博碩士論文 103427009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:9 、訪客IP:18.232.99.123
姓名 許宗漢(Tsung-Han Hsu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 創意支持、核心工作面向及內在動機對創造力的影響
相關論文
★ 人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以F銀行財富管理事業群人員為例★ 護理人員的人格特質與工作滿意及工作績效之關係—以工作壓力為調節變項
★ 護理人員之工作壓力、工作動機、工作滿意與工作績效的影響-以某公立醫院為例★ 心理契約與勞雇關係之關聯性探討
★ 情緒智力對工作動機、工作滿意及工作績效之影響-以人力資源工作者為例。★ 社會人際行為模式測驗與工作績效間關連性之探討
★ 財務與非財務獎酬對工作動機與工作滿意度之干擾研究-以M直銷公司為例★ 高科技廠商薪資策略與離職率關係之探討
★ 人力資源管理系統與組織文化之交互作用對組織績效的影響★ 情境式與行為描述式結構性面談之比較研究
★ 日薪人員與月薪人員之工作動機傾向對其工作績效與工作滿意之影響★ 本地員工人格特質與對外派人員的利他行為、互動適應之關連探討
★ 五大人格量表的效用分析—以Taylor-Russell、Naylor-Shine 及Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser 模型為例★ 工作動機的效用分析
★ 人力資源活動對人力資源效能及組織效能之影響─以台灣千大企業為例★ 五大人格量表的效用分析-以Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser及Raju-Burke-Normand Model為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 現在的市場環境變化快速,許多企業莫不追求創新的策略以提升組織的競爭
力,以獲得更高的市占率。組織若欲提升其創新能力,組織內員工個人創造力的
提升會是一個優先要務,因為個人的創造力會是組織創新能力的必要條件之一。
在過去研究創造力的研究中, 創意支持是被認為可以提升創造力的,而其機制可
能是透過內在動機,故本研究欲檢驗此一機制。同時,本研究也欲同時探討核心
工作面向與創意支持對創造力的關聯,因為在不同的工作下,其性質的不同可能
會影響創意支持與創造力的關聯,故本研究檢驗了創意支持、 核心工作面向及內
在動機,對創造力的影響。
本研究針對保險業務以及直銷人員發放,有效樣本為 300 份。結果顯示(1.)
創意支持與核心工作面向分別都與創造力有正向且顯著的關聯, (2.)而內在動機
則是與創造力之間有最強烈的相關性, (3.)內在動機會部分中介創意支持與創造
力的關聯, 以及核心工作面向與創造力的關聯,最後, (4.)核心工作面向與創意
支持的交互作用項,與創造力之間並無顯著的關聯。
摘要(英) The industrial environment changes fast nowadays. In order to win the market
share, many organizations now execute innovation strategy to improve their own
competence. Improving employees’ individual creativity is a priority if companies
want to enhance the innovation abilities, because it is a necessary condition to build
organizational innovation. Prior research found that support for creativity could
enhance creativity, and the mechanism is built on intrinsic motivation, so this paper
tries to examine the cognitive process. Meanwhile, different jobs characteristics might
influence the effect between support for creativity and creativity, so I explore if there
is an effect from the interaction of core job dimensions and support for creativity as
well. In all, I test the effect to creativity from support for creativity, core job
dimensions, and intrinsic motivation.
I target the insurance sales and direct sales to send the surveys, and receive 300
questionnaires in total. The results show (1.) support for creativity and core job
dimensions both have significant positive relations with creativity, (2.) intrinsic
motivation is the most related variable with creativity, (3.) intrinsic motivation would
mediate the relationships between support for creativity and creativity as well as core
job dimensions and creativity, (4.) there is no significant relationship between
creativity and the interaction of core job dimension and support for creativity.
關鍵字(中) ★ 內在動機
★ 創造力
★ 核心工作面向
★ 創意支持
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 第一章 緒論................................................................................................................ 1
一、 研究動機................................................................................................ 1
二、 研究目的................................................................................................ 3
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設.................................................................................... 4
一、 創造力之相關研究................................................................................ 4
二、 內在動機之相關研究............................................................................ 5
三、 創意支持之相關研究............................................................................ 6
四、 核心工作面向之相關研究.................................................................... 7
五、 創意支持、內在動機與創造力之關聯................................................ 9
六、 核心工作面向、創意支持、內在動機與創造力之關聯.................. 12
第三章 研究方法...................................................................................................... 15
一、抽樣對象與數量.......................................................................................... 15
二、測量問卷...................................................................................................... 16
第四章 資料分析結果.............................................................................................. 18
一、次數分配表.................................................................................................. 18
二、皮爾森相關分析.......................................................................................... 19
三、標準化階層迴歸分析.................................................................................. 19
第五章 結論與建議.................................................................................................. 23
一、實務意涵...................................................................................................... 23
二、研究限制...................................................................................................... 24
三、未來研究建議.............................................................................................. 25
文獻探討...................................................................................................................... 27
參考文獻 Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in
organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding
framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you
love and loving what you do. California management review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the
work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work
Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational
orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). The motivation for creativity in organizations. Harvard
Business School.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.
Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity.Journal of
personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical
considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Chan Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Value innovation: a leap into the blue
ocean. Journal of business strategy, 26(4), 22-28.
Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6
points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403.
Coelho, F., Augusto, M., & Lages, L. F. (2011). Contextual factors and the creativity
of frontline employees: The mediating effects of role stress and intrinsic
motivation. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 31-45.
28
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of
experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic
motivation.Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.
Deegahawature, M. M. D. R. (2014). The Effect of Proclivity to Open Innovation, Job
Complexity and Technology Turbulence on Creativity: Evidence from
Technologically Less Advanced Countries. International Journal of Business and
Social Research, 4(4), 125-136.
Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity
in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197-208.
De Stobbeleir, K. E., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity
at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 54(4), 811-831.
Diliello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap:
The moderating effects of perceived support for creativity. The Journal of
psychology, 145(3), 151-172.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work
motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1974). The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument
for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work:
Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign.
Hon, A. H. (2012). Shaping Environments Conductive to Creativity The Role of
Intrinsic Motivation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53(1), 53-64.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational,
social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical
extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332.
29
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance
structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation
modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jia, L., Shaw, J. D., Tsui, A. S., & Park, T. Y. (2014). A Social–Structural Perspective
on Employee–Organization Relationships and Team Creativity.Academy of
Management Journal, 57(3), 869-891.
Joo, B. K. B., Hahn, H. J., & Peterson, S. (2014). Turnover Intention for Knowledge
Workers: The Effects of Core Self-Evaluations, Proactive Personality, Perceived
Organizational Support, Developmental Feedback, and Job Complexity.
Joo, B. K. B., McLean, G. N., & Yang, B. (2013). Creativity and Human Resource
Development An Integrative Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework for
Future Research. Human Resource Development Review, 12(4), 390-421.
Joo, B. K. B., & Lim, T. (2009). The effects of organizational learning culture,
perceived job complexity, and proactive personality on organizational commitment
and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.
Leavy, B. (2005). Value pioneering-how to discover your own “blue ocean”: interview
with W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne. Strategy & Leadership,33(6), 13-20.
Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and
employee creativity. Journal ofOccupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1),
83-100.
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There′s no place like home? The
contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees′ creative
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767.
Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational Antecedents of Creative Self‐
Efficacy.Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(3), 185-195.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and
contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.
30
Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development,
health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual review of psychology, 65, 661-691.
Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors:
The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management
journal, 49(2), 327-340.
Pinder, C. C. (1984). Work motivation: Theory, issues, and applications. Scott
Foresman & Co.
Pitta, D. (2009). Issues in a down economy: blue oceans and new product
development. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(4), 292-296.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic
definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American
psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need
strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489-505.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social
and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership
Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and
contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here?.Journal of
management, 30(6), 933-958.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation
implementation the role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of
Management, 39(3), 684-708.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative
resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal,45(2), 315-330.
31
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An
“interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management
review, 15(4), 666-681.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative
performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents
and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6),
1137-1148.
Tushman, M. L. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A
contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 82-98.
Wang, C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Tsai, M. T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and
employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity,
creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79-89.
Woodman, R. W. (1995). Managing creativity. Creative action in organizations: Ivory
tower visions and real world voices, 60-64.
Wooten, J. O., & Ulrich, K. T. (2014). Idea generation and the role of feedback:
Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Available at SSRN
1838733.
Yu, C., & Frenkel, S. J. (2013). Explaining task performance and creativity from
perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more
important?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1165-1181.
Zhang, H., Kwan, H. K., Zhang, X., & Wu, L. Z. (2012). High core self-evaluators
maintain creativity a motivational model of abusive supervision.Journal of
Management, 0149206312460681.
Zhang, J., Fan, Y., & Zhang, X. (2015). The role of power motivation in creativity: A
moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality,43(4), 613-628.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee
32
creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and
creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:
Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4),
682-696.
指導教授 房美玉(Meiyu Fang) 審核日期 2016-8-3
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明