Abd El Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15-42.
Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science education, 88(3), 397-419.
Abernethy, K., Gabbert, P. & Treu, K. (1998). Inquiry-Based Computer Science Instruction : Some Initial Experiences. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education and on 6th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing, pp.14-17. Ireland.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
An, Y.-J. (2010). Scaffolding wiki-based, ill-structured problem solving in an online environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 723-734. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol6_No4.htm
Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science,33(5-6), 367–379.
Banchi, H. & Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29.
Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 427-435.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
Bencze, J.L., & Bowen, G.M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483.
Bybee, J. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI, 65-85.
Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. (1993). Goals for the Science Curriculum. In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Champagne, A.B., Kouba, V.L., and Hurley, M. (2000). Assessing inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E.H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp.447-470). Washington, DC: American for the Advancement of Science.
Chen, W., Looi, C.K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do Students do in a F2F CSCL Classroom? The Optimization of Multiple Communications Modes. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1159-1170.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175 – 218.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916 – 937.
de Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations - Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532-533.
Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 39 – 60.
Hamelin, D. (2004), Searching the Web to Develop Inquiry and Collaborative Skills. Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education. Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, United Kingdom.
Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.
Kim, M. C. & Hannaﬁn, M. J. (in press b). Foundations and practice for Web-enhanced science learning environments: grounded design perspectives. In Trends in Distance Education, 2nd ed., edited by R. Luppicini. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology‐enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science education, 91(6), 1010-1030.
Krajcik, J. S., P. Blumenfeld, et al. (1998). “Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 & 4), 313-350.
Kyriazi, E., & Constantinou, C. (2004). The Science Fair as a Means for Developing Investigative Skills in Elementary School.
Kyza, E. A., Constantinou, C. P., & Spanoudis, G. (2011). Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: Exploring relationships between grouping, reﬂective scaffolding, and evidence based explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2489–2525. doi: 10(1080/09500693),2010,550951.
Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: a qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–67.
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difﬁculties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 607–636.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge.
Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77 – 97.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional science, 26(1), 49-63.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students′ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.
Mettas, A. C., & Constantinou, C. C. (2008). The Technology Fair: a project-based learning approach for enhancing problem solving skills and interest in design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(1), 79-100.
Morgan, K., & Brooks, D. (2012). Investigating a Method of Scaffolding Student-Designed Experiments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 513–522.
Morris, R., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L. Z., Miller, M., Fior, M., Church, H., et al. (2010). Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in Study.Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 815–824.
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2011). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences: 13(3), 273-304.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273 – 304.
Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004).Explanation-driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88. 345-372.
Sharpe, T. (2006). ′Unpacking′ Scaffolding: Identifying Disourse and Multimodal Strategies that Support Learning. Language and Education, 20(3), 211-231.
Slotta, J.D. (2004). The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding Knowledge Integration in the Science Classroom. In M.C. Linn, P. Bell and E. Davis (Eds). Internet Environments for Science Education. 203-232. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, Hesse, F.W., & Spada, H. (Ed.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated knowledge communication and how they may be overcome (5 ed., pp. 15-38). New York: Springer.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 211-223.
White, B., Shimoda, T., & Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(2), 151-182.
Windschit, M. (2004). Folk theories of inquiry: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yuen, AHK & Ma, WWK (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3): 229–243.