考慮碳補償下之經濟訂購批量模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：29

、訪客IP：18.191.157.186

姓名

蕭惠名(Hui-Ming Xiao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

考慮碳補償下之經濟訂購批量模型
(Economic Order Quantity Models under the Carbon Offset Consideration)

相關論文

★ 應用灰色理論於有機農產品之經營管理— 需求預測及關鍵成功因素探討	★ NAND型Flash價格與交運量預測在風險分析下之決策模式
★ 工業電腦用無鉛晶片組最適存貨政策之研究-以A公司為例	★ 砷化鎵代工廠磊晶之最適存貨管理-以W公司為例
★ 資訊分享&決策制定下產銷協同關係之研究 -以IC設計業為例	★ 應用分析層級法於電子化學品業委外供應商評選準則之研究
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車售服零件庫存滯銷因素分析-以C公司為例	★ 多目標規劃最佳六標準差水準: 以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器C公司製造流程為例
★ 以資料探勘技術進行消費者返廠定期保養之實證研究	★ 以價值鏈觀點探討品牌公司關鍵組織流程之取決-以S公司為例
★ 應用產銷協同規劃之流程改善於化纖產業-現況改善與效益分析	★ 權力模式與合作關係對於報價策略之影響研究—以半導體產業A公司為例
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車製造業之庫存原因分析	★ 以類神經網路預測代工費報價---以中小面板產業C公司為例
★ 電路板產業存貨改善研究-以N公司為例	★ 運用六標準差改善機台備用零件(Spare parts)存貨管理

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

由於氣候環境的變遷逐漸加劇，綠色供應鏈管理與碳足跡的概念日益受到重視，而為了減緩溫室氣體的排放量，從一開始的原物料取得、製造、運輸、使用至回收之產品碳足跡過程也是現今企業節能減碳的方式之一。本研究將以碳補償與碳限額之碳政策因素作為減排的考量，並添加營收分享的機制，以零售商的角度作為考量，探討在一個零售商與一個供應商的通路分享中，考量了節能減碳的因素後，對於零售商而言，其利潤上的變化。因此，本研究主要引用了Hovelaque and Bironneau （2015）所提出的利潤函式以及Chen et al.（2013）中碳限額與碳補償的模型架構概念，表示在增加了減排因素後，對於零售商利潤的情境變化。
本研究背景主要以探討一個零售商與一個供應商的產品訂購與銷售問題為基準，並添加了碳補償與營收分享的機制，因此，本研究將會以三種情境下的模型進行探討，分析在各情境下零售商利潤的變化情形，使本研究之情境與模型不僅只探討產品的訂購與銷售，亦能因應目前市場與環境之趨勢，表現出零售商與供應商交易後所產生之利潤上的影響以及在節能減碳之趨勢下，零售商付出碳補償成本後其利潤的改變，以提供零售商在不同的經濟訂購批量模型時，對於總利潤之考量。

摘要(英)

Due to the climate change is increasingly aggravating, the concepts of green supply chain management and carbon footprint are taken more seriously. In order to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, it is one of way to the Energy Efficiency and Carbon Reduction for enterprise to the carbon footprint of products process from the acquisition of raw material, manufacturing, transportation, using to the recycling. This thesis applies the carbon policy of the carbon offset, cabon cap and add the revenue sharing mechanism to the consideration of emission reduction. Exploring a sharing pathway which is considered the carbon reduction with a retailer and a supplier makes the retailer’profit change. Therefore, this thesis mainly refers to the profit function which was proposed by the Hovelaque and Bironneau (2015) and the Chen et al. (2013) in the concepts of carbon cap and carbon offset. It expresses the change of the retailer’s profit after increasing the emission reduction factors.
This thesis is mainly exploring a retailer and a supplier’s product ordering and saling problems as a benchmark. In addition, it also adds the carbon offsets and revenue sharing mechanism. Therefore, this study explores the model under the three scenarios. Additionally, we analyze the change of the retailer’s profit in different circumstances. It makes the models in this thesis are not only exploring the product’s ordering and saling but also fulfilling the current market trend. This study expresses the influences of retailer’s profit after the transaction and displays the change of retailer’s profit which was paid out the cost of carbon offset in the Energy Efficiency and Carbon Reduction. It can provide the consideration of total profit for retailer in the different economic ordering model.

關鍵字(中)

★ 綠色供應鏈管理
★ 碳足跡
★ 碳限額
★ 碳補償
★ 營收分享
★ 經濟訂購量

關鍵字(英)

★ green supply chain management
★ carbon footprint
★ carbon cap
★ carbon offset
★ revenue sharing
★ economic order quantity

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究背景 2
1-3 研究目的 3
1-4 研究架構 4
第二章文獻回顧 6
2-1 綠色供應鏈管理 6
2-2 碳足跡 7
2-2-1 碳政策 8
2-2-1-1 碳限額 8
2-2-1-2 碳補償 9
2-3 營收分享 10
2-4 經濟訂購量 11
2-5 相關文獻之整理與比較 13
第三章模型建立 15
3-1 情境描述 15
3-2 模型假設 17
3-2-1 本研究之基本假設 17
3-2-2 參數與決策變數設定 17
3-3 模型建構 18
3-3-1 情境一：一般經濟訂購批量模型（ N） 19
3-3-2 情境二：碳補償下的經濟訂購批量模型（C） 22
3-3-3 情境三：考慮營收分享機制和碳補償概念下的經濟訂購批量模型（R） 25
第四章模型分析 30
4-1 情境間的相互關係 30
4-2 參數與決策變數的關係 31
4-2-1 情境一：一般經濟訂購批量模型（ N） 31
4-2-2 情境二：碳補償下的經濟訂購批量模型（C） 36
4-2-3 情境三：考慮營收分享機制和碳補償概念下的經濟訂購批量模型（R） 42
4-3 參數設定 50
4-4 零售商利潤敏感度分析 54
4-4-1 產品的最大市場需求 54
4-4-2 產品的單位零售價 55
4-4-3 產品的單位批發價 55
4-4-4 產品的價格敏感度 56
4-4-5 產品所產生的彈性碳排放量 57
第五章結論與未來研究方向 58
5-1 結論 58
5-2 研究貢獻 59
5-3 未來研究方向 59
英文參考文獻 60
中文參考文獻 63
附錄一情境一模型具有最佳解之證明 64
附錄二情境二模型具有最佳解之證明 68
附錄三情境三模型具有最佳解之證明 72

參考文獻

[1]Battini, D., Persona, A., & Sgarbossa, F., 2014. A Sustainable EOQ Model: Theoretical Formulation and Applications. International Jounal of Production Economics 149, 145-153.
[2]Becker-Peth, M., & Thonemann, U.W., 2016. Reference Point in Revenue Sharing Contracts-How to Design Optimal Supply Chain Contracts. European Journal of Operational Research 249, 1033-1049.
[3]Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M., 2013. Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights from Simple Models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 10 (1), 99-116.
[4]Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., & Dallery, Y., 2012. Including Sustainability Criteria into Inventory Models. European Journal of Operational Research 222, 229-240.
[5]Cachon, G.P., & Lariviere, M.A., 2005. Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Management Science 51 (1), 30-44.
[6]Cetiner, D., & Kimms, A., 2013. Assessing Fairness of Selfish Revenue Sharing Mechanisms for Airline Alliances. Omega 41, 641-652.
[7]Chakraborty, T., Chaauhan, S.S., & Vidyarthi, N., 2015. Coordination and Competition in a Common Retailer Channel: Wholesale Price Versus Revenue-sharing Mechanisms. International Jounal of Production Economics 166, 103-118.
[8]Chen, X., Benjaafar, S., & Elomri, A., 2013. The Carbon-constrained EOQ. Operations Research Letters 41, 172-179.
[9]Diabat, A., & Simchi-Levi, D., 2009. A Carbon-Capped Supply Chain Network Problem. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 523-527.
[10]Dobson, G., 1988. Sensitivity of the EOQ Model to Parameter Estimates. Operations Research 36 (4), 570-575.
[11]Dunning, J.H., & Lundan, S.M., 2009. Multinational enterprises and the global economy, second edition. Springer Publisher.
[12]Ellerman, A.D., & Wing, I.S., 2003. Absolute Versus Intensity-based Emission Caps. Climate Policy 3 (Suppl.2), S7-S20.
[13]Hammami, R., Nouira, I., & Frein, Y., 2015. Carbon Emission In A Multi-echelon Production-inventory Model With Lead Time Constraints. International Jounal of Production Economics 164, 292-307.
[14]Hoek, R.I.V., 1999. From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management 4 (3), 129-134.
[15]Hovelaque, V., & Bironneau, L., 2015. The Carbon-constrained EOQ Model with Carbon Emission Dependent Demand. International Jounal of Production Economics 164, 285-291.
[16]Hua, G., Cheng, T.C.E., & Wang, S., 2011. Managing Carbon Footprints in Inventory Management. International Jounal of Production Economics 132, 178-185.
[17]Kenny, T., & Gray, N.F., 2009. Comparative Performance of Six Carbon Footprint Models for Use in Ireland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29, 1-6.
[18]Khidir, T.A., & Zailani, D.S.H.M., Greening of the supply chain through supply chain initiatives towards environmental sustainability.
[19]Koulamas, C., 2006. A Newsvendor Problem with Revenue Sharing and Channel Coordination. Decision Sciences 37 (1), 91-100.
[20]Liberatore, M.J., 1979. The EOQ Model under Stochastic Lead Time. Operations Research 27 (2), 391-396.
[21]Lowe, T.J., & Schwarz, L.B., 1983. Parameter Estimation for the EOQ Lot-size Model: Minimax and Expected Value Choices. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 30, 367-376.
[22]Lu, J., & Shon, Z.Y., 2012. Exploring Airline Passengers’ Willingness to Pay For Carbon Offsets. Transportation Research Part D 17, 124-128.
[23]MacKerron, G.J., Egerton, C., Gaskell, C., Parpia, A., & Mourato, S., 2009. Willingness to Pay For Carbon Offset Certification And Co-benefits Among (high-) Flying Young Adults In The UK. Energy Policy 37, 1372-1381.
[24]Meera, B.L.L., & Chitramani, D.P., 2014. Environmental sustainability through green supply chain management practices among indian manufacturing firms with special reference to tamilnadu. International Jounal of Scientific and Research Publications 4 (3), 1-8.
[25]Ouardighi, F.E., 2014. Supply Quality Management with Optimal Wholesale Price and Revenue Sharing Contracts: A two-stage game approach. International Jounal of Production Economics 156, 260-268.
[26]Perry, S., Klemes, J., & Bulatov, I., 2008. Integrating Waste and Renewable Energy To Reduce The Carbon Footprint of Locally Integrated Energy Sectors. Energy 33, 1489-1497.
[27]Rhee, B.V.D., Schmidt, G., Veen, J.A.A.V.D., & Venugopal, V., 2014. Revenue-sharing Contracts across an Extended Supply Chain. Business Horizons 57 (4), 473-482.
[28]Richter, K., 1996. The EOQ Repair and Waste Disposal Model with Variable Setup Numbers. European Journal of Operational Research 96, 313-324.
[29]Sarawati, B., & Hanaoka, S., 2014. Airport-airline Cooperation under Commercial Revenue Sharing Agreements: A network Approach. Transportation Research Part E 70, 17-33.
[30]Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.H., 2011. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Jounal of Production Economics 130, 1-15.
[31]Sheu, J.B., Chou, Y.H., & Hu, C.C., 2005. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E 41, 287-313.
[32]Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.H., 2008. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Jounal of Production Economics 111, 261-273.
[33]何佩芬，「今天我減碳了嗎？-從1天減1公斤碳足跡開始」，經濟部能源局能源報導期刊，第3期，5-6頁，2012年。
[34]林柏震，「在使用營收分享合約下風險趨避之供應商所作之決策」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2008年。
[35]郭建志，「考慮訂購成本與碳排放之整合性存貨模式」，南台科技大學，碩士論文，2015年。
[36]MBA智庫-綠色供應鏈管理，2016年1月28日，取自
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E7%BB%BF%E8%89%B2%E4%BE%9B%E5%BA%94%E9%93%BE%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86。
[37]MBA智庫-碳補償，2016年2月3日，取自
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E7%A2%B3%E8%A1%A5%E5%81%BF。
[38]維基百科-碳足跡，2016年2月3日，取自
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A2%B3%E8%B6%B3%E5%8D%B0。
[39]維基百科-工業革命，2016年2月5日，取自
https://gan.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B7%A5%E6%A5%AD%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD。
[40]行政院環境保護署，2016年2月8日，取自
http://www.epa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=10052&ctNode=31352&mp=epa。
[41]行政院環境保護署-台灣產品碳足跡資訊網，2016年2月8日，取自 https://cfp.epa.gov.tw/CARBON/EZCFM/FUNCTION/PLATFORMINFO/FLCONCEPT/FLFOOTINTRODUCTION.ASPX。

指導教授

陳振明(Jen-Ming Chen)

審核日期

2016-7-11

推文