為例,國立中央大學人力資
源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳嘉星 (2012)。膠帶業景氣不振 影響有限,中華徵信所。
劉大佼 (2003)。淺談膠帶,化學材料與生活專題報導,科學發展362期。
陳淑慧 (2005)。膠帶業追求企業永續經營之關鍵因素探討-以A公司為例,國立中央大
學財務金融學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
許志隆 (2003)。職能辭典(Competency Dictionary)的發展與應用,國立中央大學人力資
源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
李向紅、金思宇、徐衛 (2009) 。英漢人力資源管理辭典,水利水電出版社。
  
二、英文部分
Alimo-Metcalfe , B. (1998). 360 degree feedback and leadership development.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 6, 35-44.
Atkins, Paul W. B.; Wood, Robert E. (2002). Self─Versus Others Ratings As Predictors of Assessment Center Ratings: Validation Evidence For 360─Degree
Feedback Programs. Personnel Psychology, 55, 871-904.
Atwater, Leanne, & Waldman, David(1998). 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 423-426.
Beehr, T. A., Ivanitskaya, L., Hansen, C. P., Erofeev, D., & Gudanowski D. M. (2001).
Evaluation of 360 degree feedback rating:relationships with each other and with
performance and selection predictors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22,
775-788.
Boyatzis,R.E. (1982). The competence manager: A Model for Effective Performance.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Church, A. H., & Bracken, D. W., (1997).Advancing the State of the Art of 360-Degree Feedback Guest Editors' Comments on the Research and Practice
of Multirater Assessment Methods, Group & Organization Mangement,22(2),
149-161.
Gary Hamel .,& C. K. Prahalad. (1994). Strategic Management Journal Supplement.
15, 5–16.
Dalton, M.(1997). Are competency models a waste? Training & Development,51, 46-49.
David C. McClelland. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence.
American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.
Facteau, C. L., & Facteau, J. D. (1998). Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback
from subordinates and peers. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4),427–448.
Funderburg, S.A., & Levy, P.E. (1997). The influence of individual and contextual
variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group & Organization
Studies, 22(2), 210-236.
Garavan, T. N., Morley, M.,& Flynn, M. (1997). 360 degree feedback:
its role in employee development. Journal of Management Development, 16(2),
134-147.
Ghorpade, Jai.(2000). Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. The
Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 140-150.
Greguras, G. J., Robie, C. (1998). A new look at within-source interrater reliability of
360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 960.
Guglieliemino, P. J. (1979). Developing the top-level executive for the 1980’s and
Beyond. Training and Development, 12-14.
Harold Klemp. (1986).The Book of ECK Wisdom. Illuminated Way Publishing,
Incorporated .
Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360‐degree
feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32,
325-351.
Ken W. Parry. (1998). The Organizational Story as Leadership. SAGE Publications
(Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore), 3(3), 281–300.
London, M., & Beatty, R. W. (1993). 360-degree feedback as a competitive
advantage. Human Resource Management, 32(3),353-372.
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching:
Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource
Management, 42(3), 243-256.
Maurer, T. J., Mitchell, D, R.D., & Barbeite, F. G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes
toward a 360─degree feedback system and involvement in post─
feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 87-107.
McLagan, P. (1983). Model for Excellence. Alexandria, VA:American Society for
Training and Development.
Miborrow, G. (1988). Crafty Management. Management Today, 5.
Morgeson, F.P., Mumford, T.V., & Campion, M.A. (2005). Coming Full Circle: Using
Research and Practice to Address 27 Questions About 360-Degree Feedback
Programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 196.
Nowack, K.,Church, A.H.,Vinson, M.N.,Wimer,S.,Rogers,E.,Rogers,C.W., Metlay, W., Bennett, B., Shaver Jr, W., & Nelson, J. (2000). 360 degree feedback-the whole story, Training and Development.
Peiperl, M. (2001). Getting 360 degree feedback right. Harvard business review, 79(1), 142-147.
Pfau, B.,Kay, I., Nowack, K. M., Ghorpade, J. (2002). Does 360-degree feedback
negatively affect company performance? HR Magazine, 47(6), 54-59.
Quinn, E.R., Faerman, R.S., Thompson, P.M. & Mcgrath, R.M. (1990). Becoming a
Master Manager: A Competency Framework. N.Y.: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Ralelin, J. A., & Cooledge, A. S. (1995). From generic to organic competencies.
Human Resource Planning, 24-33.
Richard E. Boyatzis. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of
Management Development, 27 (1),5-12.
Ryan K. Lahti, (1999). Identifying and Integrating Individual Level and Organizational Level Core Competencies. Journal of Business and Psychology,14(1), 59.
Scott , P.(1998). Project Management Competency Development Framework. PMI.
Spencer, L. M Jr., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Model for superior
performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 11.
Thornton.(1992).The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci, 8(3), 275-82.
Torno, W. W. (1993). Editor's note: Introduction to special issue on 360─degree
Feedback. Human Resource Management, 32, 211-219.
Waldman, David A; Atwater, Leanne E; Antonioni, David., 1998, Has 360 degree
feedback gone amok? The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86-94.
指導教授 鄭晉昌 審核日期 2014-4-23
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明