內隱追隨力量表之建立

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：3.21.93.44

姓名

鄭宜潔(CHENG, YI-CHIEH) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

內隱追隨力量表之建立
(Establish Implicit Followership Scale)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近來追隨力相關研究成為管理學領域中的一項新研究議題，隨著商業環境與組織型態的變遷，使得追隨者在組織中所發揮的效益，逐漸受到重視；然而，目前在華人社會的發展中，內隱追隨力相關研究仍較為稀缺，本研究目的為了解領導者個體內心認知「追隨者模式」，並建立華人社會內隱追隨力量表。
本研究主要透過量表建立的三個步驟來發展內隱追隨力量表。步驟一：透過學者、人力資源領域實務專家與管理學院研究生，進行測量題項編寫與確認性歸類，發展共24題測量題項。步驟二：將蒐集之264份有效樣本進行探索性因素分析，內隱追隨力測量題項由24題收斂至21題，分析結果之KMO值為0.946，累積變異量為72.642%，因此，初步確立內隱追隨力量表共四大構面，認真盡責、尊敬順從、顧全大局與出謀獻策。步驟三：本研究另外蒐集含括台灣與大陸之研究樣本，回收有效問卷共253份，進行驗證性因素分析，第一階四個追隨力因素模式與第二階因素模式六項指標皆顯示兩者屬於良好適配，並且具有良好的收斂效度、區別效度、信度與效標關聯效度；但就整體指標適配情形而言，第二階因素模式的各項指標略高於第一階四個相關因素模式，並且符合本研究之理論模式，故採用第二階因素模式。最後，本研究以「積極主動—主動」、「行動—價值信念」為兩軸，以此作為內隱追隨力之概念向度之分類，分成四大象限：1. 認真盡責、2. 尊敬順從、3. 顧全大局、4. 出謀獻策。
本研究之結果有助於提供組織或主管作為人才辨識工具，進而應用在人才管理、接班人計劃與職涯管理等；除此之外，亦可協助主管建立一套心目中理想的內隱追隨力，盡可能以同一套標準檢視每一位追隨者，避免個人偏誤的發生。

摘要(英)

In recent years, followership is a new research phenomenon in management field. In a dramatic change of business environments and organizations, the benefits of followers in an organization become more important. However, the lack of implicit followership related research in the Chinese context. The study aims to provide a systematic framework associated with leaders’ personal assumptions about the traits and behaviors toward followers, and develop a valid measure of implicit followership in Chinese society.
The study built on three stages. In Stage 1, after confirmatory categorization process, 24 measurement items were developed. In Stage 2 and Stage 3, through survey process, we collected 264 and 253 samples (Samples in stage 3 which includes Taiwanese and Chinese organizations) respectively. The results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated four dimensions, includes Industrious, Following leaders, Team-oriented, and Suggesting (We also abbreviate to IFTs). Not only first-order four-factor model, but also the second-order model supported with good model-fitness. Thus, we decided to adopt the second-order model, which combined the four dimensions of implicit followership. Evidence also supported with convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity. Lastly, we used proactive versus active and action versus belief as two axes, and developed a model of implicit followership including four quadrants, Industrious, Following leaders, Team-oriented, and Suggesting, respectively.
This newly developed measure would be a tool provide organization or supervisor for talent identification, and talent management, succession-plan, career management as well. In addition, this findings suggest that supervisor could establish one ideal implicit followership in their mind, and base on the same system to examine every followers to avoid individual errors.

關鍵字(中)

★ 追隨力
★ 內隱追隨力
★ 內隱追隨力量表建立

關鍵字(英)

★ Followership
★ Implicit followership
★ Implicit followership scale

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章　緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 5
第三節研究貢獻 5
第二章　文獻探討 7
第一節追隨力概念與內涵 7
第二節內隱追隨力理論發展 12
第三節內隱追隨力概念向度定義與內涵 16
第四節量表預測效標 19
第三章　研究方法 22
第一節研究步驟與流程 22
第二節研究對象 23
第三節資料分析方法 24
第四章　內隱追隨力測量工具之編製 29
步驟一：測量題項編寫與確認性歸類 29
步驟二：探索性因素分析 29
步驟三：驗證性因素分析 36
第五章　結論與討論 47
第一節研究結論與貢獻 47
第二節管理意涵 53
第三節研究限制與未來建議 55
參考文獻 57

參考文獻

中文文獻
1. 孔茗，「內隱追隨力研究進展－從員工視角分析領導過程」，技術經濟，35(2)，123-130頁，2016。
2. 孔茗和錢小君，「被領導者看好的員工其行為也一定好嗎？－內隱追隨力對員工行為的影響」，心理學報，47(9)，1162-1171頁，2015。
3. 王頊，「追隨的內容結構及與績效的關係研究」，浙江大學，博士論文，民國100年。
4. 朱昱澐，「追隨的內容結構及與績效的關係研究」，中央大學，碩士論文，民國104年。
5. 周文杰、宋繼文和李浩瀾，「中國情境下追隨力的內涵，結構與測量」，管理學報，12(3)，355-363頁，2015。
6. 邱政皓，量化研究與統計分析，五版，五南圖書出版公司，台北市，民國100年。
7. 姜定宇，「華人企業主管知覺部屬效忠」，中華心理學刊，51(1)，101-120頁，2009。
8. 涂金堂，量表編製與SPSS，初版，五南圖書出版公司，台北市，民國101年。
9. 曹元坤和許晟，「部屬追隨力：概念界定與量表開發」，當代財經，3，82-89頁，2013。
10. 彭堅和王霄，「追隨力認知圖式：概念解析與整合模型」，心理科學，38(4)，822-827頁，2015。
11. 楊紅玲和彭堅，「內隱追隨力理論研究述評」，外國經濟與管理，37(3)，16-26頁，2015。
12. 趙慧軍，「追随行為的探索性研究」，經濟與管理研究，4，106-110頁，2013。
13. 劉珮琪，「華人社會追隨力之概念初探」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國104年。
14. 鄭伯壎，「差序格局與華人組織行為」，本土心理學研究，(3)，142-219頁，1995。
15. 鄭伯壎和姜定宇，「華人組織中的主管忠誠：主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果」，本土心理學研究，(14)，65-111頁，2000。
16. 羅文豪，「追隨研究的歷史溯源，現實驅力與未來展望」，中國人力資源開發，15，6-15頁，2015。

英文文獻
1. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
2. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., and Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 230-244.
3. Bennis, W. G. (2000). Managing the dream: Reflections on leadership and change. Da Capo Press.
4. Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., and Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3), 304-319.
5. Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., and Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281-297.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
7. Borman, W. C. (1987). Personal constructs, performance schemata, and “folk theories” of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(3), 307-322.
8. Bryant, F. B. and Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm and R. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
9. Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
10. Carsten, M. K. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2009). Implicit Followership Theories (IFT): Developing and validating an IFT scale for the study of followership. In Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, Ashville, NC.
11. Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., and McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543-562.
12. Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower: standing up to and for our leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
13. Chen, M. and Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541-560.
14. Comrey, A. L. and Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62.
16. Dixon, G. and Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15(1), 19-26.
17. Dulebohn, J. H., Shore, L. M., Kunze, M., and Dookeran, D. (2005). The differential impact of OCBs and influence tactics on leader reward behavior and performance ratings over time. Organizational Analysis, 12(1), 73-90.
18. Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in Management: Productivity as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co.
19. Engle, E. M. and Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010.
20. Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., and Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858-881.
21. Ferris, G. R. and Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. Journal of management, 17(2), 447-488.
22. Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Gilbert, G. R. and Hyde, A. C. (1988). Followership and the federal worker. Public Administration Review, 48(6), 962-968.
24. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
25. Hinrichs, K. T., Hinrichs, A. T. (2014). Comparing Followers and Subordinates: Accounting for the Effects of Organizational Hierarchy. In L. M. Lapierre, M. K. Carsten (Eds.), Followership: What Is It and Why Do People Follow?. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 89-105.
26. Hollander, E. P. (1992). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 71-75.
27. Holzinger, A. I., Medcof, A. T., and Dunham, R. B. (2006). Leader and follower prototypes in an international context: An exploratory study of Asia and South America, ASAC, 218-235.
28. Howell, J. M. and Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96-112.
29. Howell, J. P. and Mendez, M. (2008). Three perspectives on followership. In Riggio et al. (Eds.), The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 25-40.
30. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., and Sorenson, R. L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 41-65.
31. Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr, J. A., and Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14(1), 6-23.
32. Junker, N. M. and van Dick, R. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(6), 1154-1173.
33. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
34. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
35. Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Kelley, R. E. (1992). The Power of Followership: How to Create Leaders People Want to Follow, and Followers who Lead Themselves. New York: Doubleday.
37. Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications.
38. Lapierre, L. M. and Bremner, N. (2010). Reversing the Lens: How Can Followers Influence Their Leader′s Behavior. In Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
39. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Wang, D., and Wang, L. (2000). Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751-765.
40. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., and Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 662-674.
41. Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 7, 87-128.
42. Lord, R. G. and Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2, 1-62.
43. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., and De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational behavior and human performance, 34(3), 343-378.
44. Lord, R., Foti, R., and Phillips, J. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In J. G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, and C. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views (pp. 104- 121). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
45. Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., and Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
46. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw.
47. Oc, B. and Bashshur, M. R. (2013). Followership, leadership and social influence. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 919-934.
48. Poole, P. P., Gioia, D. A., and Gray, B. (1989). Influence modes, schema change, and organizational transformation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(3), 271-289.
49. Rao, A., Schmidt, S. M., and Murray, L. H. (1995). Upward impression management: Goals, influence strategies, and consequences. Human Relations, 48(2), 147‐167.
50. Rosenbach, W. E., Pittman, T. S., and Potter III, E. H. (2012). What Makes a Follower?. Contemporary issues in leadership, 77-87.
51. Schriesheim, C. A. and Hinkin, T. R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 246-257.
52. Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., and Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 956-970.
53. Sparrowe, R. T. and Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of management Review, 22(2), 522-552.
54. Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84.
55. Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., and Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.
56. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182-196.
57. Wayne, S. J. and Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487-499.
58. Wayne, S. J. and Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232-260.
59. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., and Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 577-595.
60. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
61. Whiteley, P., Sy, T., and Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders′ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822-834.
62. Whitlock, J. (2013). The value of active followership: The interdependence of leaders and their teams is at the core of a newly emerging concept in the field of health care. As Joy Whitlock explains, it has the potential to improve care quality and safety. Nursing Management, 20(2), 20-23.
63. Wyer, R. S., and Lambert, A. J. (1994). The role of trait constructs in person perception: An historical perspective. In Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L. and Ostrom T. M. (Eds.). Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
64. Yukl, G. and Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525-535.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2016-7-5

推文