跨國廠商直接投資與本國政府最適投資政策

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：85

、訪客IP：3.21.158.224

姓名

林怡君(Yi-Chun Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所在職專班

論文名稱

跨國廠商直接投資與本國政府最適投資政策
(Foreign Direct Investment by Multi-National Manufacturer and a Host Country’s Optimal Investment Policy)

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 運動鞋製業的市場結構、行為與績效分析
★ 台灣筆記型電腦產業由代工轉型至自營品牌之策略及成效探討-以華碩電腦為例	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 寡占廠商的最適風險決策與政府的最適出口政策	★ 合作投資的時點不一致問題與政府最適政策
★ 兩岸租稅協議效益之研究	★ 中間財市場與耐久財廠商的產品耐久性決策
★ 系統產品之競爭與整合	★ 仿冒行為的經濟分析
★ 對外直接投資之不對稱訊息、最適進入決策與研究發展	★ 存在中間財市場下的廠商授權

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文主要討論跨國廠商為獲取利潤，將考慮到本國進行外人直接投資(foreign direct investment, FDI)，在跨國廠商固定設廠成本明顯很小或很大、本國與跨國廠商生產效率相等或不相等、跨國廠商有或無具備技術外溢效果的情況下，跨國廠商進入本國 FDI ，與本國廠商從事 Cournot數量競爭，本國政府應採取課稅或是補貼之投資政策，才能提高本國社會福利。
本論文發現當跨國廠商的固定設廠成本明顯很小時，必會到本國FDI，本國政府為促進社會福利極大化，無論跨國廠商是否有技術外溢效果皆應該對其採取課稅之投資政策，且為定額之從量生產稅。一旦跨國廠商的固定設廠成本明顯變大時，需在利潤為正值的情況下才會選擇到本國 FDI 。當跨國廠商成本下降或技術外溢效果提高等兩種情況下，均會提高社會福利水準。如跨國廠商利潤為正值，會選擇到本國市場設廠生產，本國政府仍應課稅；但若固定設廠成本明顯增大，跨國廠商發現無利潤，可能不會進入本國FDI，此時本國政府衡量社會福利只要比較本國廠商獨占時為大，甚至可能採取補貼之投資政策，藉以吸引跨國廠商進入本國直接投資，極大化本國社會福利。

摘要(英)

This thesis discusses the consideration of foreign direct investment (FDI) in a host country by a multi-national manufacturer when seeking profits. When a multi-national manufacturer directly invests in a host country and engages in Cournot competition with host country manufacturers, the host country government should employ investment policies such as either imposing taxes or providing subsidies to enhance social benefits dependent on various factors. These factors include: whether a multi-national manufacturer’s fixed factory setup costs are significantly smaller or greater, whether the host country manufacturer and multi-national manufacturer have equivalent or non-equivalent productivity, and whether the multi-national manufacturer has technological spillover.
This thesis found when fixed factory setup costs of multi-national manufacturers are significantly smaller, they will directly invest in the host country. In order to maximize social benefits, the host country government should impose unit taxes on the multi-national manufacturer, regardless if technology spillover has occurred. If the multi-national manufacturer’s fixed factory setup costs increase significantly, it will only choose FDI in the host country if the profits are positive. If the multi-national manufacturer’s costs decrease or technological spillover expands, both scenarios will enhance social benefits. If the multi-national manufacturer’s profits are positive, it will choose to set up a factory for production in the host country market.But if fixed factory setup costs increase and the multi-national manufacturer discovers there is no profit, it might decide not to directly invest. At this time, the government can decide to provide subsidies if social welfare gained outweigh factory setup by a local manufacturer. This will provide incentives for a multi-national manufacturer to directly invest in a host country and maximize the social welfare.

關鍵字(中)

★ 外人直接投資
★ 技術外溢效果
★ 社會福利

關鍵字(英)

★ foreign direct investment
★ technological spillover
★ social welfare

論文目次

目錄

第一章前言.........................................1

第二章文獻回顧......................................6

第三章基本模型.....................................10

3.1 兩廠商生產效率相當................................13

3.2 兩廠商生產效率不相當..............................15

第四章跨國廠商直接投資有固定設廠成本之變化..............18

4.1 跨國廠商無技術外溢效果.............................18

4.2 兩廠商生產效率不相當且跨國廠商有技術外溢效果...........22

第五章結論.........................................24

參考文獻..............................................26

參考文獻

中文部分：
邱俊榮與劉惠玲 (2003) ，「國際競爭與『躍過關稅』的外人直接投資：市場不確定性的考量」，中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文，第31卷，第4期，頁607-626。
邱俊榮與蔡宜臻 (2009) ，「跨國廠商的進入模式–直接投資、出口與授權決策」，中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文，第37卷，第1期，頁3-21。
馬昌璇 (2005) ，「吸引外人直接投資決定因素---以世界四十五國為例」，國立政治大學社會科學學院碩士論文，頁1-2。
陳龍杰 (2015)，「跨國公司異質性與外人直接投資外溢效果：中國製造業廠商實證研究」，國立中正大學經濟學系碩士論文，頁3-25
黃人萱 (2015)，「外人直接投資與政府的策略性汙染稅」，國立中央大學經濟學系碩士論文，頁5-7。
鄭明哲 (2015) ，「台灣外人直接投資的決定因素 1990-2014」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，頁2-14。
鍾美芳 (2009) ，「多國籍廠商進入決策與技術外溢效果分析」，東吳經濟商學學報，第65期，頁 83-108。

英文部分：
Belderbos, R. and L. Sleuwaegen (1998), “Tariff Jumping FDI and Export Substitution:
Japanese Electronic Firms in Europe,” International Journal of Industrial
Organization, 16, 601-638.
Blomstrom, M., A. Kokko, and M. Zejan (2000), “Foreign Direct Investment. Firm and
Host Country Strategy,” London: Macmillan.
Caves, R.E. (1974), “Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host
Country Markets.” Economica, 41, 176-193.
Eicher, T. and J. W. Kang (2005), “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment or Acquisition:
Optimal Entry Mode for Multinationals,” Journal of Development Economics, 77,
207-228.
Ethier, W. J. (1986), “The Multinational Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80,
805-833.
Findlay, R. (1978), “Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the
Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model,” Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 92, 1-16.
Fosfuri, A., M. Motta, and T. Ronde (2001), “Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers
through Workers’ Mobility,” Journal of Development Economics, 53, 205-222.
Hymer, S. H.(1976), “The International Operations of National Firms: A study of Direct
Foreign Investment, ” Ph. D. Thesis, MIT, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kayalica, M. Ö. and Lahiri, S. (2005), “Strategic Environmental Policies in the Present
of Foreign Direct Investment,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 30(1), 1-21.
Konishi, H., K. Saggi, and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign
Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.
Kugler, M. (2006), “ Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Within or Between Industries? ” Journal of Development Economics, 80, 444-477.
Liu, X., P. Siler., C. Wang and Y. Wei (2000), “ Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data, ” Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 407-425.
MacDougall, D. A. (1960), “The Benefit and Cost of Private Investment from Abroad: A
Theoretical Approach,” Economics Record, 127, 13-15.
Mattoo, A., M. Olarrega, and K. Saggi (2004), “Mode of Foreign Entry, Technology
Transfer, and FDI Policy,” Journal of Development Economics, 75, 95-111.
Meyer, K. E. (2004), “Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 259-276.
Motta, M. (1992), “Multinational Firms and the Tariff-Jumping Argument,” European
Economic Review, 36, 1557-1571.
Muller, T. (2007) “Analyzing Modes of Foreign Entry: Greenfield Investment versus
Acquisition”, Review of International Economics, 15(1), pp.93-111.
Qiu, L. D. and Z. Tao (2001), “Export, Foreign Direct Investment, and Local Content
Requirement,” Journal of Development Economics, 66, 101-125.
Stähler, F. (2006), “Market Entry and Foreign Direct Investment,” International Journal
of Industrial Organization, 24, 335-347.
UNCTAD (2016),World Investment Report.
Wang, J. Y. and M. Blomstrom (1992), “Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A
Simple Model,” European Economics Review, 36, 137-15

指導教授

邱俊榮、鄒孟文

審核日期

2017-7-27

推文