|| Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., Williams, J.R., 1998, Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34 (1), 73-89.|
 Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., Haney, E.B., Neitsch, S.L., 2011, Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 365 (2011)
 Barlow, P.M., DeSimone, L.A., Moench, A.F., 2000, Aquifer response to stream stage and recharge variations. II. Convolution method and applications. J. Hydrol. 230 (3-4), 211-229.
 Berris, S.N., Hess, G.W., and Bohman, L.R., 2001, River and reservoir operation model, Truckee River basin, California and Nevada, 1998: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4017, 138 p.
 Beven, K.J., Kirkby, M.J., Schoffield, N., and Tagg, H., 1984, Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three UK catchments: Journal of Hydrology, v. 69, p. 119–143.
 Borah, D.K., Bera, M., 2003, Watershed scale hydrologic and nonpoint source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Trans. ASAE 46 (6), 1553-1566.
 Brooks, R.H., and Corey, A.T., 1966, Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, v. 101, p. 85-92.
 Brunner, P., Simmons, C.T., 2012, HydroGeoSphere: a fully integrated, physically based hydrological model. Ground Water 50 (2), 170-176.
 Bui, T.V., 2010, D? An Tri?n Khai Khoa H?c Cong Ngh? Bien H?i B?n ?? ??a Ch?t, B?n ?? ??a Ch?t Th?y V?n va B?n ?? ??a Ch?t Cong Trinh Thanh Ph? H? Chi Minh-T? l? 1/50.000.
 Chang, L.C., Ho, C.C., Yeh, M.S., Yang, C.C., 2010, An integrating approach for conjunctive use planning of surface and subsurface water system. Water Resour. Manag. 25, pp. 59–78.
 Chen, Z., Govindaraju, R.S., and Kavvas, M.L., 1994, Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields-1. Development of models: Water Resources Research, v. 30, no. 2, p. 523-533.
 Cheng, X., and Anderson, M.P., 1993, Numerical simulations of groundwater interaction with lakes allowing for fluctuating lake levels: Ground Water, v. 31, no. 6, p. 929-933.
 Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., 1988, Applied Hydrology: New York, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 572 p.
 Clark, M.P., and Hay, L.E., 2004, Use of medium-range numerical weather prediction model output to produce forecasts of streamflow: Journal of Hydrometeorology, v. 5, no. 1, p. 15-32.
 Cosner, O.J., and Harsh, J.F., 1978, Digital-model simulation of the glacial-outwash aquifer, Otter Creek –Dry Creek basin, Cortland County, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 78-71, 34 p.
 Council, G.W., 1998, A lake package for MODFLOW, in Poeter, E., Zheng, C., and Hill, M.C., MODFLOW ‘98: Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colo., v. 2, p. 675-682.
 Danskin, W.R., 1998, Evaluation of the hydrologic system and selected water-management alternatives in the Owens Valley, California: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2370-H, 175 p.
 Ely, D.M., 2006, Analysis of sensitivity of simulated recharge to selected parameters for seven watersheds modeled using the precipitation-runoff modeling system: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5041, 21 p.
 Emerson, D.G., 1991, Documentation of a heat and water transfer model for seasonally frozen soils with application to a precipitation-runoff model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 91-462, 92 p.
 Freeze, R.A., 1971, Three-dimensional, transient, saturated-unsaturated flow in a groundwater basin: Water Resources Research, v. 7, no. 2, p. 347-366.
 Fulp, T.J., Vickers, W.B., Williams, B., and King, D.L., 1995, Decision support for water resources management in the Colorado River region, in Ahuja, L., Leppert, J., Rojas, K., and Seely, E., Workshop on computer applications in water management: Fort Collins, Colo., p. 24-27.
 Gilfedder, M., Rassam, D.W., Stenson, M.P., Jolly, I.D.,Walker, G.R., Littleboy, M., 2012, Incorporating land-use changes and surface-groundwater interactions in a simple catchment water yield model. Environ. Model. Softw. 38, 62-73.
 Graham, N., Refsgaard, A., 2001, MIKE SHE: A Distributed, Physically Based Modelling System for Surface Water/groundwater Interactions Golden, Colorado.
 Graham, D.N., Butts, M.B., 2005, Flexible, integrated watershed modelling with MIKE SHE. In: V.P., S., D.K., F (Eds.), Watershed Models. CRC Press, pp. 245-272.
 Guo, W., and Langevin, C.D., 2002, User’s Guide to SEAWAT: A computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A7, 77 p.
 Hamon, W.R., 1961, Estimating Potential evapotranspiration: Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Hydraulic Division, v. 87, no. HY3, p. 107-120.
 Harbaug, A.W., 2005, MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model - the groundwater ?ow process. USGS Techniques and Methods: 6-A16. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/tm6A16/PDF.htm (accessed 07.03.14.).
 Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., 2000, MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92, 121 p.
 Harter, T., and Hopmans, J.W., 2004, Role of vadose-zone flow processes in regional scale hydrology-review, opportunities and challenges, in Feddes, R.A., De Rooij, G.H., and Van Dam, J.C., eds., Unsaturated Zone Modeling - Progress, Challenges and Applications: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Wageningen Frontis Series, p. 179-208.
 Hay, L.E., and Clark, M.P., 2003, Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States: Journal of Hydrology, v. 282, p. 56-75.
 Hay, L.E., Clark, M.P., Wilby, R.L., Gutowski, W.J., Leavesley, G.H., Pan, Z., Arritt, R.W., and Takle, E.S., 2002, Use of regional climate model output for hydrologic simulations: Journal of Hydrometeorology, v. 3, p. 571-590.
 Hill, M.C., 1990, Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient 2 (PCG2), A computer program for solving ground-water flow equations: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4048, 43 p.
 Hill, M.C., Banta, E.R., and Harbaugh, A.W., 2000, MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to the observations, sensitivity, and parameter-estimation processes and three post-processing programs: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-184, 210 p.
 Hunt, R.J., and Steuer, J.J., 2000, Simulation of the recharge area for Frederick Springs, Dane County, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4172, 33 p.
 Huntington, J.L., Niswonger, R.G., 2012, Role of surface water and groundwater interactions on projected summertime stream?ow in snow dominated regions: an integrated modeling approach. Water Resour. Res. 48 (11), W11524.
 Jensen, M.E., Rob, D.C.N., and Franzoy, C.E., 1969, Scheduling irrigations using climate-crop-soil data, National Conference on Water Resources Engineering of the American Society of Civil Engineers: New Orleans, La. [Proceedings], p. 20.
 Jeton, A.E., 1999, Precipitation-runoff simulations for the upper part of the Truckee River Basin, California and Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4282, 41 p.
 Jobson, H.E., and Harbaugh, A.W., 1999, Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (DAFLOW) for coupling to the modlular finite-difference ground-water flow model (MODFLOW): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-217, 107 p.
 Kollet, S.J., Maxwell, R.M., 2006, Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv. Water Resour., 29, pp. 945–958
 Konikow, L.F., Goode, D.J., and Hornberger, G.Z., 1996, A three-dimensional method-of-characteristics solute-transport model (MOC3D): U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4267, 87 p.
 Langevin, C.D., Shoemaker, W.B., and Guo, W., 2003, MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-documentation of the SEAWAT-2000 version with the variable-density flow process (VDF) and the integrated MT3DMS transport process (IMT): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-426, 43 p.
 Leavesley, G.H., Lichty, R.W., Troutman, B.M., Saindon, L.G., 1983, Precipitation runoff Modeling System; User′s Manual USGS Water resources Investigations Report. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report: 83-4238, 206pp. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1983/4238/report.pdf (accessed 07.03.14.).
 Leavesley, G.H., Restrepo, P.J., Markstrom, S.L., Dixon, M., and Stannard, L.G., 1996b, The Modular Modeling System (MMS): User’s manual: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-151, 142 p.
 Lindgren, R.J., and Landon, M.K., 1999, Effects of ground-water withdrawals on the Rock River and associated valley aquifer, eastern Rock County, Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4157, 103 p.
 Mantoglou, A., 1992, A theoretical approach for modeling unsaturated flow in spatially variable soils - Effective flow models in finite domains and nonstationarity: Water Resources Research, v. 28, no. 1, p. 251-267.
 Markstrom, S.L., Niswonger, R.G., Regan, R.S., Prudic, D.E., Barlow, P.M., 2008, GSFLOW Coupled Groundwater and Surface-water FLOW Model Based on the Integration of the Precipitation runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005). U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-D1, 240pp. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/ tm6d1/pdf/tm6d1.pdf (accessed 07.03.14.).
 Markstrom, S.L., 2012, Integrated Watershed scale Response to Climate Change for Selected Basins across the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Scienti?c Investigations Report 2011-5077, 143pp. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5077/SIR11-5077_508.pdf (accessed 07.03.14.).
 Mastin, M.C., and Vaccaro, J.J., 2002, Documentation of Precipitation Runoff Modeling System modules for the Modular Modeling System modified for the Watershed and River Systems Management Program: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2002-362, 5 p.
 McCallum, A.M., Andersen, M.S., Giambastiani, B.M.S., Kelly, B.F.J., Ian Acworth, R., 2013, River aquifer interactions in a semi-arid environment stressed by groundwater abstraction. Hydrol. Process. 27 (7), 1072-1085.
 Merritt, M.L., and Konikow, L.F., 2000, Documentation of a computer program to simulate lake-aquifer interaction using the MODFLOW ground-water flow model and the MOC3D solute-transport model: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4167, 146 p.
 Morgan, D.S., 1988, Geohydrology and numerical model analysis of ground-water flow in the Goose Lake Basin, Oregon and California: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4058, 92 p.
 Nishikawa, T., Izbicki, J.A., Hevesi, J.A., Stamos, C.L., and Martin, P., 2005, Evaluation of geohydrologic framework, recharge estimates, and ground-water flow of the Joshua Tree area, San Bernardino County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5267, 127 p.
 Niswonger, R.G., and Prudic, D.E., 2005, Documentation of the Streamflow-Routing (SFR2) Package to include unsaturated flow beneath streams - A modification to SFR1: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A13, 62 p.
 Niswonger, R.G., Prudic, D.E., and Regan, R.S., 2006a, Documentation of the Unsaturated-Zone Flow (UZF1) Package for modeling unsaturated flow between the land surface and the water table with MODFLOW-2005: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A19, 74 p.
 Niswonger, R.G., Prudic, D.E., Fogg, G.E., Stonestrom, D.A., Buckland, E.M., 2008, Method for estimating spatially variable seepage loss and hydraulic conductivity in intermittent and ephemeral streams. Water Resour. Res. 44 (5), W05418.
 Olson, S.A., 2002, Flow-frequency characteristics of Vermont streams: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 2002-4238, 47 p.
 Perez, A.J., Abrahao, R., Causape, J., Cirpka, O.A., Burger, C.M., 2011, Simulating the transition of a semi-arid rainfed catchment towards irrigation agriculture. J. Hydrol. 409 (3-4), 663-681.
 Panday, S., and Huyakorn, P.S., 2004, A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow: Advances in Water Resources, v. 27, no. 4, p. 361-382.
 Prudic, D.E., 1989, Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-729 113 p.
 Prudic, D.E., Konikow, L.F., and Banta, E.R., 2004, A new Streamflow-Routing (SFR1) Package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1042, 95 p.
 Rankl, J.G., 1987, Analysis of sediment production from two small semiarid basins in Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4314, 27 p.
 Rassam, D.W., Peeters, L., Pickett, T., Jolly, I., Holz, L., 2013, Accounting for surface groundwater interactions and their uncertainty in river and groundwater models: a case study in the Namoi River, Australia. Environ. Model. Softw. 50(0), 108-119.
 Refsgaard, J.C., and Storm, B., 1995, MIKE SHE, in Singh, V.P., ed., Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology: Highlands Ranch, Colo., Water Resources Publications, p. 809-846.
 Ross, M.A., Tara, R.D., Geurink, J.S., and Stewart, M.T., 1997, FIPR Hydrologic Model Users Manual and Technical Documentation: Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, FIPR-OFR-88-03-085, Barton, Fla.
 Safavi, H.R., Esmikhani, M., 2013, Conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater: application of support vector machines (SVMs) and genetic algorithms. Water Resour. Manag., 27, pp. 2623–2644
 Said, A., Stevens, O.K., and Sehlke, G., 2005, Estimating water budget in a regional aquifer using HSFP-MODFLOW integrated model: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, v. 41, no. 1, p. 55-66.
 Siebert, S., Burke, J., Faures, J.M., Frenken, K., Hoogeveen, J., D€ oll, P., Portmann, F.T., 2010, Groundwater use for irrigation - a global inventory. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 7 (3), 3977-4021.
 Smith, R.E., and Hebbert, R.H.B., 1983, Mathematical simulation of interdependent surface and subsurface hydrologic processes: Water Resources Research, v. 19, no. 4, p. 987-1001.
 Sophocleous, M.A., Koelliker, J.K., Govindaraju, R.S., Birdie, T., Ramireddygari, S.R., Perkins, S.P., 1999, Integrated numerical modeling for basin wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. J. Hydrol. 214 (1-4), 179-196.
 Sophocleous, M., and Perkins, S.P., 2000, Methodology and application of combined watershed and groundwater model in Kansas: Journal of Hydrology, v. 236, p. 185-201.
 Sophocleous, M., 2002, Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol. J. 10 (1), 52-67.
 Steuer, J.J., and Hunt, R.J., 2001, Use of a watershed-modeling approach to assess hydrologic effects of urbanization, North Fork Pheasant Branch basin near Middleton, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 2001-4113, 49 p.
 Swain, E.D., and Wexler, E.J., 1996, A coupled surface-water and ground-water flow model (MODBRANCH) for simulation of stream-aquifer interaction: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A6, 125 p.
 Therrien, R., McLaren, R.G., Sudicky, E.A., Panday, S.M., 2010, HydroGeoSphere A Three dimensional Numerical Model Describing Fully integrated Subsurface and Surface Flow and Solute Transport. Technical report.
 Thoms, R.B., Johnson, R.L., and Healy, R.W., 2006, User’s guide to the Variably Saturated Flow (VSF) process for MODFLOW: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A18, 58 p.
 Tian, Y., Zheng, Y., Wu, B., Wu, X., Liu, J., Zheng, C., 2015, Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction in arid and semi-arid regions with intensive agriculture. Environ. Modell. Software, 63, pp. 170–184
 Vaccaro, J.J., 1992, Sensitivity of groundwater recharge estimates to climate variability and change, Columbia Plateau, Washington: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 97, no. D3, p. 2821–2833.
 VanderKwaak, J.E., 1999, Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems: Ontario, Canada, University of Waterloo, Department of Earth Sciences, Ph.D. Dissertation, 217 p.
 VanderKwaak, J.E., Loague, K., 2001, Hydrologic Response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics based model. Water Resour. Res. 37 (4), 999-1013.
 Vining, K.C., 2002, Simulation of streamflow and wetland storage, Starkweather Coulee subbasin, North Dakota, water years 1981-98: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4113, 28 p.
 Weill, S., Mazzia, A., Putti, M., Paniconi, C., 2011, Coupling water flow and solute transport into a physically-based surface–subsurface hydrological model. Adv. Water Resour., 34, pp. 128–136
 Werner, A.D., Gallagher, M.R., Weeks, S.W., 2006, Regional scale, fully coupled modelling of stream aquifer interaction in a tropical catchment. J. Hydrol. 328 (3-4), 497-510.
 Wilby, R.L., Hay, L.E., and Leavesley, G.H., 1999, A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado: Journal of Hydrology, v. 225, p. 67-91.
 Yates, D.N., Warner, T.T., and Leavesley, G.H., 2000, Prediction of a flash flood in complex terrain: Part II—A comparison of flood discharge simulations using rainfall input from radar, a dynamic model, and an automated algorithmic system: Journal of Applied Meteorology, v. 39, no. 6, p. 815-825.
 Zarriello, P.J., and Ries, K.G., III, 2000, A precipitation-runoff model for analysis of the effects of water withdrawals on streamflow, Ipswich River basin, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations Report 2000-4029, 99 p.