||1 Baggett, J.S., Jimenez, J., & Kravchenko, A.G. Resolution requirements in large-eddy simulations of shear flows. Annual research briefs, 51-66, 1997.|
2 Barth, T.J. Aspects of unstructured grids and finite-volume solvers for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. J. In AGARD, Special Course on Unstructured Grid Methods for Advection Dominated Flows 61 p (SEE N92-27671 18-34), 1992.
3 Biscarini, C., Di Francesco, S., Manciola, P., CFD modelling approach for dam break flow studies. J. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14.4: 705, 2010.
4 Cabot, W., & Moin, P. Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 63(1), 269-291. 2000.
5 Carman, P. C. Fluid flow through granular beds. J. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 75, S32-S48, 1997.
6 Chanson, H. Application of the method of characteristics to the dam break wave problem. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 47(1), 41-49. 2009.
7 Chanson, H. Applications of the Saint-Venant equations and method of characteristics to the dam break wave problem. 2005.
8 Cheng, D., Zhao, X. Z., Zhang, D. K., & Chen, Y. Numerical study of dam-break induced tsunami-like bore with a hump of different slopes. China Ocean Engineering, 31(6), 683-692. 2017.
9 Daru. N.P., Large eddy simulation of dam-break flows through porous obstacles. 2017.
10 Dean, R.G., & Dalrymple, R.A. Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists (Vol. 2). World scientific publishing Co Inc. 1991.
11 Dewals, B., Bruwier, M., Erpicum, S., Pirotton, M., & Archambeau, P. Energy conservation properties of Ritter solution for idealized dam break flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 54(5), 581-585. 2016.
12 Fraccarollo, L., & Capart, H. Riemann wave description of erosional dam-break flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 461, 183-228. 2002.
13 Ganesan, T., & Awang, M. Large Eddy Simulation (LES) for Steady-State Turbulent Flow Prediction. In Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics, pp. 17-32. Springer International Publishing, 2015.
14 Gullbrand, J., & Chow, F. K. The effect of numerical errors and turbulence models in large-eddy simulations of channel flow, with and without explicit filtering. J. Fluid Mechanics, 495, 323-341. 2003.
15 Hu, K.C., Hsiao, S.C., Hwung, H.H., & Wu, T.R. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of the interaction of dam-break waves and porous media. J. Advances in Water Resources, 47, 14-30, 2012.
16 Jensen, B., Jacobsen, N. G., & Christensen, E. D. Investigations on the porous media equations and resistance coefficients for coastal structures. Coastal Engineering, 84, 56-72. 2014.
17 Korobkin, A., & Yilmaz, O. The initial stage of dam-break flow. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 63(2-4), 293-308. 2009.
18 LaRocque, L.A., Imran, J., & Chaudhry, M.H. Experimental and numerical investigations of two-dimensional dam-break flows. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 139(6), 569-579, 2012.
19 Leonard, A. Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Advances in geophysics, 18: 237-248, 1975.
20 Lin, C. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of nonlinear sloshing. 2017.
21 Lin, C., Yeh, P. H., Kao, M. J., Yu, M. H., Hsieh, S. C., Chang, S. C., ... & Tsai, C. P. (2014). Velocity Fields in Near-Bottom and Boundary Layer Flows in Prebreaking Zone of a Solitary Wave Propagating over a 1: 10 Slope. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 141(3), 04014038.
22 Lin, P., & Li, C.W. Wave–current interaction with a vertical square cylinder. Ocean Engineering, 30(7), 855-876, 2003.
23 Linton, D., Gupta, R., Cox, D., van de Lindt, J., Oshnack, M. E., & Clauson, M. Evaluation of tsunami loads on wood-frame walls at full scale. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(8), 1318-1325. 2012.
24 Liu, P.F., Wu, T.R., Raichlen, F., Synolakis, C.E., & Borrero, J.C. Runup and rundown generated by three-dimensional sliding masses. J. fluid Mechanics, 536, 107-144, 2005.
25 Liu, D., & Lin, P. A numerical study of three-dimensional liquid sloshing in tanks. J. Computational physics, 227(8), 3921-3939, 2008.
26 Rider, W.J., & Kothe, D.B. Reconstructing volume tracking. J. Computational physics, 141(2), 112-152. 1998.
27 Smagorinsky, J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Monthly weather review, 91(3), 99-164, 1963.
28 Soares, F.S., ZECH, Y., Experimental study of dam-break flow against an isolated obstacle. J. Hydraulic Research, 45.sup1: 27-36, 2007.
29 Soares, F.S., ZECH, Y., Dam-break flow through an idealized city. J. Hydraulic Research, 46.5: 648-658, 2008.
30 Stansby, P.K., Chegini, A., Barnes, T.C.D., The initial stages of dam-break flow. J. Fluid Mechanics, 370: 203-220, 1998.
31 Tanaka, N. Vegetation bioshields for tsunami mitigation: review of effectiveness, limitations, construction, and sustainable management. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 5(1), 71-79. 2009.
32 Wang, Y., Liang, Q., Kesserwani, G., & Hall, J. W. (2011). A 2D shallow flow model for practical dam-break simulations. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 49(3), 307-316.
33 Wu, T.R. A numerical study of three-dimensional breaking waves and turbulence effects. 2004.
34 Wu, T.R., Liu, P., Numerical study on the three-dimensional dam-break bore interacting with a square cylinder. J. Nonlinear Wave Dynamics. p. 281-303, 2009.
35 Wu, W., & Wang, S. S. One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable beds. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 133(1), 48-58. 2007.
36 Xu, F.G., Yang, X.G., Zhou, J.W., & Hao, M.H. Experimental research on the dam-break mechanisms of the Jiadanwan landslide dam triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake in China. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.