公司企業社會責任措施、員工組織認同與員工企業社會責任感知之關聯—探討員工企業社會責任歸因的中介效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：3

、訪客IP：3.14.6.194

姓名

林吉偉(Ji-Wei Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

公司企業社會責任措施、員工組織認同與員工企業社會責任感知之關聯—探討員工企業社會責任歸因的中介效果
(Exploring the Relationships among Firms’ CSR Practices, Employees’ Organizational Identification, and CSR Perceptions: Employees’ CSR-Induced Attributions as Mediators)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

數十年來，企業社會責任（Corporate social responsibility，簡稱CSR）引起大量企業實踐者和學術研究者的關注，它是一個對學術界、產業界和社會具有顯著意義的領域。在這項研究中，我們認為一旦企業進行企業社會責任活動的相關投資，就必須有員工的參與才能夠幫助企業達到企業社會責任的目標，因為員工是企業重要利害關係人的一部分，同時，這也意味著員工擁有一定程度的權力和法律的效力得以影響公司的決策。然而，以往的研究很少探討員工對企業社會責任措施的看法，也很少提及這些可能會影響員工行為和態度的企業社會責任看法是如何形成的（前因）。因此，本研究之目的在於研究企業社會責任措施、員工組織認同和員工企業社會責任感知的關係，並探討員工企業社會責任歸因從中所扮演的中介效果為何。
本研究的主要對象是2015年台灣上市公司的員工，並且分為兩階段進行資料收集：在第一階段，我們透過分析上市公司於2015年發表的2014年企業社會責任報告書，以了解企業的企業社會責任措施採用的情況（其內容代表企業至2014年，所有企業社會責任投入與措施的實踐情形）；在第二階段，於2015年，我們透過問卷進行調查，收集員工企業社會責任感知、員工組織認同，以及員工企業社會責任的內部與外部歸因，此兩階段的資料蒐集過程，使本研究建立具有「時滯效果」的數據，以協助驗證研究模型中的因果關係。最終，在680份問卷中，一共回收34家公司、633名員工的問卷，其中614份為有效問卷，有效回收率為90.3％。將第一及第二階段的資料進行配對之後，由於部分公司於2015年沒有出版2014年的企業社會責任報告書，因此我們僅一共取得22家公司、430名員工的問卷資料，並加以進行分析。根據統計結果，本項研究證實：
一、企業的企業社會責任措施和員工企業社會責任感知具有正向關連；
二、員工組織認同與員工企業社會責任感知具有正向關連；
三、企業的企業社會責任措施與員工企業社會責任感知之間的正向關連將由員工之企業社會責任引發的內部歸因所完全中介；
四、員工組織認同與員工企業社會責任感知之間的正向關連將由員工之企業社會責任引發的內部歸因所部分中介。

關鍵字：企業社會責任措施、組織認同、企業社會責任歸因，以及企業社會責任感知

摘要(英)

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has occupied the attention of practitioners and academics for decades, and it is a ﬁeld with the remarkable meaningfulness for academia, industry, and society. In this study, we think that once the firms invest in CSR activities, there must be employees who could help the firms reach the agendas set for the CSR since the employees are a part of the stakeholders, and it means that they have remarkable power and legal right to twist the firms’ decisions. However, the previous studies rarely explore the employees’ views of the firms’ CSR practices, and rarely indicate the antecedents of the employees’ perceptions which might influence their behaviors and attitude toward the firms’ CSR practices. Thus, the proposes of this study here are to examine the relationships among the firms’ CSR practices, employees’ organizational identification (OID), and employees’ CSR perceptions, and explore what the mediating roles of employees’ CSR-induced attributions will be in this framework.
The main subjects in this survey is focusing on the employees from Taiwan’s publicly listed firms in 2015. The present study has conducted analysis in two waves: at time 1, we have collected data by reviewing the CSR reports which are published by the firms in 2015 to understand the situation of the CSR practices adopted by the firms up to the 2014; at time 2, we have executed a survey via questionnaires in 2015 to collect employees’ CSR perceptions, employees’ OID, and employees’ CSR-induced intrinsic and extrinsic attributions. These two waves will help us establish a time-lagged data and assist us with verifying the causal relationship of this research framework. Ultimately, by sending 680 questionnaires, a total of 614 valid questionnaires from 633 employees in 34 companies are returned, representing an overall response rate of 93.1% and a valid response rate of 90.3%. After matching the data from time 1 and time 2, we ultimately retain 430 employee samples from the 22 firms because some firms have no CSR report published in 2015. According to the statistic outcomes, this study confirms that:
1.There is a positive relationship between the firms’ CSR practices and employees’ CSR perceptions;
2.There is a positive relationship between the employees’ OID and employees’ CSR perceptions;
3.The positive relationship between the firms’ CSR practices and employees’ CSR perceptions will be fully mediated by employees’ CSR-induced intrinsic attribution;
4.The positive relationship between the employees’ OID and employees’ CSR perceptions will be partially mediated by employees’ CSR-induced intrinsic attribution.

Keywords: CSR, organizational identification, CSR-induced attributions, and CSR perceptions

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任措施
★ 組織認同
★ 企業社會責任歸因
★ 企業社會責任感知

關鍵字(英)

★ CSR
★ Organizational identification
★ CSR-induced attributions
★ CSR perceptions

論文目次

Abstract i
中文摘要 iii
Contents v
List of Tables vii
List of Figures vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypotheses Development 4
2.1 CSR definitions 4
2.1-1 CC and CSR 4
2.1-2 CSR practices 6
2.2 Employees’ organizational identification (OID) 8
2.3 Employees’ CSR perceptions 10
2.4 The relationships among firms’ CSR practices, employees’ OID, employees’ CSR perceptions, and employees’ CSR-induced attributions 13
2.4-1 Attribution theory 13
2.4-2 Employees’ CSR-induced attributions 16
Chapter 3 Methods 19
3.1 Research framework 19
3.2 Data sources 19
3.2-1 CSR report (archival data) 19
3.2-2 Questionnaire (survey data) 20
3.3 Variables measures 21
3.3-1 Employees’ organizational identification (OID) 21
3.3-2 Employees’ CSR perceptions 21
3.3-3 Employees’ CSR-induced intrinsic attribution 22
3.3-4 Employees’ CSR-induced extrinsic attribution 23
3.3-5 Control variables 23
3.4 Data analysis 24
3.4-1 Descriptive statistics 24
3.4-2 Reliability analysis 26
3.4-3 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) 26
3.4-4 Correlation analysis 26
3.4-5 Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) 26
Chapter 4 Results 28
4.1 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) 28
4.2 Correlation analysis 28
4.3 Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) 28
4.3-1 The main effects of firms’ CSR practices and employees’ OID 29
4.3-2 The effect of employees’ CSR-induced attributions on employees’ CSR perceptions 29
4.3-3 The mediating effect of employees’ CSR-induced attributions 30
Chapter 5 Discussions and Conclusions 34
5.1 Discussions 34
5.1-1 Theoretical implications 34
5.1-2 Managerial implications 35
5.2 Limitations and directions for future research 37
5.3-1 Limitations of research framework and variables 37
5.3-2 Limitations of data 38
5.3-3 Limitations of the KLD scale 38
References 39

參考文獻

Adams, C. A., Hill, W. Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1-21.
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
Amaeshi, K. M., & Adi, B. (2007). Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 3-18.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248-1266.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 63-86.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 1-7.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Chester, B. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clark, J. M. (1939). Social control of business. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209.
Davies, I. A., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in small- and medium-size enterprises: Investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 126-137.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: Tnternational evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451.
Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D. (2015). The relationship between Norwegian and Swedish employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility and affective commitment. Business & Society, 54(2), 229-253.
Donia, M. B. L., Sirsly, C. T., & Ronen, S. (2017). Employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic: Validation of a measure. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 66(1), 103-142.
Du, P. L., Tseng, J. F., Huang, I. C., & Shih. J. F. (2009). The relationships among leadership behavior, organizational identification and organizational learning. Journal of Management Practices and Principles, 3(1), 45-67.
Dubin, R., Champoux, J. E., & Porter, L. W. (1975). Central life interests and organizational commitment of blue-collar and clerical workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(3), 411-421.
El-Kassar, A. N., Messarra, L. C., & El-Khalil, R. (2017). CSR, organizational identification, normative commitment, and the moderating effect of the importance of CSR. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(3), 409-424.
Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2011). An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Business & Society, 50(3), 456-480.
Evans, W.R., & Davis, W. (2014). Corporate citizenship and the employee: An organizational identification perspective. Human Performance, 27(2), 129-146.
Fenwick, T., & Bierema, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Issues for human resource development professionals. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(1), 24-35.
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Garavan, T. N., & McGuire, D. (2010). Human resource development and society: Human resource development’s role in embedding corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and ethics in organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(5), 487-507.
Gautam, R., & Singh, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: A study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2(1), 41-56.
Gavin, J. F., & Maynard, W. S. (1975). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Personnel Psychology, 28(3), 377-387.
Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). Is the perception of ‘goodness’ good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 15-27.
Gond, J. P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person‐centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225-246.
Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3‐4), 327-356.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
Hack, L., Kenyon, A. J., & Wood, E. H. (2014). A critical corporate social responsibility (CSR) timeline: How should it be understood now. International Journal of Management Cases, 16(4), 46-55.
Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176-190.
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F. (2009). Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 506-526.
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1982). Basic behavioral statistics. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723-744.
Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025-2059.
Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2009). Social identity and the service-profit chain. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 38-54.
Imam, S. (2000). Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 133-142.
Isa, S. M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: What can we learn from the stakeholders? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 327-337.
Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243-262.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457-501.
Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., & Velken, I. V. S. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69.
Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716-1724.
Lemerise, E. A., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71(1), 107-118.
Li, Y., Fan, J., & Zhao, S. (2015). Organizational identification as a double-edged sword: Dual effects on job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(4), 182-191.
Lin, C. W. (2006). The identity and identification process in the organization: Stakeholder theory perspective (in Chinese). Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 119-142.
Lin, C., Lyau, N., Tsai, Y., Chen, W., & Chiu, C. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 357-372.
Lin, Y. T., & Liu, N. C. (2017). Corporate citizenship and employee outcomes: Does a high-commitment work system matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 1-19 (online first). Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10551-017-3632-1.pdf.
Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 87-128.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57-72.
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28-54.
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. (2011). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 144-149.
Martinko, M.J. (2006). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 141-172.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166-179.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Banagement Review, 33(2), 404-424.
Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20-46.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
Mohammadi, G., & Vinciarelli, A. (2012). Automatic personality perception: Prediction of trait attribution based on prosodic features. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 273-284.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
Mozes, M., Josman, Z., & Yaniv, E. (2011). Corporate social responsibility organizational identification and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 310-325.
Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013). CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1839-1851.
Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613-627.
Pérez, A., & Del Bosque, I. R. (2012). The role of CSR in the corporate identity of banking service providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 145-166.
Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society, 43(3), 296-319.
Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of management review, 36(1), 127-150.
Polzer, J. T. (2004). How subgroup interests and reputations moderate the effect of organizational identification on cooperation. Journal of Management, 30(1), 71-96.
Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(1), 87-98.
Puusa, A., & Tolvanen, U. (2006). Organizational identity and trust. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies (EJBO), 11(2), 29-33.
Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2009). Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 119-132.
Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265-283.
Roeck, K. D., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organizations’ legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees’ reactions through organizational identification theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 397-412.
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R. Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 895-933.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.
Spiller, R. (2000). Ethical business and investment: A model for business and society. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 149-160.
Stawiski, S., Deal, J. J., & Gentry, W. (2010). Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
Story, J., & Neves, P. (2015). When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: Exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 111-124.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council), 13(2), 65-93.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183-190.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP Archive).
Teufel, C., Fletcher, P. C., & Davis, G. (2010). Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 376-382.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
Turker, D. (2009), How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204.
Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 159-172.
Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, 110(2), 191-212.
van Dijk, R. L., & van Dick, R. (2009). Navigating organizational change: Change leaders, employee resistance and work-based identities. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 143-163.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self‐definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 571-584.
Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. A. (2013). Feeling good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 577-588.
Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. A. (2014). Employee judgments of and behaviors toward corporate social responsibility: A multi‐study investigation of direct, cascading, and moderating effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 990-1017.
Vlachos, P. A., Theotokis, A., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2010). Sales force reactions to corporate social responsibility: Attributions, outcomes, and the mediating role of organizational trust. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1207-1218.
Votaw, D. (1972). Genius becomes rare: A comment on the doctrine of social responsibility Pt 1. California Management Review 15(2), 25-31.
Vuontisjärvi, T. (2004). Modernization of the European social model and corporate social responsibility: a critical analysis of finnish companies. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, UK: University of Sunderland.
Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5-42.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, A. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-ﬁnancial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Wan‐Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1998). The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 724-749.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
Wu, S. I., & Wang, W. H. (2014). Impact of CSR perception on brand image, brand attitude and buying willingness: A study of a global café. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(6), 43-56.
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. D. (2016). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 253-276.
Zhu, Q., Yin, H., Liu, J., & Lai, K. H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1), 28-40.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2018-7-9

推文