博碩士論文 102423037 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:14 、訪客IP:18.204.56.97
姓名 黃詠翔(Yong-siang Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 資訊科技能力對組織敏捷性之影響:以市場導向及環境動態性為調節變數
(Moderating Effect of Market Orientation and Environmental Dynamism on the Relationship between IT Capability and Organizational Agility)
相關論文
★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越:中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討-以自行車產業為例★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析-以銀行簡訊為例★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 今日的商業環境是非常複雜且變化快速的。對企業來說,敏捷性成為取得競爭優勢必要的一種能力。過去的文獻對於資訊科技能力與組織的敏捷性有許多不同觀點,包括資訊科技能力可以使組織更加敏捷,或者是資訊科技能力會使得組織更加遲緩。另一方面過去這些文獻大多是概念性研究或者個案研究。因此,我們進行實徵研究,對於資訊科技能力及組織敏捷性的關係提供更多的證據。除此之外,過去的研究對於資訊科技能力及組織敏捷性在特定情境下的瞭解並不多。在我們的研究中,我們加入市場導向及環境變動性兩個調節變數來調節資訊科技及組織敏捷性的關係。因此,我們試圖去探索資訊科技能力與組織敏捷性的關係、市場導向如何影響組織敏捷性、市場導向對於資訊科技能力與組織敏捷性的調節效果、以及環境變動性是如何影響市場導向對資訊科技能力及組織敏捷性的調節效果。經過實徵資料的分析後,我們發現資訊科技能力對於組織敏捷性有正向的影響效果、且市場導向對於組織敏捷性有正向的影響效果。
摘要(英) Today’s business environment is complicated and rapidly changing. Agility becomes a necessary capability for a firm in order to achieve competitive advantage. There were many different perspectives about IT capability make a firm more agile or more sluggish proposed in the past but most of them are the conceptual or case study. Therefore we conduct an empirical study to provide more evidences to the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility. Besides, past researches did not deeply realize the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility in some particular circumstances. In this study, we added two variables including market orientation and environmental dynamism to moderate the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility. Hence, our study try to explore the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility, how market orientation affects organizational agility, the moderating effect of market orientation on the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility and how the moderated moderation effect of environmental dynamism influences the effect of market orientation on the relationship between IT capability and organizational agility. After the empirical data analysis, we found that IT capability is positively associated with organizational agility, and market orientation is positively associated with organizational agility
關鍵字(中) ★ 資訊科技能力
★ 組織敏捷性
★ 市場導向
★ 環境動態性
關鍵字(英) ★ IT capability
★ Organizational agility
★ Market orientation
★ Environmental dynamism
論文目次 Abstract i
中文摘要 ii
致謝 iii
Content iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Purposes and Questions 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 IT Capability 5
2.2 Organizational Agility 8
2.3 Market Orientation 9
2.4 Environmental Dynamism 11
Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypotheses 12
3.1 Research Model 12
3.2 Research Hypotheses 13
3.2.1 The Influence of IT Capability on Organizational Agility 13
3.2.2 The Moderating Effect of Market Orientation 14
3.2.3 The Influence of Market Orientation on Organizational Agility 15
3.2.4 The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism 16
Chapter 4 Research Methodology 18
4.1 Sample Selection and Data Collection 18
4.2 Instrument Development 18
4.3 Control Variables 23
Chapter 5 Data Analysis and Results 24
5.1 Sample Characteristic 24
5.2 Measurement Model 28
5.3 Structural Model 37
Chapter 6 Conclusions 42
6.1 Findings and Discussion 42
6.2 Implications 44
6.3 Limitations 46
Appendix 51
A. Questionnaire 51
參考文獻 Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of marketing research, 36-50.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Augusto, M., & Coelho, F. (2009). Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: Exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 94-108.
Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2005). Enterprise Agility and Information Technology Management: The CIO′s Manifesto: SIM Advanced Practices Council Publication.
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 169-196.
Bharadwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). IT capabilities: theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Systems.
Bhatt, G., Emdad, A., Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2010). Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage. Information & Management, 47(7), 341-349.
Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976-997. doi: 10.1287/isre.2013.0500
Chan Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 323-338.
Chang, W., Franke, G. R., Butler, T. D., Musgrove, C. F., & Ellinger, A. E. (2014). Differential Mediating Effects of Radical and Incremental Innovation on Market Orientation-Performance Relationship: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(3), 235-250. doi: 10.2753/mtp1069-6679220301
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of management, 17(1), 121-154.
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative science quarterly, 52-73.
Dove, R. (2002). Response ability: the language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise: John Wiley & Sons.
Feeny, D. F., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan management review, 39(3), 9-21.
Fichman, R. G. (2004). Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 132-154. doi: 10.1287/isre.1040.0021
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388.
Galliers, R. D. (2006). Strategizing for Agility: Confronting Information. Agile Information Systems, 1.
Garg, V. K., Walters, B. A., & Priem, R. L. (2003). Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 725-744.
Gladson Nwokah, N. (2008). Strategic market orientation and business performance: The study of food and beverages organisations in Nigeria. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 279-286.
Griffiths, J. S., & Grover, R. (1998). A framework for understanding market orientation: The behavior and the culture. Marketing Theory and Applications, 9, 311-320.
Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of marketing research, 37(4), 449-462.
Hough, J. R., & White, M. A. (2003). Environmental dynamism and strategic decision‐making rationality: an examination at the decision level. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 481-489.
Kandemir, D., Yaprak, A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324-340.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 1-18.
Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS quarterly, 35(4), 931-954.
Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS quarterly, 487-505.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy‐making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235.
Nagel, R., Preiss, R., & Goldman, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer: New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 20-35.
Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New‐Product Success*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334-347.
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage: Harvard Business Review, Reprint Service.
Rettig, C. (2013). The trouble with enterprise software. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49.
Richard, S. W. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Aufl., Englewood Cliffs (NJ).
Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm′s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 231-270.
Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan management review, 38(1), 31-42.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263.
Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. (1997). At the heart of success: organizationwide management competencies. Steps to the Future: Fresh Thinking on the management of IT-Based Organizational transformation, 143-163.
Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS quarterly, 261-290.
Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179-203.
Senge, P. M. (1993). Transforming the practice of management. Human resource development quarterly, 4(1), 5-32.
Seo, D., & La Paz, A. I. (2008). Exploring the dark side of IS in achieving organizational agility. Communications of the ACM, 51(11), 136-139.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Market orientation, customer value, and superior performance. Business horizons, 37(2), 22-28.
Smirnova, M., Naudé, P., Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., & Kouchtch, S. P. (2011). The impact of market orientation on the development of relational capabilities and performance outcomes: The case of Russian industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.009
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organizational research methods, 9(2), 221-232.
Tallon, P. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 21-36.
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS quarterly, 35(2), 463-486.
Taylor, C. R., Kim, K. H., Ko, E., Park, M. H., Kim, D. R., & Moon, H. I. (2008). Does having a market orientation lead to higher levels of relationship commitment and business performance? Evidence from the Korean robotics industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(7), 825-832.
Tsourveloudis, N., Valavanis, K., Gracanin, D., & Matijasevic, M. (1999). On the measurement of agility in manufacturing systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Intelligent Techniques.
van Oosterhout, M., Waarts, E., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2006). Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 132-145.
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results: Harvard Business Press.
Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review. v44 i1, 57.
Wilding, R., Wagner, B., Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 438-453.
指導教授 王存國 審核日期 2015-6-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明