| 摘要(英) |
The main maintenance approach are surface treatments on the Taiwan National Freeway. However, it cannot totally solve the pavement structure damaged problems caused by insufficient strength of the pavement to withstand the current traffic volume. Periodic assessments are necessary to confirm whether the strength of the pavement is sufficient or not, there is no any official criterion to establish the freeway pavement structure assessment in Taiwan. According to the AASHTO “Guide for Design of Pavement Structures”, it is necessary to establish these criteria and check the load bearing capacity of pavement, maintenance cost analysis, and strength analysis to detect the remaining service life of pavement. Therefore, this study established the standard of pavement structure evaluation for Taiwan National Freeway No. 3 from km 83 to 89 uses Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) and Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) traffic volume data to. FWD was popularly used abroad as a pavement structure deflection instrument and significance influenced by temperature. This study carried out a temperature calibration analysis of pavement deflection used Resilient Modulus (Mr) at various temperatures by ABAQUS and Statistics. The developed ETC big data used to calculate the number and types of vehicles, with standard axis load conversion factors for calculate ESALs. At last, the ESALs and FWD correction deflection were used to evaluate the current pavement structure capacity. According to the results, temperature calibration and pavement structure evaluation criteria established by this study could be used on the pavement structure our Taiwan freeway. Based on above, the pavement structure evaluation criteria of this study are worthy of further study. |
| 參考文獻 |
[1]宋侑伶，「重載交通荷重對路面破壞分析模式之建立」，國立台灣大學，博士論文，2003。
[2]林樹豪，「ABAQUS 於柔性鋪面分析之建立與驗證」，德霖學報，第十九期，第157-174 頁，2005。
[3] 翁逸偉，「鋼床鈑鋪面配置原則及較適鋪面材料之探討」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2011。
[4]陳永林，「HDM-4運用於國內高速公路養護管理之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2003。
[5]陳艾懃，「重型車輛載重限制之研究」，國立台灣大學，博士論文 ，2002。
[6]陳威東，「交通量與氣候影響國道抗滑值與交維方案之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2014。
[7]陳柏瑞，「落重式撓度儀於台灣國道鋪面撓度校估模式之建立」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2008。
[8]翁逸偉，「鋼床鈑鋪面破壞分析及較適鋪面材料之探討」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2011。
[9]馮天正，「三維有限元素應用於柔性鋪面之非線性分析」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2000。
[10]溫建源，「撓度回算值校正係數建立之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2001。
[11]楊其融，「國道鋪面經常性整修路段結構析之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2014。
[12]廖啟州，「國道柔性鋪面溫度分佈對鋪面破壞與服務年限之影響」，國立中央大學，博士論文，2009。
[13]交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局，「國道1號高雄端至仁德系統北上路段鋪面數據分析計畫成果報告」，成果報告書，2016。
[14]劉明樓，呂雨蓉，「三維有限元素法於柔性路面之破壞分析研究」，技術學刊，第二十卷，第三期，第269-278 頁，2005。
[15]劉明樓，黃建維，「三維有限元素法於柔性路面之分析」，技術學刊，第十六卷，第二期，第277-285 頁，2001。
[16]鐘偉逞，「應用衝擊式撓度儀觀測路面結構強度之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2000。
[17]AASHTO. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C, 1993.
[18]ASTM D4694 - 09, “Standard Test Method for Deflections with a Falling-Weight-Type Impulse Load Device.” ASTM Designation, 2015.
[19]ASTM D4695 - 03, “Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements.” ASTM Designation, 2015.
[20]ASTM D5858, “Standard Guide for Calculating In Situ Equivalent Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials Using Layered Elastic Theory.” ASTM Designation, 2015.
[21]Federal Aviation Administration 150/5370-11B, “Use of Nondestructive Testing in the Evaluation of Airport Pavements.” U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
[22]Guangming Wang and Reynaldo Roque., “Evaluation of truck tire types on near-surface pavement response based on finite element analysis.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, pp. 203-211, 2011.
[23]Laxmikanth Premkumar, Paul M. Dalbey, William R. Vavrik, “Using Pavement Conditions and Structural Evaluations to Optimize Construction Haul Routes for Wind Farm Development” International Conference on Transportation and Development, ASCE, pp. 227-237 , 2016.
[24]LTPP, LTPP Manual for Falling Weight Deflectiometer Measurements Perational Field Guideline. FHWA-HRDI-13, 2000.
[25]Mohammad Hossein Shafiee1, Leila Hashemian, Alireza Bayat., “Seasonal Analysis of Flexible Pavement Response to Falling Weight Deflectometer” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol.8 No.5, pp. 346-352, 2015.
[26]Hao Yin., ” Simulation of Flexible Pavement Response to FWD Loads:A Mechanistic Approach” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, pp. 257-266, 2012.
[27]The Asphalt Institute. Asphalt Overlays for Highway and Street Pavement Rehabilitation, Third Edition, 2000.
[28]Thorbjorg Saevarsdottir and Sigurdur Erlingsson., ” Modelling of responses and rutting profile of a flexible pavement structure in a heavy vehicle simulator test” Road Materials and Pavement Design , Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017.
[29]Tyler Dawson, Gilbert Baladi, Gopikrishna Musunuru, Michael Prohaska, Yan Jane Jiang., “Global Procedure for Temperature Adjustment of Measured Pavement Deflection Data” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2589, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. pp. 146–153, 2016.
[30]Ullidtz, P., “The Use of Dynamic Plate Loading Tests in Design of Overlays” The Conference on Road Engineering in Asia and Australia, Kuala Lumpur , 1973.
[31]Uzan, J., “Computer Program MODULUS” Appendix E, NCHRP Project 10-27, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, pp. E1-E22, 1986. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit