摘要(英) |
Due to the rapid changes in industrial structure in recent years, both private enterprises and government sectors strongly promote the electronic technology industry. As a result of this support, small to medium enterprises that have been the economic foundation of Taiwan, are gradually ignored or forgotten by the wider community. Taiwan′s small and medium-sized enterprises are composed of mostly traditional industries. Due to their operational size, high production cost and inability to compete with larger corporations, this research was conducted to examine how Research and Development, branding and new business strategies can assist small and medium-sized enterprises break through the difficulties they are facing.
This research will consist of a case study to explore the difficulties faced by small and medium-sized enterprises with branding and marketing. Firstly, the basis of this study will be established and drawn from literatures that explore the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises, brand functions and values. Secondly, SWOT analysis and 4P marketing portfolio will be applied to explore the marketing strategy and competitive advantage of the case company. Finally, an analysis on the problems case company faces with marketing presents and provide recommendations to the company for future development using the company′s existing resources and capabilities.
Conclusions were made after analyzing the case study, in order to break the myths about traditional industries and develop into a sustainable corporation. Small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan should not use low-cost labors as their only competitive advantage. They must develop its brand awareness, with flexible marketing network and have advantageous service than their competitors. Furthermore, proper use of strategic alliance between different industries will gradually expand the layout of its market. In addition, product development should not only focus on the technical aspect but also fully grasp the current market demand and fashion trends. Finally, a training program should be implemented for company personnel so that companies may develop goals to further the sustainable development of the company. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文部份:
1 李吉仁、陳振祥、黃恆獎(1996),國際分工與廠商策略選擇/ODM 的策略架構,第五屆產業管理研討會/台灣產業之創新與國際化。
2 杜育麟(2007),參加商展之成本效益分析: 以個案公司為例,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。.
3 沈燕雲、呂秋霞(2001),國際會議規劃與管理,新北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
4 林卿雯(2001),台灣資訊業廠商自創國際品牌績效之因素研討,國立政治大學 企業管理學系碩士論文。
5 林銘松(1996),台灣自創品牌廠商國際行銷通路選擇之研究—以資訊電子業為例,交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
6 林寧(1999),展覽知識與實務,北京:經濟科學出版社。
7 邱志聖(2001),策略行銷分析,台北:智勝文化。
8 洪順慶(2006),台灣品牌競爭力:台灣企業從代工走向自創品牌的策略,台北:天下雜誌股份有限公司。
9 郭振鶴(2005),行銷管理,台北:三民書局。
10 張秀屏(2000),自創品牌策略、核心資源類型對品牌權益績效關係之研究-國際化企業策略聯盟之實證,中原企管所碩士論文。
11 張振明(2004),行銷是什麼,臺北:商周。
12 黃俊英(2002),行銷學,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
13 余朝權(2001),現代行銷管理,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
14 溫月球(1997),如何參加國外展覽,台北:中華民國對外貿易發展協會。
15 施振荣、张玉文(2005),宏碁的世纪变革:淡出制造,成就品牌,台北:中信出版社。
16 黃蕙娟(1990),台灣企業國際上自創品牌策略之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
17 資策會MIC(2000),熱門資訊產品發展趨勢分析,台北市:資策會。
18 黎堅(1989),自創品牌的檢討,台灣經濟研究月刊,12(2),頁19-25。
19 謝佳宏(2003),商展廠商績效及其影響因素之研究,國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系研究所碩士論文。.
20 蕭富峰(2006),行銷策略,台北:華泰文化。
21 經濟部(2016),2016年中小企業白皮書(全),經濟部中小企業處。
二、英文部份:
1 Aaker,D. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.
2 Aaker, D. (2003). The power of the branded differentiator. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 83.
3 Andrews, K. R. (1971). The Concept of corporate strategy. Irwin: Dow Jones
4 Bonoma, T. V. (1983). Get more out of your trade shows. Harvard Business Review, 61(1), 75-83.
5 Bolton, J. E. (1971). Small firms: Report of the commission of inquiry on small firms. London: H.M. Stationary Office.
6 Brown, J. S., & Kotler, B. P. (2004). Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecology letters, 7(10), 999-1014.
7 Czinkota, M. R. & Ilkka. A. R. (1988). International Marketing(5TH Ed.).Fort Worth,Texas: The Dryden Press.
8 Doyle, P. (1990). Building successful brands: the strategic options. Journal of consumer Marketing,7(2), 5-20.
9 Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing,57(1), 1-22.
10 Keller, K. L. (2000). The brand report card.Harvard Business Review,78(1), 147-158.
11 Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th Ed.).New Jersey: Prentice Hall
12 Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective.The Journal of brand managenet ,9(4), 249-261.
13 Kotler, P.& Armstrong, G. (2004). Principles of Marketing(14th Ed.).New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
14 Levy, H. (1978). Equilibrium in an Imperfect Market: A Constraint on the Number of Securities in the Portfolio. The American Economic Review,68(4), 643-658.
15 Lilien, G. L., & Kotler, P. (1983). Marketing decision making: A model-building approach. New York: Harper & Row
16 Philip, K. (1994). Marketing management: analysis planning implementation and control.New York: Prentice Hall
17 Shoham, A. (1992). Selecting and evaluating trade shows. Industrial Marketing Management,21(4), 335-341.
18 Maggard, J. P. (1976). Positioning revisited. Journal of Marketing,40(1), 63-66.
19 Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. J. (1989). The international dimension of branding: strategic considerations and decisions. International Marketing Review,6(3), 22-34
20 Stern, L. W., & El-Ansary, A. I. (1992). Consumer Behavior: An Information Processing Perspective. Eaglewood cliffs,N.J.: Prentice Hall
21 Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long range planning,15(2), 54-66. |