台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：9

、訪客IP：18.216.233.58

姓名

李凱琳(Kai-Lin Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素
(The factors influences of corporate social responsibility report voluntary disclose in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響	★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性	★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例	★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例
★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例	★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數
★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果	★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果
★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素	★ CSR績效對CSR揭露量之影響：以社會參與面向為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，隨著社會進步、環保意識抬頭、食安問題以及重視消費者權益等因素，企業承受來自各界對於企業社會責任議題的關注壓力之下，過往的公司治理與互動方式，已無法滿足社會大眾的需求，因此各企業除努力實踐企業社會責任外，編製並揭露企業社會責任報告書已然成為趨勢。本研究係以台灣上市、上櫃、興櫃共13,418個年度觀察值為研究對象，探討台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素。實證結果發現企業規模、雇用員工人數等因素確實顯著影響企業自願性揭露之行為；此外，企業之財務槓桿對自願性揭露之影響效果，實證結果與預期不一致，因此尚有可研究之空間。

摘要(英)

In recent years, along with social progress and rise of environmental awareness, food safety issues and the importance of consumer rights and other factors, from all walks of life for enterprises to withstand the pressure under the attention of corporate social responsibility issues, past corporate governance and interaction, has been unable to meet the social Volkswagen needs, so enterprises in addition to efforts to practice corporate social responsibility, the preparation and expose corporate Social responsibility report has become a trend. In this study, the Department of Taiwan-listed, OTC, Emerging total of 13,418 annual observation study is to explore the factors that influence the Taiwan CSR report revealed the voluntary. Empirical results show that firm size, hire employees and other factors have significantly affect voluntary expose the behavior; addition, the company′s financial leverage affect the results of the voluntary disclose, there may be research space.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 企業社會責任報告書
★ 自願性揭露

關鍵字(英)

★ Corporate Social Responsibility
★ Corporate Social Responsibility Report
★ Voluntary disclose

論文目次

目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究動機與目的 1
1-2 研究問題 3
1-3 研究架構 4
第二章文獻探討與假說發展 6
2-1 文獻回顧 6
2-2 台灣企業社會責任報告書揭露相關法規 8
2-3 研究假說發展 10
第三章研究設計 13
3-1 資料來源與樣本篩選 13
3-2 研究變數衡量 19
3-3 實證模型 21
第四章實證結果 22
4-1 敘述性統計分析 22
4-2 相關係數分析 23
4-3 實證結果分析 25
4-4 穩健性分析 28
第五章結論與建議 31
參考文獻 33
附錄 36

參考文獻

參考文獻
行政院金融監督管理委員會，2014，強制上市(櫃)特定公司編製企業社會責任報告書，9月18日。
李振北等著，2016，台灣永續報告現況與趨勢，初版，台北：CSRone永續報告平台、國立政治大學商學院信義書院。
林文翰，2014，企業網站環境資訊揭露影響因素之研究─以國內電子業為例，中國文化大學會計學系學位論文: 1-52。
林敏涵，2011，利害關係人與企業績效對企業網站環境資訊揭露的影響，淡江大學會計學系碩士班學位論文: 1-79。
洪雪卿, 陳薇如與傅雁鈴，2013，影響企業社會責任績效之重要因素為何?，商管科技季刊14(4): 405-441。
陳冠志，2011，我國企業社會責任揭露概況與影響因素之探討，臺北大學會計學系學位論文: 1-84。
陳瑞斌, 許崇源與翁慈青，2007，公司治理架構與財務報告透明度之關聯性研究，中華管理評論國際學報，第10卷第1期。
黃劭彥, 吳東憲與紀怡如，2009，企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究，會計與公司治理，第6卷第1期: 1-29。
甄友薇，2015，企業社會責任報告書揭露品質之決定因素及其與公司績效之關聯性，臺灣大學財務金融學研究所學位論文: 1-45.
Ashbaugh, H. 2001. Non-US firms′ accounting standard choices. Journal of accounting and public policy 20(2): 129-153.
Ahmed, K. and J. K. Courtis. 1999. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review 31(1): 35-61.
Bowen, H. R. and F. E. Johnson. 1953. Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper.
Chiu, T. K. and Y. H. Wang. 2015. Determinants of social disclosure quality in Taiwan: an application of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics 129(2): 379-398.
Cho, C. H. and R. W. Roberts. 2010. Environmental reporting on the internet by America′s Toxic 100: Legitimacy and self-presentation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 11(1): 1-16.
Celik, O., E., A., and H. Karabacak. 2006. Impact of firm specific characteristics on the web based business reporting: Evidence from the companies listed in Turkey. Problems and Perspectives in Management 4(3): 100-133.
Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2004. The impact of the web on information and communication modes: the case of corporate environmental disclosure.International Journal of Technology Management 27(4): 393-416.
Chen, C. J., and B. Jaggi. 2001. Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19(4): 285-310.
Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review 4(4): 497-505.
Debreceny, R. Gray, G. L., and A. Rahman. 2003. The determinants of Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21(4): 371-394.
Deegan, C., and B. Gordon. 1996. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and business research 26(3): 187-199.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence, low balling, and disclosure regulation. Journal of accounting and Economics 3(2): 113-127.
Freedman, M., and B. Jaggi. 2005. Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting 40(3): 215-232.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston: Pitman.
Gamerschlag, R., K. Möller, and F. Verbeeten. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5(2-3): 233-262.
Gray, R., M. Javad, D. M. Power, and C. D. Sinclair. 2001. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of business finance & accounting 28(3-4): 327-356.
Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2): 47-77.
Gaber, M. 1985. Management incentives to report forecasts of corporate earnings. University Microfilms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York, New York.
Huang, C. L. and F. H. Kung. 2010. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 96(3): 435-451.
Hughes, S. B., A. Anderson, and S. Golden 2001. Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance?. Journal of accounting and public policy 20(3): 217-240.
Healy, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and K. G. Palepu. 1999. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary accounting research 16(3): 485-520.
Muttakin, M. B., and A. Khan. 2014. Determinants of corporate social disclosure: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Advances in Accounting 30(1): 168-175.
Moneva, J. M., and B. Cuellar. 2009. The value relevance of financial and non-financial environmental reporting. Environmental and Resource Economics 44(3): 441-456.
Matten, D., and J. Moon. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review 33(2): 404-424.
Magness, V. 2006. Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(4): 540-563.
Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts , and S. J. Gray. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of international business studies: 555-572.
Neu, D., H. Warsame, and K. Pedwell. 1998. Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, organizations and society 23(3): 265-282.
Patten, D. M. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and public policy 10(4): 297-308.
Shalit, S. S., and U. Sankar. 1977. The measurement of firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics: 290-298.
Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of management review 16(4): 691-718.

指導教授

陳建中

審核日期

2016-6-30

推文