以服務創新之觀點探討平台經營-以TED為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：76

、訪客IP：18.118.253.117

姓名

施亮宇(Liang-Yu Shih) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

以服務創新之觀點探討平台經營-以TED為例
(The Perspective of Service-Dominant Logic on Platform Management - The Case Study of TED.)

相關論文

★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司	★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究－以A公司為例	★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新－以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例	★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究－以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation	★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果	★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究－以新產品開發專案為例	★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力對新產品開發績效之影響	★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究以服務創新為觀點，旨在探討TED如何連結多元參與者、在現今正蓬勃發展的數位科技下，形成資源液化與資源集中，進一步創造資源整合，也就是TED精神所象徵的"好的點子值得傳遞"。

在服務創新的文獻裡皆指出，服務系統裡的機制設計，往往扮演著是否能夠處造服務創新的重要關鍵，那對TED來說，本研究好奇TED是如何設計平台機制的?針對上述問題，本研究提出七大命題，敘述TED如何逐步(1)定義多邊市場、(2)激發網路效應、(3)建立用戶過濾機制、(4)設定付費方與補貼方、(5)賦予用戶歸屬感、(6)操作開放式政策與管制式政策、(7)決定關鍵商業模式。

本研究亦發現，TED的平台機制設計，與文獻和現行平台實務如Airbnb, Uber, Toutube等大相逕庭，在文獻和現行平台實務裡，平台為了追求網絡效應，常會先以極其開放的方式，爭取使用者加入，接著為了避免負的網絡效應產生，平台再漸漸收歛，以維護平台品質。但TED的作法卻是完全相反的，本研究認為，因為TED凸顯了"知識"這項商品的獨特性，使得其平台策略反而是由管制走向開放。

摘要(英)

Starting with the lens of Service-Dominant Logic, this research aims to shed light on
how TED connect an actor-to-actor network, enable resource liquefaction and resource
density through the blooming digital technology, and eventually generate the service
innovation, which in TED is “Ideas Worth Spreading”.
Furthermore, prior literatures in the field of service innovation collectively reflect the
importance of the mechanism design in service system. As for TED, this research illustrate
how TED manage its platform. Seven propositions were proposed to demonstrate how TED
(1) identify its multi-sided markets, (2) trigger the network effect, (3) setup the user filter, (4)
moderate the subsidy and money side, (5) build the sharing awareness and brand belonging,
(6) leverage both restricted and open strategy, (7) determine its business model.
We found the TED’s evolving is totally opposite with prior literatures and practice cases
such as Airbnb, Uber or Youtube. Our research implied that there’s no general rule for platform
management - considering the uniqueness of “idea” (or knowledge), TED began with restricted
strategy, then transited to open.

關鍵字(中)

★ 服務創新
★ 平台

關鍵字(英)

★ Service-Dominant logic
★ Platform
★ TED

論文目次

Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................... 1
1.1 Research Background ....................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Incentive ............................................................................................................ 2
1.3 Research Question ............................................................................................................ 3
Chapter 2: Literature Review ................................................................ 4
2.1 Service Innovation ............................................................................................................ 4
2.2 Boundary Resource Model ............................................................................................... 6
2.3 Social Capital .................................................................................................................... 8
Chapter 3: Methodology ..................................................................... 11
3.1 Case Selection ................................................................................................................. 11
3.2 Data Collection ............................................................................................................... 12
Chapter 4: Case Study-TED ................................................................ 13
4.1 About TED ...................................................................................................................... 13
4.2 History of TED ............................................................................................................... 13
4.3 How TED Work .............................................................................................................. 14
4.4 TED’s Translation ........................................................................................................... 16
4.5 TEDx ............................................................................................................................... 17
Chapter 5: Discussion &Conclusion ................................................... 18
5.1 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 18
5.2 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 24
Chapter 6: Reference ........................................................................... 25

參考文獻

Chinese
????2016?, ??????? 18 ?????????? TED ?????
?????Inside ??????????????
??????? (2013), ???? ??????????????????
????, ??????
English
TED Talk - How web video powers global innovation (Chris Anderson, 2010)
TED Official Website- https://www.ted.com/
Ahmad Ghazawneh & Ola Henfridsson (2012) Balancing platform control and external
contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Info
Systems J , 23, 173-192
Ahuja, M., Galletta, D., and Carley, K (2003). "Individual Centrality and Performance
in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study," Management Science
Alter, S. 2008). “Service System Innovation,” in Technology in the Service Economy:
Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century, M. Barrett, E. Davidson, C.
Middleton, and J. DeGross (eds.), Boston: Springer, pp. 61-80.
Arthur, B. W. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, New
York: Free Press.
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood-Cliffs, NJ
Barrett, M. and Davidson, E. (2008). “Exploring the Diversity of Service Worlds in the
Service Economy,” in Information Technology in the Service Economy:
Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century, M. Barrett, E. Davidson, C.
Middleton, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), New York: Springer, pp. 1-10.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New
Innovation Landscape, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Coleman, J. S (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
26
Donath, J. S (1999). "Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community," in
Communities in Cyberspace, M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Routledge,
NewYork
Dörner, N., Gassmann, O., and Gebauer, H. (2011). “Service Innovation: Why Is It So
Difficult to Accomplish ? ,” Journal of Business Strategy (32:3), pp. 37-46.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of
Management Review (14:4), pp. 532-550.
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Majchrzak, A. (2011). “Knowledge Collaboration in
Online Communities,” Organization Science (22:5), pp. 1224-1239.
Gallouj, F., and Suvana, M. (2009). “Innovation in Services: A Review of the Debate
and a Research Agenda,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics (19:2), pp. 149-
172.?
Henfridsson, O., Yoo, Y. & Svahn, F. (2009) Path creation in digital innovation: a
multi-layered dialectics perspec- tive. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information
Systems, 9, 1–26. [WWW document]. URL http://sprouts.aisnet. org/9-20/.?
Jeremy Heimans & Henry Timms (2014), “TED’s shift for Old to New Power” Harvard
Business Review
Kathy Wang (2015), “TED: Changing the world, 18 minutes at a Time” Technology
and Operations Management
Lewicki, R. J., and Bunker, B. B (1996). "Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work
Relationships," in Trust in Organizations, R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.),
Sage Publications, London
Lusch, R., Vargo, S. L., and Tanniru, M. (2010). “Service, Value Networks and
Learning,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (38:1), pp. 19-31.
Lyytinen, K., and King, J. L. (2006). “Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier
for Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (30:Special Issue), pp. 405-
411.
Maglio, P. P., and Spohrer, J. (2008). “Fundamentals of Service Science,” Journal of
the Academy of Marketing Science (36:1), pp. 18-20.
27
Marwell, G., and Oliver, P. (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-
Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, NewYork
Molly M. Wasko & Samer Faraj (2005) “Why should I share? Examining social capital
and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice”, MIS Quarterly.
Vol 29, pp. 35-57
Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998) "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the
Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review (23:2)
Normann, R. (2001). Reframing Business: When the Map Changes the Landscape,
Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Oke, A. (2007). “Innovation Types and Innovation Management Practices in Service
Companies,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management
(27:6), pp. 564-587
Oliveira, P., and von Hippel, E. (2011). “Users as Service Innovators: The Case of
Banking Services,” Research Policy (40), pp. 806-818.
Orlikowski, W., and Scott, S. V. (2008). “Sociomateriality: Chal- lenging the
Separation of Technology, Work and Organization,” Academy of Management
Annals (2:1), pp. 433-474.
Putnam, R. (1995a) "Bowling Alone: America′s Declining Social Capital," Journal of
Democracy (6)
Putnam, R. (1995b) "Tuning in, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social
Capital in America," Political Science and Politics, December 1995b, pp. 664-
683.?
Robert F. Lusch & Satish Nambisan (2015) , “Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant
Logic Persperctive”. MIS Quarterly, vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 155-175/ March
Shumaker, S., and Brownell, A. (1984) "Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing
Conceptual Gaps," Journal of Social Issues (40:4), 1984, pp. 11-36.
Stewart, D. (2003) "Status Mobility and Status Stability in a Community of Free
Software Developers," paper presented at the Academy of Management
Conference, Seattle, WA
28
Thomas E., Geoffrey P., & Marshall W (2016), “Strategies for Two-Sided Markets”
Harvard Business Review
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sørensen, C. (2010). “Digital Infra- structures: The
Missing IS Research Agenda,” Information Systems Research (20:4), pp. 748-759.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sørensen, C. (2010). “Digital Infra- structures: The
Missing IS Research Agenda,” Information Systems Research (21:5), pp. 748-759.
Van de Ven, A.H. (2005) Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive
technologies. MIS Quarterly, 29, 365–378.
Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2004). “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for
Marketing,” Journal of Marketing (68:1), pp. 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2011). “It’s All B2B...and Beyond: Toward a Systems
Perspective of the Market,” Industrial Marketing Management (40:2), pp. 181-
187.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Yoo, Y. (2010) Computing in everyday life: a call for research on experiential
computing. MIS Quarterly, 34, 213–231.
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., and Majchrzak, A. (2012). “Organizing for
Innovation in the Digitized World,” Organization Science (23:5), pp. 1398-1408.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. & Lyytinen, K. (2010) The new organizing logic of digital
innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems
Research, 21, 724–735.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010). “The New Organizing Logic of
Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Informa- tion Systems Research,” Information
Systems Research (21:4), pp. 724-735.
Zuboff, S., and Maxmin, J. (2002). The Support Economy: Why Corporations Are
Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism, London: Penguin.

指導教授

陳炫碩(Shiuann-Shuoh Chen)

審核日期

2017-6-29

推文