博碩士論文 103451015 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:12 、訪客IP:3.83.32.171
姓名 葉玄崇(Hsuan-Chuung Yeh)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系在職專班
論文名稱 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響
相關論文
★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構-以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估-以北區私立高職為例★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業 創業動機與創業績效關係之研究★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品?從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創?以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討
★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究-以新竹科學園區為例
★ 台灣中小企業產業e化現況對員工資訊素養之影響★ 以內容構面探討政府部門數位學習資源整合之研究
★ 以管理面觀點進行跨部門數位學習資源整合之研究─以政府機關為例★ 以一致性模型診斷高科技產業組織之研究—以Q公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本研究提出了「特定品牌轉換型領導與交易型領導透過個人與環境適配之中介變數,對員工品牌權益之影響為何?」。本研究以跨層次階層線性模型,聚焦與員工品牌權益較有相關之中介變數,即「個人與工作適配、個人與團隊適配、以及個人與主管適配」為關鍵中介的情況下,特定品牌轉換型領導及交易型領導是否會影響到「員工品牌權益」。本研究以國內大型銀行(以下簡稱C公司)於全台不同地區之數個營業單位之主管與員工為研究對象,在362名員工同意下,以工作團隊為單位發放紙本問卷,並進行不記名調查,回收之355份問卷中,其中38份為主管問卷,餘317份為員工問卷,有效問卷回收率為98.07%。
本研究所探討之內容分為二部分。首先,探討個人與環境適配對員工品牌權益是否有正向影響;最後提出特定品牌轉換型領導與交易型領導,是否會透過個人與環境適配對員工品牌權益有正向影響。研究結果顯示:個人與環境適配對員工品牌權益具有正向顯著影響;特定品牌交易型領導透過個人與工作適配及個人與團隊適配呈現反向顯著影響,而特定品牌轉換型領導則呈現正向顯著影響;惟兩領導方式透過個人與主管適配與員工品牌權益皆無相關,亦即不具中介效果。
本研究貢獻如下。第一,探討三種個人與環境要素的適配,對員工品牌權益之影響,更能深入了解可影響員工品牌權益之變數;第二,以主管層面之兩領導風格透過個人層面之環境中介變數,探討員工品牌權益,並以階層式線性模型作為分析工具;第三,提出了特定品牌轉換型領導及特定品牌交易型領導透過個人與環境之適配,對員工品牌權益的影響與重要性,可提供組織內部作為管理參考之依據。





關鍵字:員工品牌權益、個人與工作適配度、個人與主管適配度、個人與團隊適配度、特定品牌轉換型領導、特定品牌交易型領導
摘要(英) This study addressed the question of how the effects of brand-specific TRL and brand-specific TFL on employee-based brand equity. In order to answer this question, the study employed hierarchical linear modeling to analyze the moderating effects of person-job fit, person-supervisor fit, and person-group fit on the relationship between management levels and employee individual levels. This study selected the employees served in the largest domestic bank in Taiwan to be the subjects of research. 362 questionnaires were distributed in total, and among the 7 samples retrieved, 355 samples were valid(38 samples for supervisor and 317 samples for employees), forming the valid response rate of 98.07%.
The content of this research can be divided into two parts. First, I explored whether “person-environment fit”(person-job fit, person-supervisor fit, and person-group fit) has the impact on employee-based brand equity. Next, I discussed the interference of person-job fit, person-supervisor fit, and person-group fit between brand-specific TRL, brand-specific TFL and employee-based brand equity. It was found that there was a positive effect on person-environment fit and employee-based brand equity. In addition, brand-specific TRL and employee-based brand equity had a negative effect through the interference of person-job fit and person-group fit. However, brand-specific TFL had totally different result from brand-specific TRL. Finally, person-supervisor fit was unrelated to these two leaderships and not mediated between them as well.
The contributions of this research were as follows. First, I explored the relationship between employee-based brand equity and three person-environment fir. By this, we can understand more about the attributes to employee-based brand equity. Second, I used the hierarchical linear modeling to analyze if three different kinds of fit between person and working environment are able to mediate between the relationship between two kinds of brand-specific leadership and employee-based brand equity. Finally, I emphasized the effects and importance on employee-based brand equity and two kinds of brand-specific leadership mediated by person-environment fit in hope of providing a suggestion for internal brand management.

Keywords: Brand-specific TRL, Brand-specific TFL, Employee-based brand equity, Person-job fit, Person-supervisor fit, Person-group fi
關鍵字(中) ★ 員工品牌權益
★ 個人與工作適配度
★ 個人與主管適配度
★ 個人與團隊適配度
★ 特定品牌轉換型領導
★ 特定品牌交易型領導
關鍵字(英) ★ Employee-based brand equity
★ Person-job fit
★ Person-supervisor fit
★ Person-group fi
★ Brand-specific TRL
★ Brand-specific TFL
論文目次 目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌 謝 iii
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究目的 1
1.3 研究動機與預期貢獻 4
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 5
2.1 員工品牌權益(Employee-Based Brand Equity) 5
2.1.1 員工品牌背書 (Employee Brand Endorsement) 5
2.1.2 員工品牌忠誠 (Employee Brand Allegiance) 5
2.1.3 員工品牌一致行為 (Employee Brand Consistent Behavior) 6
2.2 特定品牌領導與員工品牌權益之間的中介效果 6
2.2.1 個人與工作適配理論(person-job fit) 7
2.2.2個人與主管適配理論(person-supervisor fit) 8
2.2.3個人與團隊適配理論(person-group fit) 9
2.3 特定品牌交易型領導與特定品牌轉換型領導 9
2.3.1特定品牌交易型領導 ( Brand-specific transformational leadership) 10
2.3.2特定品牌轉換型領導 ( Brand-specific transactional leadership) 12
第三章 研究方法 15
3.1 研究對象與樣本發放 15
3.2 問卷設計 16
3.3 變項衡量方式 16
3.3.1特定品牌轉換型領導 ( Brand-Specific transactional leadership) 16
3.3.2特定品牌交易型領導(Brand-Specific transformational leadership) 18
3.3.3個人與工作適配 19
3.3.4 個人與團隊適配 19
3.3.5 個人與主管適配度 20
3.3.6員工品牌權益 21
3.4 控制變數之探討與決定 22
3.5 分析方法 22
3.5.1 敘述性統計分析 22
3.5.2 相關分析 23
3.5.3 信度分析 23
3.5.4 效度分析 23
3.5.5 變數之組內與組間變異成份分析 23
3.5.6 共同方法變異控制 24
3.5.7 因素分析 24
3.5.8 階層線性模型分析 24
第四章 資料分析與研究結果 26
4.1 敘述性統計分析 26
4.2相關分析 30
4.3信度分析 33
4.4建構效度分析 33
4.4.1收斂效度 33
4.4.2區別效度 34
4.5共同方法變異分析與因素分析 35
4.6階層線性模型之假設分析結果 36
4.6.1員工品牌權益之虛無模型 36
4.6.2員工層次之個人與工作、個人與團隊與個人與主管適配與員工品牌權益之關係 36
4.6.3個人與環境適配在特定品牌交易型領導與員工品牌權益之中介關係 37
4.6.4個人與環境適配在特定品牌轉換型領導與員工品牌權益之中介關係 39
第五章 結論與建議 43
5.1 研究結論與貢獻 43
5.2實務建議 48
5.3研究限制與建議 49
參考文獻 51
附錄一 主管問卷 57
附錄二 員工問卷 60
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文文獻:
1. 莊璦嘉 & 林惠彥. (2003),「個人與主管適配、個人與工作適配、個人與群體適配、及個人與組織適配對員工工作態度和行為之影響」,第42屆中國心理學會年會,台北:輔仁大學。
2. 莊璦嘉 & 林惠彥. (2005). 個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響。
3. 陳順宇. (2005). 多變量分析, 台北: 華泰。
4. 何金銘. (2006). 統計分析方法: SPSS 軟體的輔助分析, 台南市: 台灣復文興業公司。

外文文獻:
1. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free ress; Collier Macmillan.
2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York:Free Press.
3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
4. Bennis W., & B. Nanus , 1985. Leaders:The Strategies for Taking Changes.
5. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571.
6. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 89(5), 901.
7. Brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 1(57), 1-22.
8. Brexendorf, T. O., & Kernstock, J. (2007). Corporate behaviour vs brand behaviour: Towards an integrated view?. Journal of Brand Management, 15(1), 32-40.
9. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 533-546.
10. Burmann, C., Schaefer, K., & Maloney, P. (2008). Industry image: Its impact on the brand image of potential employees. Journal of Brand Management, 15(3), 157-176.
11. Byrne, D. E. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. Advances inexperimental social psychology. 4, 35-90. New York: Academic Press.
12. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875.
13. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847.
14. Chuang, A., & Shen, C.-T. (2007). The perceived person-environment fit scale (PPEFS): Development of four fit measures. Paper presented at the Paper accepted for presentation at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
15. Chun, J. S., Byrne, J. G., & Bornemann, A. (1969). The inhibition of deformation twinning by precipitates in a magnesium-zinc alloy. Philosophical Magazine, 20(164), 291-300.
16. De Chernatony, L. & Vallaster, C. (2005). Internationalisation of service brands: therole of leadership during the internal brand building process. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(1-2), 181-203.
17. De Chernatony, L., & Segal-Horn, S. (2003). The criteria for successful services brands. European journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1095-1118.
18. Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology: 283-357. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
19. Faircloth, B. S., & Hamm, J. V. (2005). Sense of belonging among high school students representing 4 ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(4), 293-309.
20. Fleishman, E. A., & Hunt, J. G. (1973). Current developments in the study of leadership: a centennial event symposium held at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (Vol. 1). Southern Illinois University Press.
21. Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of management review, 23(1), 32-58.
22. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 499-517.
23. Harinck, F., De Dreu, C. K., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2000). The impact of conflict issues on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 81(2), 329-358.
24. Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. Free Pr.
25. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2012). Information disclosure and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 195-233.
26. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 675.
27. Jo Hatch, M., & Schultz, M. (2003). Bringing the corporation into corporate branding. european Journal of marketing, 37(7/8), 1041-1064.
Journal, 46: 554–571.
28. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self‐evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel psychology, 56(2), 303-331.
29. Katz, D. (1964). Motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science,9(2), 131-146.
30. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior.Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
31. Kaufmann, H. R., Panni, M. F. A. K., & Orphanidou, Y. (2012). FACTORS AFFECTING CONSUMERS′GREEN PURCHASING BEHAVIOR: AN INTEGRATED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Amfiteatru Economic, 14(31), 50.
32. Kazemi, V., & Sullivan, J. (2014). One millisecond face alignment with an ensemble of regression trees. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1867-1874).
33. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based
34. Kimpakorn, N., & Tocquer, G. (2010). Service brand equity and employee brand commitment. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(5), 378-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876041011060486
35. King, C., & Grace, D. (2008). Internal branding: Exploring the employee′s perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 15(5), 358-372.
36. King, C., & Grace, D. (2010). Building and measuring employee-based brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 44(7/8), 938-971.
37. King, C., Grace, D., & Funk, D. C. (2013). Employee brand equity: Scale development and validation. Journal of Brand Management, 20(4), 350-354.
38. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175-192.
39. Klionsky, D. J., Abdalla, F. C., Abeliovich, H., Abraham, R. T., Acevedo-Arozena, A., Adeli, K., ... & Ahn, H. J. (2012). Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy, 8(4), 445-544.
40. Kolenko, T. A., & Aldag, R. J. (1989). Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis. In meeting of the National Academy of Management.
41. Kolenko, T. A., & Aldag, R. J. (1989). Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis. In meeting of the National Academy of Management.
42. Kristof, A. L. 1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49: 1-49.
43. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS′FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
44. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals′ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
45. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610.
46. Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations:Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351–389.
47. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 74(3), 424.
48. Miles, S. J., & Mangold, G. (2004). A conceptualization of the employee branding process. Journal of relationship marketing, 3(2-3), 65-87.
49. Morhart, F. M., Herzog, W., & Tomczak, T. (2009). Brand-specific leadership: Turning employees into brand champions. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 122-142.
50. Murray, H. A. 1938. Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
New York:Haper & Row.
51. O′Reilly, C. A., & J. A. Chatman, 1986. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 492-499.
52. O′Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., & D. F. Caldwell, 1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 487-516.
53. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier
54. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA:Lexingtin Books.
55. Pearce, J. A., & Ravlin, E. C. (1987). The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 40(11), 751-782.
56. Pervin, L. A. 1968. Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 69: 56-68.
57. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management journal, 49(2), 327-340.
58. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers′ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
59. Rubin, R. S., Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 845-858.
60. Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational behavior, 43(3), 310-327.
61. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of vocational Behavior, 51(2), 234-279. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253.
62. Schneider, B. 1987. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40: 437-453.
syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management
63. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., (1989). Beyond simple demographic affects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402-423.
64. Van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of business and psychology, 26(3), 249-267.
65. Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel psychology, 44(2), 333-352. Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel psychology, 44(2), 333-352.
66. Vogel, R. M., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Integrating the levels of person-environment fit: The roles of vocational fit and group fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(1), 68-81.
67. Weiss, H. M. (1978). Social learning of work values in organizations. Journal of applied psychology, 63(6), 711-718.
68. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance*. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 307-334.
69. Young Seong, J., & Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2012). Testing multidimensional models of person-group fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(6), 536-556.
指導教授 李憶萱 審核日期 2016-7-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明