博碩士論文 105124602 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:9 、訪客IP:3.145.17.46
姓名 阿法瑞(Muhamad Afifudin Alfarisi)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 哲學研究所在職專班
論文名稱 Imam Al-Ghazali的觀點下看家族學中的祖靈
(The Genealogy of Spirit In Imam Al-Ghazali′s Spirit)
相關論文
★ 論謝勒的情感現象學與人格理論— 一種文本詮釋的進路★ 佛教對「心身關係」中「心理疾病」本質的詮解 ──以廣義的心識哲學為中心
★ 康德的《單?理性限度?的宗教》之哲學研究★ 人格同一與道德責任:從初期佛教聖典對神經科學的挑戰的回應
★ 存在哲學諮商之探討─以歐文‧亞隆為例★ 德瓦Ruci的故事的意義, 根據哈吉Mutamakkin說 (Cebolek 書中的闡釋學研究及其與伊斯蘭教的關係)
★ 民族的身體-空間:以中國武術與漢文化民間信仰為核心的開展★ 活用建築哲學
★ 盧梭《愛彌兒》的教育理念在小學現場實踐的可能★ 從羅爾斯的《正義論》探討在國小教育中的公平議題
★ 泰王普美蓬的「適足經濟哲學」之研究---依據佛教倫理與中道思想來解析★ THE MEANING OF MYSTICAL CULTURE IN THE KEJAWEN COMMUNITY ACCORDING TO R. NGANEHI RANGGAWARSITA′S SULUK SALOKA JIWA
★ 從女性主義視野看商業代理孕母爭議★ 台灣保全業經營者倫理思考之建構
★ 尼采早期的歷史思想★ An Outline of the Phenomenology of Discursivity
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 摘要
過去Imam al-Ghazali的研究著眼於祖靈的家譜概念,利用公式將家譜概念作為一種方法。作者發現,在al-Ghazali的研究中,祖靈的解讀不同於外行人僅僅是對生命力量的理解。按照al-Ghazali的解釋,祖靈是一種神聖的元素(Rabbaniyyah);人類是為生命而被創造的,當他們死亡時,它意味著靈魂將回到創造者(上帝)。該研究使用系譜學方法來找出已被理解的事物的起源,而本研究將單獨預測歷史。希望家譜學能夠揭示al-Ghazali作品中精神敘述的意義。
過去文獻中,作者在Carl Gustav Jung中解釋「靈魂」概念。而專注於「靈魂」概念是因為它在al-Ghazali「靈」概念之間非常接近。因此,榮格理論中的「靈魂」將被認為是al-Ghazali精神的原始模型,以描述精神本身。
同時,Al-Ghazali在古蘭經的基礎上建立了一種名為Spirit的價值精神,當然,該想法也適用於上述概念,強調靈魂也是「絕對」由祖靈所構成的,而Al-Ghazali將宗教與祖靈兩者的概念合併。
al-Ghazali的概念描述是建立在古蘭經和聖訓的精神之上。而 al-Ghazali將聖靈分為三個部分:Nafs的力量(祖靈),Qolb的力量(靈魂)和Aql的力量(智力)。最終,這個概念與伊斯蘭教的末世論敘事有關,從而在人類社會中創造了伊斯蘭神秘主義傳統。
此外,為了理解現有解釋背後的含義,對祖靈的理解將立基於在系譜學上。作者希望在基於al-Ghazali的視角對祖靈的理解中找到闡述靈魂的意義,並且旨在進一步回應伊斯蘭學者們對於實證現代主義的批判性研究。
摘要(英) The research focuses on the genealogical concept of the Spirit in the perspective of Imam al-Ghazali. The formulation makes use of the Genealogy concepts as an approach. The author finds that in the work of al-Ghazali, he explains the Spirit as differing from the understanding of the layman who considers that the Spirit is merely the power of life. The concept of the Spirit according to al-Ghazali is a divine element (Rabbaniyyah); human beings are created for life and when they die, it means the return to the creator (God). The study uses the Genealogical approach to finding the origins of what has been understood, but we settle on presupposing the history alone. Genealogy is expected to reveal the meaning of the spiritual narration contained in Ghazali′s works.
Author would be explaining the concept of Personality in Carl Gustav Jung. Focus on “Psyche” concept because it is very close between the concept of the spirit in Al-Ghazali. Hencefore, Psyche in Jung’s theory would be figuring as raw model of spirit in Al-Ghazali to describing of Spirit itself.
Meanwhile, Al-Ghazali establishes the Spirits of a value called Spirit based on the Qur’an, certainly, the side of the proposal is also applied in its concepts, emphasizing the “absolute” also done by it, and Al-Ghazali merged with Religion and Spiritualism.
The al-Ghazali’s concept described spirit based on Qur’an and Sunnah. Then, al-Ghazali divided the Spirit into three parts: Potency of Nafs (Soul), Potency of Qolb (heart), and Potency of Aql (intellectual). Later, the concept is connected to the eschatological narrative in the Islamic Religion, thus creating an Islamic Mysticism tradition in society.
Furthermore, the understanding of the Spirit will be sought genealogically for the purpose of understanding the meaning behind the existing interpretations. The author wishes to find the meaning of spiritual narrative based on the understanding of the Spirit in al-Ghazali′s perspective, and aims to further pursue a critical study in response to modernism practiced by some Islamic scholars.
關鍵字(中) ★ 祖靈
★ 家族學中
★ Imam Al-Ghazali
★ 伊斯蘭哲學
關鍵字(英) ★ Spirit
★ Genealogy
★ Imam Al-Ghazali
★ Islamic Philosophy
論文目次 Contents
Power of Attorney ii
Approval iii
Verification iv
Abstract v
Dedication vii
Quotation viii
Acknowledgments ix
Contents x
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 3
1.2 Questions and Limit of the Research 3
1.3 Aims of the Research 3
1.4 Literatures Review 3
1.5 Research Method 4
1.6 Basic Theory 5

2. BIOGRAPHY OF AL-GHAZALI’S LIFE 7
2.1 Background Thought of al-Ghazali . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1 Religious and Intellectual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.2 AL-Ghazali’s Early Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 The Works of al-Ghazali . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3. THE SPIRIT AND ISLAMIC SPIRITUALITY 17
3.1 The Principles of Spirituality in Islam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1.1 The Essence of Qur’an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.1.2 The Qur’anic Presence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.1.3 The Sacred History in the Qur’an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.4 The Qur’an: Source of Islamic Thought and Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.5 The Qur’an as Element of Spiritual Path Way and Art in Islam . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2 Sufism: The Part of Spiritualistic Tradition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.3 The Spiritual Practice in Al-Ghazali . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4. GENEALOGY OF SPIRIT IN AL-GHAZALI’S THOUGHTS 30
4.1 The Origins of Spirit 30
4.1.1 Spirit as Psyche . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.1.2 In Personality of the Spirit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.1.3 Spirit: Nafs, Aql, Qolb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.1.3.1 The Spirit as Nafs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.1.3.2 The Spirit as Aql . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.1.3.3 The Spirit as Qalb (heart) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.2 Spiritual Consciousness 44
4.2.1 The Concept of Consciousness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.2.2 The Concept of Spirituality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
4.2.3 The Spiritual Consciousness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.3 Qolb (Heart) as Peak of The Spirit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5. CONCLUSION 59
6. REFERENCES 63
參考文獻 REFERENCES
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid (1993). The Revival of Religious Learnings Imam Ghazzali’s Ihya Ulum-Id-Din, Translated by Fazl-Ul-Karim, Pakistan: Darul-Ishaat.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid, (1958). Al-Ghazali’s Tahafut Al-Falasifah (Incoherence of The Philosopher), Translated by Sabih Ahmad Kamali, Lahore: B. A. Dar, Secretary Publications.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid (First Published: 2010). Kitab Sharh Aja’ib al-Qolb: The Marvels of The Heart, Book 21 of Ihya’ Ulum al-din; The Revival of The Religious Science, Translated from Arabic with an Introduction and Notes by Walter James Skellie with a Foreword by T.J Winter, Canada: Library of Congress Control
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid, (1962). The Book of Knowledge, Translation the Kitab Al-Ilm by Nabih Amin Faris, New Delhi: Islamic Book Service.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid, (2011). Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali (1058-1111), Curator: Sean Swanick, Canada: McGill University Press.
Almond, Ian, (2004). Sufism and Deconstruction: A Comparative Study of Derrida and Ibn ‘Arabi, London: Routledge.
Al-Baqillānī’s Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, (1950). Studied by G. von Grunebaum, A Tenth-Century Document of Arabic Literary Theory and Criticism: The Section on the Poetry of al-Baqillānīʾs Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Berry, Ralph (2004). The Research Project “How to Write It”, London and New York: Routledge.
Buckhart, T (1976). The Art of Islam, London: Festival of the World of Islam
Cherif, Mustapha (2008). Islam and the West: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida, Translated by Teresa Lavender Fagan with a Foreword By Giovanna Borradori, Chicago, and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Corbin, H (1971). En Islam iranien, Paris: Gallimard
Farrer, D.S (2009). Shadow of the Prophet: Martial Arts and Sufi Mysticism, UK: Springer.
Hegel, G.W.F (2010). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel The Science of Logic, Translated and Edited by George Di Giovanni, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit, New York: Oxford.
Hossein Nasr, Seyyed (1978). An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines, Britain: Thames and Hudson Ltd
Izutsu, Toshihiko, (1964). God and Man In the Qur’an: Semantics of the Qur’anic Weltanschauung, Japan: Keio University Publishing.
Internet Source: https://www.ghazali.org/oeuvre/ maintenance by Mohammad Hozien
Internet Sources: https://www.urbandictionary.com
Jung, C. Gustav, (2004). Four Archetypes: Mother, Rebirth, Trickster, London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Jung, C. Gustav, (1933). Modern Man in Search of A Soul, Trans. W.S Dell and Carry F. Baynes, America: A Harvest Book & Harcourt, Inc.
Kearney, R & Rainwater, M (1996). The Continental Philosophy, London, and New York: Routledge
Kumar, Ranjit (2011). Research Methodology; a step-by-step guide for beginners, London: Sage Publisher.
Lings, M (1976). The Quranic Art of Calligraphy and Illumination, London: Festival of The World of Islam
McClain, E (1981). Meditations through the Quran: Tonal Images in an Oral Culture, York Beach: Nicolas Hays
Nasr, H.N (1987) Islamic Art and Spirituality, New York: State University of New York Press
Natsoulas, T. (1999). The Concepts of Consciousness: The General State Meaning. Journal for the Theory for Social Behavior, New York: Blackwell Publisher
Palmer, Richard E (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer, USA: Northwestern University Press.
Piedmont, R. (2001). Spiritual transcendence and scientific study of spirituality. Journal of Rehabilitation
Ricoeur, Paul, (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, America: Texas Christian University Press.
Schuon, F (1979). Understanding Islam, Trans. D. M. Matheson, London: Allen & Unwin
Schuon, F & Smith, W.C (1984). The Transcendent Unity of Religions, trans. P. Townsend, Weathon, IL: Theosophical Publishing House
Schimmel, A. N (1984). Calligraphy and Islamic Culture, New York: New York University Press
Stewart, John. (2000). The Unity of Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Spirit”: A Systematic of Interpretation, America: Northwestern University Press.
Watt, W. Montgomery (1952). The Faith and Practice of Al-Ghazali, London: George Allen and Unwin LTD.
Watt, W. Montgomery, (1963). Muslim Intellectual: A Study of Al-Ghazali, America: Edinburg University Press.
指導教授 孫雲平(Sun, Yun-Ping) 審核日期 2018-7-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明