博碩士論文 103457025 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:8 、訪客IP:44.210.21.70
姓名 陳力瑜(Li-Yu Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 轉換型與交易型主管領導風格與員工工作績效之影響-以勤勉審慎性人格特質為干擾變項
(The impact of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on the followers and their performance with the personality of conscientiousness as Moderator variables)
相關論文
★ 企業內部人力資源入口網站使用者滿意度調查–以A公司為例★ 員工內部行銷知覺、組織承諾與離職傾向之關係研究─以某科技公司為例
★ 研發人員創造力人格特質、工作價值觀對工作績效之影響-以某高科技研究機構為例★ 組織生涯管理對組織承諾影響之探討-以A公司為例
★ 導入以職能為基礎之評鑑中心可行性研究--以銀行業為例★ 360 度管理職能評鑑與受評者自我覺察能力之探討-個案公司跨年度研究
★ 探討中階主管人格特質、領導風格與工作績效之關聯性--以Y公司為例★ 因應公司經營策略變革之人力資源配置調整個案探討
★ 從組織變革觀點探討業務流程管理成效之個案研究★ 主管領導風格與員工人格特質對工作績效之影響
★ 矩陣式組織之專案績效考核制度探討-以某公司為例★ 企業因應員工分紅費用化之措施及其成效探討
★ 證券後勤基層主管職業生涯地圖之建立★ 企業導入卓越經營績效評量之案例探討
★ 主管領導風格對組織氣候與績效之影響探討-以T公司為例★ 人力資源管理措施對工作態度之影響探討-以台灣高鐵為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 論文名稱:轉換型與交易型主管領導風格與員工工作績效之影響-以勤勉審慎性人格特
質為干擾變項
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學位類別:碩士
研 究 生:陳力瑜
指導教授:鄭晉昌 博士
畢業年度:一○五學年度第二學期
論文頁數:65頁
論文摘要內容
本研究主要在探討轉換型、交易型主管領導風格與員工工作績效之研究,並以員工的人格特質(勤勉審慎性)為干擾變項,探討其與工作績效之關聯。
本研究以國內北部民營企業全職工作員工為樣本進行結構性問卷調查。共計發放出180份問卷,獲得回收問卷150份,總回收率為83.33%,其中有效問卷146份,4份為無效問卷(有題項漏答或答題內容不合常理),有效問卷回收率81.11 %,統計分析採用SPSS 20中文版做為資料分析的工具,所得到的資料以信度分析、描述性統計、因素分析、相關分析、階層迴歸分析等統計方法,進行資料分析,以檢定本研究之假設。
本研究的主要結果顯示:
一、交易型領導風格主管對員工工作績效有顯著正向關聯。
二、轉換型領導風格主管對員工工作績效有顯著正向關聯。
三、勤勉審慎性之人格特質的員工對其工作績效具有顯著正向關聯。
四、勤勉審慎性之人格特質的員工在交易型主管領導風格與工作績效具有強向干擾效果。
五、勤勉審慎性之人格特質的員工在轉換型主管領導風格與工作績效具有強向干擾效果。



關鍵字:領導風格、交易型領導、轉換型領導、工作績效、勤勉審慎性人格特
質、五大人格特質
摘要(英) The impact of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on the followers and their performance with the personality of conscientiousness as Moderator variables

This study focuses on the research of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on the followers and their performance with the personality of conscientiousness as Moderator variables, and evaluated the links between the job performance and its leadership practices.
This study bases on a domestic private corporation in the northern Taiwan of their full time employees as sample structural survey. Totally 180 copies of questionnaire were sent, 150 copies were returned. Questionnaires response rate 83.33%. 146 copies sufficient response, 4 incorrect copies (missing answers, unsuitable or invalid answers). Valid questionnaires response rate 81.11%.
Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS 20 Chinese version of the tool as the data analysis.
In order to test the hypothesis of this study, the information obtained in reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, statistical correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis etc. for its data analysis.
The critical findings of this thesis are as follows:
1. Transactional leaders are described to hold positive expectations for followers, believing that they can do their best.
2. Transformational leaders are described to hold positive expectations for followers, believing that they can do their best.
3. Conscientious of personality traits of employees with significant positive correlation of their job performance.
4. Conscientious of personality employees has negative Intervening effects under the charge of transactional leadership and job performance.
5. Conscientious of personality employees has negative Intervening effects under the charge of transformational leadership and job performance.



Keywords: Styling of leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, performance and conscientiousness.
關鍵字(中) ★ 領導風格
★ 交易型領導
★ 轉換型領導
★ 工作績效
★ 勤勉審慎性人格特質
★ 五大人格特質
關鍵字(英) ★ Styling of leadership
★ transformational leadership
★ transactional leadership
★ performance
★ conscientiousness
論文目次 中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………………iv
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………vi
目錄 ……………………………………………………………………………………viii
表目錄 ………………………………………………………………………………………x
圖目錄 ………………………………………………………………………………………x
一、緒論 ……………………………………………………………………………………………1
1-1 研究背景及動機 …………………………………………………………………1
1-2 研究目的 ………………………………………………………………………………3
二、文獻探討 …………………………………………………………………………………4
2-1 領導風格 ………………………………………………………………………………4
2-2 交易型領導 ………………………………………………………………………………11
2-3 轉換型領導 ………………………………………………………………………………17
2-4 工作績效 ………………………………………………………………………………23
2-5 人格特質 ………………………………………………………………………………28
三、研究方法 ………………………………………………………………………………34
3-1 研究架構 ………………………………………………………………………………34
3-2 研究假設 ………………………………………………………………………………35
3-3 研究變項之操作性定義……………………………………………………35
3-4 研究對象…………………………………………………………………………………38
3-5 資料分析統計方法………………………………………………………………38
四、研究結果與分析…………………………………………………………………40
4-1 問卷回收與統計………………………………………………………………40
4-2 樣本結構 …………………………………………………………………………40
4-3 問卷信度分析…………………………………………………………………42
4-4 研究變項相關分析…………………………………………………………43
4-5 迴歸分析………………………………………………………………………………45
4-6 研究假設檢定結果……………………………………………………………48
五、結論與建議 ……………………………………………………………………………50
5-1 研究發現與討論…………………………………………………………………50
5-3 研究限制與建議 ………………………………………………………………52
5-3 管理意涵………………………………………………………………………………52
參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………55
中文文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………55
英文文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………57
附錄:問卷 ……………………………………………………………………………………62
參考文獻 1. 江錦樺,「人格特質與組織文化之適配性對工作績效之影響-以高科技F公司為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文,2001。
2. 宋秋儀,組織領導學Leadership in Organizations 5e,Gary Yukl原著,華泰文化,台北,2005。
3. 余德成,「品質管理人性面系統因素對工作績效之影響」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所,博士論文,1996。
4. 何書慧,「銷售人員的人格特質對其工作績效的影響—以主管的領導風格為干擾變項」,國立中山大學,人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文,2011。
5. 吳秉恩,組織行為學,華泰書局,台北,1991。
6. 吳欣蓓、陸洛、顧家祈、張妤玥,「轉換型領導行為、部屬工作壓力及主管滿意度的關聯—人格特質為調節變」,中華管理學報,11卷 2 期:1-30頁,2010。
7. 林滿祝,「交易式/轉換式領導風格對於員工態度之關聯性研究—以親信關係及員工人格特質為情境變項」,私立中原大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,2002。
8. 周旭華譯,John P. Kotter 等著,變革,天下文化出版,2000。
9. 邱如美譯,John P. Kotter 原著,企業成功轉型8 Steps,天下文化出版,1998。
10. 邱皓政,量化研究與統計分析,五南圖書出版,台北,2010。
11. 柯金貴,「轉換型領導與交易型領導對Y世代員工離職傾向之影響—以知覺主管支持為中介、組織認同為調節變項」,國立中山大學,人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文,2012。
12. 施妤璇,「轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向之研究-以組織承諾為中介變項」,中央大學人力資源管理所,碩士在職專班論文,2006。
13. 徐蓉芬,「研發人員人格特質與工作績效關係之研究─以某高科技公司為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,碩士在職專班論文,2003。
14. 孫德修、鄭純媛、陳模楷,我國高科技產業主管領導行為、員工組織承諾與主管領導效能關係之研究-以新竹科學園區廠商為例,朝陽學報,8,191-222,2003。
15. 許士軍,管理學,東華書局,台北市,1990。
16. 陳寶茶,「主管領導風格認知與員工人格特質對工作績效的影響」,高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所,碩士論文,高雄市,2011。
17. 陳佳雯、陸洛、許雅玉,「工作要求、工作資源與員工工作態度之關聯:以勤勉審慎性及主動性人格為調節變項」,人力資源管理學報,12卷 1 期: 23-49頁,2012。
18. 楊國樞,心理學,台灣商務印書館,台北,1989。
19. 楊黎東,「人格特質與內部行銷對專業承諾、工作士氣與工作績效之關聯性研究-以台南地區房屋仲介從業人員為例」,南台科技大學,高階主管企管碩士論文,2009。
20. 鄭復源,「人格特質、自我導向學習、組織承諾與工作績效之相關性研究」,東海大學管理,碩士在職專班論文,2010。
21. 鄭臻妹,「內外控人格特質、工作特性及工作績效之分析研究—以台灣高科技產業員工為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文,2001。
22. 廖良文,林文政,高績效工作系統於轉換型領導與員工工作績效間之角色-跨層級調節效果之觀點,東吳經濟商學學報,73期,P29-66,2011。
23. 盧建川,「員工績效考核辦法之研究—以R公司為例」,國立交通大學科技管理研究所,碩士在職專班論文,2002。
24. 盧建中、向大威,「新進人員人格特質與資訊尋找、社會成本、組織社會化及脈絡績效關聯性之研究」,黃埔學報,53卷:195-210頁,2007。
英文文獻
1. Bennis, W. G. & Nanus, B., Leaders:The strategies for taking charge, New York:Harper & Row, 1985.
2. Bass, B. M, (1985), Leadership performance beyond expectation, New York: Academic Press.
3. Bass, B. M, Bass and Stogdills Handbook of Leadership, New York Press, 1990.
4. Bass, B. M, “Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, No.1, pp.9-32, 1999.
5. Bass, B. M., and B. J. Avolio, Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for The Multifactor leadership questionnaire, CA: Conculting Psychologists Press, 1990.
6. Bass, B. M., and B. J. Avolio, “Transformational Leadership and organizational culture.” Public Adminstration Quarterly, 17, pp.112-121, 1993.
7. Bass, B. M., and B. J. Avolio, Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
8. Bryman, A. Charisma and Leadership in Organization. Newbury Park, 1992.
9. Bryman, A., Charisma and leadership in organizations, London:Sage, 1992.
10. Burns, J.M., Leadership, New York:Harper & Row, 1978.
11. Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge, New York: Harper & Row, 1985.
12. Byars, L.L. & Rue, L.W, Human Resource Management, McGraw-Hill/ Irwin, 2001.
13. Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901-910, 2004.
14. Colbert, A.E., B. H. Kristof-Brown, B. H. Bradley, and M. R. Barrick,uence in Top Management Teams.” Academy of Management Journal, 51, No.1, pp.81-96, 2008.
15. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: PAR. 1992.
16. Davis, K., Human behavior at work, New York:Mcgraw-Hill Book Co, 1977.
17. David V. Day and Stanley B. Silverman. “Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity.” Personnel Psychology, 42, pp.25~36., 1989.
18. Drath, W.H., & Palus, C.J., “ Making common sense:leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice,” Greensboro ,N.C:Center for Creative Leadership, 1994.
19. DuBrin, A. J., Leadership Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, 4th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004.
20. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. Transformational, transactional, and Laissez-Faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591, 2003.
21. French, W.L., & Bell, C.H.Jr., Organization Development:Behavioral science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall Inc, 1995.
22. French, W.L., Human Resource Management, Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 1998.
23. House, R. J. A path goal theory of effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338, 1971.
24. Hemphil, J.K., & Coons, A.E., “Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire”, In R.M. Stogdill and E. Coons (Ends.), Leader behavior:Its description and measurement. Columbus, Ohio:Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, 1957.
25. Hickman, C. Mind of a manager soul of a leader. University of Texa s Press, 1992.
26. Ingram P. D., and H. Patreese, “Leadership Behaviors of Principals in Inclusive Educational Settings.” Journal of Educational Administration, 35, No.5, pp.441-455, 1997.
27. John P. Kotter, ”Leading change-Why transformation efforts fail” Harvard Business Review, 2007.
28. Judge, T., and R. Piccolo, “Transformational and Transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of psychology.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, pp.755-768, 2004.
29. Jacobs, T.O., & Jaques, E., “Military executive leadership, ”In K.E. Clark and M.B. Clark (Eds.),Measures of Leadership, West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America, pp.281-295, 1990.
30. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751-765, 2000.
31. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L., The social psychology of organizations, 2nd Ed. John Wiley, New York: 1978.
32. Katz, D.,& Kahn, R .L., The social psychology of organizations, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley, 1978.
33. Leadership and Organization: A Behavioral Science Approach by R. Tannenbaum, I. R. Weschler, and F. Massarik. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1961.
34. Motowidlo, S.J., & Van Scotter, J.R. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,79,475-480, 1994.
35. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 545-559, 002.
36. Piccolo, R. F., and J. A. Colquitt, “Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics.” Academy of Management Journal, 49, No.2, pp. 327-340, 2006.
37. Richards, D., & Engle, S., “After the vision:Suggestions to corporate visionaries and vision champions”, In J.D. Adams (Eds.), Transforming leadership, lexandria, VA:Miles River Press, pp.199-215, 1986.
38. Robbins, S.P., Organizational Behavior:Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 8th ed, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, 1998.
39. Robbins, S.P. Organization behavior (6th Ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc, 1993.
40. Stogdill, R. M. Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature, New York: Free Press, 1977.
41. Sergiovanni, T.J, Value-Added Leadership:How to Get Extraordinary Performabce in Schools. San Diego:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990.
42. Schermerhorn believed that leading is a process used to motivate and to influence others to work hard in order to realize and support organisational goals, 1999.
43. Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W. H. How to Choose A Leadership Pattern. Harvard Business Review, 36, 95-101, 1958.
44. Tichy, N.M., & DeVanna, M.A. The transformational leader, Training and Development Journal, July, pp.27-32, 1985.
45. Tichy, N. & Devanna, M. The Transformational Leader, John Wiley & Sons, New York: 1986.
46. Vecchio, R. P., J. E. Justin, and C. L. Pearce, “The Utility of Transaction and Transformational Leadership for Predicting Performance and Satisfaction Within a Path-Goal Theory Framework.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, No.1, pp.71-82, 2008.
47. Wang, G., Oh, I. S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2): 223-270, 2001.
48. Walumbwa, F. O., and C. A. Hartnell, “Understanding transformational leadership- employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, No.1, pp.153-172, 2011.
49. Yukl, G. Leadership in Organizations (3rd. ed.). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
50. Yammarino, F.J., Indirect leadership: transformational leadership as a distance. 1994. In B.M. Bass & B.J. Avolio (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, 26-46.California:SAGE, 1994.
51. Zaleznik,A., “Management and leaders:Are they different?” Harvard Business Review, vol.55, no.5, pp.67-80, 1977.
指導教授 鄭晉昌(Jihn Chang Jehng) 審核日期 2016-7-11
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明