大學生自我調整學習、學習情緒及多工對於學習成效之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：40

、訪客IP：18.218.190.118

姓名

陳以如(I-Ju Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

大學生自我調整學習、學習情緒及多工對於學習成效之探討
(An investigation of college students′ self-regulated learning, learning emotion and multitasking on learning outcomes)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在大學生的自由學習環環境中，學生具備自我學習能力變得很重要，而近年來，因資訊科技快速發展，可攜式裝置非常普及，特別是在大學生年輕的一代中，攜帶行動裝置於課堂上使用已成普及，故了解學生使用情形，是教學上重要的議題。因此，本研究探討大學生使用自我調整學習策略的程度、多工情形與學習成效相關的情況及學習情緒的調節效果。
本研究採用問卷調查法，以國立中央大學大學部的學生為調查對象，進行便利抽樣並收回463份問卷。本研究經過資料分析後，所得的結果如下:
1. 學生的自我調整學習策略會正向顯著影響學習成效
2. 學生在課堂上與學習不相關的多工會負向顯著影響學習成效
3. 學生在課堂外與學習相關的多工會正向顯著影響學習成效
根據上述結果，本研究建議未來教師進行課堂教學時，以較生動的方式提高學生對於學習的正向學習情緒。課堂上學生進行多工行為，教師應明訂規則，禁止學生進行與學習不相關的多工；而在課堂外，教師可以提供與課堂相關的補充教材，讓學生於課堂外進行查看與搜尋，進而提升學生的學習成效。
關

摘要(英)

In the free learning environment of college student, it becomes important for students to have self-learning skills. Recently, due to the rapid development of information technology, portable devices are very popular, especially in the young generation of college students, the use of mobile devices in classrooms has become popular. Therefore, understanding student use is an important issue in teaching. Therefore, this study explored the degree of college students′ use of self-regulated learning strategies, the situation of multitasking, learning outcomes and the effect of learning emotion adjustment.
This study used questionnaire survey method. Valid data collected from 463 college students of National Central University. Several findings of this study include:
1. Students′ self-regulated learning strategies can significantly affect learning outcomes.
2. Students′ multitasking unrelated to learning in the classroom have a negative significant impact on learning outcomes.
3. Students′ multitasking related to learning out of the classroom have a positive significant impact on learning outcomes.
According to the results, Students′ multitasking behavior in the classroom, teachers should make rules that prohibit students from doing multitasking that is not related to learning. Teachers can provide supplementary materials that are relevant to the classroom, allowing students to view and search outside the classroom to improve student learning outcomes.

關鍵字(中)

★ 自我調整學習
★ 正向學習情緒
★ 多工
★ 學習成效

關鍵字(英)

★ Self-regulated learning
★ Positive learning emotion
★ Multitasking
★ Learning outcome

論文目次

目錄
謝辭 . .. . i
摘要 .. .. .. .. ii
Abstract .. .. .. . iii
目錄 .. .. .. . iv
圖目錄 .. .. .. vi
表目錄 .. .. .. .. vii
一、緒論 .. .. .. . 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 .. .. . 1
1-2 研究目的 .. .. .. .. 2
1-3 研究程序 .. .. .. .. 2
1-4 論文內容 .. .. .. .. 3
二、文獻探討 .. .. .. .. 4
2-1 自我調整學習策略 (Self-Regulated Learning Strategy) 4
2-1-1 自我調整學習策略架構 .. .. .. 5
2-2 學習情緒 .. .. .. .. 9
2-3 多工 .. .. .. .. 10
2-4 學習成效 .. .. .. 11
2-5 自我調整學習策略、情緒及成效的關係 .. .. 12
2-6 多工與學習成效 .. .. .. 13
三、研究方法 .. .. .. .. 14
3-1 研究模型 .. .. .. 14
3-2 研究假說推論 .. .. 15
3-3 研究設計與對象 .. .. 16
3-4 研究工具 .. .. .. 16
3-4-1 自我調整學習策略量表 .. .. 16
3-4-2 正向學習情緒量表 .. .. .. 17
3-4-3 多工量表 .. .. 17
3-4-4 學習成效 .. .. 19
3-5 資料分析方法 .. .. 19
四、資料分析與討論 .. .. .. 20
4-1 問卷之信效度分析 .. .. . 20
4-1-1 自我調整學習策略量表 .. .. 21
4-1-2 正向學習情緒量表 .. .. .. 24
4-2 敘述性統計分析 .. .. .. 25
4-2-1 自我調整學習策略與正向情緒 .. 27
4-2-2 多工 .. .. .. 28
4-3 相關分析 .. .. .. 33
4-4 研究假說檢定 .. .. 35
4-5 研究結果與討論 .. .. .. 39
4-5-1 自我調整學習策略、正向情緒對成效之影響 39
4-5-2 課堂上與外的多工 (學習相關、不)對學習成效之影響 .. .. .. .. 39
4-5-3 研究結果小.. .. . 40
五、研究結論與建議 .. .. .. .. 41
5-1 研究結論 .. .. .. 41
5-2 研究貢獻與實務意涵 .. .. 42
5-3 研究限制與未來方向之建議 .. 43
5-3-1 研究限制 .. .. 43
5-3-2 未來研究方向之建議 .. .. . 43
六、參考文獻 .. .. .. 44
英文文獻 .. .. .. .. 44
中文文獻 .. .. .. .. 49
附錄研究問卷 .. 50

參考文獻

英文獻
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An Empirical Evaluation. MIS quarterly, 18(2), 159-174.
Alexander, P. A., and Judy. J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-11.
Butler, D.,&Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
Bellur, S., Nowak, K.L., Hull K.S.(2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 63-70.
Calderwood, C., Green, J. D., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Moloney, J. M. (2016). Forecasting errors in student media multitasking during homework completion. Computers & Education, 94, 37-48.
Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009). Multi-tasking across generations: multi-tasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483-489.
Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42.
Como, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
Cotten, S. R., McCullough, B., & Adams, R. (2011). Technological influences on social ties across the lifespan. In Karen Fingerman, Cynthia Berg, Toni Antonucci, & Jacqui Smith (Eds.), Handbook of lifespan psychology ,647-671. Springer Publishers.
Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2013b). Teacher technology policies and online communication apprehension as predictors of learner empowerment. Communication Education, 62, 301-317.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007a). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478-493.
45
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis prentice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77.
Hulick, C., & Higginson, B. (1989). The use of learning and study strategies by college freshmen, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion. 521–539. New York: Wiley.
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505-514.
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use.
Computers & Education, 56(2), 370–378.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychological, 35, 401-445.
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
Kessler, S. (2011). 38% of college students can’t go 10 minutes without tech [STATS].取自 https://mashable.com/2011/05/31/college-tech-device-stats/#VrAa8jZmQEqN
(取用日期 :2018年3月6日)
Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62, 233-252.
Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64, 344-365.
Lancaster, A. L., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). An experimental examination of students’ attitudes toward classroom cell phone policies. Communication Research Reports, 32, 107-111.
Lynch, D. (2006). Motivational factors, learning strategies and resource management as
predictors of course grades. College Student Journal, 40, 423–428.
Milrad, M., & Spikol, D. (2007). Anytime, anywhere learning supported by smart phones: experiences and results from the MUSIS project. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 62-70.
Noteborn, G., Bohle Carbonell, K., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of emotions and task significance in Virtual Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 15 (3), 176-183. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
46
Pekrun, R, Frenzel, A. C., Götz, T. & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education, 13-36.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control–value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development , 143-163.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115-135.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., and Ives, B. Web -based virtual learning environment: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic it skill training, MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 2001, 401-426. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation .451-502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A Conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). Part III: Bringing technology into the classroom. 取自http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/28/part-iii-bringing-technology-into-the-classroom/ (取用日期:2018年3月6日) Ruthig, J. C., Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Hall, N. C., Pekrun, R., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2008).Perceived control and emotions: Interactive effects on performance in achievement settings. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 161 -180.
Sarason, S., & Mandler, G. (1952). Some correlates of test anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 810-817.
47
Seipp. B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4, 27-41. Susan M. Ravizza, David Z. Hambrick, Kimberly M. Fenn. (2014). Non-academic Internet Use in the Classroom is Negatively Related to Classroom Learning Regardless of Intellectual Ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109-114.
Tang, Eng Loong. (2012). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies And Pre-University Math Performance Of International Students In Malaysia. Journal of International Education Research, 8 (3), 223-232.
Tyma, A. (2011). Connecting with what is out there! : Using Twitter in the large lecture. Communication Teacher, 25, 175-181. Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self-regulation and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–340.
Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching and learning, 315-327. New York: Macmillan.
Wei, F.Y.F., Wang, K. Y., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61, 185-204.
Wigfield, A., & Meece, J., L. (1988). Math Anxiety in Elementary and Secondary School Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (2), 210-216. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365-374.
Yasutake, D., & Bryan, T. (1995). The influence of affect on the achievement and behavior of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 329-334.
Zeidner, M. (1991). Test anxiety and aptitude test performance in an actual college admissions testing situation: temporal considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 12 (2), 101-109.
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (3), 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-70.
48
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of sell-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 51-59.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
49
中文獻
Wager, W. (2003)，闡明學習成效－傳達您對生的期望，通識教育季刊，10 (3-4), 101-114頁。
林宴瑛（2006），個人目標導向、課室結構與自我調整學習策略之關係及潛在改變個人目標導向、課室結構與自我調整學習策略之關係及潛在改變量分析，國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。陳正昌（2013）， SPSS與統計分析與統計分析，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。程炳林 (2002)，大學生習工作、動機問題與自我調整策略之關係，教育心理學報, 33 (2), 79-101頁。
蔡華，張雅萍 (2007)，學習動機對成效之影響 -以領導行為干擾變數，中華管理學報，8 (4)，1-18頁。蕭文龍 (2012)，多變量分析最佳入門實用書 -SPSS+LISREL(第二版 )，碁峰資訊股份有限

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou)

審核日期

2018-6-5

推文