Nabokov’s Uncanny:The Transformation of Psychoanalysis in Pale Fire

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：13

、訪客IP：18.217.194.39

姓名

鄒文亭(WENTING ZOU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英美語文學系

論文名稱

(Nabokov’s Uncanny:The Transformation of Psychoanalysis in Pale Fire)

相關論文

★ 慾望科技:閱過科幻小說	★ 評者之限(陷)：愛倫坡，波赫士，與偵探小說
★ 從性慾物體到性感主體: Spa 熱潮中的新興身體政治	★ 模影失焦：快照攝影與文化工業
★ 時間機器：文明退化與不滿	★ 以貌取書：論譚恩美《接骨師的女兒》中東方的再製與再現
★ 享樂與現實之間:李小龍功夫電影中的幻想	★ 夢、寫作與自白：以精神分析方法閱讀湯瑪士得昆西之＜一個英國鴉片吸食者的自白＞
★ 家關何處: 以尼爾．蓋曼《無有鄉》論述幻奇作為欲望文學	★ 《葛蒂娃》(之外的)戀物式閱讀:一個史學觀點
★ 從危機到創傷:『碧廬冤孽』中現代主義者的鬼魂	★ 好萊塢電影的佛學轉向: 《駭客任務》、《隔離島》與《全面啟動》中的佛學空性智慧
★ 從鄭捷事件為出發點檢視當代台灣自戀論述	★ 伊藤潤二富江之恐怖探究:詭奇與賤斥

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本論文是在詭異的概念框架內，通過解析納博科夫經典小說之一《幽冥的火》中對精神分析的改寫來探討納博科夫對弗洛伊德既愛又恨矛盾情感的議題。
論文第一章先從三方面來解析納博科夫之詭異，亦即納博科夫獨特的憤怒情感政治，其文學觀和其在《堂吉訶德講稿》中所表現對戲仿的看法。我將解析納博科夫對弗洛伊德之敵意，將納氏之小說中純熟技巧納入考慮之中，我認為納博科夫反弗洛伊德之說過於簡單化。繼而我認為既愛又恨矛盾情感才能更確切地闡明納氏和弗氏兩者之間的關係。接下來的兩章將處理納氏對弗氏既愛又恨矛盾情感的兩面。論文第二章處理納氏如何通過在《幽冥的火》中對精神分析之挪用而回歸對弗氏熟稔這一層面。我將討論三個方面，亦即俄底浦斯情結，自戀和妄想案例，通過這三方面來完成納氏對弗氏既愛又恨矛盾情感的第一個面向的探討，亦即兩者間的緊密聯繫和貼合。論文第三章的關注點將放在納氏如何通過自己想象層面的修改潤色，通過改寫弗氏之精神分析再一次從對弗氏的熟稔轉向陌生，達到陌生化效果進而創造自己的小說。從自戀的內省性和妄想案列偏離性兩方面我將處理納氏對弗氏既愛又恨矛盾情感的第二個面向，亦即兩者間的偏離和排斥。最後，在結論部分我將說明納氏對精神分析的改寫是其對弗氏之抑製吸引力和公開敵意下妥協的產物，換而言之，納博科夫的詭異正是由於他對弗洛伊德既愛又恨的矛盾情感。

摘要(英)

My aim in this thesis is to justify Nabokov’s ambivalence towards Freud by analyzing Nabokov’s transformation of psychoanalysis in one of his classical novel Pale Fire within the concept of “uncanny”.
Chapter One analyses Nabokov’s uncanny with regard to three aspects, Nabokov’s unique politics of anger, his literary views and his opinion towards parody expressed in Lectures on Don Quixote. I will give my analysis of Nabokov’s hostility towards Freud and propose that, taking into consideration the consummate strategies used in his novel, the view that Nabokov is anti-Freudian is an over-simplifying proposition. And I think the word ambivalence can shed a more exact light on the bond between Nabokov and Freud. The following two chapters will deal with the two sides of Nabokov’s ambivalence towards Freud. Chapter Two will deal with the second layer of the thesis, that is, how Nabokov returns to his heimlich with Freud by his appropriation of psychoanalysis in Pale Fire. I will talk about three aspects, that is, the Oedipal complex, narcissism and a case of paranoia, and thus complete the discussion on the first side of Nabokov’s ambivalent attitude towards Freud, that is, his affinity and intimacy with Freud. Chapter Three pays attention to the third layer of the thesis,that is, how Nabokov achieves the effect of defamiliarization and creates his own novel, changing the heimlich to unheimlich again by transforming Freud’s psychoanalysis through the modifying colors of his own imagination. From two aspects, that is, narcissistic introspection and “para-noia” reading, I will deal with the other side of Nabokov’s ambivalent attitude towards Freud, that is, his beyond and beside Freud. Finally, I will make the conclusion that Nabokov’s transformation of psychoanalysis is the product of the compromise between his repressed attraction to Freud and open hostility towards him. That is, Nabokov’s uncanny proceeds from his ambivalence towards Freud.

關鍵字(中)

★ 詭異
★ 既愛又恨矛盾情感
★ 精神分析
★ 自戀
★ 妄想
★ 挪用
★ 改寫

關鍵字(英)

★ uncanny
★ ambivalence
★ psychoanalysis
★ narcissism
★ paranoia,
★ appropriation
★ transformation

論文目次

English Abstract ...... i
Chinese Abstract ...... ii
Acknowledgement ...... iii
Introduction ...... 1
Chapter One: Nabokov’s Uncanny ...... 9
Nabokov’s Politics of Anger ...... 10
Nabokov’s Literary Views ...... 14
Nabokov’s Attitude Towards Parody ...... 17
Chapter Two: Appropriation of Psychoanalysis ...... 21
Oedipal Complex: Rivalry ...... 21
Narcissism:Homosexuality and Double ...... 24
Paranoia: Persecution, Erotomania, Jealousy And Megalomania
...... 29
Chapter Three: Transformation of Psychoanalysis ...... 38
Narcissistic Introspection ...... 38
A “Para-noia” Reading in a Mirror World ...... 43
Conclusion ...... 50
Works Cited ...... 53

參考文獻

Ackerley, Chris. “Pale Fire: Three Notes Towards a Thetic Solution.”Nabokov Studies.2 (1995): 87-103. Project Muse.Web. 15 Oct. 2015.
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973. Print.
Boyd, Brian. Pale Fire: The Magic of Artistic Discovery. Princeton: Princeton U P,1999. Print.
---. “Reflections on Narcissus.” Nabokov Studies.5 (1998/1999): 179-83. Project Muse.Web. 15 Oct. 2015.
Bruhm, Steven. “Queer, Queer Vladimir.” American Imago.53 (Winter 1996): 281-302. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/41.Web.30 October. 2016.
DeRewal, Tiffany. “John Shade’s Duplicate Selves: An Alternative Shadean Theory of Pale Fire.”
http://www.academia.edu/1079816/John_Shades_Duplicate_Selves_
An_alternative_S hadean_theory_of_Pale_Fire. Web.30
October. 2016.
Elms, Alan.“Nabokov contra Freud.” Uncovering Lives: The Uneasy Alliance of Biography and Psychology,1994: 162-83. EBSCOHost. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
Freud, Sigmund. “Psycho-Analytic Notes on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 7:1-82. Ed. and trans. James Strachey. London: Hogarth and Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Print.
---. “On Narcissism: An Introduction.” Standard Edition 14: 73-102. Print.
---. “Mourning and Melancholia.” Standard Edition 14: 243-58. Print.
---. “Transference.” Standard Edition 16: 431-47. Print.
---. “From the History of an Infantile Neurosis.” Standard Edition 17: 3-123. Print.
---. “The Uncanny.” Standard Edition 17: 219-52. Print.
---. “The Ego and the Id.” Standard Edition 19: 19-66. Print.
---. “ Negation.” Standard Edition 19: 233-39. Print.
---. “Civilization and Its Discontents.” Standard Edition 21: 59-145. Print.
Green, Geoffrey. Freud and Nabokov. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1988. Print.
Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody : The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. London: Routledge,1985. Print.
Kohut, Heinz. The Analysis of The Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press,1971. Print.
Lacan, Jacques. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function.” Ecrits. Trans.Bruce Fink. London: Norton, 2004. Print.
Miller, Karl. Doubles: Studies in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Print.
Nabokov, Vladimir. Lolita. New York: Berkley Medallion Books, 1955. Print.
---.Pale Fire. New York: Random House, 1962. Print.
---. Strong Opinions. New York: Vintage Books, 1973. Print.
---. Lectures on Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980. Print.
---. Lectures on Don Quixote. New York: Mariner Books,1984. Print.
---. Speak, Memory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999. Print.
Ohi, Kevin. “Narcissism and Queer Reading in Pale Fire.”Nabokov Studies.5 (1998/1999):153-78. Project Muse.Web. 9 May. 2015.
Parkin-Gounelas, Ruth. “The Uncanny Text.” Literature and Psychoanalysis: Intertextual Readings. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2001.103-30. Print.
Rank, Otto. The Double: A Psychoanalytical Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009. Print.
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own : British Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Beijing : Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2004. Print.
Shute, J.P. “Nabokov and Freud: The Play of Power.” Modern Fiction Studies 30 (1984): 637-50. JSTOR. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1945. Print.
Xiong, Zhehong. “Parody: Nabokov’s Critique of Freudian Psychoanalysis Theory.”
http://www.overseaswindow.com/node/10832?language=zh-hant.Web.26 March. 2016.

指導教授

易鵬(PENG YI)

審核日期

2016-12-19

推文