建構學派與機構理論的觀點探討資訊科技介入的組織改變

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：78

、訪客IP：18.226.34.215

姓名

張耿郡(Keng-Chun Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

建構學派與機構理論的觀點探討資訊科技介入的組織改變
(The perspective of constructivism and institutional theory on IT-mediated organizational changes)

相關論文

★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司	★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究－以A公司為例	★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新－以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例	★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究－以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation	★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果	★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究－以新產品開發專案為例	★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力對新產品開發績效之影響	★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

過去研究科技對組織影響研究眾多，從早期工業時期開始的科技決定論，它主張科技本身的物質性決定了結果，例如：有打字機就一定回提高組織效率，之後有建構主義強調科技所產生的影響是透過科技與人互動下所產生的結果，然而，機構理論主張人並不是完全的自由意識，人受到機構力量的影響。

各家學派各自論述主張不同，本研究以建構學派的觀點為主，並且整合決定論所說的物質性與機構論所說的機構力量，綜觀科技對組織的影響全貌，並認為科技對組織的影響不是決定性，而是在與組織間的互動根據不同的人而會浮現不同的結構。

本研究的觀點與批判實證主義這個哲學觀點相呼應，因此，本文最後以批判實證論做總結，試圖整理使用者、決策者與設計者這三種不同角色的人對科技這個人造物的影響，並整理出影響這三種不同角色與科技之間的力量。

本文最終的結論是科技對組織的影響本質上是互動當下才會浮現的結構，所以從本質上不是受什麼物質或者力量所決定，也因如此，科技對組織的影響無法僅採用變數模型這種方法論來證明。

摘要(英)

In the past, there are numerous researches about the effect of technology for organization. A nascent of the study, technological determinism advocates materiality itself determines the outcome from industrial era. Then Constructivism emphasizes the impact of organization emerges from the interaction between technology and agency, however, the institutional theory proposes that agency is not entirely free, agency will be affected by the institution of pressures.

Each school has their own tenet, this study base on Constructivism, and then integrating with determinism and institutionalism to pursue the complete understanding of the effect of technology. This article believes the effect of technology won’t be determine by materiality and institutional pressures, but those will influence agency, and the effect will be emerged from the interaction between technology, agency, and institution.

This article reflects a philosophical view, Critical Realism, so this article concludes by Critical Realism. It identifies the different role of agency, users, managers, and designers, and conceptually portray the interaction between those roles and technology.

The final conclusion of this article is the structure will emerge from the technology and agency under the moment of action. Because of the conclusion, this article announces that materiality and institutional forces won’t determine the result, therefore, the methodology of variable model is hard to prove the effect of technology.

關鍵字(中)

★ 機構理論
★ 結構理論
★ 能供性
★ 調適性結構化理論
★ 建構學派

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

前言 1
理論回顧 2
一、科技決定論 2
二、建構學派 3
三、調適性結構化理論 7
四、能供性(Affordance) 9
五、機構理論 12
六、批評實在論 18
理論架構 20
一、情境機制(Situational Mechanisms)20
二、行為準則機制(Action-formation Mechanisms)20
三、改造機制(Transformational Mechanisms) 20
結論 21
參考文獻 22

參考文獻

1. Aldrich, H.E. (1972). Technology and organizational structure: A reexamination of the findings of the Aston group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 26–43.
2. Blau, P. M. 1955. The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relationships in two government agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Blau, P.M., Falbe, C.M., McKinley, W., & Tracy, P.K. (1976). Technology and organization in manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 20–40.
4. Carter, B., and New, C. (Eds.). 2004. Making Realism Work: Realist Social Theory and Empirical Research, London: Routledge.
5. Cousins, K.C. and Robey, D. (2005). The Social Shaping of Electronic Metals Exchanges: An institutional theory perspective, Information Technology & People 18(3): 212.
6. Currie, W.L. (2004). The Organizing Vision of Application Service Provision: A process-oriented analysis, Information and Organization 14: 237–267.
7. DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, London: Continuum.
8. DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M.S. (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.
9. Devereaux Jennings, P. and Greenwood, R. (2003). Constructing the Iron Cage:Institutional theory and enactment, in R. Westwood and S. Clegg (eds.)
10. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective
11. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–951.
12. Fulk, J., & Boyd, B. (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations. Journal of Management, 17(2), 407–447.
13. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Ryu, D. (1995). Cognitive elements in the social construction of technology. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 259–288.
14. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C.W., Schmitz, J., & Power, G.J. (1987). A social influence model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529–552.
15. Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields, Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 58–80.
17. Hedstrom, P., and Swedberg, R. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay,” in Social Mechanisms, P. Hedstrom, and R. Swedberg (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-31.
18. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 61-85.
19. Leonardi PM, Barley SR. (2010) What′s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann.4(1) :1–51. CrossRef
20. Lucas, H.C. (1975). Performance and the use of an information system. Management Science, 29(8), 908–919.
21. Mark, A.L. (2007). Modernising healthcare – Is the NPfIT for purpose? Journal of Information Technology 22(3): 248–257.
22. Merton, R. K. 1940. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18: 560–568.
23. Mignerat M and Rivard S (2009) Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 24(4), 369–391.
24. Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books.
25. Norman, D. A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design,” Interactions (6:3), pp. 38-43.
26. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
27. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
28. Orlikowski, W.J., & Gash, D.C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 174–207.
29. Parsons, T. 1956. Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
30. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
31. Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173–193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5–49.
33. Ramiller, N.C. and Swanson, E.B. (2003). Organizing Visions for Information Technology and the Information Systems Executive Response, Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1): 13–50.
34. rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
35. Reichers, A. E. (1987), "An Interactionist Perspective on Newcomer Socialization Rates," Academy of Management Review, 12, 2, 278-287.
36. Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219–244.
37. Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8(5): 458–474.
38. Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: theorizing it-associated organizational change process. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834.
39. Wang, P. and Swanson, E.B. (2008). Customer Relationship Management as Advertised, Information Technology & People 21(4): 323.
40. Wang, P. Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 63–85.
41. Woodward, J. (1958). Management and technology. London: HSMO.

指導教授

陳炫碩

審核日期

2015-8-17

推文