博碩士論文 102450011 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:18 、訪客IP:44.201.72.250
姓名 馬繼泰(Chi-Tai Ma)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 高階主管企管碩士班
論文名稱 適應性績效與員工職涯成功關聯性之研究-以LMX為調節變項
(The Study of the Relationship Between Adaptive Performance and Career Success, and The Moderating Effects of LMX)
相關論文
★ 溝通與領導課程訓練成效之分析★ 母國企業直線主管領導風格與國際 人力資源管理措施對外派人員績效之影響
★ 豐田管理模式之人才培育對品質與成本之影響-以某汽車公司為例★ 360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例
★ 兩岸研發人員職能發展應用研究-以M公司為例★ 企業併購過程中的人力資源角色
★ 組織變革成功個案分析 - John P. Kotter 領導變革八大步驟之觀點★ 社群網站經營模式分析-以『BB-BOX』網站為例
★ 觸控IC經營策略之個案研究-以A公司為例★ 科技研發單位實施接班人計畫之探討─以國內某科技研發單位為例
★ 面對數位匯流,傳統媒體代理商應對策略探討─以安吉斯集團偉視捷媒體公司為例★ 台灣光電產業選擇產品認證外包廠商的決定因素─以發光二極體照明產品為例
★ 團隊激勵獎金與團隊績效關連性之研究★ 晶圓代工業關鍵成功因素的探討—以台積公司為例
★ 員工潛能與績效對員工晉升的影響--以營造建築業為例★ 建構整合性智慧健康照護網絡─以中壢天晟醫院醫療小管家為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 協助員工達成職涯上的成功,進而促成組織的成功,一直是組織在人才管理上的一項重要課題。晉升向來被多數組織及個人視為職涯成功的主要象徵,而晉升力評分不但是員工晉升時的重要指標,也是衡量員工職涯成功的關鍵因素之一。在傳統的組織內部晉升發展途徑,多半仍以員工的工作績效做為晉升力評分的重要決定因素。
在人力資源管理領域,有關適應性績效的概念正逐漸開始萌芽。過去的任務性績效構面忽略了個體對新任務和新要求適應情況的描述。而適應性績效強調個體於動態的環境下,調整自身表現的能力。相較於靜態觀點的任務性績效,適應性績效對晉升力評分應更具有預測力。而在晉升力評分的過程中,社會脈絡的因子向來被認為會對晉升力評分的結果產生影響。因此,同步考量主管-部屬交換關係有其意義存在。
本研究採跨產業樣本蒐集之方式,由台灣及大陸兩岸各產業類型之民營企業,回收後配對成功之503份有效問卷,以階層迴歸分析探討員工適應性績效與主管晉升力評分的關聯性,同時觀察社會脈絡中的主管-部屬交換關係對上述關係間存在的調節效果。研究結果說明,適應性績效與晉升力評分間具有顯著的正向關係。
摘要(英) For organizational success, assisting employees in reaching career goals is always one of the major issues in the talent management. Promotion is considered as the obvious symbol of measuring career success by most individuals and organizations. Therefore, promotability rating is not only the main indicator for promotions of employee but one of the key elements indicating employee’s career success. In the traditional organizations, the main determinant of promotability ratings for employee promotions is mostly the job performance evaluation.
Nowadays, the concept of adaptive performance for evaluating employees’ job performance is progressively developed in the field of human resource management. In the past, task performance usually ignores how individuals adapting the new task and the superior’s request. Compared to task performance which focuses on static views of data, adaptive performance emphasizes evaluating the ability of how individuals adjusting personal performance in the dynamic environment. Thus, adaptive performance should have more predictive capability for promotability ratings. In other perspective, most researches deem the social context one of the main factor of promotability ratings. Thus, Leader-member Exchange Theory (LMX) is taken into consideration as the moderating effect.
In this study, we collected pair questionnaires from privately owned companies based on Taiwan and China in different industries. 503 valid paired questionnaires were returned for data analysis. This study analyzes the relationship of employees’ adaptive performance and supervisors’ promotability ratings with hierarchical multiple regression, also the moderating effect of LMX on the previous relationship. The results of regression analysis showed that adaptive performance had positively related to promotability ratings.
關鍵字(中) ★ 適應性績效
★ 職涯成功
★ 晉升力評分
★ 主管-部屬交換關係
關鍵字(英) ★ Adaptive Performance
★ Career Success
★ Promotability Ratings
★ Leader-member Exchange
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與範圍 4
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 5
第一節 適應性績效 5
第二節 職涯成功:晉升力評分 7
第三節 主管-部屬交換關係 9
第四節 適應性績效與晉升力評分之關係 11
第五節 LMX對適應性績效與職涯成功關係間的調節效果 12
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究對象與程序 16
第三節 研究變項衡量 18
第四章 研究結果 21
第一節 相關分析 21
第二節 階層迴歸分析 22
第五章 結論與建議 24
第一節 研究結果與討論 24
第二節 研究貢獻 25
第三節 管理意涵 26
第四節 研究限制與建議 27
參考文獻 29
參考文獻 中文部分
1.沈俊吟(2012),適應性績效對晉升力評分之影響-以LMX及關係年資為調節變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
2.林文政(2009),晉升的陷阱,經理人月刊,第60期,頁24。
3.林文政(2014),績優員工升主管就陣亡,是選人標準出問題了嗎?,經理人月刊,第116期,頁30。
4.林文政、鍾珮珊、范維恩(2014),好關係沒有壞影響嗎?領導部屬交換關係對組織年資與晉升力評分倒U字型關係的調節效果,東吳經濟商學學報,第86期,頁1-28。
5.周厚余、鄭全全(2006),適應性績效研究及其績效管理的意義,人類工效學,第十二卷第四期,頁57-59。
6.俞志緯(2012),任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效對晉升力之影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
7.許玉輝(2014),工作績效與職涯成功關聯性之探討-以主管教練行為為調節變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
8.陶祁(2006),適應性績效結構分析及在培訓評估中的應用,管理科學,第十九卷第二期,頁48-54。
9.莊如松(2006),適應性績效量表之發展及其與目標導向、前瞻人格之關係,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
10.簡博浩、韓志翔(2008) ,任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策的影響:調查法及實驗法,臺大管理論叢,第十八卷第二期,頁27-62。

英文部分
1.Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 97-111.
2.Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: a new perspective for organizational inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 295.
3.Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N. and Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005), Career success in a boundaryless career world. J. Organiz. Behav., 26, 177-202.
4.Arthur, M. B. and D. M. Rousseau (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era.
5.Baruch, Y. (2004). Managing careers: Theory and practice, Pearson Education.
6.Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
7.Beechler, S., &; Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global war for talent. Journal of International Management, Vol.15, 273–285.
8.Bird, R. B., &; Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221-238.
9.Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 71–98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.Breaugh, J. A. (2010). Modeling the managerial promotion process. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4), 264-277.
11.Cappellen, T. and M. Janssens (2010). The career reality of global managers: an examination of career triggers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21(11), 1884-1910.
12.Connelly, B. L., S. T. Certo, R. D. Ireland and C. R. Reutzel (2011), “Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment.” Journal of Management, 37, No.7, pp.39-51.
13.Dansereau, F., & Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
14.De Pater, I. E., Van Vianen, A. E. M., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Klehe, U. (2009). Employees’ challenging job experience and supervisors’ evaluations of promotability. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 297-325.
15.Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 499-521.
16.DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360–396.
17.Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership:A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634.
18.Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2012).How to identify leadership potential: Development and testing of a consensus model. Human Resource Management, 51(3), 361–385.
19.Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 499-521.
20.Eby, L. T., Butts, M., and Lockwood, A. (2003). Predictor of success in the era of the boundaryless career. Journal of Organization Behavior, 24(6), 689-708.
21.Ferris, G. R., Buckley, M. R., & Allen, G. M. (1992). Promotion systems in organizations. Human Resource Planning, 15, 47–68.
22.Gentry, W. A. and J. J. Sosik (2010), Developmental Relationships and Managerial Promotability in Organizations: A Multisource Study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, No.1, 266- 278.
23.Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psycology of dyadic organizing. In L.L.cummings & B. M. Staw(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
25.Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86.
26.Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviors for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 65-73.
27.Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K M., & Carlson, D. S (2006). An Examination of Temporal Variables and Relationship Quality on Promotability Ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31(6), 677-699.
28.Heneman, H. G. and T. A. Judge (2009). Staffing organizations, McGraw-Hill,Irwin, Boston.
29.Homans, G. C., (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange, The American Journal of Sociology, 597-606.
30.Hui, C., Lam, S. S. K., & Law, K. S. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A filed quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 822–828.
31.Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D.(1999). The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development:1-20. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
32.Jaskolka, G., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1985). Measuring and predicting managerial success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 189-205.
33.Jawahara, I. M., Meursb, J. A., Ferrisc, G. R., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Self-Efficacy and Political Skill as Comparative Predictors of Task and Contextual Performance: A Two-Study Constructive Replication. Human Performance, 21, 138-157.
34.Jawahar, I. M., & Ferris, R. F. (2011). A Longitudinal Investigation of Task and Contextual Performance Influences on Promotability Judgments. Human Performance, 24, 251-269.
35.Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984-996.
36.Jugde, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485-519.
37.Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., &; Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
38.Jung, Y. and N. Takeuchi (2014), Relationships Among Leader-Member Exchange, Person-Organization Fit and Work Attitudes in Japanese and Korean Organizations: Testing a Cross-Cultural Moderating Effect. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, No.1, 23-46.
39.Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602–609.
40.Klein, G., & Pierce, L. (2001). Adaptive teams: in Proceedings of the 6th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium.
41.LePine, J. A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in teams of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1153-1167.
42.Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
43.Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J. &; Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators. Personnel Psychology, 31, 269-280.
44.London. M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implicationsfor staffing, motivation, and development, 119-153.
45.London, M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1983). Effects of Candidate Characteristics on Management Promotion Decisions: An Experimental Study. Personnel Psychology, 36(2), 241-259.
46.Lyness, K. S. and M. E. Heilman (2006). When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(4), 777.
47.Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4) 370-96.
48.Neal, A. F. and Hesketh, B. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. Ilgen and D. Pulakos (Ed.), The Changing Nature of performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development , 21-55.
49.Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
50.Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.
51.Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428-436.
52.Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., & Scandura, T. A. (1998). Delegation and Leader-Member Exchange: Main Effects, Moderators, and Measurement Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 298-318.
53.Shoss M. K., Witt L. A., & Vera D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 910-924.
54.Silzer, R., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 377-412.
55.Spence M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
56.Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21, 739-756.
57.Tucker J. S. & Gunther K. M. (2009). The application of a model of adaptive performance to Army leader behaviors. Military Psychology, 21, 315-333.
58.Tucker, J. S., Pleban, R. J., & Gunther, K. M. (2010). The Mediating Effects of Adaptive Skill on Values-Performance Relationships. Human Performance, 23, 81–99.
59.Turner, R. H. (1960), Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System. American Sociological Review, 25, No.6, 855-867.
60.Van Scotter, J. R., Cross, T. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526-535.
61.Walker, J. W., & LaRocco, J. M. (2002). Perspectives: Talent pools: The best and the rest. HR. Human Resource Planning, 25(3), 12-14.
62.Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1809-1824.
63.Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions . Personnel Psychology , 50(4 ), 979-1006.
64.Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 577-595.
65.Werner, Jon M. and Randy L. DeSimone(2008). Human Resource Development. 5th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College.
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2015-6-29
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明