企業社會責任與企業持有現金之價值

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：37

、訪客IP：3.144.121.155

姓名

曾詩綺(Shih-Ci Zeng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

企業社會責任與企業持有現金之價值
(Corporate Social Responsibility and the Value of Corporate Cash Holdings)

相關論文

★ 台灣建置碳排放權交易機制之分析	★ 保險業如何建立創造公司、顧客及員工三贏的RFP商業模式 —以全球人壽為例
★ 在IAS 21：「匯率變動之影響」規範下，我國企業如何應用商業模式選擇功能性貨幣之研究-以A公司為例	★ 台灣銀行業如何改變商業模式以因應ECFA下之變局-以個案銀行為例
★ 公司發行可轉債之宣告與長期績效	★ 申請上市櫃過程中股票價格之變化：來自興櫃市場的實證
★ 外資買賣超對個股之影響	★ 文創產業之融資模式探討
★ 私募股權基金入股後對台灣金融業的影響	★ 新舊承銷制度下首次公開發行公司盈餘管理之比較研究
★ 匯率風險與管理策略研究-以個案公司為例	★ 商業銀行併購融資之契機
★ 我國證券商辦理離境證券業務與海外子公司業務之比較：以個案銀行券商為例	★ 借殼公司之探討以台灣市場為例
★ 家族企業接班：專業經理人與家族成員之績效比較	★ 本國銀行Basel III 資本適足率與流動性覆蓋率探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本篇研究利用永續發展研究機構(Sustainalytics Responsible Investment Services)於2014年公布美國上市公司之ESG分數作為樣本，探討公司積極投入企業社會責任之程度是否與公司持有之現金價值有關，並利用拔靴法解決樣本數不足之問題。研究結果有以下三點發現，第一，企業投入於企業社會責任積極程度越高(低)，其現金價值越低(高)；第二，同產業下之企業對於CSR投入之行為積極程度差異甚大，因此CSR的積極投入行為並沒有出現群聚現象；第三，不論企業投入於企業社會責任積極程度高低，發放一單位之普通股現金股利均減少公司價值，但較積極投入於企業社會責任之企業，其減少的幅度呈正相關，意味著CSR的投入能增加投資者之保護。綜合以上，對於公司而言，CSR之投入並不能提升公司持有現金之價值，但是對於投資者仍有正面影響。

摘要(英)

This study discusses the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the value of corporate cash holdings by using the multi-factor model and Bootstrap methodology. The data of ESG score of U.S. listed companies are provided by Sustainalytics Responsible Investment Services at 2014. The results of this study are following. First, the firms with higher ESG score tend to have lower the value of cash holding, and vice versa. Second, there are great variations in the ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) score among firms in the same industry. Third, no matter how higher ESG score, the value of cash holding will decrease at the same levels when the cash dividend increase, but the firm with higher ESG score tend to have lower decreases. That suggest the firms with higher ESG score have higher investor protection. In conclusion, the firms involve in CSR activity could not increase the value of cash holding, but have positive effect on shareholders.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 現金價值

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章、緒論 - 1 -
1.1 研究背景 - 1 -
1.2 研究動機 - 4 -
第二章、文獻回顧 - 6 -
2.1 CSR與公司價值的研究方法與相關理論 - 6 -
2.2 公司價值與現金價值之關係 - 8 -
2.3 公司持有現金價值之衡量模型 - 10 -
第三章、研究設計與方法 - 12 -
3.1 假說建立 - 12 -
3.2 模型建立 - 13 -
3.3 資料來源 - 14 -
3.4 樣本篩選 - 16 -
第四章、實證結果 - 17 -
4.1. 敘述統計 - 17 -
4.2. 迴歸結果 - 21 -
4.3. 拔靴法迴歸結果 - 25 -
第五章、結論與建議 - 30 -
參考文獻 - 31 -
附錄一. - 34 -
附錄二. - 37 -

參考文獻

Cheung, A., 2016. Corporate social responsibility and corporate cash holdings.
Journal of Corporate Financial 37, 412-430.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C. and Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate social performance
and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial
Management 35, 97-116.
Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386-405.
Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A.C., 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate
finance. Financial Management 16, 5-14.
Deng, X., Kang, J.K. and Low, B.S., 2013. Corporate social responsibility and
stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of
Financial Economics 110, 87-109.
Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J. and Servaes, H., 2013. International corporate
goverance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and
Quantitative Analysis 38. 111-133.
Efron, B., 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of
Statistics 7, 569-593.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R., 1998. Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value.
Journal of Finance 53, 819-843.
Feldman, S.J., Soyka, P.A. and Ameer, P.G., 1997. Does improving a firm′s
environmental management system and environmental performance result
in a higher stock price. The Journal of Investing 6, 87-97.
Ghoul, S.E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C.Y. and Mishra, D.R., 2011. Does
corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital. Journal of Banking
& Finance 35, 2388-2406.
Goss, A. and Roberts, G.S., 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility
on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 1794-1810.
Hamilton, S., Joe, H. and Statman, M., 1993. Doing well while doing good? The
investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial
Analysts Journal 49, 62-66.
Harford, J,. Klasa, S. and Maxwell, W.F., 2014. Refinancing risk and cash
holdings. The Journal of Finance 69, 975-1012.
Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M., 2009. The price of sin: The effects of social
norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93, 15-36.
Kalcheva, I. and Lins, K.V., 2007. International evidence on cash holdings and
expected managerial agency problems. The Review of Financial Studies
20, 1087-1112.
Kim, M., Surroca, J. and Tribó, J.A., 2014. Impact of ethical behavior on
syndicated loan rates. Journal of Banking & Finance 38, 122-144.
Laporta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W., 2000. Investor
protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58,
3-27.
Luo, X. and Bhattachary, C.B., 2009. The debate over doing good: Corporate
social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk.
Journal of Marketing 73, 198-213.
Myers, S.C., Rajan, R.G., 1998. The paradox of liquidity. The Quarterly Journal
of Economics 113, 733-771.
Nelling, E. and Webb, E., 2009. Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance
and Accounting 32, 197-209.
Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. and Williamson, R., 2006. Does the contribution of
corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on
governance? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Finance 61, 2725-
2751.
Pinkowitz, L. and Williamson, R., 2007. What is the market value of a dollar of
corporate cash. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 19, 74-81.
Surroca, J., Tribo´, J.A. and Waddock, S., 2010. Corporate responibility and
finacial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic
Management Journal 31, 463-490.
Wolf, J., 2014. The relationship between sustainable supply chain management,
stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of
Business Ethics 119, 317-328.
周心怡，2004，拔靴法(bootstrap)之探討及其應用，碩士論文，國立中央大學統
計研究所。
陳旭昇，2013，時間序列分析: 總體經濟與財務金融之應用，二版，東華書局，
臺北市，民國一O二年。

指導教授

徐政義

審核日期

2017-7-14

推文