||Baturo, A. R. (2004). “Empowering Andrea to help 5 students construct fraction understanding”, Proceedings of the 28th PME Conference, Vol. 2, Bergen University College, Bergen, pp. 95-102.|
Beeland W. D. Jr (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education, Trinity College, Dublin.
Boticario, J., & Santos, O. (2007). An open IMS-based user modeling approach for developing adaptive learning management systems. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, Retrieved 10.10.11 from: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2007/02/.
Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. (2009). “Conditions for Effective Use of Interactive On-line Learning Object: The case of a fractions computer-based learning sequence”, The Electric Journal of Mathematics and Technology, Vol. 3, Number 1. Available online https://php.radford.edu/~ejmt/ContentIndex.php
Bull, J., & McKenna, C. (2004). Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment (1st ed.). London: RoutledgeFamler.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D. & Klein, S. P. (2006), “Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 47, Number 1, pp. 1-24.
Chang, H. P., Chen, J. Y., Guo, C. J., Chen, C. C., Chang, C. Y., Lin, S. H., & Su, W. J. (2007). Investigating primary and secondary students? Learning of physics concepts in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education. 29(4), 465-482.
Chou, C., Chan, P. S., & Wu, H. C. (2007). Using a two-tier test to assess students’ understanding and alternative conceptions of cyber copyright laws. British Journal of Education Technology, 38(6), 1072-1084.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1618-1627.
Cormier, D., & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. EDUCAUSE Review, 45, 30–39.
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 53–64.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education,56(4), 1023-1031.
Kikkas, K., Laanpere, M., & Põldoja, H. (2011). Open Courses: The Next Big Thing in eLearning. In A. Rospigliosi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 370-376). Reading: Academic Publishing Limited.
Kolar, R. L., Sabatini, D. A., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Laptops in the classroom: do they make a difference? Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 397–401.
Kop, R. (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experience during a Massive Open Online Course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38.
Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud Computing and Creativity: Learning on a
Massive Open Online Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and
E-Learning, Special Issue on Creativity and OER. Retrieved April 28, 2013,
from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&article=457. Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M. S., Abajian, S. C., de Waard, I., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N. O., & Rodgriguez, C. O. (2012). Emotive Vocabulary in MOOCs: Context &
Participant Retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1. Lazarinis, F., Koutromanos, G., Green, S., & Pearson, E. (2009). Utilizing a multicriteria multimedia adaptive tool in formative assessments. In: Proceedings of the international technology, education and development conference (pp.
1522–1528), (Valencia, Spain).
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and Translations among
Representations in Mathematics Learning and Problem Solving. In C. Janvier, (Ed.), Problems of Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lin, S. W. (2004). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of flowering plant growth and development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 175-199.
Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 16-32.
Masten, S., Chen, K., Graulau, J., Kari, S., & Lee, K. (2002). A web-based and group learning environment for introductory environmental engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 69–80.
Mora, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., Iserte, J. L., & Sánchez, F. T. (2012). An e-assessment approach for evaluation in engineering overcrowded groups. Computers & Education, 59, 732-740.
Mora-Aguilar, M. C., & Sancho-Bru, J. L. (2010). Diagnostic and formative
E-Assessment in engineering on a Moodle-based VLE. In F. Lazarinis, S. Green,
& E. Perason (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-learning standards and
Interoperability (pp. 378–398). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. Mora-Aguilar, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., & Iserte-Vilar, J. L. (2009). Alternatives for evaluation in overcrowded groups: the e-assessment. In IATED. (Ed.), Proceedings of the international technology, education and development
conference, Valencia, Spain (pp. 3957–3966).
Mora-Aguilar, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., & Iserte-Vilar, J. L. (2010). Applying new
educational methodologies in overcrowded groups: experiences in basic Mechanics. In W. Kouwenhoven (Ed.), Advances in technology, education and development (pp. 147–164). Vukovar, Croatia: IN-TEH.
Mora-Aguilar, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., Rodríguez-Cervantes, P. J., & Iserte-Vilar, J. L. (2008). The challenge of improving teaching methodologies in overcrowded groups: experiences in basic mechanics. In IATED. (Ed.), Proceedings of the international technology, education and development conference, Valencia, Spain.
Nguyen, J., & Paschal, C. (2002). Development of online ultrasound instructional module and comparison to traditional teaching methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 278–283.
Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). The development and application of a two-tiered diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 45-61.
OECD (2007), Giving Knowledge for Free: the Emergence of Open Educational Resources Retrieved on January 14, 2013 from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38654317.pdf.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.2-design patterns and business models for the next
￼generation of software.
Retrieved 02.07.11 from:
Özmen, H. (2008). The influence of computer-assisted instruction on students’
conceptual understanding of chemical bonding and attitude toward chemistry: a
case for Turkey. Computers & Education, 51, 423-438.
Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment:
practitioner cases. Computers and Education, 54, 715–721.
Pappano, L. (2012). “The Year of the MOOC.” Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.
Peterson, R., Treagust, D., & Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students’
misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic
instrument. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 40-48.
Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems,
Instructional Science, 18, pp. 119-144.
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning
approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay.
Higher Education, 35, 453–472.
Tan, K. C. G., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and
application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301.
Technical Report. In Streng, S., Baur, D., Broll, G., De Luca, A., Wimmer, R., & Butz, A. (Eds.), Trends in e-learning. University of Munich.
Treagust, D. F. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconception by means of diagnostic
multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 199-207.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconception in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169
Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2007). The Taiwan national science concept learning study in an international perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 391-403.
Tsai, C. H., Chen, H. Y., Chou, C. Y., & Lain, K. D. (2007). Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students’ understandings of electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 483-496.
Tsai, C. C. (2003). Using a conflict map as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 307-327.
Tsai, C. C., & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in science through a networked two-tier test system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 157-165.
Voska, K. W., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160-176.
Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203.
Yang, T. C., Chen, Y. & Hwang, G. J. (2015). The influences of a two-tier test strategy on student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach. Computers & Education, 82, 366-377.