探討認知風格於數位遊戲式英語學習環境對遊戲行為與學習成效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：152

、訪客IP：3.21.248.47

姓名

蔡威群(Wei-Chiun Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

探討認知風格於數位遊戲式英語學習環境對遊戲行為與學習成效之影響
(The Influences of Cognitive Styles on Game Behavior and Learning Performance in the Context of Digital Game-based English Learning)

相關論文

★ 由空間能力探討遊戲式英語學習如何影響學習者之遊戲行為和遊戲表現	★ 從全面性的角度探討先備知識對同儕互評中受評與評分之影響
★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評分組對遊戲製作與評量之影響	★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評對遊戲式學習系統製作與評量之影響
★ 在數位遊戲式學習環境中先備能力對兩種學習內容整合方式之影響：緊密結合 vs. 鬆散結合

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，數位遊戲學習被廣泛應用在教學和學習中。許多研究指出遊戲式學習可以幫助學習者，例如：提升學生的學習成效、增加學習動機等。但因每一個人的背景、需求及學習偏好是不同的，所以尚未確定的是，遊戲式學習系統是否能適用於每一個學習者。因此需要從人因的角度來研究，在人因方面，本研究特別著重於認知風格，因為認知風格與學習者處理和組織資訊的方式有關。過去亦有學者指出認知風格在遊戲式學習扮演著一個關鍵的角色，然而，缺乏研究探討認知風格對英語遊戲學習中的學習行為和學習成效的影響。
為了填補這一空白，本研究旨在解決這個問題，在不同的認知風格中，本研究著重於場依賴與場獨立學習者之間的差異，因為此差異攸關學習者在學習歷程中的訊息處理，因此近十幾年來，探討認知風格影響遊戲式學習的研究有日益增長的趨勢。然而，在該領域的研究卻鮮少探討此差異對數位遊戲英語學習的遊戲行為與學習成效之影響。遊戲行為包含遊戲中各種輔助工具的使用次數和使用時間及遊戲分數，學習成效為學習者的學習前後測的成效差異。為了全面性了解此差異，本研究探討了三個研究問題，即：(a)認知風格學習者如何影響學習者在英語遊戲學習的遊戲行為； (b)認知風格學習者如何影響學習者在英語遊戲學習的學習成效； (c) 認知風格學習者的遊戲行為、遊戲分數與學習成效之相關性。
本研究的結果顯示，不同的認知風格的學習者表現有所不同。對於場獨立學習者而言，輔助工具的使用沒有很大的影響，因為它們善於開發自己的資訊處理結構；相比之下，場依賴學習者則依賴遊戲說明、地圖和其他輔助工具來找到解決問題的方法。此外，場獨立學習者在遊戲學習的學習效率比場依賴學習者來得高，場依賴學習者需要更多的輔助功能才能提高學習效率。
另一方面，場獨立學習者及場依賴學習者表現出相似的學習成效，但與場依賴學習者相比，場獨立學習者的平均成績略有提高。因此，多樣化的關卡學習可能對於場獨立學習者較有利，此外，場獨立學習者顯示出有較佳的第二語言學習能力；相反的，場依賴學習者需要額外的協助來提高他們的學習成效。
最後，結果顯示，不同的認知風格，會使用不同的遊戲策略，場獨立學習者能夠在較少使用輔助工具的情況下，也能夠在遊戲分數得分高於場依賴學習者，而場依賴學習者則偏好外來協助。此可能因為數位遊戲導入不同認知風格學習者偏好的功能可以提升學習者的學習動機，換言之，合適的數位遊戲式英語學習對場獨立與場依賴學習者來學習語言是有用的。
本研究結果有助於深入了解如何建立一個能適應不同認知風格學習者的遊戲式英語學習系統，此外，這些發現可以指導設計師、研究學者、教材設計者與學生如何開發符合每個人需求的數位遊戲，進而達到建立個人化遊戲式學習系統的目標，並促進未來遊戲式學習系統的發展。

摘要(英)

Digital game-based learning has been widely used in teaching and learning for recent years. Many studies have suggested that digital game-based learning can bring benefits to student learning, e.g., the improvement of students′ learning performance and the increase of learning motivation. However, each individual′s background, needs and learning preferences are different so it is doubtful whether digital game-based learning systems can be suitable to every learner. Thus, there is a need to consider individual differences. Among various human factors, this study focuses on cognitive styles, which refer to the way of learners processing and organizing information. Some previous scholars have found that cognitive styles play a key role in digital game-based learning. However, paucity of research examined the impacts of cognitive styles on gaming behavior and learning performance in the context of English game-based learning.
To fill this gap, this study aimed to address this issue. Among a variety of cognitive styles, this study focuses on differences between field-dependent and the field-independent learners. To comprehensively identify their differences, this study examined three research questions, i.e., (a) How the different cognitive styles affect learners ′ game behavior in English game-based learning; (b) How does the different cognitive styles affect learners ′ learning effectiveness in English game-based learning; (c) how gaming behavior and game performance of cognitive styles learners correlated to their learning performance. Game behavior pertained to the frequencies and time of using auxiliary tools while game performance was associated with scores obtained from the game. Learning performance was related to a difference between pre-test scores and post-test scores.
The results of this study showed that different cognitive style groups behaved differently. Regarding field-independent learners, the use of auxiliary tools did not have great impacts because they were good at developing their own information processing structure. In contrast, field-dependent learners relied on game descriptions, maps and other auxiliary tools to find solutions to the quests. Furthermore, field-independent learners demonstrated better learning performance than field-dependent learners, who needed to rely on auxiliary tools to improve their learning performance. .
On the other hand, the results showed that field-independent learners and field-dependent learners demonstrated similar learning performance but field-independent learners slightly demonstrated better mean scores than field-dependent learners. Therefore, multiple quests were beneficial for field-independent learners. In addition, the field-independent learners showed better abilities in second language learning. Conversely, field-dependent learners needed extra support to improve their learning performance.
Finally, the results show that different cognitive styles will use different game strategies, field -independent learners can be less than the use of auxiliary tools, but also in the game score higher than the field-dependent learners, while the field-dependent learners prefer external assistance. This might be because the digital game to introduce different cognitive style learner preferences can improve learner′s motivation. In other words, the appropriate digital game-based English learning was useful for field-independent and field-dependent learners to learn Phonics.
The results of this study can provide deep understandings of how to build a digital game-based learning system that can accommodate learners’ different cognitive styles. Moreover, these findings can guide designers, researchers, textbook designers and students on how to develop appropriate digital games that meet the needs of everyone, and thus achieve the goal of establishing a personalized game-based learning system. By doing so, the development of digital game-based learning system can be promoted in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 數位遊戲式學習
★ 認知風格
★ 遊戲行為
★ 學習成效

關鍵字(英)

★ digital game-based learning
★ Cognitive style
★ game behavior,
★ learning performance

論文目次

摘要 VI
Abstract VIII
致謝 X
目錄 XI
圖目錄 XIII
表目錄 XIV
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究問題 4
1.4 名詞釋義 4
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1 字母拼讀法 6
2.1.1 英語學習的困境 6
2.1.2 字母拼讀法教學 7
2.2 數位遊戲式學習 8
2.2.1數位遊戲式學習的優點 8
2.2.2 數位遊戲式學習的特色 9
2.2.3 數位遊戲式學習的缺點 12
2.3 認知風格 14
2.3.1 「場獨立-場依賴」認知風格之相關研究 15
2.3.2 認知風格在數位遊戲式學習的學習成效 16
第三章系統設計與實作 22
3.1 系統架構 22
3.2 系統特色 23
3.3 系統操作流程 28
第四章研究方法 35
4.1 實驗目的 35
4.2 研究對象 35
4.3 實驗流程 36
4.4 研究工具 38
4.4.1 藏圖測驗 38
4.4.2 學習成效測驗 39
4.4.3 系統使用紀錄檔 40
4.5 資料處理與分析 40
第五章研究結果與討論 43
5.1 認知風格取樣 43
5.2 認知風格與遊戲行為分析 43
5.2.1 輔助工具 43
5.2.2 減少迷失的工具 45
5.2.3 遊戲分數差異分析 50
5.3 認知風格與字母拼讀法學習成效分析 51
5.3.1 學習成效分析 51
5.3.2 學習成效、輔助工具與遊戲分數之相關 53
5.3.3 各遊戲關卡對輔助及減少迷失的工具之比較 56
第六章結論與未來工作 62
6.1 研究成果與結論 62
6.2 研究貢獻 65
6.3 未來研究方向 66
參考文獻 68
中文部分 68
英文部分 71
附錄一學習成效 80

參考文獻

中文部分
丁珮純（2017）。應用Google Cardboard於遊戲式自我組織的學習環境之研究。國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
朱浚維（2013）。探討基於認知風格之客製化遊戲對於學習者推理能力之影響。國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系碩士論文，未出版，台南。
朱惠美（2003）。淺談字母拼讀教學：兒童英語教學面面觀。臺北市：書林。
吳裕益（1987）。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊，7，51-98。
吳靜吉（1974））。藏圖測驗。台北：遠流出版社。
宋倩如（2007）。 EFL嚴肅型遊戲網站設計及使用性評估。中學教育學報，14，185-219。
李銘義、劉乃維（2013）。參與式個案教學的意義與應用。T&D飛訊 2014; 171: 1-25。
依筱雯（1997）。耳到口到眼到學phonics。敦煌英語教學雜誌，15，40-43。
林逸農（2016）。從人因與互動行為模式的觀點探討數位遊戲式學習輔助能源知識。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所博士論文，未出版，桃園。
林煜倫（2012）。探討數位遊戲對不同認知風格學習者與其推理能力之影響。國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系碩士論文，未出版，臺南。
林蕙蓉（2007）。中西文化特質與國小學童英語學習。國教之友，58(4)，11-18。
林蕙蓉（2010）。國小英語字母拼讀教學。國教之友，61(1)，31-37。
林宜親、李冠慧、宋玟欣、柯華葳、曾志朗、洪蘭、阮啟弘 (2011)。以認知神經科學取向探討兒童注意力的發展和學習之關聯。教育心理學報，42(3)，517-541。
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析。SPSS/PASW 資料分析範例解析(第五版)。台北：五南。
柯華葳、游婷雅譯（2001）。M.S. Burns, P. Griffin, & C. E.Snow, NRC著。踏出閱讀的第一步。台北：信誼。
洪文東（2000）。從問題解決的過程培養學生的科學創造力。屏師科學教育，11，52-62
洪文榮、蔡俊彥、施文玲、林郁為、林芳白(2014)。數位遊戲式學習對學生PISA科學能力之影響。
施宥廷（2016）。英語學習動機與學習困擾: 理論的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(7)，111-128。
范含芸、吳佳娣、黃思華、楊忠曉（2016）。導入認知風格之遊戲式學習輔助系統對學習成效影響之探究。教育科技與學習，4:1 2016.01[民105.01] 頁59-86
孫培真、黃柏齊、林永紹（2013）。透過遊戲特性探討數位教學遊戲對學童之專注力影響。線上資源，擷取日期：2013/11/01，網址： http://140.127.82.166/retrieve/18842/23.pdf
張武昌（2011）。台灣的英語教育：現況與省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊，第 69 期，頁 129-144。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北：東華。
張基成、林冠佑 (2016) 。從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習―學習成效，心流體驗與認知負荷。Chinese Journal of Science Education, 24(3)，221-248。
教育部（2002）。創造力教育白皮書。臺北：教育部。
曹逢甫（2007）。在臺灣進行英語字母拼讀法教學：理論與實踐。載於曾守得（主編）英語文教學的奠基與傳承：紀念楊景邁教授。臺北：文鶴。
郭惠玲（民91）。自然發音法對國中輕度智能障礙學生在英語字彙學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台南。
陳木金（2009）。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。教學發展中心電子報。取自： http://140.115.197.17/rdnewsletter/cover.php?action=show&cid=40&id=25
陳似瑋、徐新逸（2009）。行動遊戲學習之現況與發展。朝陽科技大學：資訊科技國際研討會。
陳映秀（2004）。國民中小學英語教師對於英語學習低成就學生補救教學之看法與實施現況。國立台灣師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳綵菁、邱榮輝、陳志豪、張宇樑（2013）。數學遊戲融入教學在國小三年級學生除法概念學習之應用。桃園創新學報，33，313-330。
陳慧芬（2012）。希望理論在提升國小六年級英語學習低成就學生學習成效之行動研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
鄭茹蓉（2008）。輕鬆記單字。誠正之心，第十二期。2011年12月24日取自http://www.ctg.moj.gov.tw/public/Data/726135048242.doc
謝淑娟（2001）。桃園縣國民小學英語教學實施現況之研究。國立新竹師範學院學校行政碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
謝欽舜（1997）。暢談發音教學。台北：師德教育訓練顧問公司。

英文部分
Arena, D. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Experience and explanation: Using videogames to prepare students for formal instruction in statistics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 538-548.
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2003). A child becomes a reader: Kindergarten through grade 3. Proven ideas from research for parents.
August, D., McCardle, P., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Developing literacy in English language learners: Findings from a review of the experimental research. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 490-498.
Al-Bayed, M. H., & Naser, S. S. A. (2017). An intelligent tutoring system for health problems related to addiction of video game playing. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, 2(1), 4-10.
Arnold, S. S., Barton, B., McArthur, G., North, K. N., & Payne, J. M. (2016). Phonics training improves reading in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: A prospective intervention trial. The Journal of pediatrics, 177, 219-226.
Birsh, J. R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Brookes Publishing Company. PO Box 10624, Baltimore, MD 21285.
Blevins, W. (1998). Phonics from A to Z: A practical guide. Scholastic Inc..
Tinajero, C., Lemos, S. M., Araújo, M., Ferraces, M. J., & Páramo, M. F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of brazilian university students. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(1), 105-113.
Chang, B., Chen, S. & Jhan, S.N. (2015). The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers & Education, 88, 399-407.
Chapelle, C. A., & P. Green. 1992. Field independence/dependence in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 42, 47-83.
Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2016). Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Computers & Education, 103, 99-113.
Chen, S. Y, & Ford, N. I- (1998). Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: An individual differences approach. international journal of Knowledge Organization, 25(3), 67-78.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. (2010). Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 379-387.
Chen, Y. C. (2017). Empirical Study on the Effect of Digital Game-Based Instruction on Students’ Learning Motivation and Achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3177-3187.
Chuang, T. Y., & Chen, W. F. (2007). Digital Games for Cognitive Learning: A Pilot Study. Journal of Scientific and Technological Studies, 41(1), 17-27.
Chuang, T. Y., & Chen, W. F. (2009). Effect of Computer-Based Video Games on Children: An Experimental Study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 1–10.
Clark, R. E. (2007). Learning from serious games? Arguments, evidence, and research suggestions. Educational Technology, 47(3), 56–59.
Cooper, D. H., Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2002). The contribution of oral language skills to the development of phonological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 399–416.
DeTure, M. (2004) Cognitive style and self-efficacy: predicting student success in online distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18, 21–38
Dawe, L. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematics in a multi-cultural classroom-guidelines for teachers. Australian Mathematics Teacher, The, 72(3), 33.
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Heide, J., & Tosca, S. (2006). Thoughts on learning in games and designing educational computer games. Understanding video games. Retrieved from: http://game-research.com/index.php/articles/thoughts-on-learning-in-games-and-designing-educational-computer-games/
Ehrman, M. E. (1997). Field independence, field dependence, and field sensitivity. Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom, 62-70.
Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156-167.
Eseryel, D., Law, V., Ifenthaler, D., Ge, X., & Miller, R. (2014). An investigation of the interrelationships between motivation, engagement, and complex problem solving in game-based learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 42-53.
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5-22.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.
Gee, J. P. (2007). Why are video games good for learning. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved, 23.
Gresham, P., & Gibson-Langford, L. (2012). Competition, games, technology - boys are loving English. English in Australia, 47(1), 81-89.
Huang, L. Y. (2014). Investigating Mixed-Ability Teaching in Taiwanese Primary Schools. International Education Studies, 7(5), 85.
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179.
Ho, S.-C., Hsieh, S.-W., Sun, P.-C., & Chen, C.-M. (2017). To Activate English Learning: Listen and Speak in Real Life Context with an AR Featured U-Learning System. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 176–187.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tam, K. P., Lai, Y. H., & Liu, L. C. (2012). Effects of cognitive style on digital jigsaw puzzle performance: A GridWare analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 920-928.
Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). A cognitive style perspective to handheld devices: customization vs. personalization. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1). 1-22
Hsieh, S. W. (2011). Effects of cognitive styles on an MSN virtual learning companion system as an adjunct to classroom instructions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 161.
Hsieh, Y. H., Lin, Y. C., & Hou, H. T. (2016). Exploring the role of flow experience, learning performance and potential behavior clusters in elementary students′ game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 178-193.
Huang, Y. M., Hwang, J. P., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Matching/mismatching in web-based learning: a perspective based on cognitive styles and physiological factors. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1198-1214.
Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., Lai, C. L., & Hsueh, C. J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in EFL students’ English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26–42.
Hwang, G. J., Yin, P. Y., Wang, T. T., Tseng, Judy C. R., & Hwang, G. H. (2008). An enhanced genetic approach to optimizing auto-reply accuracy of an e-learning system. Computers & Education, 51(1), 337-353.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students′ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639-657.
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 13-24.
Kaewprapan, W., & Suksakulchai, S. (2008). Student Motivation and Attitude Towards Virtual Versus Traditional Learning Based On Cognitive Styles. In EDU- COM International Conference (pp. 19–21).
Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning.
Kuo, F. R., Hwang, G. J., Chen, S. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2012). A cognitive apprenticeship approach to facilitating web-based collaborative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4).
Lai. (1998). The Effects of Visual Display on Analogies Using Computer-Based Learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 151-152.
Lai. (2000). Influence of Audio-Visual Presentations on Learning Abstract Concepts. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 199-206.
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., & Depickere, A. (2005), What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system, Computers & Education, 45(1), 1-19.
Lee, J. (2011). Taiwanese Young Learners′ English Phonological Awareness: Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Relations to Word Reading and Spelling (Doctoral dissertation).
Lin, Y. L. (2009). The effect of phonics instruction on word recognition and reading comprehension among EFL low-achieving learners in a Taiwanese junior high school. Journal of the Educational Research, 5, 293-355.
Liu, C. C., Cheng, Y. B. & Huang, C. W. (2011). The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1907-1918. (SSCI).
Mefoh, P. C., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. C., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problem solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
Mahmood, T., & Gondal, M. B. (2017). Effect of School Environment on Students’ Achievement: Cross Comparison of Urdu and English Medium Classes in Punjab Province. Pakistan Journal of Education, 34(1), 67-80.
McDaniel, R., & Kenny, R. (2013). Evaluating the relationship between cognitive style and pre-service teachers’ preconceived notions about adopting console video games for use in future classrooms. (IJGBL). International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 3(2), 55-76.
McLhuan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Nova Iorque: McGrow-Hill.
Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. Individuality in learning, 4, 22.
Mohammed, P., & Mohan, P. (2007). Sugar coated learning: Incorporating intelligence into principled learning games. Proceedings of Learning with Games, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Mohammed, P., & Mohan, P. (2007). Contextualizing learning objects using ontologies. Computational Intelligence, 23(3), 339-355.
Negahi, M., Nouri, N., & Khoram, A. (2015). The study of learning styles, thinking styles, and English language academic self-efficacy among the students of Islamic Azad university of Behbahan considering their field of study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1722.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes: Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2017). Bilingual children′s long‐term outcomes in English as a second language: language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental science, 20(1), 10.
Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based learning: Latest evidence and future directions. NFER Research Programme: Innovation in Education. Slough: NFER.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pivec, M., Dziabenko, O., & Schinnerl, I. (2004). Game-based learning in universities and lifelong learning:"UniGame: social skills and knowledge training" game concept. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(1), 14-26.
Raptis, G. E., Fidas, C., & Avouris, N. (2016, July). A qualitative analysis of the effect of wholistic-analytic cognitive style dimension on the cultural heritage game playing. In Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), 2016 7th International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Riding R., Cheema I. (1991). Cognitive styles— An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193–216.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (2013). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. Routledge.
Robinson, D. (1997). 3003, Becoming a Translator: An Introduction to the′theory and Practice of Translation. Revised second edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Sampson, D. G., & Panoutsopoulos, H. (2012). A study on exploiting commercial digital games into school context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 15-27.
Schmitz B., Klemke R., Walhout J., Specht M. (2015). Attuning a mobile simulation game for school children using a designbased research approach. Computers and education, 81, 35-48.
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218
Solak, E., & Bayar, A. (2015). Current Challenges in English Language Learning in Turkish EFL Context. Online Submission, 2(1), 106-115.
Spires, H. A., Rowe, J. P., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2011). Problem solving and game-based learning: Effects of middle grade students′ hypothesis testing strategies on learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(4), 453-472.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, C. J., & Hong, T. W. (2017). Experiencing the Analects of Confucius: An experiential game-based learning approach to promoting students′ motivation and conception of learning. Computers & Education, 110, 143-153.
Tan, P. H., Ling, S. W., & Ting, C. T.(2007).Adaptive Digital Game-Based Learning Framework. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Digital interactive media in entertainment and arts, 142-146.
Theodoropoulos, A., Antoniou, A., & Lepouras, G. (2016). How do different cognitive styles affect learning programming? Insights from a game-based approach in Greek schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(1), 3.
Tsai, C. H., & Yen, J. C. (2016, September). Effect of an Equivalent Fractions Digital Game on the Learning Outcome, Motivation, and Flow Types among Elementary School Students. In Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 2016 International Conference on (pp. 70-75). IEEE.
Tsai, F. H., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback types on game-based formative assessment in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 81, 259-269.
Valbuena, A. C. (2014). Tucker signing as a phonics instruction tool to develop phonemic awareness in children. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 8, 66-82.
Wang, Y. S., Chen, C. M., Hong, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2013, July). Interactive augmented reality game for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. In Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), 2013 IEEE 37th Annual (pp. 391-396). IEEE.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1976). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. ETS Research Report Series, 84(4), 661-89.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1975). Field‐dependent and field‐independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. ETS Research Report Series, 1975(2), 1-64.
Wouters, P., & van Oostendorp, H. (2017). Overview of Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. In Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games (pp. 1-16). Springer International Publishing.
Yang, T. C., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students′ learning styles and cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185.
Bakar, Z. A., & Ali, R. Cognitive Styles in Students’ Learning and Quality Education: An Exploration of the Fundamental Issues Underpinning. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013).

指導教授

楊接期陳攸華(Jie Chi Yang Sherry Y. Chen)

審核日期

2017-11-14

推文