敘事化廣告之典型性與認知風格對品牌成效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：18.218.129.100

姓名

潘謙儀(Chien-Yi Pan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

敘事化廣告之典型性與認知風格對品牌成效之影響

相關論文

★ 幽默廣告與網路紅人可信度對廣告效果之影響：以推薦人適配度為中介	★ 廣告訴求與產品種類對品牌態度、廣告態度及自我品牌連接度的影響
★ 社群媒體Instagram使用動機對品牌參與及購買意圖之影響：以廣告價值為中介變數	★ 專業生成及用戶生成內容與消費者創新性對推薦式廣告之效果
★ YouTuber類型與廣告價值對消費者反應之影響：以幽默程度作為調節變數	★ 影響者特質、消費者感知對品牌效果之研究：以廣告揭露為中介
★ Unlocking the power of motivations on engagement with ephemeral content: Mediated by gratification and moderated by need for closure	★ 探討 YouTube 使用動機與消費者行為之關係: 以 YouTube 使用強度及平台可信度為調節變數
★ Instagram廣告的互動性與自我品牌連結對網路口碑和廣告態度之影響：以 Instagram使用頻率和錯失恐懼為中介	★ 社群影響者追蹤動機對消費者行為影響之研究:以互動性、參與程度、廣告意圖為中介變數
★ 品牌聯名的行銷策略對消費者產品接受度及購買意願之影響：以社會認同與社群影響為中介變數	★ 探討Instagram上品牌擬人化貼文及自我概念品牌投入對消費行為之影響
★ 探討廣告利益對原生廣告之成效：以廣告與平台一致性為中介變數	★ 網路紅人類型與網路紅人/產品一致性對消費者反應之影響: 以錯失恐懼、社會比較以及Instagram使用強度為中介
★ 調查廉價航空業在服務補救後受補救行為之影響：關係慣性和市場行家所扮演的角色	★ YouTuber「虛擬vs.真實」呈現對廣告效果之研究：探討代言人可信度與消費者參與的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來，敘事化逐漸的運用在廣告行銷領域當中，不同類別的品牌或是產品利用敘事化廣告來吸引消費者、降低傳統廣告所帶來的負面觀感。此篇研究以典型理論、分類理論、廣告不一致理論、基模觸發影響等等相關的理論基礎來定義敘事化廣告的典型性，並探究其對消費者行為所產生的影響。另外，在消費者認知風格方面本研究運用認知風格理論中的雙元認知風格來進一步探討理性認知風格與經驗性認知風格的消費者在接觸敘事化廣告的同時是否存在行為差異。
本研究採實驗設計法，以敘事化廣告來做為實驗刺激物，針對240位國立中央大學大學部學生做調查。本研究為二因子實驗設計，由敘事化廣告的類型(典型vs.非典型)與認知風格類型(理性vs.經驗性)兩自變數設計出四個不同的研究組別，針對品牌效益相關概念(廣告態度、品牌態度、購買意圖、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度)的影響作分析研究。
研究發現，不論是在典型或是非典型的敘事化廣告類別上，對於品牌相關概念效益基本都是經驗性認知風格的表現優於理性認知風格。理性認知風格只有在敘事化廣告是典型性時，品牌黏著度的表現才會優於非典型的敘事化廣告。本研究的理論貢獻是創立一套依據典型性對於敘事化廣告的分類概念以及其對消費者行為之影響。在實務上，研究結果建議必須先針對敘事化廣告的類別與消費者的認知風格類型做策略上的區別，以達到對於消費者的精準行銷。

摘要(英)

In recent years, many worldwide brands and companies are using narrative advertisements to attract consumers and reduce negative impression in the marketing field. Building on theories such as typical theory, category theory, ad incongruence theory, and schema triggered affect theory, this study conceptualizes typicality of narrative ads and explores how such ads shape consumer behavior. To further evaluate consumers’ behavioral differences, the dual-process view in consumer cognitive is applied to compare the advertising effectiveness between rational cognitive or experience cognitive consumers.
A two-factor (narrative advertisement type: typicality vs. atypicality and cognitive style: rational vs. experience) between-subject experimental design method was employed to stimulate 240 National Central University students’ reactions including attitude toward the ad, attitude toward the brand, purchasing intention, brand trust, and brand attachment.
The results showed that both typical and atypical narrative ads were more effective for experience cognitive consumers than rational cognitive consumers in terms of the brand outcomes. The rational cognitive consumers only performed better than experience cognitive consumers on brand attachment in the condition of typical ads. Therefore, the research findings suggest that narrative ad type and cognitive style must be taken into consideration when designing efficient strategies to target consumer segments.

關鍵字(中)

★ 敘事化廣告類型
★ 典型性
★ 認知風格類型
★ 廣告態度
★ 品牌態度
★ 購買意圖
★ 品牌信任度
★ 品牌黏著度

關鍵字(英)

★ narrative advertisement type
★ typicality
★ cognitive style
★ attitude toward the ad
★ attitude toward the brand
★ purchase intention
★ brand trust
★ brand attachment

論文目次

目錄
頁次
中文摘要 ..............................................i
英文摘要 ...............................................ii
目錄 ...............................................iii
圖目錄 ...............................................vi
表目錄 ..............................................vii
附錄目錄 .............................................ix
一、緒論 ..............................................1
1-1 背景資訊與研究動機 ................................1
1-2 研究預期貢獻 .....................................2
1-3 研究程序 .........................................4
二、文獻探討 ..........................................5
2-1 概論 ............................................5
2-2 敘事化廣告 (Narrative Advertising) ...............5
2-3 典型廣告與非典型廣告 ..............................7
2-4 沉浸性 (Transportation) ........................10
2-5 雙元認知風格 (The Dual-Process View) ............11
2-5-1 理性經驗性清單 [Rational-Experiential Inventory
(REI-40)] ...................................11
2-6 品牌信任度 (Brand Trust) ........................13
2-7 品牌黏著度 (Brand Attachment) ...............14
2-8 態度和行為意圖 (Attitude And Behavioral Intention) 15
2-8-1 廣告態度 (Attitude Toward The Ad) ............16
2-8-2 品牌態度 (Brand Attitude) ....................16
2-8-3 購買意圖 (Purchasing Intention) ..............17
2-9 敘事化廣告與消費者的態度關聯性 ....................17
2-9-1 敘事化廣告典型性 vs. 品牌相關態度 ..............18
2-9-2 個人的認知風格 vs. 品牌相關態度 ...............18
2-10 研究假說 ......................................20
三、研究方法 .........................................22
3-1 研究架構 ........................................22
3-2 研究對象與材料 ..................................23
3-3 研究變數定義與衡量方法 ...........................23
3-3-1 自變數之操作定義與衡量 ........................24
3-3-2 個人的認知風格：理性認知風格 vs. 經驗性認知風格 25
3-3-3 應變數之操作定義與衡量 ........................27
3-3-4 共同變異數之操作定義與衡量 ....................31
3-4 研究設計 ........................................32
3-4-1 實驗設計 .....................................32
3-4-2 廣告前測 .....................................33
3-5 正式問卷與抽樣 ..................................35
四、研究結果 .........................................37
4-1 資料分析 ........................................37
4-2 統計方法 ........................................37
4-3 樣本特性分析 ....................................37
4-4 主要變數信度分析 ................................39
4-5 自變數的操弄檢定 ................................40
4-5-1 敘事化廣告典型性 .............................40
4-5-2 個人的認知風格 ...............................40
4-6 品牌相關變數之變異數分析 .........................41
4-6-1 廣告效果變異數分析 ............................41
4-6-2 品牌信任度變異數分析 ..........................44
4-6-3 品牌黏著度變異數分析 ..........................44
4-7 研究結果 ........................................45
五、結論與建議 .......................................47
5-1 結論概述 ........................................47
5-2 不同的敘事化廣告典型性對廣告效果、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度
之影響 ..........................................47
5-3 不同認知風格對廣告效果、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度之影響 48
5-4 不同的敘事化廣告典型性搭配不同認知風格對廣告效果、品牌信
任度與品牌黏著度之影響 ...........................50
5-5 總結 ...........................................50
5-6 建議 ...........................................51
5-6-1 行銷策略 .....................................51
5-6-2 研究限制 .....................................52
六、參考文獻 .........................................53

參考文獻

〔1〕 Adaval, R., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (1998). The Role of
Narratives in Consumer Information Processing.
Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates), 7(3), 207.
〔2〕 Akinci, C., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2013). Assessing
Individual Differences in Experiential (Intuitive)
and Rational (Analytical) Cognitive Styles.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
21(2), 211-221. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12030
〔3〕 Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The Effects
of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making.
Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 14-25.
〔4〕 Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000).
The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive
Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television
Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 1-15.
〔5〕 Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive
Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For
Organizational Research. Journal of Management
Studies, 33(1), 119-135. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-
6486.1996.tb00801.x
〔6〕 Armstrong, S. J., & Priola, V. (2001). Individual
Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on
Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work
Teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 283-312.
doi:10.1177/104649640103200302
〔7〕 Baek, T. H., & Morimoto, M. (2012). Stay Away From
Me. Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 59-76.
〔8〕 Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995).
Personality and mate selection in personal ads:
Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection
process. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,
10(3), 517-536.
〔9〕 Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective Responses
Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal of
Consumer Research, 13(2), 234-249.
〔10〕 Belch, G. E. G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2004).
Advertising and promotion : an integrated marketing
communications perspective (6th ed ed.): McGraw-
Hill/Irwin.
〔11〕 Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of
measurement (Vol. 15).
〔12〕 Brumbaugh, A. M. (1993). Physical Attractiveness
and Personality in Advertising: More than Just a
Pretty Face? Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1),
159-164.
〔13〕 Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic
information processing and the use of source versus
message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
〔14〕 Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process
theories in social psychology. New York, NY, US:
Guilford Press.
〔15〕 Chang, C. (2008). Increasing mental health literacy
via narrative advertising. Journal of Health
Commun, 13(1), 37-55. doi:10.1080/10810730701807027
〔16〕 Chang, C. (2009). "Being Hooked" By Editorial
Content: The Implications for Processing Narrative
Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 21-34.
doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380102
〔17〕 Chang, C. (2012). Narrative Ads and Narrative
Processing. In E. Thorson and S. Rodgers (Eds.),
Advertising Theory (pp. 241-254). New York:
Routledge.
〔18〕 Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2005). The
Development of Self-Brand Connections in Children
and Adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research,
32(1), 119-129. doi:10.1086/426622
〔19〕 Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of
attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion,
and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 71(4), 810-832. doi:10.1037/0022-
3514.71.4.810
〔20〕 Cools, E., Van den Broeck, H., & Bouckenooghe, D.
(2009). Cognitive styles and person–environment
fit: Investigating the consequences of cognitive
(mis)fit. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 167-198.
doi:10.1080/13594320802295540
〔21〕 Dahlen, M., Lange, F., & Smith, T. (2010).
Marketing Communications: A Brand Narrative
Approach: John Wiley & Sons.
〔22〕 Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989).
Using Drama to Persuade. Journal of Consumer
Research, 16(3), 335-343. doi:10.1086/209219
〔23〕 Delgado-Ballester, E. (2002). Development and
Validation of a Brand Trust Scale.
〔24〕 Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J. L., &
Yague-Guillen, M. J. (2003). Development and
validation of a brand trust scale. International
Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 35-54.
〔25〕 Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An
Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller
Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
doi:10.2307/1251829
〔26〕 Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive
and the psychodynamic unconscious. American
psychologist, 49(8), 709-724. doi:10.1037/0003-
066X.49.8.709
〔27〕 Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive‐Experiential Self‐
Theory of Personality. In Handbook of psychology
(pp. 159-184): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
〔28〕 Escalas, J. E. (1998). Advertising narratives: What
are they and how do they work. Representing
consumers: Voices, views, and visions, 267-289.
〔29〕 Escalas, J. E. (2004a). Imagine Yourself in the
Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative
Transportation, and Persuasion. Journal of
Advertising, 33(2), 37-48.
〔30〕 Escalas, J. E. (2004b). Narrative Processing:
Building Consumer Connections to Brands. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 168-180.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19
〔31〕 Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You Are
What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on
Consumers’ Connections to Brands. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339-348.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_14
〔32〕 Escalas, J. E., Moore, M. C., & Britton, J. E.
(2004). Fishing For Feelings? Hooking Viewers
Helps! Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates), 14(1/2), 105-114.
〔33〕 Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and
Empathy: Emotional Responses to Advertising Dramas.
Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566-578.
doi:10.1086/346251
〔34〕 Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: dual-
process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 7(10), 454-459.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
〔35〕 Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts
of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.
Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255-278.
doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
〔36〕 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, Attitude,
Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory
and Research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-
132.
〔37〕 Fisher, R. J., & Dub, L. (2005). Gender Differences
in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social
Desirability Perspective. Journal of Consumer
Research, 31(4), 850-858. doi:10.1086/426621
〔38〕 Fiske, S. T. (2014). Schema-triggered affect:
Applications to social perception. In Affect and
cognition (pp. 65-88): Psychology Press.
〔39〕 Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does
the Schema Concept Buy us? Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 543-557.
doi:10.1177/014616728064006
〔40〕 Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A Continuum
of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to
Individuating Processes: Influences of Information
and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation. In
M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74): Academic Press.
〔41〕 Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-
based versus piecemeal-based affective responses:
Developments in schema-triggered affect. In
Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations
of social behavior. (pp. 167-203). New York, NY,
US: Guilford Press.
〔42〕 Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R.
(1978). Some correlates of trust. J Psychol, 99(1st
Half), 103-108. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447
〔43〕 Gardner, M. P. (1985). Does Attitude toward the Ad
Affect Brand Attitude under a Brand Evaluation Set?
Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 192-198.
doi:10.2307/3151364
〔44〕 Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-Based
Applications and Extensions in Advertising:
Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing. Journal of
Consumer Research, 20(1), 87-99.
〔45〕 Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of
transportation in the persuasiveness of public
narratives. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.
〔46〕 Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind′s
eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative
persuasion. In M. C. Green, T. C. Brock, & J. J.
Strange (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and
cognitive foundations. (pp. 315-341). Mahwah, NJ,
US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
〔47〕 Gunnell, J. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2010). When
emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual
processing style and juror bias. Behav Sci Law,
28(6), 850-877. doi:10.1002/bsl.939
〔48〕 Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive
Style and its Relevance for Management Practice.
British Journal of Management, 5(1), 53-71.
doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00068.x
〔49〕 Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The Role
of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal
and Visual Information: What is Incongruency?
Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475-492.
〔50〕 Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A.
(1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal
Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7(11), 1097-
1108. doi:10.1007/bf00287587
〔51〕 Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming:
Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 51(6), 1106-1115.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1106
〔52〕 Hogarth, R. M. (2005). Deciding analytically or
trusting your intuition? The advantages and
disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In
T. B. & S. Haberstroh (Ed.), The routines of
decision making. (pp. 67-82). Mahwah, NJ, US:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
〔53〕 Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. (2005). An Empirical
Test of Cognitive Style and Strategic Decision
Outcomes*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2),
417-448. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00502.x
〔54〕 Jin, H. S., & Lutz, R. J. (2013). The Typicality
and Accessibility of Consumer Attitudes Toward
Television Advertising: Implications for the
Measurement of Attitudes Toward Advertising in
General. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 343-357.
doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.803184
〔55〕 Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002).
Representativeness Revisited: Attribute
Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In D. Griffin,
D. Kahneman, & T. Gilovich (Eds.), Heuristics and
Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp.
49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
〔56〕 Kim, J.-E., Lloyd, S., & Cervellon, M.-C. (2016).
Narrative-transportation storylines in luxury brand
advertising: Motivating consumer engagement.
Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 304-313.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.002
〔57〕 Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). The
Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding
Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. Journal
of Marriage and Family, 42(3), 595-604.
doi:10.2307/351903
〔58〕 Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to
Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role
of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor. Journal of
Consumer Research, 26(2), 156-169.
doi:10.1086/209557
〔59〕 Lien, N.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2013). Narrative ads:
The effect of argument strength and story format.
Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516-522.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.016
〔60〕 Lin, C.-H., & Chen, M.-Y. (2015). “Being hooked” by
a brand story: a view of regulatory focus. European
Journal of Marketing, 49(5/6), 692-712.
doi:10.1108/EJM-07-2013-0381
〔61〕 Loef, J. (2002). Incongruity between Ads and
Consumer Expectations of Advertising. (Ph.D.
thesis), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Retrieved
from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/869 (EPS-2002-017-
MKT)
〔62〕 Loken, B., & Ward, J. (1990). Alternative
Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of
Typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2),
111-126. doi:10.1086/208542
〔63〕 MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E.
(1986). The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a
Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of
Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing
Research, 23(2), 130-143. doi:10.2307/3151660
〔64〕 Mackenzie, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How Does
Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and
Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and
Intentions? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4),
519-529.
〔65〕 Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1982). The role of
familiarity in determining typicality. Memory &
Cognition, 10(1), 69-75. doi:10.3758/BF03197627
〔66〕 Martín-Luengo, B., Luna, K., & Migueles, M. (2013).
Memory for Radio Advertisements: the Effect of
Program and Typicality. The Spanish Journal of
Psychology, 16. doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.80
〔67〕 Mattila, A. S. (2000). The Role of Narratives in
the Advertising of Experiential Services. Journal
of Service Research, 3(1), 35-45.
doi:10.1177/109467050031003
〔68〕 McDaniel, S. R. (1999). An investigation of match-
up effects in sport sponsorship advertising: The
implications of consumer advertising schemas.
Psychology & Marketing, 16(2), 163-184.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199903)16:2<163::AID-
MAR6>3.0.CO;2-Y
〔69〕 Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization
of Natural Objects. Annual Review of Psychology,
32(1), 89-115.
doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
〔70〕 Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema
Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.
Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54.
doi:10.1086/209192
〔71〕 Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models
and the sense of trust: An exploration of
interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209-
1224. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
〔72〕 Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment
in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change:
Guilford Press.
〔73〕 Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The
Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.
Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
doi:10.2307/1252308
〔74〕 Murphy, G. L. (2004). The Big Book of Concepts: MIT
Press.
〔75〕 Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2009). The Fit of
Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of
Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational
Cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 56-
72. doi:10.1086/596026
〔76〕 Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory:
McGraw-Hill.
〔77〕 Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of
rational and experiential information processing
styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the
ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
〔78〕 Padgett, D., & Allen, D. (1997). Communicating
Experiences: A Narrative Approach to Creating
Service Brand Image. Journal of Advertising, 26(4),
49-62.
〔79〕 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes
and persuasion : classic and contemporary
approaches: W.C. Brown Co. Publishers.
〔80〕 Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Narrative and Self-
Concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History,
1(2-3), 135-153. doi:doi:10.1075/jnlh.1.2-3.04nar
〔81〕 Polyorat, K., Alden, D. L., & Kim, E. S. (2007).
Impact of narrative versus factual print ad copy on
product evaluation: The mediating role of ad
message involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 24(6),
539-554. doi:doi:10.1002/mar.20172
〔82〕Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985).
Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
〔83〕 Resnik, A., & Stern, B. L. (1977). An Analysis of
Information Content in Television Advertising.
Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 50-53.
doi:10.2307/1250490
〔84〕 Riding, R., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of
cognitive style and mode of presentation on
learning performance. Br J Educ Psychol, 63 (Pt
2), 297-307.
〔85〕 Riding, R., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (1992). Type of
Instructional Material, Cognitive Style and
Learning Performance. Educational Studies, 18(3),
323-340. doi:10.1080/0305569920180306
〔86〕 Ritchie, W. J., Kolodinsky, R. W., & Eastwood, K.
(2007). Does Executive Intuition Matter? An
Empirical Analysis of Its Relationship With
Nonprofit Organization Financial Performance.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1),
140-155. doi:10.1177/0899764006293338
〔87〕Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family
resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of
categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
〔88〕 Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976).
Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human perception and
performance, 2(4), 491.
〔89〕 Sadler-Smith, E. (1998). Cognitive style: Some
human resource implications for managers. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management,
9(1), 185-202. doi:10.1080/095851998341260
〔90〕 Schlinger, M. J. (1979). A profile of responses to
commercials. Journal of Advertising Research,
19(2), 37-46.
〔91〕 Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two
systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,
119(1), 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
〔92〕 Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and
concepts: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
〔93〕 Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974).
Structure and process in semantic memory: A
featural model for semantic decisions.
Psychological Review, 81(3), 214-241.
doi:10.1037/h0036351
〔94〕 Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-Process
Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology:
Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying
Memory Systems. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 4(2), 108-131.
doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
〔95〕 Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring
Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions.
Journal of Current Issues & Research in
Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
〔96〕 Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (2002). The
Advantages of Atypical Advertisements for
Stereotyped Product Categories. Journal of Current
Issues & Research in Advertising, 24(1), 25-37.
doi:10.1080/10641734.2002.10505125
〔97〕 Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual
differences in reasoning: Implications for the
rationality debate? In Heuristics and biases: The
psychology of intuitive judgment. (pp. 421-440).
New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
〔98〕 Stern, B. B. (1994). Classical and Vignette
Television Advertising Dramas: Structural Models,
Formal Analysis, and Consumer Effects. Journal of
Consumer Research, 20(4), 601-615.
doi:10.1086/209373
〔99〕 Stoltman, J. J. (1991). Advertising effectiveness:
The role of advertising schemas. Marketing theory
and applications, 2, 317-318.
〔100〕Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer Knowledge: Effects on
Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments.
Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46.
〔101〕Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to
absorbing and self-altering experiences
("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic
susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
83(3), 268-277. doi:10.1037/h0036681
〔102〕Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C.
(2005). The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength
of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77-91.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
〔103〕van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., &
Wetzels, M. (2014). The Extended Transportation-
Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents
and Consequences of Consumers′ Narrative
Transportation. Journal of Consumer Research,
40(5), 797-817. doi:10.1086/673383
〔104〕Vance, C. M., Groves, K. S., Paik, Y., & Kindler,
H. (2007). Understanding and Measuring Linear-
NonLinear Thinking Style for Enhanced Management
Education and Professional Practice. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 167-185.
〔105〕Wang, W.-C., Silva, M. M. S., & Moutinho, L.
(2016). Modelling Consumer Responses to Advertising
Slogans through Artificial Neural Networks.
International Journal of Business and Economics,
15(2), 89-116.
〔106〕Wells, W. D., Leavitt, C., & McConville, M. (1971).
A reaction profile for TV commercials. Journal of
Advertising Research, 11(6), 11-18.
〔107〕Whan Park, C., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J.,
Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand
Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual
and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand
Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.
doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1

指導教授

陳冠儒

審核日期

2018-7-13

推文